| Introduction |
| A review inspection of Strathclyde Police was
conducted in June 1998 by HMIC's Assistant Inspector of Constabulary, Mr David Garbutt and
Her Majesty's Lay Inspector, Mr Graham Harcus. |
| Inspections of police forces are carried out
according to a three-year cycle. In the first year, a comprehensive primary inspection of
management and operational functions takes place, out of which recommendations arise. In
year two, a review inspection examines progress on these, together with any other
significant changes or developments. In year three, HMIC visits the force to discuss any
matters of importance following the review inspection. The primary and review inspection
reports are published. |
| The first step in the inspection process is
information gathering. All forces supply statistical information annually to Her Majesty's
Inspectorate of Constabulary (HMIC) in a standard format and this is fed into a
computerised database, which allows comparative analysis of data. HMIC sends out a
comprehensive list of questions based primarily on the recommendations and good practice
advice contained in the report of the primary inspection. The questions also cover a wide
range of police functions and matters of current interest in respect of the force and the
police service nationally. These require a written reply. |
| When information gathering is complete, a
staff officer from HMIC spends some time in the force visiting and interviewing a
cross-section of police and support staff in divisional and departmental posts. This forms
the basis for briefing HM Inspectors. During the inspection, the Assistant Inspector of
Constabulary meets with the clerk to the Joint Police Board to identify any current issues
relevant to the process. |
| The inspection sought to assess the
efficiency and effectiveness of the force by reviewing data, processes and results across
a whole range of operational and support activities. Visits were made to headquarters
departments, operational and support services and to territorial divisions. Interviews
were held with staff at all levels, including representatives of the staff associations
and unions. |
| This report provides an informed assessment
of the force, based on professional judgement. It does not represent a comprehensive
account of all its activities. That function is fulfilled by the annual report of the
Chief Constable. A summary of recommendations is attached at Appendix B and a list of
observations and good practice at Appendix C. |
|
