| CIRCULAR SWSG4/94 5455
SECTION 7 - TREATMENT OF PROPERTY
General
7.001 If the capital asset is a house or land there are
circumstances under which its value must be disregarded indefinitely and circumstances
where its value must be taken fully into account. Local authorities also have an element
of discretion over whether to take the value of a property into account see 7.007.
Property to be disregarded
7.002 The value of a dwelling normally occupied by a
resident as his home should be ignored if his stay in a residential care or nursing home
is temporary and
he intends to return to the dwelling, and the
dwelling is still available to him, or
he is taking steps to dispose of the property in
order to acquire another more suitable property for the resident to return to.
Only one dwelling can be disregarded in these
circumstances.
NB. If the residents stay is initially thought
to be permanent but turns out to be only temporary, the dwelling he normally occupies as
his home should be treated in the same way as if he had been temporary from the outset.
Schedule 4 para 1
7.003 Where the resident no longer occupies a dwelling as
his home, its value should still be disregarded where it is occupied in whole or in part
by
the residents partner or former partner
(except where the resident is estranged or divorced
from the partner/former partner)
a relative of the resident or member of his family
(i.e. another person for whom the resident shall be treated as responsible) who
is aged 60 or over, or
is aged under 16 and is a child whom the resident is
liable to maintain, or
is incapacitated.
Schedule 4 para 2
Meaning of relative
7.004 The term "relative" in paragraph 7.003 is
defined to be any of the following
A. parent (including an adoptive parent)
B. parent-in-law
C. son (including adoptive son)
D. son-in law
E. daughter (including adoptive daughter)
F. daughter-in-law
G. step-parent
H. step-son
I. step-daughter
J. brother
K. sister
L. grandparent
M. grandchild
N. uncle
O. aunt
P. nephew
Q. niece
R. the spouse or unmarried partner of any of A to K
inclusive.
Meaning of "incapacitated"
7.005 The meaning of "incapacitated" in paragraph
7.003 is not defined in the regulations.
It will be reasonable to conclude that a relative is
incapacitated if either of the following conditions applies
i. the person is receiving one (or more) of the following
social security benefits
Invalidity Benefit, Severe Disablement Allowance,
Disability Living Allowance,
Attendance Allowance, Constant Attendance Allowance, or an
analogous benefit;
or
ii the person does not receive any of the benefits listed
in (i) but the degree of incapacity is equivalent to that required to qualify for any one
of those benefits. Medical or other relevant evidence may be needed before a decision is
reached.
Property acquired but not yet occupied
7.006 Where the resident has acquired property which he
intends eventually to occupy as his home, disregard the value of the dwelling for up to 26
weeks from the date the resident first takes steps to take up occupation, or such longer
period as is considered reasonable.
Schedule 4 para 16
Discretion to disregard property
7.007 Where the LA considers it reasonable to do so, they
can disregard the value of premises not covered in paragraphs 7.002-006 in which a third
party continues to live. LAs will have to balance the use of this discretion with
the need to ensure that residents with assets are not maintained at public expense. It may
be reasonable, for example, to disregard a dwellings value where it is the sole
residence of someone who has given up their own home in order to care for the resident, or
someone who is an elderly companion of the resident particularly if they have given up
their own home.
Schedule 4 para 18
7.008 Where the local authority has decided to disregard
the value of a property, it is left to the local authority to decide if and when to review
that decision. It would be reasonable, for example, where the authority has been ignoring
the value of a property because a long term carer was living there, for the authority to
begin taking account of the value of the property when the carer dies or moves out.
Property to be taken into account
Legal and beneficial owners
7.009 The treatment of property will depend on whether the
resident is a legal or a beneficial owner. A legal owner is a person in
whose name the property is held. A beneficial owner is one who is entitled to receive the
profits or proceeds of a property. In most cases the legal and beneficial owners will be
the same person but, where this is not the case, the value of the property will be valued
according to the following paragraphs.
Legal ownership
7.010 For the purposes of assessing the residents
ability to pay a charge no account should be taken of the value of a property where the
resident is a legal owner but has no beneficial interest in the property i.e. the resident
is holding the property on trust for the beneficial owners and has no right to the
proceeds or profits should the property be sold.
Beneficial ownership
7.011 Where the resident is the sole beneficial owner of a
property the capital value should be taken into account in full. If the resident and the
local authority agree that the value of the property, after taking into account any
deductions in 6.010 (expenses of sale and debts secured on the asset), is over £8,000, or
when added to any other capital assets will take the total capital over £8,000, a precise
valuation will not be needed. If the resident disputes the value, or there is some doubt
as to the value, a professional valuation should be obtained.
Joint beneficial ownership of property
7.012 Where a resident is a joint beneficial owner of
property, i.e. he has the right to receive some of the proceeds of a sale, it is the
residents interest in the property which is to be valued as capital, and not
the property itself. The value of this interest is governed by:
1. the residents ability to re-assign the beneficial
interest to somebody else
2. there being a market i.e. the interest being such as to
attract a willing buyer for the interest.
Reg 27 (2)
7.013 In most cases there is unlikely to be any legal
impediment preventing a joint
beneficial interest in a property being re-assigned. But
the likelihood of there being a willing buyer will depend on the conditions in which the
joint beneficial interest has arisen.
7.014 Where an interest in a property is beneficially
shared between relatives, the value of the residents interest will be heavily
influenced by the possibility of a market amongst his fellow beneficiaries. If no other
relative is willing to buy the residents interest, it is highly unlikely that any
"outsider" would be willing to buy into the property unless the financial
advantages far outweighed the risks and limitations involved. The value of the interest,
even to a willing buyer, could in such circumstances effectively be nil. If the local
authority is unsure about the residents share, or their valuation is disputed by the
resident, again a professional valuation should be obtained.
Example
The resident has a beneficial interest in a property worth
£60,000. He shares the interest with two relatives, After deductions for an outstanding
mortgage, the residual value is £30,000. One relative would be willing to buy the
residents interest for £5,000.
Although the value of the residents share of the
property may be £10,000, if the property as a whole had been sold, the value of just his
share is £5,000 as this is the sum he could obtain from a willing buyer
The amount to be taken into account as actual capital would
be £4,500 because a further 10 per cent would be deducted from the value of his share to
cover the cost of transferring the interest to the buyer.
Property held in a shared trust
7.015 Where property is held in Trust and the resident is
both a joint trustee and joint beneficiary, he legally owns the property as a
trustee of the Trust, but purely on a "fiduciary" basis i.e. he is legally
obliged to administer the Trust for the benefit of the Trust -as a whole, and not for his
own particular purposes. His real interest is that of a beneficial owner,
and falls to be valued accordingly (paragraphs 7.012 to 7.014).
Sale of jointly owned property
7.016 See the example at 6.062 for the consideration of
deprivation of capital where a jointly owned property is sold and the resident passes some
of his share of the proceeds to the joint owner. |