 |
 |
| Consultations |
| Home | Press | Publications | What We Do | Who We Are | Search | Site Map | Contacts | Links | ||||
|
|
|||
 Your Views Consultations Justice |
< Previous | Contents | Next >
1 1998 SCCR 440
2 (1992) 16 EHRR 135
3 1996 SCCR 114
4 Second Report, paragraph 52.18
5 A small-scale pilot study carried out on behalf of the Scottish Executive Central Research Unit (The Work of Precognition Agents in Criminal Cases - Crime and Criminal Justice Research Findings No 32) makes some observations and recommendations regarding the vetting and training of precognition agents.
6 See the case of Jamieson -v- HMA 1994 SLT 537; 1994 SCCR 181
7 Scottish Law Commission Report No 78 ISBN 0 10 2028842.
8 See recommendation 63, in paragraph 9.72 of "Speaking up for Justice", published by The Home Office, June 1998.
9 See, for example, the comment in paragraph 9.12 and footnote 17 of The Law of Evidence by David Field (W Green & Son 1988).
10 Sexual History and Sexual Character Evidence in Scottish Sexual Offence Trials: Brown, Burman & Jamieson. Scottish Office Central Research Unit 1992. ISBN 07480 04939.
11 See paragraph 5.3 of Report No 78.
12 See Brown, Burman & Jamieson op.cit. Also "Prosecuting and Defending Rape: Perspectives from the Bar" by Jennifer Temkin, Journal of Law and Society, June 2000.
13 [1991] 2 SCR 577.
14 For example, see p.72 of Brown, Burman & Jamieson, op.cit.
15 See p.71-72 of Brown, Burman & Jamieson op.cit.
16 Regina -v- Z (Respondent), House of Lords, 22 June 2000.
< Previous | Contents | Next >
The information contained on this WWW site is Crown Copyright but may be reproduced without formal permission or charge for personal or in-house use. Privacy and Content Disclaimer.
For general enquiries about this web site email ceu@scotland.gov.uk or fill out our online questionnaire.
