tso-banner.gif (2487 bytes) Previous page Contents page Next page
  
Communities: Change Through Learning
 
8. Recommendations
8.1 A new Scottish Office Circular should be published which firmly promotes community education as described in this report and which requires the production of local authority community learning plans (see below).
A strong statement on community education is required at national level and this should be in the form of a Scottish Office Circular to local authorities, representing a shared agreement. At present the only formal statement is SOED Circular 6/95 and this should be replaced. The new guidance should, however, clearly apply to all fields which are relevant to community education; a statement which only seemed relevant to local authority education departments would not suffice. Commitment to and involvement in community education should be clear in such fields as health, planning or social work. The new statement should emphasise that, through its concentration on promoting personal development, building community capacity and investing in community learning, community education will contribute to the achievement of Government objectives in lifelong learning, social inclusion and the promotion of active citizenship. Local government responsibilities should include their own contributions to community education and their creation of the circumstances which yield effective community learning plans.
8.2 Community learning plans should be built from the bottom up; the timescale for completion of the first version - it will be continually renewed - must be realistic in this regard. Targets, target-setting procedures and monitoring should be very clear.
Within the understanding described at paragraph 4.4 of this report, the precise nature of individual community learning plans should be determined in the light of local interpretations of community planning and the operation of the Best Value regime. They should represent a process of continuing dialogue among providers and between them and participants, and not deteriorate into a chore for annual completion. They should refer to the contributions of all providers, and the plans should have a clear and practical reality for those who benefit from them. Their key purposes should be:

to identify where the main responsibilities for using and developing community education approaches lie, especially with regard to the authority's development of its corporate and community based operations, and its relationship with other public and voluntary bodies;

to involve communities in a continuing process of planning, implementing and reviewing provision for community learning, drawing in all relevant agencies in order to maximise their complementary contributions and responsiveness to need;

through this process, to provide an analysis of learning needs and resources in communities, particularly in disadvantaged areas, and baseline data on key topics for the purposes of target-setting;

to maximise the contribution of community education to lifelong learning, social inclusion programmes and the promotion of active citizenship, ensuring mutual support with key institutions and partnerships and giving particular attention to practical developments, such as local learning centres;

to ensure that FE colleges, schools, HEIs, other appropriate bodies and partnerships such as adult guidance networks and local learning partnerships, are fully consulted in the creation, implementation and monitoring of plans;

to ensure that voluntary organisations are fully consulted in the creation, implementation and monitoring of plans for community education and to that the resource implications of that involvement are recognised;

to ensure that targets are set for community education against clear baseline data and that these are reviewed regularly;

to ensure that there is effective monitoring, evaluation and reporting, and that this takes full account of Best Value.

