| Safeguards for the Community |
| 3.24
The wider community in any local authority area will
continue to have a strong interest in the houses which
are transferred to new community landlords. It will want
to be re-assured that the houses are well managed and
that public resources are used to good effect. It will
also be important that housing continues to be allocated
fairly and that full account is taken of the needs of the
homeless and other vulnerable groups. |
| |
| Regulation of Landlords |
| 3.25
Until recently, Scottish Homes has only been able to
register and supervise housing associations. The advent
of New Housing Partnerships has encouraged local
authorities to consider setting up other types of
landlord to provide affordable rented housing which would
not necessarily be housing associations, for example
local housing trusts. The Government believes that
regulating these new landlords should bring benefits to
tenants, local authorities and the landlords themselves. |
| 3.26
A Working Group on the regulation of new landlords
(consisting of representatives of the Scottish Office,
COSLA, Scottish Homes, the Chartered Institute of Housing
in Scotland and the Scottish Federation of Housing
Associations) set up to consider this issue recommended
in 1997 that, in the long term, both housing associations
and other types of new landlord should be regulated under
statute. The Group recognised the scope, within existing
legislation, for Scottish Homes to develop a new set of
rules for statutory registration which would encompass
more flexibility. The Group further recommended that
Scottish Homes should establish a new register for
landlords who were not currently eligible for statutory
registration, but who could be regulated by contract.
Following consultation, the Government accepted the
recommendations of the Working Group and asked Scottish
Homes to amend its criteria for the registration of
housing associations under statute and make arrangements
for registration of other landlords under contract. All
landlords registered with Scottish Homes will, however,
be known as Registered Social Landlords. |
| 3.27
All new landlord organisations benefiting from New
Housing Partnerships' funding will be required to
register with Scottish Homes as this provides a safeguard
for tenants, for local authorities and for private
lenders. Registration means that landlords have to prove
that they can provide and manage rented housing to a high
standard. Their performance will be measured against a
set of performance standards which require them to treat
their tenants fairly and properly at all times and
consult them for their views. These standards will also
require them to manage their houses efficiently, deal
with repairs promptly and make sure that they provide
good value for money. Tenants can take comfort from the
fact that Scottish Homes uses a system of tried and
tested supervision procedures to check that the standards
are being met and will take action if they are not. |
| 3.28
Registration also means that tenants are safeguarded in
the knowledge that their landlord is committed to
long-term affordable rented housing and to improving the
quality of service. Any surpluses made by registered
social landlords can only be used to improve the quality
of the housing and the housing management services. The
members of the Board cannot benefit from their position
by receiving payments in cash or in kind. |
| 3.29
Finally, registration will ensure that the new landlord
is controlled only by its governing body. Registered
social landlords are expected to be under the absolute
control of this body, which must act independently of any
other organisation. |
| 3.30
Although we have asked Scottish Homes to establish a
contractual system of regulation for those new landlords
who are not covered by existing statutory requirements,
we consider, in line with the Working Group report
recommendation, that a single, unified statutory system
would be preferable in due course. A further possibility,
discussed in Chapter 4, would be to establish a single
regulatory system which would also cover local
authorities' housing activities. |
| |
- Views
are sought on whether establishing a single
statutory system of regulation for all registered
social landlords should be an early legislative
priority for the new Scottish Parliament.
|
| |
| Allocation of Tenancies and
Responsibilities towards the Homeless |
| 3.31
The setting up of transfer partnerships involving
transfers of all or a substantial proportion of the
housing stock in any particular local authority will have
significant implications for the allocation of tenancies.
