| |
| THE STANDARD GRADE COURSES |
| Standard Grade has much to offer young
people in S3 and S4 because, in nearly all subjects,
courses are designed to match the needs of pupils of all
abilities. The way this is achieved differs from subject
to subject. For example, in mathematics, courses at three
levels have been developed while, in English, the course
is the same for all, but the skills to be acquired are
differentiated. In most cases, pupils are assessed by a
combination of internal and external means at or towards
the end of the two-year course. In most cases,
examination papers are differentiated with one set
leading to awards at Credit level (grades 1-2), another
to awards at General level (grades 3-4) and another to
awards at Foundation level (grades 5-6). Schools, in
consultation with parents, advise pupils on the most
appropriated examinations to take based on past
performance. However, it is open to pupils to take
examinations covering two adjacent levels if there is any
doubt as to the most appropriate level for them. |
| |
| ASSESSMENT AND CERTIFICATION |
| In Standard Grade courses, pupils are
assessed against performance standards related to the
three levels of award. Criteria for achievement at
Foundation, General and Credit Levels give a description
of what pupils achieving the award should know and be
able to do. At Credit level, a grade 1 award will
indicate a high degree of mastery of Credit level
criteria, while grade 2 will indicate a satisfactory
degree of mastery and similarly for grades 3 and 4 at
General level and grades 5 and 6 at Foundation level. The
award is this based on the achievements of the
individual, measured against stated standards, rather
than on how his or her achievements compare with those of
other candidates. Pupils must provide evidence of
achievement in all basic aspects or "elements"
of a subject before an overall grade can be awarded. For
example, in English, pupils will receive separate
assessments for Reading, Writing and Talking, as
well as an overall grade. A profile of performance
stating the grade obtained in each element will appear on
the Certificate beside the overall award for the course. |
| Elements will be assessed in a variety of
ways. In the majority of courses, pupils will have to
demonstrate attainment in oral or practical skills and
these skills will usually be assessed internally by the
class teacher on the basis of work done on the course.
Other elements, such as Writing in English will be
assessed on the basis of a folio of work submitted to the
Scottish Examination Board and a written examination.
Others will be assessed only through a written
examination. In all cases, even where an element is
assessed externally, teachers will submit estimates to
the Board, which may be used to improve the Boards
grades in cases of disagreement. |
| It is important to know that if an
assessment is not available for any element, for whatever
reason, no overall grade can be given for the course. The
only exception to this is when a pupil follows an adapted
course excluding an element because of a particular
disability. |
| The Scottish Certificate of Education will
record any Short Courses which have successfully been
completed. The school or college is responsible for
assessing candidates attainment in short courses,
although the Board will moderate these assessments to
make sure that national standards are being observed. |
| |
| THE SCOTTISH CERTIFICATE OF EDUCATION AT
HIGHER GRADE |
| The Higher Grade of the Scottish Certificate
of Education, usually taken in the fifth or sixth year of
secondary education, has continued to be the target for
many including those who aim to enter higher education or
take advanced courses in further education. Its place was
not affected by the introduction of Standard Grade, but
some adjustments were made to courses to create better
progression from Standard Grade. Theses revised Higher
Grade courses were developed in full consultation with
the teaching profession, education authorities, higher
education, industry and other interested bodies. Pupils
who achieve a Credit level award at Standard Grade would
normally sit the Higher Grade examination in that subject
after one more year of study. Pupils who achieve a
General level award at Standard Grade would normally
require a further two years of study before being ready
to take an examination at Higher Grade, although not all
schools are able to offer courses leading to Higher Grade
over two years. Sometimes, National Certificate modules
are used in fifth year as a bridge to a Higher in sixth
year. |
| |
| THE CERTIFICATE OF SIXTH YEAR STUDIES |
| The Certificate of Sixth Year Studies (CSYS)
is normally taken by pupils who obtain a pass at Higher
Grade in their fifth year and who wish to continue their
studies into sixth year. Minor changes to CSYS were
undertaken as a consequence of revision to Higher Grade. |
| |
| MODULES
AND SHORT COURSES POST-16 |
| Pupils
continuing in full-time education, and adults returning
to education can opt to study for National Certificate
modules or SEB Short Courses as an alternative or
complement to Higher Grade and CSYS courses. In some
schools and in colleges, modules are grouped together to
form programmes sometimes leading to a group award, for
example a schools Group Award or the General Scottish
Vocational Qualification (GSVQ). It is not unusual to
find schools operating in consortia, which may include a
further education college, in making provision post-16. |
| |
| THE
FUTURE |
| In March
1994, following consultation on the report of the Howie
Committee (a major review of curriculum and examinations
in the fifth and sixth years of secondary education) the
Secretary of State announced his decision in Higher
Still: Opportunity for All to introduce a new,
post-16 system for students in schools and colleges. Thus
the Higher Still Development Programme was launched,
involving partnership between the Scottish Office
Education Department, SCOTVEC, SEB, education
authorities, further education, higher education,
parents representatives and other interested
bodies. In 1998-1999, a new framework of units (modules),
courses and group awards will replace existing
qualifications. This new framework should ensure: |
- Higher
standards of attainment for all students
- Recognised
qualifications for all students
- An
even gradient of progression from earlier
achievements
- Opportunities
to ensure that students attain qualifications in
a broad range of subjects
- Competence
in core skills
- One
unified curriculum and assessment system which is
easier to understand and use.
