 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
| HM Chief Inspector of Prisons for
Scotland - Annual Report 1996-97 |
|
| 4. OVERCROWDING |
|
| Introduction 4.1 A growth in the prison population and a loss in design capacity
due to a rolling refurbishment programme means that the prison estate is currently housing
almost 1,000 prisoners over capacity. This figure is expected to rise by at least a
further 200 every year and this does not take into account those calculations which are
concerned with recently proposed changes in early release (see paragraph 1.4).
4.2 Overcrowding has increased over a number of years and
has many potentially unsatisfactory consequences, including a delay in the much needed
refurbishment of several Victorian era prisons. It can also lead to heightened tension and
potential difficulties over discipline and control as staff can be swamped by the
additional weight of numbers. Additionally, they are often unable to devote sufficient
time to remands or those in the early stage of sentence - ie those who are in most need of
attention. Overcrowding can also lead to remand and convicted prisoners being mixed at
some prisons, which is undesirable.
4.3 Many prisoners are also prevented from taking part in
work, so that the opportunity more fully to repay their debt to society is denied and they
are left lounging about in their cells. This can increase the boredom factor which is said
to be behind some cases of drug abuse - or even some suicide attempts. Prisoners are also
unable to acquire the skills which would be useful in rebuilding their lives after
release. Others may be unable to participate in offending behaviour, drug reduction and
similar programmes which are important to rehabilitation, with later impact on rates of
re-offending - and therefore possible increases in the future number of victims of crime.
Currently, the only relief in sight is the completion of a new 500 place prison at
Bowhouse, Kilmarnock, but this is unlikely to come into operation much before the end of
the century.
The Scale of the Problem
4.4 In March 1995 the SPS estate was overpopulated by a
figure of 589, the total number of places available being 5,156 against a daily population
of 5,645. In March 1996, the over population had reduced to 279 due mainly to some
re-arrangement of the prison estate; the total number of places available had risen to
5,418 against a population of 5,697. In March 1997, however, the figure had risen to 927,
the total number of places available being 5,291 against a population of 6,218. (At one
point - on 19 March 1997 - the over population rose to 1,059 when those held in custody
reached a record figure of 6,350.)
4.5 A large number of closed establishments were affected
by overcrowding throughout the year. Those who were consistently overcrowded, or over
usable capacity in excess of 10%, are shown below.
|
1996-97 |
1995-96 |
|
|
|
| HMYOI Polmont |
15% |
8% |
|
|
| HMP Inverness |
23% |
21% |
|
|
|
| HMP Aberdeen |
30% |
22% |
|
|
|
| HMP Perth |
50% |
14% |
|
|
|
| HMP Edinburgh |
50% |
36% |
|
|
|
| HMP Barlinnie |
51% |
27% |
|
|
|
|
|
| Comment 4.6
This is the first time in recent years that HMYOI Polmont has been overcrowded on such a
scale. In anticipating this situation, the SPS had hoped to provide some relief by
creating a new male offenders wing at Cornton Vale but a spate of suicides and other
difficulties in that establishment led to the suspension of this innovative plan.
4.7 The five other prisons referred to above, all contain
remand prisoners and have been overcrowded at various stages over the past few years.
However, there has been a significant increase this year due to the steady rise in the
number of those being taken into custody - a situation which coincided with a temporary
loss in design capacity mainly due to some accommodation Halls at Perth, Edinburgh and
Barlinnie being closed for much needed refurbishment.
Other Factors
4.8 The number of individuals who are likely to be sent to
prison by the Courts can never be accurately forecast and this is a major reason for the
mismatch which will always occur between the number of cells available and the actual
daily prison population. There is also a number of other factors which impinge on capacity
- for example, a number of cells must always be left vacant for national contingency
purposes.
4.9 Full account must also be taken of prisoners
security categories. These cannot accurately be predicted, firstly because they cannot be
calculated until after prisoners have been sentenced and secondly because the security
categories of individuals can change as they progress through their sentence. Prisoners
should, of course, be placed in an establishment appropriate to their security category
but that means that there can often be a demand for cells in one type of prison whilst
there may be significant vacancies elsewhere. There is also an obligation to segregate
sexes and where possible, to separate remand from convicted prisoners and adults from
young offenders, all of which can complicate resource planning.
