Scottish Study of Early Learning and Childcare: Three-year-olds (Phase 3) Report - Updated 2021

Findings from the third phase of the Scottish Study of Early Learning and Childcare (SSELC), a research project established to evaluate the expansion of early learning and childcare in Scotland.


Appendix C: Supplementary tables

Table C1: ASQ gross motor domain Phase 3 by ASQ gross motor domain Phase 1
Phase 1 ASQ gross motor domain  
Further assessment may be needed Monitoring suggested Child's development appears on schedule All
Phase 3 ASQ gross motor domain % % % %
Further assessment may be needed 55 27 26 32
Monitoring suggested 22 18 20 20
Child's development appears on schedule 23 55 54 48
Unweighted base 77 62 214 353

Base: All children (with keyworker observations at both Phase 1 and Phase 3, unweighted)

Table C2: ASQ fine motor domain Phase 3 by ASQ fine motor domain Phase 1
  Phase 1 ASQ fine motor domain
Further assessment may be needed Monitoring suggested Child's development appears on schedule All
Phase 3 ASQ fine motor domain % % % %
Further assessment may be needed 44 31 10 26
Monitoring suggested 20 25 21 22
Child's development appears on schedule 36 44 69 52
Unweighted base 90 117 147 354

Base: All children (with keyworker observations at both Phase 1 and Phase 3, unweighted)

Table C3: ASQ problem solving domain Phase 3 by ASQ problem solving domain Phase 1
Phase 1 ASQ problem solving domain  
Further assessment may be needed Monitoring suggested Child's development appears on schedule All
Phase 3 ASQ problem solving domain % % % %
Further assessment may be needed 53 34 18 37
Monitoring suggested 10 20 7 11
Child's development appears on schedule 37 46 76 52
Unweighted base 147 79 119 345

Base: All children (with keyworker observations at both Phase 1 and Phase 3, unweighted)

Table C4: ASQ personal-social domain Phase 3 by ASQ personal-social domain Phase 1
Phase 1 ASQ personal-social domain  
Further assessment may be needed Monitoring suggested Child's development appears on schedule All
Phase 3 ASQ personal-social domain % % % %
Further assessment may be needed 37 4 7 16
Monitoring suggested 16 17 7 12
Child's development appears on schedule 48 78 87 71
Unweighted base 122 93 149 364

Base: All children (with keyworker observations at both Phase 1 and Phase 3, unweighted)

Table C5: ASQ communication domain Phase 1 and Phase 3 by ITERS score
  Low-Average ITERS (<5) Good ITERS (5+)
Phase 1 Phase 3 Phase 1 Phase 3
% % % %
Further assessment may be needed 39 33 28 24
Monitoring suggested 17 15 22 22
Child's development appears on schedule 44 51 49 54
Unweighted base 195 195 144 144

Base: All children (with keyworker observations at both Phase 1 and Phase 3, unweighted)

Table C6: SDQ total difficulties score Phase 1 and Phase 3 by ITERS score
Low-Average ITERS (<5) Good ITERS (5+)
Phase 1 Phase 3 Phase 1 Phase 3
% % % %
Close to average  38 58 48 56
Raised / high 62 42 52 44
Unweighted base 193 193 144 144

Base: All children (with keyworker observations at both Phase 1 and Phase 3, unweighted)

Table C7: Child's health in general Phase 3 by child's health in general Phase 1
Phase 1 child's health in general  
Very good Good Fair All
Phase 3 child's health in general % % % %
Very good 73 38 24 58
Good 26 57 24 35
Fair / bad 1 6 52 7
Unweighted base 135 69 21 225

Base: All children (with parent/carer questionnaire at both Phase 1 and Phase 3, unweighted)

Table C8: Long-term health condition Phase 3 by long-term health condition Phase 1
  Phase 1 long-term health condition or illness lasting or expected to last 12 months or more  
Yes No All
Phase 3 long-term health condition % % %
Yes 67 7 14
No 33 93 86
Unweighted base 27 196 223

Base: All children (with parent/carer questionnaire at both Phase 1 and Phase 3, unweighted)

Table C9: Parental concerns about how child talks Phase 3 by parental concerns about how child talks Phase 1
Phase 1 parental concerns about how child talks in words or sentences  
No A little Yes All
Phase 3 parental concerns about how child talks % % % %
No 90 49 21 75
A little 7 46 21 15
Yes 3 6 57 10
Unweighted base 162 35 28 225