|
| The
Higher Still Development Programme will seek to ensure
good progression from Standard Grade courses but will not
involve change to these courses or to the stage at which
they are taken. Standard Grade courses will, however,
continue to be responsive to changing circumstances, for
example scientific and technological advances or to
societal needs. |
| In August
1995, the Secretary of State announced his decision to
set up a new qualifications body taking over the existing
functions of SCOTVEC and SEB and the certification of
Higher Still. |
| |
| APPENDIX
1 |
| Arrangements
until 1986 |
| Until
1986, examinations taken at the end of S4 were for the
Ordinary Grade, which was introduced in 1962 for the top
30% of the ability range. In practise, far more than 30%
took the Ordinary Grade, and by 1985, 75% of all school
leavers held at least one award at Ordinary Grade.
However, a substantial minority of school leavers still
held no nationally recognised certificates recording
their achievements at school. In addition, many pupils
achieved very limited success in the Ordinary Grade
courses which they attempted, while the same examination
provided insufficient challenge for the pupils of highest
ability. Furthermore, these pupils were faced with only
two terms in which to complete much more demanding Higher
Grade syllabuses, a situation which was widely
criticised. Thus, there were weaknesses in the provision
of courses and qualifications to meet the needs of the
full ability range and to ensure appropriate progression
to Higher Grade. |
| |
| The
Munn and Dunning Reports |
| The first
steps to remedy these problems were taken with the
setting up of the Munn and Dunning Committees, whose
reports were published in 1977. Briefly, the Munn Report
recommended a restructuring of the curriculum to be
followed in S3 an S4 to meet the needs of the pupils of
all abilities; the introduction of teaching and learning
methods which reflected pupils needs and
circumstances; and the development of new courses which
crossed traditional subject boundaries. The Dunning
Committee recommended that all pupils should be given the
opportunity to take courses leading to the Scottish
Certificate of Education and that both examinations and
internal assessment by teachers should play a part in
determining awards. All pupils should be assessed in a
way which would enable them to demonstrate positive
achievement. |
| |
| The
Standard Grade Development Programme |
| In 1983,
after widespread consultation, the Secretary of State
announced his intention to proceed with reforms based on
the reports of the Munn and Dunning Committees. The
Scottish Education Department worked closely with the
Scottish Consultative Council on the Curriculum, the
Scottish Examination Board and education authorities
throughout the Development Programme. Courses were
introduced in four phases with the first group of
subjects coming on stream in 1984 for examination in 1986
and the last in 1989 for examination in 1991. Since then,
other courses have been added as needs have been
identified, for example English Alternative
Communication and English Spoken were introduced
in 1994; and Urdu will be introduced in 1997. A period of
overlap with the former Ordinary Grade examinations
enabled education authorities and schools to match the
pace of change to the support available. Exemplar
teaching and learning materials, produced nationally,
assisted teachers in the early years of implementation. |
| |
| Support
for Introduction |
| The
successful implementation of Standard Grade was in large
measure due to the level of involvement of teachers,
education authorities, examinations officers and HM
Inspectors working with the Scottish Office Education
Department (SOED) and SEB in the first instance to
develop the courses and latterly with SOED and the
Scottish Consultative Council on the Curriculum to
develop support materials for teachers. Other agencies
also lent their support, for example industry advised on
and sponsored a number of the materials developed for use
in schools. |