< Previous | Contents | Next >
PAN 45 (revised 2002): Renewable Energy Technologies
Hydro Power (and Shore Line Wave Power)
Introduction
| |
|
94. Hydroelectric developments offer a clean source of electrical energy
with a steady output, with no production of particulates or harmful gases.
A scheme with a capacity of 100kW would typically supply enough electricity
for about 150 homes. If this displaced electricity generated by currently
operating fossil-fuel power stations, it would save the emissions of around
400 tonnes per year of carbon dioxide, as well as around 5 tonnes of sulphur
dioxide and 2 tonnes of nitrogen oxides.
|
| |
|
95. Major existing hydro schemes in Scotland are usually based on a dam
and storage reservoir and currently generate about 11% of Scotlands
electricity. New hydro developments are likely to be much smaller and
not require large storage reservoirs. The key aspects of the economics
of hydro are the initial large capital outlays. However, this is mitigated
by the long lifetime, high reliability and availability of plant, low
running costs and no annual fuel costs.
|
| |
|
96. Under the ROS, it is the intention to extend eligibility to include
the output of refurbished hydroelectric plant of up to 20MW capacity and
new hydro plant of any capacity. Very small hydro schemes (1.25MW DNC
or less) will be eligible without the need to refurbish.
|
| |
|
97. This section provides information on the technology and characteristics
of hydroelectric developments and advice for handling these as planning
and environmental issues in development plans and planning applications.
It is concerned mainly with small-scale schemes often involving small-scale
storage. It also includes advice on shoreline wave power developments
as these fall within the control of the Planning Acts and are significantly
different in character from offshore wave projects.
|
Case Study 7 : Loch Tarbert Hydro Scheme
|
Located on the north side of Glen Tarbert near the village of Strontian,
this SRO2 run of river scheme commissioned in 2001, utilises
two small tributaries of the River Tarbert to generate 840kW, enough power
for nearly 1,000 homes.
Bypasses at the intakes ensure that the tributaries always contain the
agreed residual flows. Buried pipelines connect the intakes to the turbine
house and a tail race returns the water back to the main stream.
On this steep, remote site, low-impact methods were used in construction.
These included the use of helicopters to deliver pipes to the steeper
sections and careful rehabilitation and replanting. As part of the landscape
restoration programme, very careful attention was paid to ground recovery
on the pipeline route and the landscaping around the turbine house. This
involved the planting of many trees in association with a wider planting
programme by the landowner.
|
The Technology
| |
|
98. The process of harnessing waterpower is well established. Water flowing
from a higher to a lower level is used to drive a wheel or turbine, producing
mechanical energy. This energy may be used for a variety of purposes,
including the generation of electricity. In simple terms, power output
is related to the volume of water available, and the vertical distance
through which it falls. Similar power can be obtained from a large quantity
of water falling a small vertical distance, or from much less water falling
a greater distance. In the first case a larger turbine is required; in
the second case, the plant will be smaller. To provide sufficient depth
of draw off the water, a natural pool is required or a headpond must be
created with a weir. A conduit then conveys the water from the intake
in the pool or headrace to the turbine. The conduit may be an enclosed
pipe (or penstock) or an open channel, often called a headrace.
|
| |
|
99. The essential elements in a typical hydroelectric scheme are discussed
below. The scale and physical form of each of these elements will depend
heavily upon local environmental conditions.
|
| |
|
100. A reliable supply of water is clearly a pre-requisite for a viable
hydro scheme. Rivers with large variations in flow will be unsuitable
unless a holding reservoir is constructed to store water at times of excess.
The water must also be sufficiently deep at source to enable the supply
to be drawn off via an intake.
|
| |
|
101. There are two principle types of headworks :
- Run-of-river - no (or negligible) water storage upstream of
the weir i.e. the output from the turbine is proportional to the flow
of the river.