Base: All children (with parent/carer questionnaire at both Phase 1 and Phase 3, unweighted)

Table C10: Home learning environment: Frequency of looking at books or reading stories Phase 3 by frequency of looking at books or reading stories Phase 1
Phase 1 number of days in last 7 on which looked at books or read stories at home
0-2 days 3-4 days 5-6 days 7 days All
Phase 3 number of days in last 7 on which looked at books or read stories at home % % % %  
0-2 days 42 18 10 8 14
3-4 days 25 33 16 8 16
5-6 days 13 20 19 14 16
7 days 21 29 55 70 54
Unweighted base 24 45 31 118 218

Base: All respondents (with parent questionnaire at both Phase 1 and Phase 3, unweighted)

Table C11: Home learning environment: Frequency of painting or drawing at home Phase 3 by frequency of painting or drawing at home Phase 1
Phase 1 number of days in last 7 on which did activities involving painting or drawing at home  
0-2 days 3-4 days 5-6 days 7 days All
Phase 3 number of days in last 7 on which did activities involving painting or drawing at home % % % %  
0-2 days 44 13 17 11 22
3-4 days 37 37 39 21 33
5-6 days 12 30 15 15 19
7 days 7 21 29 53 26
Unweighted base 59 63 41 53 216

Base: All respondents (with parent questionnaire at both Phase 1 and Phase 3, unweighted)

Table C12: Home learning environment: Frequency of reciting nursery rhymes or singing songs at home Phase 3 by frequency of reciting nursery rhymes or singing songs at home Phase 1
Phase 1 number of days in last 7 on which recited nursery rhymes or sung songs at home  
0-2 days 3-4 days 5-6 days 7 days All
Phase 3 number of days in last 7 on which recited nursery rhymes or sung songs at home % % % %  
0-2 days 24 21 * 2 7
3-4 days 12 13 * 5 8
5-6 days 18 33 * 10 14
7 days 45 33 * 83 70
Unweighted base 33 24 15 143 215

Base: All respondents (with parent questionnaire at both Phase 1 and Phase 3, unweighted)

Table C13: Home learning environment: Frequency of playing at recognising letters, words, numbers or shapes at home Phase 3 by frequency of playing at recognising letters, words, numbers or shapes at home Phase 1
Phase 1 number of days in last 7 on which played at recognising letters, words, numbers or shapes at home  
0-2 days 3-4 days 5-6 days 7 days All
Phase 3 number of days in last 7 on which played at recognising letters, words, numbers or shapes at home % % % %  
0-2 days 28 19 15 6 16
3-4 days 25 28 15 12 19
5-6 days 18 22 42 12 20
7 days 28 31 27 71 46
Unweighted base 60 36 33 86 215

Base: All respondents (with parent questionnaire at both Phase 1 and Phase 3, unweighted)

Table C14: How coping as a parent, Phase 1 and Phase 3
Phase 1 Phase 3
As a parent/carer … % %
I always feel I am coping really well - things never get on top of me 8 8
Most of the time I feel I am coping pretty well 51 50
Sometimes I feel I am coping but sometimes things get on top of me 38 38
Most of the time I feel I am not coping very well 3 2
I feel I am not coping at all these days - 1
Unweighted base 219 219

Base: All respondents (with parent questionnaire at both Phase 1 and Phase 3, unweighted)

Table C15: Proportion of children on schedule for ASQ gross motor, fine motor, problem solving and personal-social domains, by sex of child, Eligible 2s and Comparator 3s, Phase 3
Eligible 2s Comparator 3s
Boys Girls Boys Girls
% % % %
Gross motor domain 47 46 49 44
Fine motor domain 40 67 53 75
Problem solving domain 46 59 59 67
Personal-social domain 64 79 74 81
Unweighted base 187 183 408 396

Base: All children (keyworker observations, Eligible 2s unweighted, Comparator 3s weighted)