These will need to be considered carefully both by the
local authorities sponsoring the transfer and the new
community landlords themselves. The operational
responsibility for allocating houses must be transferred
to the new community landlords if they are genuinely to
have control over their own affairs. It will, however, be
essential to ensure that sufficient housing is available
to the local authority to meet its statutory obligations,
particularly its duties in relation to homeless persons
as set out in Part II of the Housing (Scotland) Act 1987,
and that operational responsibility is exercised within a
framework that ensures that allocation policies continue
to take account of the full range of housing need,
including the needs of those requiring care in the
community and other vulnerable groups. |
3.32
Local authorities will be expected to enter into new
contractual arrangements with the new community landlords
to ensure that this framework is established. These
contractual arrangements should cover:
- agreement on the
broad priorities to be applied by the new
community landlords when considering applications
for houses on their waiting list, for example,
that priority should be given to persons assessed
by the local authority as unintentionally
homeless and in priority need; persons occupying
houses which do not meet the tolerable standard;
persons occupying overcrowded houses; etc;
- agreement on
nomination arrangements to ensure that the
council is able to meet its statutory duties and
agreement over the way in which these nomination
rights should be exercised. For example, many
councils already have nomination agreements with
housing associations operating in their areas.
These generally give them access to around 50% of
an association's lets. Where a council is
transferring housing to a new community landlord,
the contract of sale should clearly define the
rights and responsibilities of both partners in
this area. In particular, the local authority
will want to ensure that the proposed nomination
arrangements provide sufficient housing of the
right type and in the right place to allow local
authorities to meet their homelessness
responsibilities; to implement their strategic
responsibilities in community care which require
access to a supply of affordable rented housing,
for example, as part of the running down of a
long stay hospital in the area; and to meet the
needs of other vulnerable groups; and,
- agreement that, as
far as possible, houses built to meet the needs
of a specific group within the community, for
example, houses built for wheelchair users or
houses which have major adaptations to make them
suitable for the disabled, should be used for
this purpose.
|
| The
extension of regulation by Scottish Homes to the new
community landlords will also ensure that allocation
policies are carefully assessed and monitored. |
3.33
The Government's view, then, is that the statutory duties
relating to homelessness should continue to remain with
the local authority as the strategic housing authority in
the area and that it would be impractical and undesirable
for these duties to be transferred to each community
landlord. Nevertheless, there may be a case for some
change in the legislation. One area that may need to be
looked at is the operation of nomination arrangements in
relation to homeless people. The contractual arrangements
that are put in place between local authorities and new
community landlords might benefit from statutory
underpinning to ensure that the unintentionally homeless
in priority need get early access to permanent
accommodation. A second possibility would be to ensure
that the new community landlords are subject to some of
the statutory requirements that currently apply to the
management of waiting lists and the allocation of houses
by local authorities. For example, at present:
- section 19 of the
Housing (Scotland) Act 1987 specifies that the
local authority shall not take account of certain
factors (e.g. age for those over 16, income, etc)
in considering whether an applicant is entitled
to be admitted to a housing list;
- section 20 of the
1987 Act requires the local authority in
allocating houses to ensure that reasonable
preference is given to persons with specified
needs including homeless persons and that other
factors are not taken into account, (e.g. length
of residence, age over 16, income, etc); and,
- section 21 of the
1987 Act requires the local authority to publish
any rules which it applies governing admission of
applicants to the waiting list and priorities for
allocations and transfers.
|
| |
- Views
are sought on the need for new statutory
provisions on allocations, to safeguard access
for particular groups.
|
| |
| 3.34
The establishment of new community landlords could lead
to a significant increase in the number of organisations
letting affordable rented housing within the socially
rented sector. There is already considerable interest in
establishing common housing registers in any particular
local authority area which would allow potential
applicants to record their interest in obtaining a house,
together with relevant information on their
circumstances, on a single register available to all
relevant landlords. The existence of a common housing
register does not prevent individual landlords from
deciding which applicants should be accepted on to their
waiting lists or priorities for re-housing from these
lists. The arguments for common housing registers are
likely to become even stronger as the community ownership
programme is developed. We look to local authorities to
take the lead in establishing and agreeing common housing
registers for applicants in their areas within a
framework which would still allow individual community
landlords to shape their own allocation priorities. |
| |
- Views
are sought on the need for common housing
registers to be established which would cover all
community and social landlords in a local
authority area.
