****
Scottish Executive*Publications  

Making it work together
* * *
* Home | Topics | About | News | Publications | Consultations | Search | Links | Contacts | Help *
*
 

< Previous | Contents | Next >

The Development of a Policy on Architecture for Scotland: Report on the Public Consultation

CONCLUSION

Overall, respondents welcomed the proposal to develop a policy on architecture for Scotland and were supportive of the aims and aspirations set out in the framework document. Respondents were of the view that the document addressed an appropriate agenda of issues and that the objectives and topics set out in the framework for action provided a sound basis from which to develop the details of policy. Respondents noted that interest in matters to do with architecture and the built environment was increasing and suggested that a policy should seek to capitalise on this interest.

Respondents suggested that if a policy were to be successful, then the development of both its detail and plans for its implementation would need to engage positively with a broad constituency of interests. Respondents also suggested that a policy on architecture should take account of, and be integrated with, other policy areas within the Executive. Respondents were of the view that the credibility of a policy on architecture would be impaired if Scottish Executive Departments did not themselves embrace its aims and objectives.

There was some concern amongst respondents as to how the detail of policy might develop. It was suggested that too prescriptive a policy would be counter-productive and would run the risk of inhibiting creativity and design innovation. On the other hand, it was suggested that a policy couched solely in aspirational terms was unlikely to stimulate interest or to be effective in practice.

Respondents noted that, whatever form policy took, it would be important to assess its effectiveness in stimulating interest in Scotland’s architecture and in bringing about improvements in Scotland’s built environment. Respondents suggested that a strategy for policy implementation should include for a 3-5 year review cycle to allow for an assessment of progress in meeting the policy’s objectives and for any necessary adjustments to policy priorities to be made.

"Architecture as a cultural expression and an artform has a duty to interpret and challenge our own age. "

"The buildings we build form the context for our lives and our children’s lives in the future; their importance cannot be underestimated. "

"Our buildings must have architectural impact, but all buildings, whether new, old or refurbished should be sustainable. "

"We must learn from the lessons of the past, to ensure that future generations are not faced with the prospect of trying to fix mistakes every 25 years."

Quotes from respondents

< Previous | Contents | Next >

* * *
* Home | Topics | About | News | Publications | Consultations | Search | Links | Contacts | Help *
Crown Copyright | Privacy policy | Content Disclaimer | General enquiries