< Previous | Contents | Next >
Race Equality Advisory Forum
7 Consultation with Minority Ethnic Communities
7.1 Introduction
The promotion of more effective consultation with minority ethnic groups is
part of developing a more comprehensive understanding of the needs of all communities.
It is necessary not only for effective policy-making but also to fulfil the
legislative requirements of the Race Relations (Amendment) Act 2000. The Act's
general duty to promote race equality requires public bodies to seek to avoid
unlawful discrimination before it occurs by assessing how their policies and
programmes could affect the promotion of race equality. Further to this, key
central bodies will also soon be subject to a specific duty to develop means
of consulting on proposed policies.
The Forum also sees consultation as being central to effective partnership
working with communities. Its own approach of involving members of minority
ethnic communities and organisations in wider dialogue on the development of
the race equality strategy and action plans at the same time as public, private
and mainstream voluntary sector interests demonstrates the value of such direct
exchanges.
|
Mainstreaming race equality issues into consultation mechanisms and
processes is one way of ensuring the diversity of minority ethnic
needs are always considered in policy development and that consultation
with communities is not just limited to those issues which are considered
to be directly relevant to minority ethnic communities.
In particular, the Forum considers that there are real opportunities
for significant progress through mainstreaming race equality into:
- the development of community planning;
- local economic forums as part of the wider strategy on enterprise;
- best value with its emphasis on user involvement;
- the Civic Forum and the potential for the Forum to mainstream consideration
of the experiences and circumstances of minority ethnic communities
into all its work; and
- the development in the Scottish Executive and the wider public sector
of new approaches to civic participation.
|
7.2 When?
It became apparent during the Forum's dialogue with communities that their
experiences of participating in consultation processes have often been very
negative. In particular, some individuals and communities complained of consultation
fatigue.
It was also suggested that some consultation was tokenistic, taking place after
decisions had already been made and that public consultation was sometimes used
as a means of delaying action and avoiding responsibility. Impressions that
minority ethnic consultation is tokenistic have the potential to reduce participation.
Efforts should be made to ensure that consultation is, and is seen to be, meaningful.
- Consultation should be built into the process from the beginning so that
the purpose of the consultation exercise is clear from the outset.
- Consultation with minority ethnic communities and their representatives
should not just take place at one point in the development of policy but throughout
the whole process.
- In order to involve and inform minority ethnic community members enough
time should be allowed for the consultation process. Extra time might also
be needed should translation or interpreting services be utilised.
- The planning of consultation exercises needs to take into account religious
festivals or other events that different minority ethnic communities might
be involved in so that as many members of minority ethnic communities as possible
are able to take part.
7.3 How?
The methods applied to different consultations may have a significant effect
on both the outcome of the consultation and the level of participation. Choosing
the appropriate method of consultation should involve an examination of both
the needs and circumstances of those being consulted and the type of information
required. Also some minority ethnic individuals and communities may have specific
requirements. Issues of confidentiality, a fear that detailed personal information
could be misused and language barriers can be of particular concern for minority
ethnic community members who take part in consultations and must be taken into
consideration.
Traditional paper-based approaches to consultation can cause difficulties for
some members of some minority ethnic communities but at the same time it should
not be assumed that this is always the case. A number of factors can contribute
to an experience which fails to maximise partnership with communities and enable
effective timely input from communities. These include language issues (see
below) and lack of the necessary resources within communities to consider the
impact of proposed changes.
Focus groups, in-depth interviews or targeted paper-based questionnaires (so
long as they take into account language barriers) can all provide a means to
involve groups normally excluded from other consultation approaches. Targeted,
or structured, consultation methods also allow for consultation with under-represented
groups within minority ethnic communities, for example young people or disabled
people.
- In-depth interviews and focus groups offer the opportunity to examine and
explore sensitive subjects in some detail as reassurance can be provided as
to the confidentiality of the exercise.
- When face-to-face consultations are used it is usually advantageous to conduct
consultative events in known community locations where possible so that consultees
are placed at ease.
7.4 Language
Language can pose a real barrier to participation for some minority ethnic
community members. For this reason the Forum suggests that:
- when clarifying the purpose of the consultation exercise it may be appropriate
to provide briefing material or seminars in other languages;
- the use of complex, specialist language or jargon in consultation documents
should be avoided;
- alternatives to written translations such as tapes of spoken translations
into minority languages should be considered;
- where possible, translated material should be provided and disseminated
rather than simply being made available on request;
- even non-written forms of consultation, such as informal brainstorming sessions
can be excluding because unless everyone involved speaks the same language
to the same level some people may find it difficult to follow the conversation
or may feel too intimidated to participate fully; and
- for all forms of consultation appropriate steps should be taken for example
through the use of interpreters and translators to avoid language barriers.
7.5 Who?
Central to effective consultation is an appropriately structured sample of
people, groups or organisations on both sides of the consultation process, those
being consulted, but also those involved with designing and carrying out the
consultation. This is essential to reflect the diversity of minority ethnic
communities and the full range of experiences and circumstances. Although this
is an issue which can affect consultation with all groups, some specific concerns
exist around consultation with minority ethnic communities.
