The Scottish Office (Back)
HM Inspectorate of Prisons for Scotland
Annual Report 1994-95
 
SPS PERFORMANCE MEASURES AND KEY TARGETS 1994-95
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1 During the course of each financial year the Prisons Inspectorate examines every prison in Scotland, either through a 5-10 day formal programme or via short unannounced visits. These are then followed by published written reports: in this respect 1994-95 was no different to any other year. However this Annual Report, which described trends, is more detailed than its predecessors in order to describe the many and significant developments which have taken place throughout the year, which also was the SPS’s second as an Executive Agency of The Scottish Office.
1.2 Detailed and impressive results of a wide range of initiatives, some of which were started several years ago, are now beginning to take effect; they are noticeable on a growing scale. For example, there have been considerable improvements to the Prison Estate, including the initial formation of two new Units. Further improvements have also been announced for the coming year: these include enhancements to Victorian era buildings such as the Halls at HMP Barlinnie, which are long overdue.
1.3 Prisoner ‘Opportunity’ agendas have similarly been expanding. These are mainly aimed at trying to change individual attitudes so that there can be a sustained reduction in recidivism: current rates are often depressingly high. Other important developments have included: the publication of new Prison Rules, which came into effect on 1 November 1994, the first such change for 40 years; prisoners were each issued with a ‘Prisoner Information Pack’ at the same time. A Prisons Complaints Commissioner was also appointed. Additionally, useful insights into prisoner (and staff) expectations were obtained through the publication of a ‘Second Prison Survey’. Far-reaching changes to the dispersal of women prisoners were also announced.
1.4 Prison staff have been subjected to all these changes, together with the considerable effects of last years Staffing Structure Review (SSR). The latter is leading to sweeping changes in pay and working conditions, having been the cause of considerable anxiety in preceding months. The Criminal Justice and Public Order Act separately removed the right of any Prison staff to discuss or take industrial action. Meanwhile a number of new education contracts were awarded as the result of competitive tendering and market testing was applied to the Works staff. Controversial changes to nursing staff support are also being made following an earlier review.
1.5 From the following pages it will be seen that the SPS is fulfilling its mission statement: it was a particularly good year for Custody, Order and Control in all its establishments. However as the SPS recognises itself, there are areas which still require improvement, many of which are highlighted in our report, including some fundamental problems which have persisted for some time. For example, chronic overcrowding has continued at 4 prisons during 1994-95. Lack of full-time work was also an increasing difficulty in some, but not all worksheds. Meanwhile a very disturbing rise in the number of suicides was experienced for which no common cause has yet been identified, although there could be connections with national trends for younger males. Drug abuse was also still of great concern, for obvious legal, health and control reasons.
 
SPS PERFORMANCE MEASURES AND KEY TARGETS 1994-95
MEASURE TARGET RESULT
The number of prisoners unlawfully at large. (a) No ‘A’ Category prisoner should escape.
(b) The number of escapes by ‘B’ Category prisoners should not exceed 2.5 per 1,000 prisoners - ie no more than 14.
(a) Target met.
(b) Target met - there were 7 such escapes.
The number of significant incidents. There should be no more than 11. Target met - there was 1.
The number of serious assaults on staff and prisoners. (a) The number of serious assaults on staff should not exceed 5 per 1,000 - ie no more than 23.
(b) The number of serious assaults on prisoners by prisoners should not exceed 11 per 1,000 prisoners - ie no more than 56.
Target met - there were 5.
Target met - there were 50.
Basic quality of life for prisoners. 60% of prisoners to have access to night sanitation. Target met -60-61%.
Opportunities for prisoner self development. 80% of convicted prisoners to have at least 7 hours per working day of programmed activities. Target met. 89% of convicted prisoners had 7.6 hours per day in such activities.
Time out of cell for unconvicted prisoners. 25% (6 hours in every 24) out of cell activities. Target met. 30%.
Average cost per prisoner place. To remain within £26,624 per annum. Target met. £26,008.
Levels of staff sickness. No more than average of 18 days. Target met. (17.7 days).
SPS costs included:
Staff salaries £114 million
Total £165.6 million