- Storage - the intake structure is generally larger and is used
to store water so that power from the turbine(s) can be timed to meet
demand from consumers.
|
| |
|
102. The intake normally comprises a trash screen of vertical or sloping
bars to trap floating debris and a sluice gate to regulate the flow of
water to the turbine. Some trash screens, which needs to be kept clear
of debris on a regular basis, are designed to require virtually no maintenance
through passive design rather than automatic / active cleaning
(e.g. over washed screens). A fine mesh screen may also be installed over
the intake at certain times of the year to prevent fish being drawn into
the supply pipe.
|
| |
|
103. The intake structure is normally contained in a modest concrete
housing set into the bank of the river. Where the water level needs to
be raised in order to ensure a regular supply, the headworks will also
include an artificial weir, usually of concrete or stone construction.
As well as providing a water supply of suitable depth, the headpond behind
the weir can help to sustain supplies to the turbine when the river is
temporarily low.
|
| |
|
104. Water is carried from the headrace to the turbine house by an enclosed
pipe (penstock), an open channel (millrace, leat or lade), or by a combination
of these. Depending on local circumstances, the distance between the headrace
and the turbine house can vary from a few metres to one kilometre or more.
New schemes using a high head of water will tend to use an enclosed or
buried pipe. Some refurbishment schemes may use existing open channels.
|
| |
|
105. A headrace pipe might be metal, plastic, concrete or made of a composite
material. The range of diameter sizes for future run-of-river medium and
high-head hydro schemes in Scotland is likely to be from 200 to 1500mm.
A valve is incorporated close to the turbine house to enable the water
supply to be regulated when required. The pipeline will be anchored securely
to the ground, particularly at bends and junctions, and can be buried
at places where it would otherwise limit access to land or cross areas
of landscape sensitivity.
|
| |
|
106. Open channels may be unlined, or lined with clay, concrete or plastic.
They will usually incorporate a second sluice gate close to the turbine
house, to divert or channel water back to the main stream when the turbine
needs to be stopped.
|
|
|
|
107. The turbine house contains the turbine, the generator and associated
electrical equipment. For a typical small-scale hydro scheme, the turbine
house will be similar in size to a domestic double garage. The turbine
will be sited to optimise the trade-off between the length of the headrace
and the drop in water level, but there is a degree of locational flexibility.
Where feasible, a turbine house may be partially buried. In order to minimise
the length of the tailrace, the turbine house will normally be situated
close to the watercourse. In visual terms the turbine house will often
be the most prominent built element in a small-scale hydro scheme. Its
design and location are thus significant planning considerations and are
considered further below. (See paragraphs
116-120)
|
| |
|
108. After driving the turbine, water is returned to its natural course
via the tailrace. Where the turbine house is close to the watercourse,
the tailrace will take the form of a short open channel. In other cases
it will be of similar construction to the headrace. As slow-moving water
can impair the efficiency of the turbine, the tailrace should have a gradient
sufficient to encourage a swift discharge of water.
|
Controls Under Other Legislation
| |
|
109. A proposal to construct or operate a hydro-electric station with
a capacity of more than 1 MW must be submitted to the Scottish Ministers
for consent under section 36 of the Electricity Act 1989. Before applying,
an applicant must consult the Fisheries Committee, which advises
on possible damage to fisheries or fish stocks. The current Scottish Executive
intention, under "Proposals for Abolition or Reform of Public Bodies",
is that the Fisheries Committee be abolished and its functions passed
to the Inspector of Salmon and Freshwater Fisheries. Since this Committee
is appointed by statute under the Electricity Act 1989, abolition will
require a change of legislation when the legislative timetable allows.
|
| "Notes for Guidance on the Provision
of Fish Passes and Screens for the safe passage of Salmon". SOAFD
July 1995. |
|
110. The risk to all fish can be minimised by careful design and adjustment
of the seasonal operating schedule of the plant. Some types of turbine
(such as low to medium head crossflow designs) can oxygenate the river
water and may thereby benefit the fish population. Where necessary, dams
and weirs should include structures which allow the free passage of migratory
fish and afford fish and other freshwater animals protection from the
turbines.
|
|
"The Salmon (Fish Passes and Screens) (Scotland) Regulations
1994".
