| Chapter 4 Working
together locally |
| |
| Working together locally "Integrated local
partnerships are the way ahead. Joint vision, joint
investment and shared responsibility are all vital."
|
| |
| 4.1 The
links have not been strong enough between strategic and
resource decisions and decisions about people's needs. There
need to be clear connections between high-level strategic
and resource decisions at area level and local service
delivery, with strong co-operation between agencies at
both levels. |
| |
| 4.2
Combining health and social care in one organisation is
one option. Health and social work are integrated in
Northern Ireland. Since local government re-organisation
in Scotland, social work and housing staff increasingly
work in joint departments. And in Dumfries and Galloway,
the Social Work Department and the Health Board share the
same premises and public identity. |
| |
| Working
together locally |
| |
| 4.3 The
lessons from this kind of integration are consistent. It
can help people to work together but is not enough in
itself to break down barriers. For this reason we are not
suggesting a formal integration of local authority social
work and housing with health services. Instead we aim to
encourage joint planning and organising services at a
more local level. |
| |
| 4.4 This
should in turn develop the shared respect, understanding
and trust we need for joint working and improved local
services. No laws or national guidance can substitute for
the local sense of value of working together successfully
on joint agendas, joint investments and joint services. |
| |
4.5 Some local authorities and health boards
are already starting to manage and deliver services on a
locality basis. A locality should be a natural catchment
area for community care. It may be:
- a town or part of
one;
- a group of villages;
- a district; or
- a social work
management, health or housing district, or a
group of them.
|
| |
| 4.6
'Designed to Care', for example, suggests that Local
Health Care Co-operatives might serve populations of
between 25,000 and 150,000. What is important is that the
area served is large enough to be supported in community
care terms. But this does not mean that it has to be
self-sufficient in services. Most importantly, a
locality's boundaries should not make administrative
arrangements more complicated. They should use existing
boundaries (for example social work catchment areas or GP
practices). |
| |
| 4.7 Some of
the present arrangements focus only on planning, but
others deal with the needs of the local community and how
to meet them. |
| |
Examples
- Developing local
planning and service delivery models (St Andrews,
Caithness and Johnstone).
- Developing resource
centres shared by several agencies to serve one
area (Angus).
- Planned 'one stop
shop' for social care, health care and housing
(West Lothian).
- Decentralising local
authority management, including developing local
plans (Fife and Angus).
- Very sheltered
housing, respite care and day care complex
(Forres).
|
| |
4.8 This local approach to community care
can cover any one part or a large block of community care
activity. The wider the scope, the better the results for
the locality. We must consider the three key levels of:
- planning;
- organising services;
and
- delivering services.
|
| |
| Planning |
| |
| 4.9 Local
plans should be consistent with a clear strategic vision
for the 'area' and should influence that vision. |
| |
| New local
partnerships |
| |
4.10 New local partnerships may be
necessary, not just between social work, health and
housing agencies, but also with:
- education, leisure
and recreation;
- independent community
care providers; and
- people using services
locally.
These partnerships do not
need to be the same as the formal structures in the
present community care planning system. They should
develop to reflect the needs of the area. It is most
important to involve the people using the services and
their carers.
|
| |
| 4.11 The new
structures in the NHS and the increased opportunities
within primary care should make for closer local working
between local authorities and Primary Care Trusts and,
within them, the Local Health Care Co-operatives. We must
seize the opportunity for greater co-ordination and
co-operation across the social work, community health and
primary care boundaries. |
| |
4.12 We must strengthen the relationship
between professionals in the restructured NHS, and in
local authorities and other organisations. For this
reason we are:
- encouraging those
involved in co-operatives to recruit from a
variety of backgrounds so as to provide a joint
service; and
- developing
arrangements to support the new shape of the NHS
which will encourage closer working links with
stakeholders, including local authorities.
|
| |
4.13 Local planning should achieve an agreed
understanding of:
- the locality's needs;
- the period over which
change will take place;
- the investments
needed from each agency; and
- the responsibilities
falling on partners.
|
| |
| 4.14
Integrated local partnerships are the way ahead. This
will mean individual agencies giving priority to the
greater good of the locality. Joint vision, joint
investment and shared responsibility are all vital if an
area is to be well served. |
| |
4.15 We expect local partnerships to avoid
unsuitable incentives and passing on their financial
burdens (cost shunting). They should focus on using the
locality's collective resources for the better based on:
- a shared vision;
- joint commissioning;
- joint standards;
- thinking based on
users' and carers' needs; and
- imaginative
partnership funding (for example, local community
care Trusts).
|
| |
| 4.16 This
more local approach offers considerable scope to work
more effectively in partnership with people who
use services, rather than doing things to them.
