tso-banner.gif (2487 bytes) Previous page Contents page Next page
  

Identifying The Solutions

5 Delivering The Vision: Law Reform
5.1 Overall, the views expressed in the responses to the Group’s first consultation paper were as follows:
  • There was a widespread welcome for the Government’s proposals to abolish the feudal system; particular support was expressed for the removal of the more oppressive aspects of the system such as the practice of demanding money for waiving feudal conditions;
  • An even stronger body of opinion favoured retaining conditions on land ownership ("real burdens") where this is useful and not against the public interest, especially where burdens provide for access to essential services or the maintenance of properties; some landowners - in both the public and the private sector - pointed to the way in which burdens can be used to maintain the amenity of an area and to safeguard the interests of neighbours or members of the community; there was concern as to how this "conditionality" should be provided in a modern context, and alternatives which were mooted included a greater role or more pro-active approach by the planning authorities, more powers for communities, and the establishment of a principle that land ownership should carry with it responsibility for the public good;
  • Some landowners pointed out that thought needs to be given to the protection of existing rights; land had been sold at a price which reflected the restrictions or burdens on its use: if the burdens disappear there should be compensation for the landowner;
  • There was no support for the creation of new public rights for the Crown: this was regarded as undemocratic, old-fashioned and possibly very expensive; some respondents believed it would amount to nationalisation by the back door;
  • The majority of respondents did not favour legislation to strengthen public rights over the foreshore, but there was support for more consultation at local level to resolve disagreements; some respondents suggested that disputes which could not be resolved should be referred to the Lands Tribunal or a similar body; another suggestion was that there should be a code to govern access to and use of the foreshore.
Vision for the future
5.2 This feeds in well to the emerging vision set out in Chapter 3. Key features as regards law reform are:
  • outdated and unfair feudal arrangements swept away;
  • conditionality of land ownership where appropriate to reflect modern circumstances;
  • a more constructive approach to problem cases, including those relating to the foreshore and the seabed.
Delivering the vision
5.3 The Scottish Law Commission will take all of the comments received into account in developing
  • its final Report on abolition of the feudal system which will be submitted by the end of 1998; and
  • the discussion paper on the related question of real burdens which will issue in the autumn (with the final Report due to be submitted by the end of 1999).
The Land Reform Policy Group is liaising closely with the Scottish Law Commission on these issues.
5.4 In the light of concerns relating to the foreshore and the seabed, and the complexity of the current law in this regard, the Group proposes that the Scottish Law Commission be invited to undertake a comprehensive review with a view to reform of the law of the foreshore and the seabed.

 

Previous page Contents page Next page