4.10 As already mentioned, major sections of the prison
estate have recently been involved in an extensive refurbishment programme. This was long
overdue and was needed in order to upgrade some Victorian buildings and to provide the
most basic of amenities, such as integral sanitation. This dictates that cells and often
entire Halls, have to be emptied whilst contractors instal WCs, which then contributes to
overcrowding elsewhere. Often this particularly impinges on remand prisoners at the larger
establishments with many being held two (and sometimes three) to a cell. This was the
situation found at the inspections of Edinburgh and Perth, where the rolling refurbishment
programme has had to be delayed due to even greater pressure of numbers. A piece-meal
approach is now having to be adopted, which means that overcrowding will go on for longer.
A delay in the ending of slopping out is also likely, with a third of
prisoners in Scotland denied any access to night sanitation at present.
Effect on Prison Life
4.11 Overcrowding pervades almost every aspect of prison
life. It can first be seen at the Reception and Induction phases, where there may be
insufficient staff or inadequate facilities to process the number of prisoners on
admission and can result in vital information being missed - for example previous drug
histories or other indications of risk. Other areas which can be affected are as follows:-
- Security and control are at risk as the increased numbers of
prisoners are not being matched by any corresponding increase to staffing levels.
|
|
- Wear and tear on buildings, corridors and facilities also
increases greatly, whilst the provision of fundamental items, such as bedding and other
basic items of cell furniture, may be lacking.
|
|
- As well as the possible heightening of tension among
prisoners, there are obvious health and hygiene factors when prisoners are crammed
together, a factor which was particularly evident among remand prisoners during our recent
inspections at Edinburgh and Perth.
|
|
- Many support facilities become overstretched - for example,
equipment in the kitchen at Edinburgh had originally been designed to cope with a maximum
of 600 prisoners but was regularly having to provide for an additional 150. This was also
stretching catering staff to their limits.
|
|
- The basic component of every prison regime is work, yet at
several large prisons - such as Edinburgh, Perth and Barlinnie - we found that many
individuals were not working on a daily basis. This was because the workshop facilities
and staff supervision were designed to meet only the normal capacity of the prison, which
meant that those who could not be allocated work were locked up for most of the day in
their cells. During the Edinburgh inspection at least 150 convicted prisoners were so
affected, with the situation being even worse at Barlinnie.
|
|
- Prisoners may be prevented from taking part in a variety of
other activities such as drug reduction or offending behaviour programmes because there
are not sufficient places for them.
|
|
- There are not always enough staff to ensure that prisoners
are escorted to outside hospitals, which results in cancelled - or lost - appointments.
(This was a particular problem at Edinburgh.)
|
|
- As regards visits, families and friends may be afforded the
bare minimum of time, in visit rooms which are overflowing and difficult to control - this
was most evident in the two largest establishments, Edinburgh and Barlinnie, where
facilities are in any case inadequate.
|
|
- Staff may be unable to devote time to those prisoners who
are often in most need of attention. This is not good either for their own morale or for
the development of constructive prisoner relationships. Additionally, the overstretch
caused by overcrowding might mean that staff are unable to attend important training and
career development courses.
|
|
- Remand prisoners are not required by Prison Rules to take
part in work which means that they can be locked in their cells for much longer periods
than convicted prisoners. However, overcrowding produces even greater pressures on
resources - including staff - and reduces further the regime available to them so that
they end up with the most monotonous and unproductive of existences (see also Drugs,
paragraph 5.1 and Suicide, paragraph 6.5.5). Overcrowding can also lead to remand or
unconvicted prisoners having to share Halls and sometimes even cells with those who have
been convicted, which is highly undesirable.