The result should be communities which are more involved,
helped and supported by community care. |
| |
| Organising
services |
| |
| A
'tartan' of services |
| |
| 4.17
Organisational success depends on statutory
organisations' roles and responsibilities being fully
understood by them, their employees, their partners and
those using their services. These organisations should
identify where their functions begin and end. But, more
importantly, they should also identify where they join
with others to create a balanced 'tartan' of services for
the areas. |
| |
| 4.18 Joint
working must be based on strong understandings and
effective systems. We cannot rely on individuals'
strengths and commitment alone to achieve effective
results. A structured approach, supported by joint
training, will create a powerful platform for joint
working. |
| |
| Ways
of improving current working practices |
| |
| Create health, housing and social care
trusts |
- pool all resources
for community care in an area.
- integrate skills and
services.
- reduce overheads and
bureaucracy.
|
| |
| Agency staff to share premises |
- social workers in GP
practices.
- one stop shops.
|
| |
| A single manager for community care services |
- from either health or
social work.
- to manage all
relevant staff and budgets.
|
| |
| Staff to move between agencies |
- from statutory to
voluntary sector.
- from NHS Trusts to
social work (assessment).
- between councils and
boards (strategic issues).
|
| |
| General workers |
- social workers,
nurses or occupational therapists as care
managers.
- home care staff with
a mix of personal care and nursing experience.
- hospital and
community occupational therapists sharing
caseloads.
|
| |
| Pooled or grouped budgets |
- covering capital and
revenue (Trusts, co-ops).
- joint stores for
equipment.
- joint services (for
example, for dementia).
- matching capital and
revenue funding.
|
| |
| Shared information systems |
- to collect and
communicate information effectively.
- single assessment
forms.
- shared assessment
procedures for social work and housing.
- to protect
confidentiality (for example, local
information-sharing projects (LISP) supported by
the NHS Information Directorate).
|
| |
| Joint training |
- to identify joint
tasks.
- to carry out a
training audit.
- to develop joint
training agendas.
|
| |
| Many
of these are already working successfully in some areas
in Scotland. |
| |
| Delivering
services |
| |
| 4.19 Service
delivery already tends to be focused on local areas. We
want to build on this by encouraging an integrated,
flexible 'tartan' of services, geared to the needs of
each locality. |
| |
| Quality
services and real benefits |
| |
| 4.20 We
expect high-quality services delivered efficiently and
effectively. To focus on their locality, agencies
should identify opportunities for task-sharing. This is
particularly relevant for home care services (where
health workers and social workers are often involved with
the same person) and integrated specialist housing and
care facilities. The aim is to trouble the user as little
as possible while providing them with the maximum
benefits. People are not usually concerned whether the
care they receive is from health or social work staff.
What matters is the quality of that care and the benefit
to the user. |
| |
- Some examples of
effective service delivery which can be followed
in localities are:
- health and social
care workers ordering home care services from one
another in Stirling;
- joint equipment
stores in North Ayrshire;
- users keeping their
care plans at home for visiting professionals to
see in Shetland;
- integrated teams,
especially where they also include housing, for
people with mental health problems or learning
disabilities, as in Inverclyde; and
- nursing staff in the
dementia teams in Aberdeenshire being able to use
social work resources.
|
| |
| Making change
happen |
| |
| 4.21 Local
authorities, health boards and housing partners need to
develop local frameworks for planning, organising and
delivering services. |
| |
| 4.22 When
preparing strategic plans, we must make clear the
strategic vision for the area as a whole and its
relevance to localities. Primary Care Trusts and Local
Health Care Co-operatives must be in place by April 1999.
And we must also develop the basis for a new local
infrastructure and focus during the same period. We
want every area to have effective local structures in
place and working by March 2000. |