Table C16: Proportion of children scoring close to average for the individual SDQ domains, by sex of child, Eligible 2s and Comparator 3s, Phase 3
Eligible 2s Comparator 3s
Boys Girls Boys Girls
% % % %
Emotional symptoms domain 80 73 80 79
Conduct problems domain 72 78 77 86
Hyperactivity domain 44 62 53 68
Peer problems domain 46 63 58 68
Prosocial behaviour domain 63 81 67 83
Unweighted base 188 183 405 396

Base: All children (keyworker observations, Eligible 2s unweighted, Comparator 3s weighted)

Table C17: Whether child sleeps through the night, Eligible 2s and Comparator 3s, Phase 3
  Eligible 2s Comparator 3s
% %
Never sleeps right through the night 18 12
1-2 times a week 12 13
3-5 times a week 15 23
6 times a week 9 13
Every night 47 38
Unweighted base 268 563

Base: All children (parent questionnaire, Eligible 2s unweighted, Comparator 3s weighted)

Table C18: Frequency of looking at books or reading stories at home, by area deprivation, Eligible 2s and Comparator 3s Phase 3

  Scottish index of multiple deprivation quintiles  
Most deprived 20% 2nd 3rd Least deprived 40% All
% % % % %
Eligible 2s
Not in last 7 days 3 - - 3 2
1 to 3 days 28 12 15 10 20
4 to 6 days 22 22 29 28 24
7 days 46 66 56 59 54
Unweighted base 127 73 34 29 265
Comparator 3s
Not in last 7 days - 1 - - 0
1 to 3 days 19 18 10 12 14
4 to 6 days 41 28 24 14 24
7 days 40 53 66 74 62
Unweighted base 100 108 112 236 558

Base: All respondents (parent questionnaire Phase 3, Eligible 2s unweighted, Comparator 3s weighted)

Table C19: Whether would work more if could afford good quality childcare which was reliable, convenient and affordable, by equivalised income, Comparator 3s Phase 3
Equivalised household income  
Lowest income quintile 2nd Top 3 income quintiles All
% % % %
Comparator 3s
Strongly agree 28 24 10 15
Agree 25 18 16 18
Neither agree nor disagree 36 36 28 30
Disagree 10 12 32 25
Strongly disagree - 10 15 12
Unweighted base 44 75 270 419

Base: All respondents in employment (parent questionnaire Phase 3, Comparator 3s weighted)

Table C20: General health, by highest level of education, Eligible 2s and Comparator 3s Phase 3
Highest level of education  
None Lower school (Standard grade or equivalent) Upper school (Highers or equivalent) Post-school pre-HE (HNC, HND, etc.) Degree or equivalent All
% % % % % %
Eligible 2s
Very good 19 24 17 27 26 24
Good 39 37 36 35 49 39
Fair 32 33 31 29 23 30
Bad 3 6 11 6 - 6
Very bad 6 - 6 2 2 2
Unweighted base 31 87 36 62 43 267
Comparator 3s
Very good * 29 36 35 46 39
Good * 42 40 47 44 44
Fair * 20 16 17 8 14
Bad * 9 8 1 1 3
Very bad * - - - - -
Unweighted base 14 79 72 130 263 564

Base: All respondents (parent questionnaire Phase 3, Eligible 2s unweighted, Comparator 3s weighted)

Table C21: General health, by household type, Eligible 2s and Comparator 3s Phase 3
  Single parents Couple parents All
% % %
Eligible 2s
Very good 20 29 24
Good 40 37 39
Fair 33 25 30
Bad 6 5 6
Very bad 1 4 2
Unweighted base 153 114 267
Comparator 3s
Very good 27 42 39
Good 43 44 44
Fair 22 12 14
Bad 8 2 3
Very bad - - -
Unweighted base 89 474 564

Base: All respondents (parent questionnaire Phase 3, Eligible 2s unweighted, Comparator 3s weighted)

Table C22: How longstanding condition or illness affects parent, Eligible 2s and Comparator 3s Phase 3
  Eligible 2s Comparator 3s
% %
Vision 2 3
Hearing 6 4
Mobility 28 24
Learning, concentrating or remembering 28 16
Stamina or breathing difficulty 22 20
Mental health, social, emotional or behavioural issues 75 64
Other impairment(s) 12 24
Unweighted base 106 98

Base: All respondents with a long-term condition (parent survey, weighted)

*Note: respondents were able to choose more than one response. As such, percentages will not total 100%.