|
|
- Finally, the potential effect on control should not be
underestimated. Although the community and the SPS have been spared large scale riots and
incidents in recent years, despite the levels of overcrowding which have had to be
endured, in recent times there has been a rise in serious assaults by prisoners on other
prisoners. Whilst it is recognised that drug dealing and drug feuds, which have been
brought in from outside, may be major contributory factors to these assaults, overcrowding
may be adding to the tensions involved and to difficulties of staff supervision at
vulnerable points in the prisons (where assaults tend to take place).
|
|
|
| The Future 4.12 We recognise that it is easier to
describe the various effects of overcrowding than it is to provide coherent solutions. Nor
should the Inspectorate be concerning itself with matters of criminal justice policy, as
these are outwith its remit; however, as the latter can affect conditions in prisons, we
offer the following observations.
4.13 SPS management and staff are managing to cope with
present levels of overcrowding, but a considerable effort is involved and cannot go on
being sustained indefinitely. Additionally, the numbers of those imprisoned in Scotland
are forecast to rise by at least 200 prisoners in each successive year, a figure which
does not take any proposed changes to early release into account. Arrangements for those
held under the Prisoner and Criminal Proceedings (Scotland) Act 1993 are currently as
follows: prisoners who are serving sentences of less than 4 years are released when they
have served half of their sentence. Those who are serving determinate sentences of 4 years
or more are eligible for parole at half sentence and are automatically released at two
thirds of sentence if they are not granted parole.
4.14 Major changes to this system are contained in the
Crime and Punishment (Scotland) Act 1997 and include the proposal that offenders should
now serve their full sentence in custody, apart from a small period of remission of one
sixth of sentence. It is not known when this will come into operation, though it is
generally accepted that its enforcement will lead to even more significant increases to
the penal population. It is estimated that there could be up to 1,000 additional prisoners
on a daily basis by the turn of the century - rising to 2,200 within 5 years.
Long Term Solutions
4.15 A new 500 place prison at Bowhouse, Ayrshire will
provide some relief for present levels of overcrowding and is expected to come into
operation in 1999. However, by then there may be up to 400 more prisoners more in the
system - ie there might be no real change to the status quo, with the equivalent of two
additional 500 place prisons still being needed.
4.16 As noted at paragraph 4.14, when changes to remission
are enacted, it is expected that there will be a further 1,000 prisoners on top of the
existing level of overcrowding. In anticipation of this eventuality and following
publication of last years Crime and Punishment proposals, Local Authorities were
invited to consider the siting of new prisons in their area. However, the lengthy planning
and construction time involved, indicated that it would take 4-5 years for any such
project to become operational. There are also considerable funding implications; for
example, the new prison at Bowhouse will be built under the Private Finance Initiative,
with initial construction costs for a 500 place prison being estimated at a minimum of
£60 million.
Medium Term Solutions
4.17 We believe that up to 500 additional places (or the
equivalent of one prison) could be provided if there was to be further building within
existing prison perimeters. These might not require such lengthy planning permission and
as land would not have to be bought, they might be a cheaper option. In addition, the
staffing infrastructure of the parent establishment would already be in place.
4.18 We estimate that space might exist for several such
blocks to be built - for example in Edinburgh, Shotts and Peterhead with space also
possibly existing for a further temporary or permanent block at Barlinnie. However, at
present the major obstacle is that there is no funding for the additional Discipline staff
who would be required to run these new buildings.
Other Solutions
4.19 We understand that consideration might be being given
to the use of temporary overflow sites but even if these could be found, there is no
funding for additional supervisory staff on present planning.
4.20 We estimate, however, that up to 500 places (or the
equivalent of one new prison) might be saved via the combination effect of various
diversionary schemes such as:
| The establishment in each of the
sheriffdoms but especially in the Greater Glasgow area, of many more bail beds for low
security risk remands. |
|
| A reduction in the number of
those being given custodial sentences and the adoption of many more court attendance
orders. |
|
| The practical realisation of many
more community service orders. |
|
| Greater use of drug addiction
clinics as a possibly cheaper alternative to custody. |
|
| An expansion of diversionary
schemes such as the Airborne Initiative (see also Annex 4). |
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|