Previous Page Contents Page Next Page
HM Chief Inspector of Prisons for Scotland - Annual Report 1996-97
8 STAFF AND MANAGEMENT

Organisation

1996-97

1995-96

Complement

Staff in Post

Complement

Staff in Post

SPS HQ South Gyle Edinburgh

263

246

216

215

SPS College Falkirk (Recruit Induction,Training Co-ordination)

62

58

61

61

22 Prison Establishments

4,387

4,350

4,213

4,182

TOTAL

4,712

4,654

4,490

4,458

Introduction

8.2 The organisation, training and morale of both management and staff all have a considerable effect on matters of general efficiency and in turn, the day to day routine of prisoners. For this reason, we have included below a number of observations on progress across the SPS throughout the year. The main issue which has continued to exercise management and staff has been the implementation of NSS, which was introduced in April 1995 when a four year period was agreed for its implementation.

Management

8.3 New Staffing Structure. NSS has involved a delayering of the management structure, with a move away from grades to roles and a reduction in the number of management grades, though there has been an overall increase in the number of prison Officers. The prison Officer role is now divided into Band ‘C’ and Band ‘D’ levels with the latter working directly with prisoners; Band ‘C’ Officers are much more concerned with basic security, escort and other prisoner supervisory duties.

8.4 The nature of these changes should not be underestimated, more especially the very high turnover of staff which has been sustained (see paragraph 8.9). At the same time, other new initiatives - such as information technology and MDT - were also being introduced across the SPS and we commend management and staff for coping with so many complex challenges which have been competing for their attention at much the same time.

8.5 Restructuring has resulted in an unprecedented level of mobility and change among staff and management and during our inspection of HMP Edinburgh, we expressed concern over the high rate of staff turnover, especially at managerial level. This, coupled with a reduction in experience of new team members, gave us cause for serious concern and we have recommended that enforced changes in this management team should be avoided for at least 6-9 months to allow for a period of stability and consolidation. Edinburgh was one of many establishments to experience a high turnover of managers and staff and in this respect, we advocate a degree of caution in the future or control and stability could be adversely affected.

8.6 Co-ordination. In last year’s report, we identified the need for greater co-ordination at establishment level to avoid functional compartmentalisation. However, we continued to find that though disparate departments such as Healthcare, Social Work, Education and Vocational Training were involved in sound and appropriate work, they were often operating in isolation without a clear understanding of what was being achieved elsewhere. In our opinion, the Governor/Deputy Governor relationship is of particular importance and it is clear from our inspections that where an atmosphere of co-operation and an agreement of common purpose exist between these two individuals, then the operation of the prison is much smoother - more especially in the larger and more complex establishments. It is equally clear, however, that where such collaboration is on a reduced scale, then a fragmented response across the establishment may become entrenched. We believe that the qualifications for a Deputy Governor’s post should include the candidate’s potential compatability with the existing Governor.

8.7 We have also commented before on the pressures at Prison Board level, resulting from the large number of initiatives being launched or developed across the prison system. During the course of this year, these pressures do not appear to have abated; indeed, as a result of the sudden death of the Human Resource Director and the intermittent absence due to illness of both Area Directors, these could well have increased. However, the appointment of a Head of Regime Development and a Head of Psychology will have helped and we are gratified to note that considerable emphasis has gone into improving the coordination between SPS HQ and establishments, particularly over offending behaviour programmes.

Staff

8.8 Recruitment. During the course of 1996-97, a total of 288 Band ‘C’ Officers either completed their four week basic training course at the SPS College or started work in prisons. They will remain on probation in their rank for the next two years, whilst a further 140 recruits are expected to start this year. These recruits are now required to complete a number of SVQ modules, though progress on assessment and verification has now started to fall seriously behind - to the extent that it has proved necessary to extend the probation period for a number of recruits by six months to enable them to complete that programme. The problem would appear to have been caused by the enforced mobility among those Supervisors who would normally act as assessors, though part of the reason could also be attributed to a delay in the Supervisors being trained for their new role. This unsatisfactory situation has caused concern amongst recruits, though we support the SPS’s view that standards of recruit training should be maintained and not diluted as a result of these temporary difficulties.

8.9 Staff Turnover. A total of 415 members of staff have retired from the SPS since April 1995, whilst a total of 655 new Officers have been recruited since March 1995. This represents a 25% turnover in the work force and the assimilation, induction and training of such a large number has represented a considerable effort on behalf of management at both SPS HQ and individual establishments. However, a total of 58 of the recent recruits left the Service before the completion of their probationary period, many having taken up other employment in organisations such as the Police Service, where pay and conditions were thought to be better - the basic rate of pay for a Band C Officer is £12,500 per annum. We believe this to be a relatively high wastage rate.