|
| |
| Community
Ownership and Neighbourhood Regeneration |
| 3.35
Chapter 2 has already discussed the important role of the
housing sector in creating and sustaining employment and
training opportunities. The extension of community
ownership and stock transfers from local authorities will
create substantial potential for new investment to
upgrade and improve housing in Scotland. This investment
will be spread over a number of years and the precise
levels and timing of investment will depend on the
resources available from the public and private sectors.
It should generate significant numbers of new jobs in the
construction sector and, in addition, the new community
landlords will have access to large revenue streams for
the management and maintenance of their housing stock.
There should, therefore, be excellent opportunities for
generating local employment and boosting the confidence
of the communities concerned. |
| 3.36
This work will often take place in areas where there are
few local job opportunities at present and will give
people the opportunity for productive work within their
community, especially where landlords and contractors can
be encouraged to use locally hired labour. A key priority
will be to develop within communities the skills needed
for housing improvement and refurbishment. These will
range from basic entry level skills which can be acquired
largely through on-the-job training through to higher
skill levels which will require a longer period of
apprenticeship training. By linking housing investment
with job creation and training through the New Deal we
can ensure that local people in the communities involved
have the skills that they need to compete for jobs and
that they are ready to take on work. One approach which
has been used successfully is for employers to guarantee
an interview for people who successfully complete an
initial period of training. This ensures that local
unemployed people acquire skills and have the opportunity
to compete for jobs. |
| 3.37 There
will be benefits for contractors, and for local people
and communities, in using a locally based workforce. It
will reduce the costs of travel and should help to ensure
a committed and motivated workforce. For the community,
there will be benefits in terms of jobs, which would not
otherwise be there, and benefits in terms of local
incomes and potential spending on services. There may
also be opportunities for existing local firms to benefit
from both the initial refurbishment work and subsequent
maintenance contracts and, in time, for new local
businesses to be established. 3.38 Chapter 2 also referred to the
possibility that housing associations, particularly
community based housing associations and co-operatives,
might play a wider role in their areas which might
encompass both local economic development and local
service delivery initiatives. New community landlords
might, in time, also wish to contribute to neighbourhood
regeneration by developing a wider role along these
lines.
|
 |
| |
Craigmillar, Edinburgh.
|
| The Position of
Local Authority Staff |
| 3.39
The Government will expect local authorities in drawing
up plans for community ownership to give careful
consideration to the impact on existing local authority
staff. Staff who are directly affected by the transfer
may be protected by the Transfer of Undertakings and
Protection of Employment Regulations (TUPE) and local
authorities should aim to secure continuity of employment
on comparable terms and conditions as provided by their
current posts. They will, no doubt, also wish to ensure
that individual members of staff have access to
professional advice on their future employment and
associated terms and conditions. The experience of
Scottish Homes is that their staff who have transferred
to locally based housing associations as a result of
their stock transfer programme have often found that this
presented new career challenges and opportunities. |
| 3.40
Local authorities should also consider the position of
staff who might be affected indirectly, including staff
who may provide services to the Housing Department, for
example, local authority solicitors. Employees in Direct
Labour Organisations (DLOs) may be particularly affected
and, in the short term, it might be appropriate for the
local authority to make transitional arrangements with
the new community landlord to continue to provide these
services, for example for the remaining period of any
existing contract between the Housing Department and its
DLO. However, our view is that the fair and proper way
forward, beyond this initial period, would be for new
community landlords to award contracts for goods and
services following a normal competitive process and for
Direct Labour or Direct Service Organisations to be
allowed to compete on equal terms with other contractors. |
| |
- Views
are sought on this approach towards local
authority staff affected by community ownership
proposals.
|
| |
| Planning for
Community Ownership |
| 3.41
Changes of this magnitude need careful planning and
preparation. The Scottish Homes Initiatives Unit has
considerable relevant expertise as a result of experience
with arranging stock transfers over a number of years and
can provide advice and assistance to local authorities.
