| Scotland's
Diet: The Problem |
| 1.1 The
Report on the Scottish Diet, published in 1993, commented
that: "Given the clear benefits that can come from
dietary change and the evidence from national data on
diet and disease that improvements are under way, the
issue is how best to accelerate the process in Scotland
so that many more people can benefit from improved
health." |
| 1.2 The
Scottish Diet Action Plan seeks to address this task
through a concerted approach to dietary improvement. |
| 1.3 A
well-balanced diet is vital to good health. Conversely, a
badly balanced diet is harmful and predisposes people to
a variety of serious illnesses including diabetes,
coronary heart disease and some cancers. Our diet in
Scotland is notoriously unhealthy and worse than that of
almost any other country in the Western world. Indeed,
next to smoking, it is the most significant reason for
our poor health record. Children's diets are particularly
poor, with many failing to eat green vegetables and
fruit. Sugar consumption is high, especially among
children, leaving a legacy of tooth decay among all ages,
particularly in deprived population groups who neither
have the benefits of fluoridation in the public water
supply nor compensate for its absence by using
fluoridated toothpaste. |
| 1.4 Put into
context, death in middle age in Scotland is twice as
likely as in many western European countries. Over 2,600
people under 65 die each year from coronary heart
disease, over 4,000 from cancers and around 700 from
strokes. Our poor eating habits are a significant factor
in many of these premature deaths. The probability of
dying under the age of 65 is currently 34% greater than
in England. Moreover, diet-related disease among the
population contributes substantially to healthcare costs
in Scotland and to a much reduced quality of life for
sufferers. |
| |
| Recognition
of the problem |
| 1.5 The
decisive influence of diet on our health was acknowledged
by the Government in the 1991 national policy statement,
"Health Education in Scotland". For the first
time, a policy was articulated which set national
priorities and health targets to tackle the main causes
of premature death in Scotland; emphasised the importance
of healthy lifestyles; and identified the achievement of
a better diet as a priority for action. A further
Government policy statement, "Scotland's Health - A
Challenge To Us All", followed in 1992. This
comprehensive document identified a range of initiatives
designed to facilitate progress towards the health
targets. |
| 1.6 In
response to the vital need to improve Scotland's diet, a
multidisciplinary Working Party was established under the
chairmanship of Professor Philip James, Director of the
Rowett Research Institute. The Working Party was charged
with the specific task of surveying the Scottish diet and
of making recommendations on the improvements required.
Its Report, published in 1993, leaves no doubt about the
direct relationship between poor diet and coronary heart
disease, stroke and cancer and about the disease patterns
and premature mortality of the Scottish people being
heavily influenced by their dietary habits. The Report
concludes that the health of Scots, of all ages, is being
adversely affected by an unhealthy balance of diet which
is low in cereals, vegetables and fresh fruit but rich in
confectionery, meat and dairy products with high
saturated fat contents, sweet and salty snacks, baked
goods of an unhealthy composition and excessive amounts
of sugary drinks. As a result of these eating patterns,
the Scottish diet is short of certain vitamins and fibre
and contains an excess of saturated fat, refined sugar
and salt. |
| |
| The
Government's Response |
| 1.7 The
Government accepted the findings of the James Report as
an authoritative base from which to proceed. After
consultation involving a wide spectrum of interests,
including the NHS and other health and dental interests;
the agriculture, fishing, manufacturing and catering
industries; the retail sector; local authority and
community interests; consumer organisations;
educationalists; voluntary organisations and Government
Departments, a number of key national dietary targets
were set for Scotland, based on the Report's
recommendations and targets. These targets, for the year
2005, are set out below. |
| Fruit
and vegetables: average intake to double to more
than 400 grams per day. |
| Bread:
intake to increase by 45% from present daily intake of
106 grams, mainly using wholemeal and brown breads. |
| Breakfast
cereals: average intake to double from the present
intake of 17 grams per day. |
Fats:
- average intake of
total fat to reduce from 40.7% to no more than
35% of food energy.