8.10 Employment/Pay. The full impact of reorganising into two Officer grades has yet to be measured, though we are aware of some perceptions as a result of interviewing staff groups. Some Band ‘C’ Officers have begun to feel as if they were second class citizens within their establishments and that there was a pressing need for them to be much more comprehensively trained. At the same time, Governors and staff are also highlighting the problem of a mobile work-force who are reacting to market forces and shifting jobs, a problem which might have serious long-term effects. Because of the potential stress involved, some staff may also be reluctant to move to establishments where there are difficult long term prisoners, a situation which will have to be carefully monitored if operational efficiency is not to be destroyed. In our opinion, a means of making more rapid adjustments to staffing issues will have to be found.

8.11 Training and Personal Development. The recognition that individual training and development requires the highest priority is emphasised by management at all levels and it is generally acknowledged that the range of courses provided by the SPS College is thorough and comprehensive. At establishment level, most Staff Training Officers are able to show a fully planned programme of training which is designed to meet local needs and targets but when some plans are examined in depth, it often transpires that training is not actually receiving the appropriate priority. This is because it can be difficult to make enough time available to enable staff to attend individual training courses or to enable groups of staff to make events such as these cost effective, though an allowance for training is built into the complement of each establishment allowing for five shifts per Officer per year to be spent specifically on training. Fundamental requirements such as Control and Restraint and Breathing Apparatus training can quickly account for an individual Officer’s basic allowance, which may lead to complaints from staff that little or no opportunities for 'proper' (ie individual development) training are available. At several establishments the perceptions of staff (as related to us) were that little or no staff training took place and in such circumstances, we have advised Governors that much more information on staff training should be made available on as wide a distribution as possible. We also believe that management at all levels must monitor not only the quantity of training but also the quality.

8.12 Staff Sickness. The average number of days lost through sickness was 16 for each of the 4,600 members of staff employed. Though this was an improvement on last year’s figures, levels such as these still represent a very considerable drain on the SPS’s resources. We noted, however, that some individual establishments had recorded particular improvements over the previous year - eg Aberdeen, Castle Huntly and Peterhead. These would appear to have been achieved, at least in part, by a rigorous application by line management of the local Absence Management Policy.

8.13 Staff Facilities. We are pleased to report that there were some further - if limited -improvements in the standards of staff facilities. In particular, were impressed with the upgrading and refurbishment of a number of small rooms for staff at Noranside. That development confirmed what we have always suspected - that it sometimes takes imagination and determination rather than major resources, to make a difference.

8.14 Equal Opportunities. Steady progress has continued to be made in this area. The main issues of contention which were brought to our attention were over the provision of separate or improved facilities, and in particular toilets, for female staff. It is reassuring to note, however, that where improvements are possible, resources are gradually being made to provide the appropriate facilities.

8.15 Industrial Relations. Regular meetings between central management and the SPS TUS have taken place and formal agreement reached on a number of issues, including Job Evaluation and a Compulsory Transfer Appeals Panel. A number of issues, including a revised Code of Conduct and an Alcohol and Substance Abuse Policy, have yet to be formally agreed and it would appear that the hiatus caused by the premature death of the Director of Human Resources has not helped this situation.

8.16 During the period under review, the SPS TUS withdrew their co-operation from the system of Local Whitley Councils. This well tried and tested system, which has existed in public sector bodies for many years, is a means of ensuring that all employees are represented in industrial relation terms, irrespective of the size of their union or the number of members employed at any one site. Under these circumstances, the local Whitley system has been unable to function and the local committees now do not seem to meet, much to the disappointment of management. However, the SPS TUS have expressed their desire for the system to be re-introduced with further discussions expected.

8.17 The SPS TUS is concerned about the question of staff morale, particularly in relation to proposals for the introduction of Annualised Hours Contracts for all staff. This would change the agreed hours to be worked from a weekly to an annual basis (so that the deployment of staff could be more flexible).

8.18 From an SPS TUS point of view, it would appear that the year under review has been somewhat disappointing, in the sense that consultation between staff and management at national level has deteriorated. From a management point of view, it has also been a disappointing year, with some unions preferring to go to legal representatives (or even to the media) to progress some matters when internal avenues had not yet been exhausted.

Previous Page Contents Page Next Page