We have made it clear that the Scottish Office will be
prepared to consider New Housing Partnership bids for
feasibility studies and preparatory work generally, for
example, stock condition surveys. We have also recently
issued procedural guidance to local authorities. It is
essential that plans are taken forward in consultation
with tenants, other relevant interests such as local
housing associations, local authority staff
representatives, Scottish Homes and private sector
lenders. The wider community must also be given an
opportunity to understand what is being proposed and to
express views. Adequate time must be allowed for these
consultations. |
| |
| Housing Debt |
| 3.42
The Government recognises that the level of local
authority housing debt is a major barrier to large-scale
stock transfers in Scotland, particularly for those
councils where the value of the stock to a new landlord
is thought to be less than the outstanding debt. The
total local authority housing debt was estimated at £3.9
billion in April 1998, i.e. an average of almost £6,500
per house. The position varies from local authority to
local authority, but on the basis of the information
currently available the estimated receipts from the
transfer of all local authority houses in Scotland to
alternative social landlords would still leave a net
residual debt of around £2 billion. In addition, if debt
was actually repaid prematurely then this could expose
local authorities to significant breakage costs. The
problems associated with housing debt and the
implications for New Housing Partnerships are discussed
in a recent joint report by Scottish Homes and COSLA.2 |
| 3.43
We envisage that the Government will be prepared to
provide funding to tackle the outstanding debt problem in
those cases where stock transfer proposals represent good
value for money and are selected to proceed. It is
important to secure the fairest possible deal for the
taxpayer, and each bid must be considered on its merits.
Detailed arrangements to deal with the debt would
therefore need to be agreed in individual cases and be
affordable. But where a local authority's housing debt
exceeds the receipt from disposal of its stock we would
hope to arrive at an outcome which would have four
elements, as follows: (i) the local authority would be expected to
obtain the best possible receipt;
(ii) the whole of that
receipt would be used to repay part of the council's
outstanding housing debt;
(iii) the cost of the
premature repayment of debt (i.e. the breakage costs)
would be met from resources provided by the Scottish
Office; and,
(iv) the cost of servicing
the remaining (i.e. residual) debt would also be met by
resources provided by the Scottish Office.
|
| 3.
44 The arrangements for dealing with the existing public
sector debt on houses which are to be transferred into
community ownership will clear the way for new community
landlords to negotiate new investment from banks and
building societies in the private sector to undertake the
necessary repair and modernisation work. The net result
will be more and faster investment in affordable rented
housing by using central government support to lever in
additional resources from the private sector. |
| |
| Providing New
Affordable Rented Housing |
| 3.45
New Housing Partnerships provide an opportunity to
modernise and revitalise existing housing stock, but, as
Chapter 1 made clear, there is likely to be a continuing
need for new affordable rented housing. For some time now
almost all new affordable rented housing in Scotland has
been built by housing associations with government
support channelled through Scottish Homes and paid in the
form of a one-off grant for each new development. Since
the establishment of Scottish Homes in 1989, housing
associations in Scotland have built almost 40,000 new
houses for rent or for shared or low-cost home ownership
on this basis. |
| 3.46
Housing associations have established a clear track
record for building high quality new housing which is
well managed and let at affordable rents. Many housing
associations in Scotland operate at local or community
level and are well aware of the needs of their area;
others have developed a particular interest in meeting
the needs of specific client groups such as the elderly,
the disabled, or persons with learning disabilities. Over
the years, housing associations have developed a detailed
and specialised knowledge of the requirements of their
prospective tenants together with a willingness to
innovate. With the assistance and encouragement of
Scottish Homes, they have successfully managed to attract
over £600 million of private finance into new rented and
low cost home ownership housing since 1989. Housing
associations will have a continuing and important role to
play in the provision of new affordable rented housing in
Scotland and we have provided increased resources for
Scottish Homes for 1999-2000 to allow for a modest
expansion of the housing association development
programme. |
| |
| 3.47 The
housing association sector in Scotland is diverse and
characterised by a large number of small organisations -
two thirds own less than 500 units. What is needed is
arrangements that retain the advantages which result from
the current diversity and structure of housing
associations in Scotland whilst allowing for improved
economies in the commissioning of new building work. In
some cases, it may be sensible for smaller housing
associations to consider joint working. A possible
alternative to this would be for smaller housing
associations to make greater use of the expertise and
resources of some larger associations in development work
by using them as development agents. This might enable
both Scottish Homes and housing associations to increase
the value for money from development work, and it should
allow the existing smaller housing associations to
concentrate on the preparation of the development brief
for any new housing in their areas and its subsequent
management. |
 |
- Views
are sought on the scope for strengthening the
development work of housing associations and
achieving greater value for money through such
approaches.