- average intake of
saturated fatty acids to reduce from 16.6% to no
more than 11% of food energy.
|
| Salt: average
sodium intake to reduce from 163 mmol per day to 100 mmol
per day. (It is the sodium rather than the salt (sodium
chloride) content of the diet which matters and some
foods contain significant quantities of other sodium
salts eg sodium glutamate. For convenience, however, and
ease of comprehension, reference will be made to
"salt" throughout the text.) |
Sugar:
- average intake of NME
sugars in adults not to increase.
- average intake of NME
sugars in children to reduce by half to less than
10% of total energy.
|
| Breast-feeding:
the proportion of mothers breast-feeding their babies for
the first 6 weeks of life to increase to more than 50%
from the present level of around 30%. |
| Total complex
carbohydrates: increase average non-sugar
carbohydrates intake by 25% from 124 grams per day
through increased consumption of fruit and vegetables,
bread, breakfast cereals, rice and pasta and through an
increase of 25% in potato consumption. |
Fish:
- white fish
consumption to be maintained at current levels
- oil rich fish
consumption to double from 44 grams per week to
88 grams per week.
|
| 1.8 These targets are
challenging. They cannot be met solely by providing
further dietary education and advice to consumers,
although this will continue to be very important. Nor can
they be met from intake of dietary supplements or vitamin
tablets. They demand, in addition, the commitment,
interaction, co-operation and support of the wide range
of interests involved in all aspects of the food chain,
both directly and indirectly. |
| |
| The Action Plan |
| 1.9 The fundamental
changes required in the Scottish diet will take time to
achieve and will need careful planning and
implementation. To facilitate this process, the Secretary
of State for Scotland established the Scottish Diet
Action Group in November 1994 to develop an Action Plan,
with the aim of engaging the commitment and involvement
of the wide range of interests in a position to
contribute to dietary improvement. The Group was led by
the Minister of State at The Scottish Office with
responsibility for health matters. Its remit and full
membership are set out in the Appendix. The Group was
representative of a broad spectrum of expertise - from
farmers and other primary producers through to food
manufacturers, retailers, caterers, consumers, health
professionals, community and education interests and the
media. From the outset, despite this wide diversity of
interests, a clear commonality of purpose and consensus
of view existed within the Group about the need for
improvement in the Scottish diet and the approach
required to achieve this. |
| 1.10 As the work of the
Action Group progressed it became increasingly clear that
the most immediate and attainable benefit to the Scottish
diet would be an increase in the consumption of fruit and
vegetables and of complex carbohydrates from foods such
as potatoes, wholemeal bread and cereals. The challenge
now lies in ensuring that all sectors of Scottish society
recognise both the need to change their diet and the
extent of the change required to improve their health and
wellbeing. Each sector needs to recognise its role and to
contribute to producing an environment where an increase
in fruit, vegetables, cereal and fish consumption is
readily achievable by individuals throughout Scotland. |
| 1.11 Achieving the
remaining dietary targets of reduced intake of fats, salt
and sugar may take longer because of significant barriers
to change. These include our historically strong
attachment to less healthy foods and our cultural
reluctance to experiment with new foods and cooking
methods and healthier products, although the latter is
now beginning to show signs of being less entrenched; the
restricted availability of, and access to, high quality
fruit, vegetables, fish etc for vulnerable consumers in
low income groups; and the predominantly demand-led
market philosophy of producers, manufacturers and
processors, who have been generally reluctant to initiate
new replacement healthy food products because of
potential consumer resistance. The Group had little doubt
that these barriers could be reduced - some more quickly
than others - if the key participants in the food chain
were to acknowledge their potential contribution to
improving the health of Scotland and work together, with
health policy planners and health promotion agencies, to
bring the dietary targets within reach by 2005. Such an
acknowledgement by the food chain would represent a clear
and public demonstration of its social responsibility in
seeking to take into account, in its commercial
operations, the health and well-being of its customers. |
1.12 This Action Plan
looks at the changes required in the diet of the Scottish
population in general and of particular groups such as
those living in disadvantaged areas, pregnant women,
babies, pre-school children and school students; it
identifies the contribution which the Group considers
each of the key interests exercising major influence over
the Scottish diet is capable of making to dietary
improvement; and it proposes actions for all of them. The
key "influencers" are:
- community
organisations
- consumer
organisations
- Government and its
agencies
- local authorities
- manufacturers and
processors
- the media
- the National Health
Service
- primary producers
- retailers
- schools
- the voluntary sector
|
| 1.13 A similar programme
of action is underway in England to tackle the dietary
problems which exist south of the Border. The Nutrition
Task Force, established under the "Health of the
Nation" strategy (the English equivalent to the
Scottish national policy statement of 1992), published
its plan of action "Eat Well" in March 1994 and
has since been working towards a programme of
implementation. Some of that will be undertaken on a GB
basis, eg in the areas of product labelling and product
development, and this will bring benefits to Scotland. |
| |
| Role of the
Government and its Agencies |
| 1.14 Much of the action
to achieve the dietary targets and consequential
improvements in health necessarily rests with consumers
and the food industry itself. But the task is very great
and will be difficult to undertake effectively, and on
the timescale needed, without the support of central
Government. It is vital to the success of the Plan,
therefore, for Scottish Office Ministers, The Scottish
Office, and relevant Government agencies to demonstrate
their commitment to the improvement of the Scottish diet
in principle and in three practical ways - by directly
facilitating a better understanding of dietary issues by
the general public, the food industry and health and
educational professionals; by providing support,
(including, where appropriate, resources,) to encourage
the key actions and initiatives required; and by closely
monitoring and evaluating progress. |
| |
| Monitoring of
progress and evaluation |
| 1.15 A substantial part
of the Government's contribution should be provided at
working level by The Scottish Office and by Government
Agencies. But we propose, in addition, that the Public
Health Policy Unit of The Scottish Office Department of
Health should have responsibility for monitoring the
delivery of the action recommended in the Plan. The Unit
should report annually to The Scottish Office
Interdepartmental Group on Health Strategy, whose members
are senior representatives of each of The Scottish Office
Departments including agriculture, industry and
education. The Interdepartmental Group should maintain an
overview of progress both in the implementation of the
Plan and towards achievement of the dietary targets.
Reporting mechanisms to brief the Policy Unit and
Interdepartmental Group in their task include the
recently introduced Scottish Health Survey, together with
the National Diet and Nutrition Survey. These will
provide an important database from which to monitor and
evaluate changes in eating habits over the next 10 years.
The first Scottish Health Survey is currently underway
and will be repeated at 3 yearly intervals, providing a
regular and consistent monitoring mechanism. The first
results are due to be published in March, 1997. |
| |
| Resource
Implications |
| 1.16 The Action Plan is a
framework for a concerted programme to achieve dietary
targets. We cannot impose the tasks we see as important,
though we can and do press their case hard. Previous
reports have confirmed a willingness on all sides to help
improve Scotland's diet. It is already the mission of
many in health and education, for example, to do so. For
others, in food production and marketing, there are
opportunities to shape and respond to market demand as
part of a constantly changing pattern of investment and
targeting. |
| 1.17 A conventional cost
benefit analysis of the resources needed and likely
savings within the NHS from effective action would be
complex and time-consuming, with the collation and
recalculation of a very wide range of both direct and
indirect costs. Thus to the conventional costs of
hospital and health centre care has to be added the cost
of time lost from work, the excess cost of disability
pensions, the infrastructure cost of diverting resources
to cope with the extra demand, and the social costs of
illness within the community. One example of diet-related
health costs which has been estimated in several Western
countries is that of obesity where 7-10% of total health
care costs have been related to this condition, both
directly and indirectly, through its contribution to
other diseases such as diabetes, high blood pressure and
heart disease. In Finland, the costs of treating high
blood pressure have fallen in the last 15 years because
only a quarter of the numbers previously treated now have
this condition. Similarly, premature deaths from stroke
and coronary heart disease have fallen by 60-75%.
Scotland has, per capita, a substantially higher demand
on health care than England and Wales, this reflecting,
in part, the extra burden of the diet-related diseases.
Such costs will not fall, immediately, however, as
dietary changes occur because the corollary of a
projected decline in death rates from cardiovascular
disease may be an increase in the total numbers surviving
with coronary artery disease or strokes. These additional
patients will be in need of treatment. A lengthening life
expectancy may also bring additional health care costs.
