| Home | Press | Publications | What We Do | Who We Are | Search | Site Map | Contacts | Links | ||||
| ![]() | |||
| Publications > Crime, Law, Justice & Rights | ||||
< Previous | Contents | Next >
Cohort analysis
6.1 Analysis of a group of young offenders in the same age group allows
consideration of other factors that may be related to reconviction. For this purpose,
all offenders who were aged 18 and sentenced in 1995 were chosen as an initial
cohort to analyse. This is a useful group to choose as they were at peak age for
convictions in about the middle of the time period currently covered by the SOI.
There were 3,522 18 year olds sentenced in 1995, who were involved in 5,313 convictions
in 1995 and 21,551 convictions overall within the scope of the SOI. Some characteristics
of the group are given in the box below.
| Characteristics of persons sentenced in 1995 aged 18 | |
|
% sentenced for: | |
|
Males: 89 % | Crimes of dishonesty: 38 % |
| Previous conviction: 54 % | Violence: 20 % |
| Fined: 60 % | Breach of the peace: 22 % |
6.2 Some 60 per cent of the cohort was reconvicted within two years. Those with previous convictions were more likely to be reconvicted than those who with no previous convictions, 76 per cent and 42 per cent respectively. It is striking that of those given a custodial sentence and who had previous convictions, 89 per cent were reconvicted within two years of release. Also interesting is the comparison between probation and community service. It can be seen that for offenders with no previous convictions, 44 per cent of those given community service were reconvicted within two years compared with 69 per cent of those given probation. For offenders with one or more previous convictions, reconviction rates for those given community service and probation were more similar.
| Percentage of 1995 cohort of 18 year old offenders reconvicted within 1-4 years,by type of sentence and whether convicted previously | Table 9 |
| Sentence type by number of previous convictions |
Number of offenders |
Percentage reconvicted within: | |||
|
1 year | 2 years | 3 years | 4 years | ||
| All sentences |
3,522 | 47 | 60 | 66 |
69 |
|
None | 1,631 |
29 | 42 | 49 | 51 |
| One or more |
1,891 | 63 | 76 | 81 |
84 |
|
Custody | |||||
| None |
36 | 31 | 47 |
47 | 50 |
| One or more |
272 | 78 | 89 |
93 | 93 |
| Community service order | |||||
| None |
78 | 31 | 44 |
50 | 51 |
| One or more |
171 | 62 | 79 |
85 | 87 |
| Probation | |||||
| None |
68 | 57 | 69 |
75 | 75 |
| One or more |
174 | 73 | 83 |
87 | 88 |
| Monetary | |||||
| None |
1,057 | 28 | 41 |
49 | 51 |
| One or more |
1,061 | 59 | 72 |
78 | 81 |
| Other | |||||
| None | 392 | 27 |
39 | 44 | 48 |
| One or more |
213 | 54 | 70 |
75 | 79 |
Age
at first conviction
6.3 When considering the age at which offenders
in this cohort were first convicted, one pattern that emerges is that the younger
a person was at the time of their first conviction, the more likely they are to
be reconvicted. Considering males only, 71 of the total of 3,150 offenders in
the cohort were first convicted when aged under 16. (As noted in section
3.3, these convictions will generally have involved the more serious type
of offence.) Of this small group, 87 per cent were reconvicted within two years
of their index conviction at age 18 in 1995. The corresponding reconviction rates
for those aged 16 and 17 when first convicted were 82 per cent and 73 per cent
respectively.
6.4 As well as being more likely to be reconvicted, those who were younger when first convicted tended to be reconvicted more often. For offenders who were reconvicted at least once within two years of their index conviction in 1995, the average number of reconvictions in this period was 3.6 for those first convicted aged 16 or less, dropping to 3.3 for those first convicted aged 17 and to 2.3 for those first convicted when aged 18.
Comparison
of cohorts
6.5 A comparison of the cohort of 18 year olds sentenced
in 1995 with the corresponding cohorts from 1989, 1991 and 1993 allows for possible
changes in reconviction patterns over time for this age group to be investigated,
as well as for a validation of conclusions from the 1995 cohort. The overall reconviction
rates for the four cohorts were found to be very similar. The total numbers of
convicted offenders in the age group decreased over time, thought to be in part
due to the fall in the overall population aged 18 over this period. Males comprised
around 90 per cent of all convicted offenders aged 18 in each cohort. The number
of 18 year old males convicted as a proportion of all 18 year old males in the
population fell slightly over the period, from 11.8 per cent in the 1989 cohort
to 10.5 per cent in the 1995 cohort. The corresponding proportion of females remained
fairly static, at just over 1 per cent.
| Comparison of cohorts aged 18 at sentence in 1989, 1991, 1993 and 1995 | Table 10 |
|
Year of sentence | ||||
|
1989 | 1991 | 1993 |
1995 | |
| Number in cohort | 5,330 | 4,677 |
4,018 | 3,522 |
| % males |
91 | 89 | 89 |
89 |
|
Conviction rate in population(1): | ||||
| 1 year |
46 | 48 | 46 |
47 |
| 2 years | 59 |
61 | 59 | 60 |
| 3 years |
65 | 67 | 65 |
66 |
| 4 years | 68 |
70 | 68 | 69 |
|
Average number of reconvictions after 2 years(2) |
3 | 3 | 3 |
3 |
| Percent given custody | 7 |
6 | 8 | 9 |
| % reconvicted within two years |
80 | 85 | 79 |
84 |
| Percent given community service | 4 | 6 |
6 | 7 |
| % reconvicted within two years | 79 |
73 | 70 | 68 |
| Percent given probation |
4 | 4 | 6 |
7 |
| % reconvicted within two years | 75 | 81 |
74 | 79 |
| Percent given monetary penalty | 71 |
66 | 60 | 60 |
| % reconvicted within two years |
57 | 60 | 57 |
56 |
(1) Number of offenders as a
percentage of the GROS mid-year population estimate for 18 year olds in the relevant
year.
(2) Average for offenders who had at least one reconviction within two
years.
6.6 It can be seen that sentencing patterns have changed slightly, with relatively fewer 18 year olds being fined and more being given community sentences and custody. This is consistent with the general trend in sentencing patterns recorded over the period, and is thought in part to reflect increased availability of alternatives to prosecution and also the more widespread provision of community service schemes. Some trends may merit further research investigation. For example, the proportion of convicted 18 year olds given community service increased from 4.3 per cent in the 1989 cohort to 7.1 per cent in the 1995 cohort, with the 2-year reconviction rate for this group decreasing from 79 per cent to 68 per cent.
< Previous | Contents | Next >
The information contained on this WWW site is Crown Copyright but may be reproduced without formal permission or charge for personal or in-house use. Privacy and Content Disclaimer.
For general enquiries about this web site email ceu@scotland.gov.uk or fill out our online questionnaire.
