| HMIP
Annual Report 1997-98
APPENDIX 1
THE USE OF LAY PEOPLE IN THE INSPECTION OF PUBLIC
SERVICES
(Extracts from Report Prepared by the Scottish Consumer
Council 1997)
In 1991 the Government, in its Citizens Charter,
devoted a section to the question of audit and inspection of public services and proposed
a series of innovations and developments which would strengthen audit and inspection
services. In relation to the main inspectorates, the Charter stated that the central
responsibility of inspections was to check that services were delivered in the most
effective way and also that they "genuinely meet the needs of those they serve".
In making the case for a change in the balance of those involved in inspection, the
Charter also stated that:-
It is essential also that inspectors reflect the
interests of the public receiving a service as well as the profession providing it....The
Citizens Charter will therefore begin to open up inspectorates to the outside
world....To this end, we will appoint lay members to more inspectorates to work closely
with professional colleagues.
The emphasis in the Charter was on whether or not a service
was meeting the needs of those who use it and two distinct issues arose: firstly, how do
inspectorates find out whether a service is meeting the needs of its users and to what
extent is this furthered by the use of lay people in inspection teams; and secondly, what
kind of lay people can bring the qualities of independence and objectivity which will act
as a counterweight to the prevailing professional views about service provision. The
implication from the Citizens Charter is that lay people involved in inspection will
not necessarily be service users themselves, but will be able to act as proxies for the
public interest and will draw on their professional expertise to bring an objective view
to bear which is independent of the professional groups subject to inspection.
The Scottish Consumer Council thought that it would be
interesting to see how far the different inspectorates in Scotland have gone in the
introduction of lay people into inspection teams and therefore undertook a research
project between October 1996 and February 1997 to look at the main public services,
including prisons, which are subject to inspection. A literature review and desk research
formed the first stage of the research which was followed by discussions with staff within
all the inspectorates, either face to face or by telephone. The Councils report
concluded that:-
User involvement has not in any way reached its
potential....Users need to be able to see their growing importance and to develop skills
and strengths to hold their own in the provider/regulator relationship, in order to make a
real impact on service provision and standards of inspection.
Specifically in relation to this Inspectorate the report
said:-
The Chief Inspector of Prisons appears to have
effectively developed a wider pool of people involved in inspections, albeit not
particularly as lay members but rather as consultants.
Recommendations relating to the Inspectorate were as
follows:-
| Recommendation |
Inspectorate Comment |
| HM Inspectorate of Prisons should
advertise for lay members of inspection teams. |
The Team comprises 9, of whom one
is ex SPS, and 2 are members of the SPS. The remainder are now lay members/consultants. |
| HM Inspectorate of Prisons should
provide a training programme for any lay members, including the Chief Inspector, which
should cover the service to be inspected, the value of lay involvement and training in
particular skills. |
Some drug awareness and media
training are now standard practice, but financial restraints limit further expansion for
the moment. |
| HM Inspectorate of Prisons should
consider further the involvement of former prisoners in inspections, possibly as a way of
facilitating discussions with prisoners. |
This remains an aspiration - when
the right individual can be found! |
| We recommend that the Secretary
of State should review the funding of the Prisons Inspectorate with a view to ensuring
that the funding is adequate to carrying out these inspections. |
The 1996-97 Budget was overspent
by £12,000 and was subsequently increased for this year. |
|