SI 1994/2524.
|
|
111. The Salmon (Fish Passes and Screens) (Scotland) Regulations 1994
require dams to have an adequate fish pass and all off-takes, whether
or not associated with a dam, to be screened to protect the passage of
salmon (and sea trout). The Scottish Office Agriculture and Fisheries
Department issued non-statutory guidance notes, to accompany the Fish
Pass Regulations, to assist owners of dams and weirs on the practical
aspects of their implementation. It should be noted that while the Regulations
apply to proposals dealt with by planning authorities, they do not apply
to dams or off-takes which are authorised by the Scottish Ministers under
Acts which provide that they can have regard to the arrangements for the
safe passage of salmon and sea trout when authorising the scheme e.g.
under the Electricity Act 1989.
|
| |
|
112. Each District Salmon Fishery Board (DSFB)
has statutory powers and duties in relation to the management and protection
of salmon fisheries within its district. Consultation with the local DSFB
should be undertaken immediately a hydro scheme is proposed and throughout
the planning process. The local DSFB should be consulted on fish passes
and exclusion devices in their area as requirements are generally site specific. |
| |
|
113. The Scottish Environment Protection Agency
(SEPA) has a duty to promote the cleanliness of controlled waters and to
conserve, so far as practicable, water resources. Consultation with SEPA
should therefore be undertaken for all proposed hydro developments, both
small-scale projects covered by planning legislation and larger schemes
authorised under the Electricity Act 1989. The potential effect of construction
works on water quality should be borne in mind. Under the Control of Pollution
Act 1974 (as amended), it is an offence to cause or knowingly permit any
poisonous, noxious or polluting materials or any solid waste matter to enter
inland or coastal waters. |
|
"Rivers, Lochs, Coasts : The Future for Scotlands Waters".
Scottish Executive Consultation Paper June 2001.
|
|
114. The EC Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC)
establishes a new framework for the management and protection of Scotlands
natural water environment, including the rivers and lochs which provide
the resource on which hydroelectric schemes are based. The implications
of the Directive and the way it will be implemented through Scottish legislation
in the proposed Water Environment Bill will have implications for hydro
schemes. |
| |
|
115. The development of hydroelectric power generation
schemes should be achieved in a manner which is compatible with the many
other uses to which a river is put. Early liaison between the developer,
planning authority, SNH, SEPA and the DSFB is essential to ensure that the
proposals do not detract from the existing value and interest of the watercourse
and its surroundings. |
|
Siting in the Landscape and Design Considerations
|
| |
|
116. As with several renewable sources of energy, it is usually only
possible to exploit hydropower resources where technically the potential
exists. Hydro schemes do however enjoy a limited locational flexibility
to the extent that the precise siting of the headworks and, in particular,
the turbine house, can sometimes be influenced by non-operational factors,
including local landscape characteristics.
|
| |
|
117. In general terms, it will be desirable to choose a location for
the development where the built elements can be integrated into the landscape.
Where rivers are lined with trees, for instance, it will be relatively
simple to conceal the hydropower facilities, particularly if the existing
woodland cover is supplemented by new planting. Where the development
is taking place in a more open location, built elements should either
be designed to be as small as possible, having regard to operational considerations,
or should be designed to contribute positively to the landscape. In the
case of schemes proposed for hillsides or other prominent locations, the
landscape impact of the development, in close and distant views, should
be appraised.
|
| |
|
118. In some cases, the visual impact of the development can be minimised
by siting the turbine house away from the headworks. However, the greater
this separation is, the longer and potentially more prominent will be
the headrace connection between the two. There will also be significant
cost implications. The remote siting of a turbine house will rarely be
justified by landscape considerations alone, and can become self-defeating
if the headrace pipe or channel becomes a visually obtrusive feature in
its own right. In many cases it will be advantageous to underground pipelines
from the intake to the turbine house but careful restoration of the ground
is necessary. Preferably, access tracks to weirs should be reinstated
once the construction stage has been completed.
|
| |
|
119. Although the foreseeable hydro developments will generally be small
scale, their waterside location will, in some cases, place them in areas
valued for their natural and/or cultural significance. Such schemes can
operate for many decades, and their principal built elements will often
become permanent additions to the landscape. In some circumstances, weirs,
fish ladders and headrace channels can become features of interest in
their own right, attracting visitors.
|
| |
|
120. For these reasons, planning authorities may reasonably insist on
a high standard of design. Particular attention may be required to the
architectural quality of built elements, the choice of building materials
and the manner in which the development is integrated with its surroundings.