8.3 The main interests should be asked to agree on the overall approaches to be taken to evaluation and reporting, so that Ministers, councillors and voluntary sector management committees can have a clear understanding of the criteria for success.
A very high priority is required for the evaluation of, and reporting on community education, and this should include assessment of inter-disciplinary operations. There should be a commitment to involving communities in the processes of monitoring and evaluation. Attention should be given to longer-term evaluation of community education strategies for combating social inclusion, developing lifelong learning and promoting active citizenship.
8.4 Those responsible for community planning should use the skills and insights of community education to achieve effective community involvement.
The SO/CoSLA report on community planning recommended that a serious commitment be given to community involvement. Within community learning plans, the voice of the communities should be clear and well developed. Specifically, communities should have a key role in formulating plans for community education contributions to social inclusion, lifelong learning and active citizenship. The commitment of resources to enable people to be effective participants in the affairs of their communities is of the greatest importance.
8.5 All community education providers should adopt procedures which seek the maximum involvement of the users of their services in decisions about how they plan and operate.
Although it is not possible to legislate for attitude, it is possible to create structures which reflect particular beliefs and approaches. It is the Group's belief that the learners and communities should be seen as the starting point for planning rather than just the end users of services. This should be reflected in structures and funding arrangements.
8.6 The Scottish Office should discuss with CoSLA, SCEC, the voluntary sector and others the steps which can be taken to ensure that community education, in the terms set out in this report, is accorded high priority in delivering the Government's policies on social inclusion, lifelong learning and active citizenship.
The problems created by the current lack of continuity of funding for both statutory and voluntary providers of community education require attention. Research is needed to establish the extent and characteristics of central and local government and other funding of the voluntary sector in community education as defined by the Group. The process of review should draw in representatives of other providers of community education, such as further education and health education, as appropriate.
8.7 Having agreed on community education's priority as a method of delivering key policies, The Scottish Office and CoSLA should agree an approach to secure and monitor all expenditure which covers the new agenda, aiming for its clear identification, transparency, continuity, priority and collaborative funding commitments.
The Group's proposals call for a new approach to funding and financial monitoring which does not rely solely on the current GAE3 allocation for community education, as this will not reflect expenditure on the range of activities which should grow as part of community education in the future. All of the fields and agencies contributing to community learning should identify their commitments and doing so should be accorded a high priority by Government. The total will represent the shared priority which the Government and local authorities give to community education's contribution to social inclusion, lifelong learning and active citizenship. There is a need to track this expenditure as, unless this is done, there will be no monitoring of the new community education agenda. At the same time, acknowledgement by Ministers and by CoSLA is required of the priority for community education as proposed by the Group in order that appropriate commitments from the fields and agencies concerned can be drawn together, through the community learning plans, into a coherent and significant endeavour. Achieving continuity will be as important as appropriate levels and sources of funding. Priority is now acknowledged for social inclusion, lifelong learning and active citizenship, which have long been the concern of community education, but without shared priorities and joint commitments, the community education approach will not achieve the momentum that is required.
8.8 The Scottish Office should consult with relevant interests, perhaps using the good offices of the appropriate umbrella organisations, to explore their needs and the best ways of continuing to meet them within community education as now defined.
The new configuration of community education proposed by the Group may raise concerns among some organisations, such as those in the voluntary sector which regard their work in adult education, youth work or community work as coming under the community education banner.
8.9 The Scottish Office should ensure that responsibility is allocated nationally to appropriate bodies for the development of joint policy statements among the fields which already play, could play or should play a larger role in community education as now defined.
The new agenda for community education emphasises that its approach is the concern of many. It will take time and effort to achieve understanding of this, and the subsequent commitments to joint action. Relevant fields should be actively encouraged to recognise their place in the new approach and to have recognised the work that they already do.
8.10 The Scottish Office and providers should make the maximum possible allocations to the programme of inter-disciplinary in-service training.
There is an immediate and considerable in-service training requirement, the response to which should be inter-disciplinary in nature, to reflect the integration and values which are to be achieved at local level and give immediacy to learning about working in partnership. The creation of a programme of a sufficient scale, which may have implications for staff cover, will require a high level of co-operation among the main interests. It should involve the professional community education training organisations, assisted by staff from selected organisations acknowledged as demonstrating good practice. Senior staff from all authorities, the major voluntary organisations and interested FE colleges should be invited to attend, with the expectation that they would follow-up with in-house courses covering the same ground. The programmes should cover government policy, community planning and Best Value, inter-disciplinary work and the roles of community education in promoting personal development, community capacity building and investment in community learning.
8.11 Training for community education should be reviewed in the light of this report. Initial training should contain a strong and effective commitment to inter-disciplinary work and should be relevant to a wider range of context. Approaches to quality assurance should be reviewed.
The longer-term implications of this report for pre-service training for community education are considerable. They will not just be the concern of the NTO which is expected to be created for community education but will also be of direct interest to other NTOs e.g. for the voluntary sector, social work and libraries and to training for schools and further education. The development of inter-disciplinary training is an increasingly common theme and one which should not in any way undermine the needs of particular interests, such as those of the voluntary sector. Training should encompass the wider range of contexts to which the report refers and be accessible to other professions needing to extend their skills. It is also essential that training adapts to changing circumstances, requiring quality assurance procedures which reflect the realities of the work which graduates will do. Consideration should be given to the inspection of training for community education.
8.12 An enhanced concern with and a coherent approach to research should be promoted in order to produce good information and effective analysis at all levels.
The need for good research to inform practice and the presentation of well-founded argument within policy development has received insufficient attention in community education local projects, providing organisations and policy-makers should expect research information to be available to them but there is too little done and too little access to the resources which exist.
8.13 The Scottish Office should continue to extend the development of its own arrangements for the co-ordination of action on matters of corporate concern. It should ensure that its organisation and procedures are clear and accessible to the interests covered in the report.
The Working Group strongly welcomes the Government's commitment, through the New Deal for Communities, to a general strategy of support for community involvement and cross sectoral working. The commitment to the inter-disciplinary working necessary to support such approaches has been shown by the Scottish Office in its work on social inclusion and related topics. Such a commitment is also required in other fields of direct relevance to community education, such as youth issues. The group recognises that community involvement and inter-disciplinary working can present administrative difficulty but believes that solutions must be found to meet the multi-dimensional needs of communities.
8.14 In due course the Scottish Executive may wish to consider any possible legislative requirements.
The new agenda for community education will be of signal importance to the new Scottish Parliament for it provides a mechanism for supporting democratic renewal at the level of local communities. Its effectiveness will depend on serious commitment by the fields and agencies referred to in this report and this, and their effectiveness, will require to be monitored. Given the importance of the issues, continuing dependence on discretion any provision may merit review.
 
3 Grant Aided Expenditure - the amount that the Government think that local authorities need to spend in total on the provision of services
  Previous page Contents page Next page