The challenge, therefore, is to improve health by dietary
means so that there is minimum ill-health until late in
life. |
| 1.18 As indicated in
paragraph 1.17 the costs and benefits are broader than
those relating to the Health Service alone. Although
detailed analysis is difficult, it seems feasible that
exploitation of new markets for fish, fruit and
vegetables, cereals and leaner meat will offer rewards
for primary producers which growing demand among more
health conscious consumers will boost. Adjusting food
products to make them healthier will carry costs for
manufacturers, processors and, in some cases, retailers,
but, carried out over a period, against the need to
respond to changing consumer perceptions and demands
which are already evident, they will also bring
commercial rewards. Adaptations in training and
information for key staff, so that nutrition is better
covered, can generally build on courses and opportunities
already in place, but there will be development costs. |
| 1.19 A number of early
tasks have been identified and costed. For these we
recommend funding from The Scottish Office, in particular
the appointment of a national project officer to promote
and focus dietary initiatives within low income
communities within a national strategic framework, the
introduction of a pilot scheme providing a low cost (or
free) nutritional advisory service for caterers and the
issue of a mailshot on healthy eating to all Scottish
households. Another large task - the preparation of the
Model Nutritional Guidelines for Catering Specifications
for the Public Sector in Scotland - has already been
tackled; the Guidelines accompany this Action Plan. A
great deal can be done with existing personnel and
structures. Recurrent investment in new educational,
health and other resources can be used to redirect
programmes to facilitate dietary change. But some
short-term resource will be needed to stimulate
initiatives jointly or sequentially in different sectors.
We would expect the agencies as well as departments of
Government in Scotland to act in support of these
recommendations wherever they can. |
| |
| Timescales |
| 1.20 The Action Plan
signposts the way towards achievement of the dietary
targets set for the year 2005. The process and pace of
change towards that destination will necessarily vary
across the sectors concerned. The Plan does not,
therefore, set milestones along the route to be reached
within rigid timescales. To do so would be impracticable
and intrusive. Instead the Group concluded that the
various interests involved should be encouraged to
initiate the necessary action to set timescales which are
practical within their own settings but which result in
the achievement of the dietary targets for 2005. The
Chief Medical Officer for Scotland and the Public Health
Policy Unit will require to monitor closely the action
being taken and its progress, and to report annually to
the Interdepartmental Group, on Health Strategy. |
| |
| Terminology |
| 1.21 In this Action Plan
we refer, variously, to "healthy" and
"unhealthy" foods. This is a form of shorthand
for ease of reference for the reader. In practice, there
are no intrinsically healthy or unhealthy foods, (other
than those contaminated with bacteria or toxins), only
healthy and unhealthy diets in which the diet is either
well balanced and thus "healthy" or poorly
balanced and thus "unhealthy". |
| |
| Consultation on
the Action Plan |
| 1.22 The Group has drawn,
in its work, on the great goodwill that was evident
following publication of the Report on the Scottish Diet
in 1993. The Group's wide span of membership brought
expert contributions from food and catering, as well as
education and health. This included sectors which are not
brought together in Scotland by representative groups.
From the Group's collective knowledge and experience have
come recommendations with a real impact for good on the
Scottish diet. The Group has been further guided by
helpful advice from key agencies about particular
proposals - designed to test practicality - and
acknowledges there too a wide debt. Further discussions
will be necessary with the different sectors, as the
exploratory steps and developments recommended are
completed, and wider action taken on board. |
| |
| Conclusion |
| 1.23 As we indicate in
paragraph 1.12 the proposals in the Action Plan are
discussed and presented according to the various sectoral
interests and agencies which we believe are capable of
exercising major influence on the nature of the Scottish
diet. They are many in number. Co-ordinated and concerted
action between them will be essential if the dietary
targets are to be achieved. The common objective must be
to ensure that the barriers to a healthy diet are removed
as quickly as possible, and that the public can be
encouraged and enabled to make informed and sensible
healthy food choices. The Action Plan seeks to address
how this objective can be achieved and the dietary
targets secured. If the Plan is taken forward
effectively, the benefits will be experienced by the
whole population within a 10 to 15 year period. But the
most significant health gain of all will be the legacy
for our children, and succeeding generations, of an
improved quality of health and life expectancy. |