| FARM INCOMES IN
SCOTLAND 1997/98 |
| |
| INTRODUCTION |
| This booklet
gives the latest financial results from a survey
involving the collection of around 600 accounts
representing all the main types of full time farms in
Scotland. The information is collected annually on a
standardised basis for the Department by the Scottish
Agricultural College (SAC) who submit the individual
records anonymously to the Department. |
| |
| The results
are used to aid administrative and policy decisions and
the Department is very grateful to the participating
farmers for their continued co-operation with SAC and for
the detailed information they provide. |
| |
| The analysis
relates to an identical sample of 499 farms for which
accounts were available for both 1996/97 and 1997/98,
that is the 1996 and 1997 crop years respectively.
However, the unavoidable spread of closing valuation
dates from the Autumn of one year to the Spring of the
next means that some of the 1997/98 accounts relate to
the 1996/97 winter whilst others relate to that of
1997/98. The corresponding split applies to the 1996/97
accounts as well. The type classification of the farm
depends on the relative importance of the various crop
and livestock enterprises. A summary of the system and
the farm type definitions are given in the Appendix. |
| |
| In order to
put all farms on the same basis for the purpose of the
net farm income calculation, all farms are considered to
be tenanted and therefore an appropriate rent has been
charged on owner occupied holdings. Net farm income, as
defined, is before the deduction of any interest
payments. Machinery depreciation is calculated on current
values and breeding livestock stock appreciation is
excluded from net farm income in accordance with
established practice. |
| |
| A summary of
net farm income results for 1996/97 and 1997/98 is
provided in Table 1, but the following commentary relates to
the detailed figures in Table 2 and also gives some
indication of the forecasts for 1998/99. |
| |
| SPECIALIST SHEEP
(LFA) |
| In most
areas, although ewes were generally in good condition at
tupping time, early snows and wet weather in November and
early-December 1996 checked their condition resulting in
a reduced number of twins for the hill and upland flocks.
Conditions at lambing, and therefore lamb mortality,
varied widely across the country, but overall the 1997
lamb crop was considered to be slightly better than
average. The availability of grass through the summer
resulted in a high demand for store lambs in the south
which was not readily met as producers have tended to
keep more of their own lambs back, keeping prices
buoyant. The net farm income fell by over 40% in 1997/98
mainly due to falls in subsidies and sheep output while
the cost of inputs rose by less than 1% while feed costs
fell, probably due to the high fodder stocks at the end
of 1996. |
| |
| It is
expected that for 1998/99 net farm incomes will fall by
just under 20% as increases in certain livestock
subsidies are crowded out by reductions in the market
element of sheep output. |
| |
| |
| SPECIALIST BEEF
(LFA) |
| The
favourable grazing conditions in the back-end of 1996
meant cows entered the winter in good condition and there
was no shortage of winter keep, even though in the north
spring turnout was delayed due to cool, wet weather. No
severe weather problems were reported for out-wintered
herds and all cattle benefited from the abundant supplies
of grass throughout the summer of 1997 which resulted in
stock being in good condition by the autumn. The
financial performance of these farms was dominated by the
continuing impact of the beef ban and the reduced subsidy
payments in comparison of the BSE emergency subsidies
paid in 1996. Although the cost of feed also fell,
overall the cost of inputs rose. This resulted in net
farm income falling by nearly 60%. |
| |
| The net farm
income is forecast to fall by over 45% in 1998/99 mainly
due to reductions in the market element of sheep and
cattle outputs. As in the LFA Specialist Sheep farm type,
this is in spite of increases in certain livestock
subsidies and agrimonetary compensation. |
| |
| CATTLE AND SHEEP
(LFA) |
| These farms
also saw falls in their cattle output as with the LFA
Beef Specialists mainly due to the fall in subsidies.