|
Catering for diversity together:
Fountainbridge
Housing Association and Edinburgh Elderly
Chinese Association.
|
| |
| 3.48
Other types of landlord will also have a role to play in
providing new affordable rented housing alongside the
existing housing associations. With the help of resources
made available through the New Housing Partnerships
initiative, new social landlords are being established in
several areas with local authority and, in some cases,
housing association involvement to develop new affordable
rented housing and housing for sale. Resources are
already being made available under the New Housing
Partnership initiative for "development
partnerships" along these lines, to provide new
housing to meet housing need. It may well be that new
community landlords established as a result of stock
transfers from existing public sector landlords will also
wish to develop new building programmes although, in most
cases, their first priority is likely to be with the
repair and modernisation of their existing houses.
Although we are keen to encourage landlords which are not
conventional housing associations to get involved in
building new affordable rented housing, it will be
necessary for all landlords to agree to registration and
supervision by Scottish Homes, as a condition of
receiving any public funding. Moreover, we would wish to
encourage close co-operation between these landlords and
existing housing associations. |
| |
| Funding New
Affordable Rented Housing |
| 3.49
In 1998-99, the grant paid by Scottish Homes to housing
associations is expected to meet approximately 70%, on
average, of the cost of new building projects, although
the actual percentage varies from project to project.
This figure has reduced steadily since 1989. The
remainder of the cost is met from borrowing from the
private sector with the servicing costs, along with
management and maintenance expenditure, being set against
rental income. There is, therefore, a balance to be
struck between the initial level of grant provided and
ensuring that rents are affordable _ reducing the
effective grant rate enables more houses to be built for
a given amount of grant but a steep reduction in grants
is likely to have an adverse effect on rents with a
number of undesirable consequences. Housing Benefit costs
are likely to increase, the rents may be unaffordable for
households on relatively low incomes who do not qualify
for Housing Benefit, and households containing persons
who are looking for work may find that taking up
employment is not financially worthwhile because of the
loss of Housing Benefit. The Government considers that,
in general in Scotland, the grant arrangements for new
housing association developments have struck a reasonable
balance between the taxpayers interest in ensuring value
for money and the need for affordable rents. Although the
scope for reducing the effective grant percentage further
should be kept under review by Scottish Homes, the
Government sees no immediate prospect for significant
reductions. |
| 3.50
Nevertheless, there may well be scope for reducing the
costs of new building without compromising on quality or,
alternatively, achieving improvements in standards
without commensurate increases in costs. In 1997-98, the
overall average cost of a new rented house, approved for
grant aid by Scottish Homes, was approximately £56,000.