Measures to minimise the visual impact of headrace pipes and power lines
should be considered carefully at the design and planning application
stages.
|
|
Aquatic Habitats and Species
|
| |
|
121. In designing a hydro scheme, account needs to be taken of the fact
that different species will be affected in different ways and that some
species, such as the freshwater pearl mussel, are protected under the
EC Habitats Directive. Discussions with SNH will provide guidance on the
species which require to be considered in a particular location. Experience
has shown that by careful design it is possible to reconcile hydro schemes
with conservation of the natural heritage.
|
| |
|
122. In general, the construction impact of a hydropower scheme will
be no different to that of other developments of similar size. However,
construction in or beside a river or loch may cause the water to become
clouded with silt or mud. Before granting planning permission for a hydro
project, the planning authority may, in consultation with SEPA and SNH,
request that the developer specifies the site management measures that
will be adopted to minimise this problem.
|
Case Study 8 : Loch Poll hydroelectric Scheme
| DTIs New and Renewable Energy Programme is supporting
a project to monitor the environmental impact of a small hydro scheme currently
being developed at Loch Poll in the Scottish Highlands. The aim is to assess
the schemes effects during and after construction by comparison with
the baseline situation. By generating information on this subject, the monitoring
project will help hydro scheme design in the future, particularly community-based
renewables projects.
Loch Poll is a 0.24 MW hydro scheme (commissioned in Autumn 2000). The
scheme lies partly within a potential Special Protection Area (pSPA),
protected under the European Wild Birds Directive because it supports
breeding black-throated divers. In addition, one of the rivers affected
by the scheme contains a breeding population of freshwater pearl mussel,
one of only 50 known to be remaining in Scotland. It is also within the
Assynt-Coigach National Scenic Area (NSA).
The monitoring project brings together a number of organisations : Highland
Light & Power Ltd; the Assynt Crofters Trust; the West Sutherland
Fisheries Trust; Scottish Natural Heritage; the European Regional Development
Fund; Highlands & Islands Enterprise; the Highland Council; and the
RSPB.
Highland Light & Power is contracted to build the project and manage
it for the 15 year life of the SRO contract, at the end of which the asset
will transfer to ownership of the Assynt Crofters Trust.
|
Shoreline Wave Power
| |
|
123. Additional to conventional hydroelectric power, the interface between
the sea and the land has considerable energy generation potential. It
does however differ from offshore wave and tidal in that it is within
the land use planning regime. The main device deployed world-wide is the
Oscillating Water Column (OWC). This consists of a partially submerged,
hollow structure that is open to the sea below the water line. This encloses
a column of air on top of a column of water. Waves cause the water column
to rise and fall, which alternatively compresses and depressurises the
air column. This trapped air is allowed to flow to and from the atmosphere
via a Wells turbine, which has the ability to rotate in the same direction
regardless of the direction of the airflow. The rotation of the turbine
is used to generate electricity.
|
| |
|
124. Three projects were awarded contracts under
the third round of the Scottish Renewables Obligation (SRO3). One of these
is the LIMPET (Land Installed Marine Powered Energy Transformer) - a 500kW
shoreline OWC on Islay. This device was commissioned in the Spring of 2001
and replaced a prototype shoreline 75kW OWC which operated successfully
for 10 years. |
Case Study 9 : The Islay Project
|
|
|
|
The Worlds first commercial wave power station has been commissioned
in Scotland near Portnahaven, Islay, the first time that wave-generated
electricity has been fed into the electricity distribution network on
this scale.
The LIMPET (Land installed marine powered energy transformer) harnesses
oscillating water column technology to provide 500kW of power for the
national grid under SRO 3.
Visual intrusion is minimised by the low profile of the device and material
colours. The reduction / elimination of noise is achieved by use of appropriate
materials in the construction of the turbine generators and aerodynamic
designs that minimise noise generation.
The company now plans to use the larger resource of the Atlantic Ocean
to generate more power with their prototype offshore machine. The £2.7M
wave-power machine is expected to be launched next summer. The location
has yet to be determined but when operational, the commercial scheme will
supply enough electricity to power 1,400 homes.
|
< Previous | Contents | Next > |