7.5.1 Those conducting the consultation
The choice of those conducting the consultation, especially if it involves
the use of interviewers or facilitators, should also be made carefully as they
can have a significant impact on the outcome of the consultation. This could
be due to lack of training or because of pre-conceived judgements made by consultees
or those conducting the consultation.
- The composition of interviewers or facilitators should be monitored and
where appropriate, have some links to the consultees to help encourage full
and confident responses.
- Consideration should be given to commissioning or funding specific work
in communities by members of the communities themselves. Such work might also
identify unexpressed or unmet needs or issues specific to particular communities.
- Consideration should be given to the need for gender matching with the groups
being consulted as a female facilitator for a female only focus group to encourage
participation.
7.5.2 Those being consulted
In deciding who to consult, the following points should be taken into account:
- consultation needs to recognise diversity both across, and within, minority
ethnic communities;
- there is no one-unified minority ethnic voice therefore, it is not possible
to gain a representative and comprehensive picture of minority ethnic experiences
simply through the use of large or established organisations and known contacts.
Some degree of grassroots or local level consultation is required to identify
minority ethnic concerns;
- consultation with large organisations and/or known contacts can be valuable
as long as the limitations of such consultation are recognised and the purpose
of consultation is clear;
- the experiences of minority ethnic people arise from a combination of factors
including their age, gender, health, financial circumstances and sexual orientation
as well as their ethnicity. In order to reflect the range of minority ethnic
experiences and needs a balance must be struck between the interaction of
these other dimensions with ethnicity for both the collectors and the users
of the information gathered; and
- making assumptions about the ethnicity of consultees on the basis of their
physical characteristics can lead to inaccurate findings. Wherever possible,
participants should be invited to indicate their own ethnic identity.
Much use has been made by the Forum of existing databases of minority ethnic
communities and organisations. In particular, it has relied on Positive Action
in Housing's directory containing over 400 contacts, the Black and Ethnic Minorities
Infrastructure in Scotland (BEMIS's) database on voluntary sector organisations
and Forum members' own contacts with grassroots interests in communities themselves.
7.6 After Consultation: Feedback
In taking the view that consultation is continuous, feedback should occur throughout
the process and responses should be regularly reviewed. In line with the proposed
specific duties of the Race Relations (Amendment) Act 2000, under which information
should not only be available but be easily accessible and widely disseminated:
- Statutory organisations should be able to demonstrate through annual reports
and other reporting processes the ways in which they have undertaken consultation
and to what extent the outcome influenced policy or practice; and
- Feedback should be provided to those consulted and the consultation results
should be published.
7.7 Recommendations for Improved Consultation
The Forum welcomes the Scottish Executive Central Research Unit's commissioning
of a study to develop good practice guidelines in relation to consultation with
equalities groups and more specific work to explore issues of engagement with
ethnic minorities.
In order to embed improved consultation processes and mechanisms, the Forum
recommends that the Scottish Executive:
- take the lead in continuing to support the development of a Scotland-wide
database. This database would include minority ethnic community organisations,
researchers with relevant experience and interest and race equality contacts
within the public, private and voluntary sector organisations. This is a commitment
in the Scottish Executive's Equality Strategy and will make a crucial contribution
to the successful implementation of this race equality strategy; and
- encourage public sector interests including Scottish Executive departments,
local authorities, health and community care and housing providers to develop
sectoral specific better practice on inclusive events and consultation. This
to be achieved in part through the issuing of guidance on the purpose and
timing of consultation and on ways of identifying the needs and interests
of minority ethnic communities.
As part of these efforts to develop better practice, the Forum encourages
all Departments of the Scottish Executive and organisations to:
- develop awareness of different approaches which might enhance consultation
and dialogue; and
- involve members of minority ethnic communities in trying out different approaches
and evaluating their suitability for different types of policy-making, service
design and evaluation of implementation.
The Forum also recommends that as a minimum those responsible for consultation
with civic society in whatever sphere need to ensure that:
- the Commission for Racial Equality, Racial Equality Councils, BEMIS, the
Scottish Interfaith Council and the Scottish Trades Union Congress Black Workers'
Committee are included in all consultations along with relevant minority ethnic
community organisations with a specific interest in the particular policy
or service under consideration such as health, education or enterprise;
- responses are regularly reviewed throughout the consultation period to identify
gaps in coverage of respondents and action is taken quickly to make direct
approaches to communities to identify any difficulties in responding and to
identify what support/assistance is required;
- consideration is given to commissioning and/or funding specific work in
communities led by members of the communities themselves. Such work might
identify unexpressed or unmet needs or issues specific to particular communities
such as Gypsies/Travellers, asylum seekers, faith groups, other groups within
minority ethnic communities such as women, older or younger people or those
living in cities or more rural areas; and
- for all consultation and civic participation initiatives, consideration
is given to the provision of relevant, accessible information in community
languages (possibly in summary form) with a statement on decisions on the
communication strategy adopted included in all consultation documents and
reports. Part of this communication strategy should include consideration
of the most effective places, media and ways to raise awareness in communities.
The Forum therefore encourages the Scottish Executive Media and Communications
Group to initiate a specific study, with input from communities, on accessible
and relevant means of communicating with minority ethnic communities.
< Previous | Contents | Next > |