The proposals set out above for greater co-operation in
the work of developing housing associations may help to
reduce costs. In recent years, Scottish Homes has
initiated two competition pilots. The first, launched in
October 1995, asked housing associations to compete on
the basis of the lowest level of subsidy. Phase 2 was
launched in December 1996 and seeks to test whether
associations can deliver increased quality, innovation,
or both, against set costs. Scottish Homes has also
reviewed the procurement processes of housing
associations and is currently piloting an approach to
'bulk' purchasing with Perthshire Housing Association
which may have wider applicability. The Government
believes that Scottish Homes should be encouraged to take
forward initiatives of this nature and to ensure that
they are carefully evaluated so that any lessons learnt
can be applied more generally. |
| 3.51
The present arrangements for calculating the grant paid
to housing associations were developed some time ago. The
system is project based and uses a standard set of
assumptions applied to the first year of the project
relating to income and costs. Scottish Homes have
suggested a number of ways of achieving efficiencies. The
Scottish Office has asked Scottish Homes to work up these
ideas in more detail, in consultation with the Scottish
Federation of Housing Associations, with a view to
developing a set of proposals which could be considered
in more detail by Government. |
| 3.52
There might also be advantage, in the longer term, in
establishing a unitary grant system for all providers of
affordable rented housing. This new grant would be
payable to all landlords who have registered with
Scottish Homes whether on a statutory or on a contractual
basis. We would expect this change to follow on from the
introduction of any revised procedures for calculating
Housing Association Grant and the result would be a
Social Housing Grant based on these new procedures and
potentially available to both housing associations and
other relevant landlords. |
| |
- Views
are sought on the potential for longer term
changes to create a new unitary grant system for
all providers of affordable rented housing.
|
| |
| Conclusions |
| 3.53
The Government believes that its strategy for encouraging
community ownership of public sector housing offers the
prospect of fundamental and radical change which could
bring major benefits to tenants, local authorities and
communities. It has the potential to provide tenants with
a greater say in the ownership and management of their
housing and to improve the conditions of many thousands
of households that, at present, are faced with the
prospect of deteriorating housing conditions. For local
authorities it will provide the opportunity to accelerate
investment in their housing stock and encourage them to
take up a more strategic role in their approach to local
housing needs, as we discuss in more detail in the next
chapter. And for local communities, the strategy will
enable further decentralisation of decision-taking and
support community regeneration. |
3.54
Views are invited on the strategy set out in this
chapter, including the proposed safeguards. In
particular, views would be welcomed on:
- the case for
legislation to establish a new social tenancy
(para 3.23);
- whether legislation
to establish a single statutory system of
regulation for all registered social landlords
should be an early priority for the new
Parliament (para 3.30);
- the need for new
statutory provisions on allocations to safeguard
access for particular groups (para 3.33);
- the need to establish
common housing registers across all landlords
letting affordable rented housing in any local
authority area (para 3.34); and,
- the approach towards
local authority staff affected by transfers to
community landlords (para 3.40).
|
3.55
Notwithstanding the relatively high level of new building
currently undertaken by the private sector, there is
likely to be a continuing requirement for some additional
new socially rented housing. We envisage that most of
this new building should be undertaken by housing
associations or other registered social landlords and
there is a continuing need to ensure that we are
achieving the best value for money from this expenditure.
In this context, views are invited on:
- the scope for
strengthening the development work of housing
associations and achieving increased value for
money from Scottish Homes' development funding,
through greater joint working between housing
associations, the adoption of group structures
or, possibly, greater use of
"developer" associations (para 3.47);
and
- the need for Scottish
Homes to review its procedures for paying grant
to housing associations with a view, in the
longer term, to establishing a unitary grant
system for all housing providers (para 3.52).
|
| |
| Footnotes |
1 The key differences between the two
types of tenancies are shown in the Annex to this Chapter
although this does not reflect any additional rights
provided through contractual agreements linked to assured
tenancies.
2 Scottish Homes and COSLA, New Housing Partnerships and
the Treatment of Housing Debt - A Discussion Paper (1998) |