However they also experienced a fall of 10.5% in their
sheep output compared to LFA Specialist Sheep farms of
6%. As with the other LFA farm types the cost of inputs
rose slightly even though the feed bill fell, resulting
in net farm income falling by nearly 60%. |
| |
| It is
forecast that the net farm income will fall by 65% for
1998/89 for similar reasons as the two LFA farm types
above. |
| |
| LOWGROUND CATTLE
AND SHEEP |
| It must be
noted that the small sample size for this farm type means
the results should be treated with caution. In the wake
of the 1996 BSE difficulties finished cattle prices in
the first half of this year remained flat averaging about
92p/kg which was the lowest for 16 years. A slight
tightening in supplies combined with increased demand
(including the return of the big burger chains to British
beef) lifted prices to 99p/kg by the autumn of 1997 (up
4p on the year) with the Scottish Premium adding a
further 3p/kg. Top-up payments under the BSPS and BMPS
providing some cash compensation to producers helped. It
is anticipated that the losses sustained in this sector
will result in further expansion of arable cropping on
farms, where this is feasible, and reduced purchases at
the store sales despite the availability of cheap
cereals. For sheep finishers, despite a sharp drop in
May/early-June 1997, prices over the summer ran at a few
pence per kilogram above last years level, but by
autumn with the larger volumes of lamb coming onto the
market, prices dropped. They suffered financially with
the last of the 1997 lamb crop. Although cost of inputs
fell by over 5%, the 15.5% drop in livestock output,
brought about due to falls in sheep and milk output,
meant that the net farm income for the average farm of
this type went below zero for 1997/98. |
| |
| It is
expected that the net farm income of this farm type will
fall further into the red in 1998/99 since it too will
see falls in the market element of its livestock output.
Also it will not benefit in the increases in HLCA, and be
more adversely affected by the falls in the crop output
since it is more dependent on crops than the LFA farms. |
| |
| CEREALS |
| The autumn
1996 sowing conditions were generally good and winter
cereals established and over-wintered well. Yields
however suffered from the cool conditions and lack of sun
in late-spring and early-summer which resulted in reduced
yields. For 1997 spring crops, yields and quality were
generally depressed with the rejection of barley for
malting a common occurrence. For both winter and spring
crops harvesting was trouble-free with little drying
required but bushel weights were low. Winter oilseed crop
yields were similar to 1996, but for spring crops the
yield was down. Overall the arable sector has had one of
its worst years for some time. Reductions in the yields
of most crops have been combined with extremely low
cereal prices for feed, milling and malting grain brought
about by the weak global market and the strength of
Sterling. The drop in the cereals and oilseed rape
outputs was the main factor behind the near 100% fall in
net farm income, with contributing factors being the fall
in livestock output and the rise in the cost of inputs. |
| |
| Net farm
incomes for these farms are forecast to fall in 1998/99
to below zero mainly due to the fall in the value of the
crop output. |
| |
| GENERAL CROPPING |
| The cereal
situation was similar to that experienced by the cereal
specialist farms. The 1997 potato crop was generally
lifted in good conditions and tubers stored well, with
final yields above those of preceding years. Prices for
the 1997 harvested potatoes was poor. Demand for seed was
sporadic with the continued tendency to wait as late as
possible before ordering. Seed was trading at £90 to
£120/tonne and ware at £50 to £60/tonne but a scarcity
of supplies led to a dramatic increase in the ware price
to about £150/tonne in spring 1998. Although the cost of
inputs actually fell for this farm type, the percentage
fall in net farm incomes was similar to the specialist
cereal farms except that the result was that it fell to
just below zero. |
| |
| This farm
type is the only one expected to see an increase in its
net farm income in 1998/99 and this is due to the
relatively good outlook for the potato sector. |
| |
| DAIRY |
| In 1997
turnout in the south of the country was a little early
due to the warm April weather encouraging early grass
growth. Further north the cooler conditions resulted in a
slightly later turnout but in all areas the growth of
grass through the summer kept yields at, or above, normal
with less reliance on concentrates. For the past few
years dairying has enjoyed a relatively prosperous
financial position, but 1997/98 has seen a fall in
producers prices. This fall was due to production
exceeding quota combined with the strength of Sterling,
reducing the value of support prices because of
realignments of green rates. Most dairy companies offered
considerable seasonal price incentives to encourage
evenness of supply. But despite these incentives there
was an overall price fall to below 20 pence per litre by
the end of 1997/98 together with falls in the value of
quota sales and leasing. The value of cull cows also fell
under the OTMS due to reductions in price and maximum
weight allowed. Calf prices were underpinned by the Calf
Processing Aid Scheme which provided an outlet for the
dairy bred calves and the poorer beef cross calves. The
fall in the cost of inputs was insufficient to counteract
the fall in outputs, especially within the milk sector
resulting in a halving of the net farm income. |
| |
| Due to a
further fall in milk prices it is expected that Dairy
farms should just break even in 1998/99. |
| |
| MIXED |
| The physical
performance of these farms are reflected in those above.
