River Crossings and Migratory Fish: Design Guidance
< Previous | Contents | Next >
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Introduction
Fish passage at stream crossings is an important consideration in the planning,
design, installation and upgrading of river-crossing structures. The purpose
of this publication is to give design guidance to the engineer and others with
an interest in river crossings that will ensure free fish passage can be achieved.
For many fish, migration is essential to the survival of the species. Salmon,
for example, travel from the sea up river to spawn, and both juveniles and spawned
adults migrate downstream to the sea. Other fish such as trout migrate upstream
and downstream during their life cycle seeking a variety of aquatic habitats
for spawning, rearing young and hiding. Although these migrations may only be
over a few kilometres, they can be important for the long-term survival of the
species and maintenance of fish production in a watercourse.
Improperly planned and designed culverts and other river-crossing structures
can be barriers to such migration. Common problems at river crossings are mainly
associated with culverts, but can also be present at bridges, fords and weirs,
and include:
- inadequate water depth during periods of migration;
- excessive water velocities; and
- vertical barriers to fish passage (e.g. perching).
The Road Planning Process
Avoiding or minimising obstruction to fish passage requires consultation by
the engineer with SEPA, SNH, SERAD and DSFBs throughout the design process to
ensure that all relevant requirements are identified (see
Figure 1). The resolution of engineering, biological, hydraulic and cost
factors requires a balanced and interactive approach across these disciplines
so that structures do not present a barrier to fish migration. The first three
steps indicated can be equated to the three stage DMRB assessment process used
in the development of a road project. The process is also relevant to minor
improvement and major maintenance projects although these are not subject to
the three stage process.
Design Requirements for Fish Passage
In general, fish will be able to travel through a river crossing structure
provided that the conditions in the structure are not substantially different
from those in the existing watercourse. The design parameters detailed in Table
1 have been developed to ensure the free passage of most migratory fish species
through river-crossing structures (specific advice relating to individual fish
species is given in Table 5.1 of this document).
These parameters must be incorporated into the design of new or altered structures
to ensure that they do not present a barrier to migrations.
It is not necessary to design for fish passage at all flow conditions. A suggested
"passage design flow range" for checking for excessive velocity at high flows
and inadequate water depth at low flows is the 10 percentile and 90 percentile
of normal flows respectively (the flows which are exceeded for 10% and 90% of
the time).
The preferred form of structure is one in which the characteristics and dimensions
of the original watercourse are maintained. This may be achieved by using a
bridge or a culvert. If using a culvert, the following alternatives should be
considered in turn until a successful solution for fish passage is determined:
|
Case 1 :
|
Culvert barrel with dimensions derived for flood flow conditions;
|
|
Case 2 :
|
Culvert with depressed invert to allow for inclusion of stream bed material
within the barrel;
|
|
Case 3 :
|
Provision of a bottomless arch culvert to retain the natural stream bed;
|
|
Case 4 :
|
Provision of a low flow channel within the culvert invert; and
|
|
Case 5 :
|
Provision of baffles within the culvert.
|
Table 1 Design Criteria for Salmonids
|
Design Factor
|
Target Criteria
|
|
|
Up to 20m
culvert length
|
20 - 30m
culvert length
|
over 30m
culvert length
|
|
Maximum water velocity at 10 percentile flow (mean over cross-section)
(1)
|
1.25m/s
|
1.0m/s
|
0.8m/s
|
|
Minimum pipe diameter
|
0.5m
|
|
Minimum water depth at 90 percentile flow (1)
|
0.3m
|
|
Maximum water level drop (1)
|
0.2m
|
|
Minimum gap on trash screen (if applicable)
|
0.2m
|
Existing Problem Sites
There are two approaches to retro-fitting existing culverts and bridge aprons
to allow for fish passage:
(a) raising the tailwater level by installing a weir which backs up water;
and
(b) installing baffles.
Design details of these measures are contained in Chapter
7 of this document. Both are effective in deepening water levels and reducing
excessive velocities. However, they result in a reduction of the structure's
flow capacity which may have significant effects on upstream flooding during
storm flow conditions.

< Previous | Contents | Next > |