Table C23: Longstanding health condition, by equivalised income, Comparator 3s Phase 3
  Equivalised household income  
Lowest income quintile 2nd Top 3 income quintiles All
% % % %
Comparator 3s 37 23 13 20
Unweighted base 98 110 309 563

Base: All respondents in employment (parent questionnaire Phase 3, Comparator 3s weighted)

Table C24: Longstanding health condition, by highest level of education, Eligible 2s and Comparator 3s Phase 3
Highest level of education  
None Lower school (Standard grade or equivalent) Upper school (Highers or equivalent) Post-school pre-HE (HNC, HND, etc.) Degree or equivalent All
% % % % % %
Eligible 2s 37 43 50 37 37 41
Unweighted base 30 87 36 59 43 264
Comparator 3s * 35 29 19 12 20
Unweighted base 15 79 72 130 262 563

Base: All respondents (parent questionnaire Phase 3, Eligible 2s unweighted, Comparator 3s weighted)

Table C25: Longstanding health condition, by household type, Eligible 2s and Comparator 3s Phase 3
  Single parents Couple parents All
% % %
Eligible 2s 43 38 41
Unweighted base 150 114 264
Comparator 3s 29 18 20
Unweighted base 90 472 563

Base: All respondents (parent questionnaire Phase 3, Eligible 2s unweighted, Comparator 3s weighted)

Table C26: Proportion agreeing with activities done / perceived change in feelings because child is in nursery, by area deprivation ( SIMD), Eligible 2s and Comparator 3s Phase 3
Scottish index of multiple deprivation quintiles
Most deprived 20% 2nd 3rd Least deprived 40% All
% % % % %
Eligible 2s
Have been feeling happier 55 46 53 47 51
Have been feeling less stressed 64 50 60 48 58
Had more time to oneself 75 76 57 63 72
Care for other family members 59 52 62 52 57
Study or improve work related skills 37 31 31 29 33
Increase the number of hours work 19 21 15 11 18
Work or look for work 45 49 48 43 47
Undertaken voluntary work 13 15 8 12 13
Think about what may do in the future 70 68 81 69 71
Unweighted base 123 69 31 29 253
Comparator 3s
Have been feeling happier 43 41 42 41 42
Have been feeling less stressed 37 45 44 41 42
Had more time to oneself 72 64 62 57 63
Care for other family members 42 28 33 38 35
Study or improve work related skills 17 35 40 36 33
Increase the number of hours work 15 33 27 30 27
Work or look for work 49 44 54 57 52
Undertaken voluntary work 5 10 11 9 9
Think about what may do in the future 66 61 56 52 57
Unweighted base 98 105 110 226 564

Base: All respondents (parent questionnaire Phase 3, Eligible 2s unweighted, Comparator 3s weighted)

Table C27: Proportion agreeing with activities done / perceived change in feelings because child is in nursery, by highest level of education, Eligible 2s and Comparator 3s Phase 3
Highest level of education  
None Lower school (Standard grade or equivalent) Upper school (Highers or equivalent) Post-school pre-HE (HNC, HND, etc.) Degree or equivalent All
% % % % % %
Eligible 2s
Have been feeling happier 53 55 40 46 63 51
Have been feeling less stressed 57 60 60 55 68 58
Had more time to oneself 77 72 83 70 65 72
Care for other family members 59 55 68 52 55 57
Study or improve work related skills 8 36 29 39 45 33
Increase the number of hours work 8 15 18 23 27 18
Work or look for work 32 49 41 59 43 47
Undertaken voluntary work 4 19 22 5 12 13
Think about what may do in the future 67 80 74 63 67 71
Unweighted base 30 83 35 59 39 253
Comparator 3s
Have been feeling happier * 38 49 39 40 42
Have been feeling less stressed * 37 44 38 43 42
Had more time to oneself * 66 69 59 61 63
Care for other family members * 33 34 43 34 35
Study or improve work related skills * 18 37 43 33 33
Increase the number of hours work * 20 24 29 30 27
Work or look for work * 43 43 57 58 52
Undertaken voluntary work * 10 4 9 10 9
Think about what may do in the future * 55 68 62 52 57
Unweighted base 13 75 72 121 254 564

Base: All respondents (parent questionnaire Phase 3, Eligible 2s unweighted, Comparator 3s weighted)