Although the cost of inputs remained stable, the near 17%
drop in the level of outputs resulted in net farm incomes
falling by 115%. It is usually the case that with this
farm type overall income remains relatively buoyant as
one enterprise income goes up when another goes down.
However in 199798 all livestock enterprises experienced
falls in output, as did cereals. |
| |
| Since the
majority of the agricultural enterprises are expected to
remain depressed in 1998/99, it has been forecast that
the net farm income for this farm type to fall further
into the red. |
| |
| BALANCE SHEET DATA |
| The opening
and closing balance sheets from the 1997/98 accounts
sample are presented in Tables 6(a), 6(b) and 6(c). These
show the average results by type of farm for the
owner-occupied and tenanted categories and for these two
categories weighted together. The owner-occupied category
comprises those holdings or businesses that are wholly or
mainly owner-occupied. Similarly the tenanted category
comprises wholly or mainly tenanted holdings or
businesses. The relatively few that are clearly neither
one nor the other are excluded from this analysis. Thus
the accounts sample for these tables is a sub-sample of
that for which results are shown in the previous tables. |
| |
| For
owner-occupied farms, most farm types net worth
fell with the exceptions being dairy and mixed farm
types. This was due to all farm types experiencing
increasing in their liabilities, the average of which was
over 11%. Also all farm types saw their Total External
Liabilities as a percentage of Total Assets either
remained stable or increase by anything upto four
percentage points as with the LFA Specialist Sheep.
However, on average assets have also increased by nearly
2%, due to most farms having only small falls while
General Cropping, Dairy and Mixed farm types experiencing
large increases. |
| |
| All tenanted
farm types showed falls in net worth ranging from LFA
Specialist Beef and Dairy farm types with less than 2% to
Cereals with a fall of nearly 22%. Although half the
farms showed reductions in their liabilities, all farm
types, except Dairy where it has remained relatively
stable, also showed reductions in their overall assets.
The main factor for this seems to be the fall in the
value of current assets, especially for Cereals probably
due to the combination of a fall in yields and very low
cereal prices. |
| |
| FLOW OF FUNDS |
| Table 7 presents an additional income measure,
discarding the assumption made in the net farm income
calculation that all farms are tenanted, charging
interest paid and net investment spending but not
deducting depreciation on plant and machinery or other
imputed costs to provide a flow of funds more directly
related to farmers financial situation. The figures
shown are for the same sample of farms as the balance
sheet data, this sample being identical for the two years
shown. |
| |
| For
owner-occupied farms, 1997/98 has for all farm types seen
falls in their net farm incomes, cash incomes and cash
flow from the farm business, although unlike net farm
incomes, cash incomes still remained relatively high.
However, due to some farm types increasing their
borrowings, especially General Cropping, 1997/98 has also
been a mixed year for flow of funds with some falling and
others increasing. |
| |
| As with
owner-occupied farms, tenanted farms also exhibited falls
in net farm incomes and cash incomes with the latter
again remaining relatively high. Most of the farm types
also saw their cash flow for farm business fall, however
the LFA Specialist Sheep and General Croppings cash
flow from farm business increased in 1997/98 due to
reductions in their net investment spending.. |