![]() | ![]() | | |
| Home | Topics | About | News | Publications | Consultations | Search | Links | Contacts | Help |
| Publications > Agriculture |
< Previous | Contents | Next > THE RURAL STEWARDSHIP SCHEME14. Bracken Eradication Programme for Moorland
Management Requirements: Carry out a systematic programme of treatment and follow-up, where necessary using Asulam or other approved herbicide, in accordance with a Bracken Eradication Programme laid out in an approved BEP Management Plan:
Where chemical control is used, such follow-up action normally requires a spot-treatment approach. If cutting is the method adopted, it is essential that the programme of twice-yearly treatments continues for the duration of the BEP. Only by repeated cutting of the bracken fronds will the food reserves in the plant's rhizomes be depleted sufficiently to cause its death. Is bracken eradication always appropriate? It is not always appropriate or indeed desirable to clear bracken entirely from a site. Indeed, there are some situations in which bracken is best left alone:
The locations of any such 'sensitive' sites with appropriate buffer zones must be marked on the BEP Management Plan map to ensure their conservation. What sort of commitment is involved? Clearing bracken from an area is a long-term project. A bracken eradication programme will involve: the drawing up of a detailed BEP Management Plan in Year 1; primary treatment by chemical or mechanical means in year 2 (or in year 1 if all the requirements have first been met) and aftercare spanning the remaining years of the RSS agreement. Such aftercare may involve annual spot-treatment of any bracken re-growth or, if mechanical control is adopted, continued twice-yearly cutting, also mechanical disturbance or gathering of the litter and stock control where necessary). If the agreement is renewed at the end of 5 years, the participant will be obliged to continue with the follow-up action on the areas addressed under the BEP during the first 5 years. Bracken eradication should only be contemplated over an area where there is reasonable prospect of achieving the desired result within the timescale. For this reason, rather than attempt to treat too large an area at the outset, you should concentrate your efforts upon a number of small blocks _ those where the regeneration of underlying vegetation is paramount. Where the bracken canopy cover exceeds 75% at full frond stage, it should be clearly demonstrated that vegetation of conservation interest would be enhanced through this measure. The optimum size of the area(s) to be tackled under the Bracken Eradication Programme will depend upon such factors as the methods that can be employed given the nature of the terrain and the anticipated availability of labour and equipment at the appropriate times. What detail is required on the Environmental Audit and Moorland Management Plan? An outline only of the maximum extent of the area(s) to be covered by the Bracken Eradication Programme (BEP) is to be drawn on the Environmental Audit and Moorland Management Plan maps submitted as part of the application to join the RSS. This will allow SERAD, when appraising the application, to verify that the bracken infestation exists at that location(s) and that it exists within an area of species-rich grassland, coastal or lowland heath or moorland with conservation interest. It will be assumed 15% of this area will not be treated with herbicide - to protect sensitive species and habitats. Consequently, the figure used to calculate the payment for this prescription will be restricted to 85% of the area outlined on the EA map. Forward planning Forward planning is essential. This will involve surveying each area and, based upon the results of the survey, establishing the methods to be employed to carry out both the primary and follow-up treatments and the resources required. The optimum period for mapping bracken frond density and coverage is at full frond stage (mid/late June on the West Coast to early August in the eastern Borders). The locations of any sensitive species and habitats need to be identified and appropriate buffer zones set. < Previous | Contents | Next > |
| Home | Topics | About | News | Publications | Consultations | Search | Links | Contacts | Help |
| Crown Copyright | Privacy policy | Content Disclaimer | General enquiries |