| 7.
Action Without New Legislation |
| 7.1 Some
action to help deliver the vision is possible now,
without having to enact new legislation. Across the
board, there is considerable scope for using existing
machinery in new and more appropriate ways to make a real
difference. |
| 7.2 The
Group has identified a number of further initiatives that
could also be taken now. |
| |
| Public landowners |
- New requirements for
all public bodies with rural landholdings in
Scotland, which are answerable to the Secretary
of State, should be set to ensure that they: have
clearly identifiable and accessible local
representation; develop and maintain a good
relationship with those who live and work on or
near their property; consult them over the
development of land management plans; inform them
and consult them about any significant changes;
otherwise involve them in the management of their
land; optimise the opportunities for employment
of local people; and in general ensure a positive
impact on local sustainable development. This
could readily be done through the issue of
guidance letters from the Secretary of State to
these bodies. Discussions with each of the bodies
concerned would be necessary to consider the
practical implications of such requirements for
their objectives. The aim would be to ensure that
in general their actions have as positive an
impact as possible on local sustainable
development. Other public bodies with significant
landholdings in Scotland such as the Crown Estate
and the Ministry of Defence should be invited to
do likewise.
|
| |
| Private landowners |
- A Code of Good
Practice for rural landownership should be
developed, compliance with which should wherever
possible become a condition of public assistance.
The Code should provide that major landowners
(including non-Governmental organisations which
are major landowners in Scotland) should be known
locally and as far as possible should be readily
available to the local community or, if not
available personally, should have clearly
identifiable and accessible local representation.
The Code should also set out best practice for
major landowners in terms of developing and
maintaining a good relationship with those who
live and work on or near their property, for
example informing them and in some circumstances
consulting them about any significant changes;
otherwise involving them as appropriate in the
management of their land; optimising the
opportunities for employment of local people; and
in general ensuring a positive impact on local
sustainable development. The Scottish Office
should seek contributions to the development of
such a Code, both from rural and environmental
bodies and interest groups and from relevant
representative bodies including the Scottish
Landowners' Federation, the Royal Institution of
Chartered Surveyors, the National Farmers' Union
of Scotland and the Scottish Crofters' Union.
|
| |
| Support for communities |
- A Scottish Land Fund
is needed (funded from the National Lottery) to
ensure that the scope for supporting viable
community action is not unduly constrained by
resource implications. This is expected to be set
up shortly as a major new initiative under the
New Opportunities Fund. Scottish Enterprise
should also set up a Community Land Unit to
support community land involvement outside of the
Highlands and Islands area, within the terms of
its existing remit to promote economic growth.
|
| |
| Compulsory purchase |
- The Government should
give explicit support for the use of compulsory
purchase powers as a last resort where this will
assist implementation of local plans or other
strategies (eg by SNH, Highlands and Islands
Enterprise etc) adopted by public bodies such as
Scottish Natural Heritage, Scottish Homes or the
enterprise bodies. Possible changes must await
the outcome of the comprehensive study of such
powers already under way; but that should not
impede the Government signalling in what
circumstances it would expect local authorities
and other public bodies to use their existing
powers.
|
| |
| Land use |
- The integrated
planning of rural land use at local level,
involving all relevant interests including the
local community, should be taken forward in the
context of community planning. In rural areas,
rural development strategies should be developed,
and community aspirations and wishes should be
taken account of by liaison at the local level.
- A Code of Good
Practice on rural land use should be developed,
clearly setting out standards for land uses such
as agriculture, forestry, sporting and
conservation as appropriate. A flexible approach
will be needed, to keep pace with changing
practice and for application across Scotland.
Again, compliance with this Code should wherever
possible become a condition of public assistance.
Such a Code should draw out existing examples of
sustainable development, presented as good
practice to be followed. A Code pitched at a more
strategic level could most usefully examine
issues of integration of social, economic and
environmental aspects, recommending a 'joined-up'
approach towards rural land use. Current codes of
practice and reference material in this area tend
to deal with specific subjects at a greater level
of detail. They might usefully be
cross-referenced to a new overarching document.
It will be important to involve land use
practitioners and bodies with appropriate
expertise in the compiling of such a Code, and
research may be needed to develop it further.
- Initial steps should
be taken to improve co-ordination of activity
between public bodies responsible for land use
matters and rural development. Further study
should follow to refine the approaches taken in
the light of experience.
|
| |
| Information about land |
- A new
(non-authoritative) database on rural
landholdings should be set up, as a publicly
accessible, map-based record. It would consist of
information which can be disclosed without new
legislation, such as data currently held in the
Register of Sasines and information volunteered
by private sources. An existing public body
should be given the task of collating and
publishing the data, and this could also include
information on land uses and official site
designations.
|
| |
| Landlord and tenant |
- Some initial action
to simplify agricultural arbitration could and
should be taken, including appointing a smaller,
more experienced arbiters' panel, with more
training and general guidance. This would involve
changes in the way the arbiters' panel is
constituted, in the process of selecting members
and in the simplification of documentation. In
the same way, there should also be early action
to promote wider opportunities for
diversification, such as provision of model forms
of agreement for tenants to obtain landowners'
consent for diversified uses of land on the farm;
amendments to grant scheme literature to clarify
the position; and new guidance to arbiters or
valuers in assessing the level of compensation at
the termination of a tenancy in respect of
woodlands established by the tenant.
|
| |
| Crofting |
- The Crofters
Commission should act to encourage more community
management of croft land by issuing guidance
which illustrates the economies of scale and
savings in individual time and effort which can
be gained through pooling of resources, and
highlights the successes achieved by community
based businesses such as stock clubs and
machinery pools. It should also take action to
ensure that there is no bias against newcomers in
crofting administration by adopting a policy to
underlie its decisions on assignations and relets
which allows greater transparency in decision
making, gives no special priority to existing
members of the crofting community and judges
applicants for crofts primarily on the basis of
their plans for the croft and the benefits their
presence on the croft will bring to the wider
local community. In addition, it should tackle
absenteeism vigorously by continuing the present
intensive review process and by following up
cases of absenteeism identified which adversely
affect local development so as to reach in each
case a conclusion which is to the long-term
benefit of the local community as a whole.
|
| 7.3 Such
action would complement early land reform legislation. |