Table C28: Proportion agreeing with activities done / perceived change in feelings because child is in nursery, by household type, Eligible 2s and Comparator 3s Phase 3
Household type  
Single parents Couple parents All
% % %
Eligible 2s
Have been feeling happier 53 49 51
Have been feeling less stressed 61 55 58
Had more time to oneself 69 76 72
Care for other family members 55 59 57
Study or improve work related skills 37 29 33
Increase the number of hours work 17 19 18
Work or look for work 47 47 47
Undertaken voluntary work 12 13 13
Think about what may do in the future 76 64 71
Unweighted base 146 107 253
Comparator 3s
Have been feeling happier 50 40 42
Have been feeling less stressed 41 42 42
Had more time to oneself 68 62 63
Care for other family members 37 35 35
Study or improve work related skills 34 32 33
Increase the number of hours work 20 28 27
Work or look for work 55 52 52
Undertaken voluntary work 4 10 9
Think about what may do in the future 66 55 57
Unweighted base 85 454 564

Base: All respondents (parent questionnaire Phase 3, Eligible 2s unweighted, Comparator 3s weighted)

Table C29: Proportion agreeing with activities done / perceived change in feelings because child is in nursery, by SDQ total difficulties score, Eligible 2s and Comparator 3s Phase 3
  SDQ total difficulties score  
Close to average Slightly raised High Very high All
% % % % %
Eligible 2s
Have been feeling happier 51 56 51 42 51
Have been feeling less stressed 60 56 63 46 58
Had more time to oneself 73 70 73 74 72
Care for other family members 58 55 54 55 57
Study or improve work related skills 33 35 26 43 33
Increase the number of hours work 22 8 9 17 18
Work or look for work 46 45 43 48 47
Undertaken voluntary work 14 13 6 10 13
Think about what may do in the future 74 65 62 71 71
Unweighted base 134 43 39 24 253
Comparator 3s
Have been feeling happier 41 43 44 40 42
Have been feeling less stressed 40 45 38 44 42
Had more time to oneself 62 65 74 60 63
Care for other family members 34 37 48 36 35
Study or improve work related skills 34 29 51 22 33
Increase the number of hours work 27 30 23 20 27
Work or look for work 56 42 53 45 52
Undertaken voluntary work 9 13 6 0 9
Think about what may do in the future 54 57 78 66 57
Unweighted base 316 110 35 34 564

Base: All respondents (parent questionnaire Phase 3, Eligible 2s unweighted, Comparator 3s weighted)

Table C30: Proportion of children for whom full costs of time child spends at nursery are met by the government, by area deprivation, Eligible 2s and Comparator 3s, Phase 3
Scottish index of Multiple deprivation quintiles  
Most deprived 20% 2nd 3rd Least deprived 40% All
% % % % %
Eligible 2s 93 93 88 90 92
Unweighted base 119 67 33 30 251
Comparator 3s 92 80 72 74 78
Unweighted base 94 106 111 233 545

Base: All respondents (parent questionnaire Phase 3, Eligible 2s unweighted, Comparator 3s weighted)

Table C31: Use of grandparents and private or workplace nurseries for childcare prior to the age of three, by area deprivation, Eligible 2s and Comparator 3s Phase 3
Scottish index of Multiple deprivation quintiles  
Most deprived 20% 2nd 3rd Least deprived 40% All
% % % % %
Eligible 2s
Grandparents 28 33 31 42 31
Private nursery 13 16 28 29 17
Unweighted base 102 63 29 24 220
Comparator 3s
Grandparents 54 61 62 71 64
Private nursery 19 27 37 46 35
Unweighted base 88 95 99 223 507

Base: All respondents (parent questionnaire Phase 3, Eligible 2s unweighted, Comparator 3s weighted)

Table C32: Use of grandparents and private or workplace nurseries for childcare prior to the age of three, by household income, Comparator 3s Phase 3
OECD equivalized income quintiles  
Bottom 20% 2nd Top 60% All
% % % %
Comparator 3s
Grandparents 43 60 72 64
Private nursery 19 24 44 35
Unweighted base 83 100 286 507

Base: All respondents (parent questionnaire Phase 3, Comparator 3s weighted)

Contact

Email: socialresearch@gov.scot

Back to top