tso-banner.gif (2487 bytes) Previous page Contents page Next page
  
Report of the Consultative Steering Group on the Scottish Parliament
 
 
ANNEX G
 
MECHANISMS FOR ENCOURAGING PARTICIPATION: GENERAL
  • Social Partnerships. Such partnerships may take any form between a loose sense of co-operation between a wider variety of groups in society to a highly specific institutional structure bringing together government, business and labour. Models may be "corporatist" in that a formal relationship is established between government (usually the Executive) and interest groups. Other more fluid, "pluralist" models involve groups operating outside the formal structure of power to influence the decision making process.
  • Consensus Conferences. Such conferences aim to both inform and consult with citizens by incorporating the perspectives of lay members of civil society within the assessment of new scientific and technological developments. A forum of lay people question experts about a controversial scientific or technological subject, assesses the experts' responses, reaches consensus about the subject and reports its conclusions at a press conference.
  • Citizens' Juries. These brings together a group of randomly chosen citizens to deliberate on a particular issue (either the setting of a policy agenda or the choice of particular policy options). Over a number of days the jury hears evidence and cross examines witnesses with the help of trained moderators. Following their deliberations, the jury produces a decision or provides recommendations in the form of a citizens' report, obliging some form of response from the department, local authority, or agency.
  • Deliberative Opinion Polling. Here a national random sample of between 250 and 600 citizens is brought together to discuss and debate a particular issue. Balanced briefing material is provided and citizens can question competing experts and politicians. At the end of the process and after group discussion, citizens are polled in detail.
  • Citizens' Panels. There are two kinds of citizens' panels: research panels, which use a large sample of a local population as a sounding board to track changes in opinion over time, and standing panels, which are made up of a stable sample of citizens representative of an area's population. The panel meets regularly to assess local services and develop views about future needs and goals, and may be used to test specific policy options or proposals or to scrutinise policy implementation.
  • Public Petitions. A system of public petitions allows a group of members of the public to indicate their support for a particular cause by gathering signatures which are then presented to the legislature, who may be obliged to take a particular course of action.
 
MECHANISMS TO FACILITATE PARTICIPATION IN THE WORK OF PARLIAMENTARY COMMITTEES
  • The European Rapporteur system. A "rapporteur" may be appointed within a Committee for a particular issue on which the Committee is deliberating. The rapporteur has final responsibility for signing the report which the Committee presents to the Plenary, but also acts as a focal point for interest groups and individuals who wish to make representations to the Committee.
  • Expert Panels. In deliberating on a particular matter, a Committee may wish to set up one or more expert panels where non-members of the Parliament are invited to feed into the Committee's work by advising on areas where they hold expertise. Such a system would be similar to the support provided to CSG by the three Expert Panels.
  • Advisory and Consultative Council (ACC). This idea is based around the idea of an independent body to which civic organisations would appoint representatives. The ACC would form itself into Committees and would have Parliamentary funding and base itself within the old Royal High School. In this way, the ACC would become a forum for consultation and could also provide expert advice to the Executive and the Parliament and its Committees.
  • Recognition of particular forums - eg Civic Forum or a Business Forum, which the Executive might be obliged to consult. These could be "official" or "unofficial" as preferred. At the official end of the scale, the bodies might receive some funding from the Parliament.
  • Appointment of specialist advisors. Select Committees in the UK Parliament already use this mechanism, with both short and long-term appointments.
  • Co-option of non-MSPs. Committees could co-opt non-voting members, for particular items of business.
  Previous page Contents page Next page