< Previous | Contents | Next >
The Licensing (Scotland) Bill: A Consultation on Liquor Licensing
Chapter 4
Licences
The Nicholson Report
The Nicholson Committee believes that the present system of seven types of
licence is confusing and unhelpful. They therefore recommend its replacement
with a system of two licences - a premises licence and a personal licence. This
is similar to the approach taken in England and Wales under the Licensing Act
2003.
Premises Licence
The premises licence would be a single form of licence for any premises which
sells alcohol, each licence being tailored to the type of premises in question
by reference to an operating plan lodged by the applicant. Operating plans would
cover a range of detailed issues including the activity to be conducted, opening
hours and policy in relation to children. They would also specify the designated
personal licence holder responsible for the premises. They would form the basis
for the terms and conditions of the licence. Once granted there would be no
need for renewal, in contrast to the present system where renewal takes place
every 3 years. However, there would have to be a facility to allow licences
to be varied, for transfers and for provisional licences.
The Nicholson Committee sees the need for a set of standard national conditions
applicable to all premises licences. The Committee also recommends that the
Licensing Board should be able to modify or add to a premises operating plan
regardless of whether or not a complaint has been lodged.
Fire and Safety
The Nicholson Committee proposes that there should be a requirement for all
applications for a premises licence to be accompanied by a certificate from
the fire authority and for the Licensing Board to be able to request, in addition,
specification of a safe maximum capacity. The Committee also recommends the
continuation of the requirement (with the extension to off-sales premises) for
applications for provisional or new licences to be accompanied by certificates
from the relevant planning, building control and food hygiene authorities. However,
Boards should be able to attach additional conditions where this is necessary
or desirable to promote the licensing principles.
Personal Licence
A personal licence would be granted to a named individual over the age of 18
who possesses appropriate, approved qualifications and who has not been convicted
of any relevant offence or forfeited a licence in the past 5 years. The licence
would authorise the holder to manage and to operate licensed premises without
supervision and it would authorise that person to supervise others. The licence
would be valid for 10 years before requiring renewal. The Committee believes
that there should also be a central register of personal licence holders.
Occasional Licences and Occasional Permissions
The Nicholson Committee supports the retention of the current system of occasional
licenses (for the licensee to offer catering outwith licensed premises) and
occasional permissions (to an otherwise non-licensed voluntary organisation
for special events). The Committee recommends that an occasional licence should
in future be granted to a personal licence holder with the appropriate qualifications.
Whilst a personal licence would not be required for occasional permissions,
the Committee felt there was a need to define 'voluntary organisation'.
Grounds for Refusal of a Premises Licence
The Nicholson Committee recommends that, even in the absence of objections,
a Licensing Board should be obliged to consider an application for a premises
licence on its merits, and, if it concludes that the licence should not be granted,
it should be able to take that course. The Committee recommends statutory grounds
for refusal based on the following:
- undermining the promotion of the licensing principles;
- suitability of the premises with regard to location, character, condition
and likely clientele; and
- overprovision.
Where a licence is refused, the Committee recommends that the present 2-year
period before reapplication should be reduced to 1 year and an earlier reapplication
should be allowed at any time if circumstances have changed.
Consultation Summary
Premises Licence
There was broad agreement that the current licensing system needs to be simplified,
although several contributors believed that there should continue to be some
differentiation between different types of establishments. Those who wished
to maintain such distinctions, in particular certain sections of the Licensed
Trade, believe that their removal would encourage a growth in irresponsible
promotions through increased competition between different sector operators.
The main alternatives to the single premises licence revolved around using
two or more of the three following type classifications:
- on-sale - to cover pubs, hotels, cafes and refreshment places;
- off-sale - to cover off-licences, supermarkets and other retail stores;
and
- entertainment - to cover discos, nightclubs, dance halls and other clubs.
The majority supported the overall principle of the operating plan, however,
several opposed the recommendation believing it to be overly bureaucratic and
burdensome.
While two-thirds of respondents were in favour of removing the need to renew
the premises licence, there was notable concern at the inability to review the
licence regularly. On licence variations, there was a need to clarify the process.
The majority agreed to standard national conditions although one Licensing
Board wished to be able to add conditions to any national standards to reflect
local circumstances. A significant minority opposed allowing Boards to modify
or add to a premises operating plan, believing it gave them too much power.
Fire and Safety
Whilst the majority supported the proposed fire certificate and safe maximum
capacity specification, Fire Boards were concerned at how this sat with current
fire prevention policy and the fact that maximum safe occupancy levels are at
present the responsibility of local authority building control sections. On
the continuation of new licences being accompanied by the relevant certificates
and a Board's ability to attach additional conditions, most respondents were
in general agreement.
Personal Licence
Personal licences were broadly supported although further clarification was
sought on the holder's specific role and responsibility.
In qualifying for a personal licence, several respondents felt that it would
be more appropriate to keep the 'fit and proper person' criteria from the present
legislation and some (including the police) felt that this should be extended
to premises licences.
It was suggested that applications should be made in the area an applicant
is working in as opposed to the area of residence. There was general support
for a central register.
Occasional Licences and Occasional Permissions
Only 4 respondents opposed the recommendation regarding occasional permissions,
mainly on the basis that the voluntary organisations would be untrained and
a belief that occasional permissions were abused, leading to unfair competition
for other licensed premises.
Grounds for Refusal of a Premises Licence
In the main, respondents supported giving Boards overall discretion on whether
to grant a licence. The majority agreed that the licensing principles should
form the general ground for refusals although concerns were raised that this
would give an unreasonable amount of power to the Board. If over provision was
to be retained as a ground for refusal, more explicit guidance was requested
together with a need to consider the relationship between planning and licensing.
Our Approach
We support the Nicholson Committee's proposals for a new personal licence
and for a single new premises licence with an operating plan, which goes to
the heart of the new system. We support the proposed duration for those licences.
In addition, we intend, unlike the present system, to restrict licences to those
aged over 18.
Premises Licence
We envisage a new licensing system that will ensure that Boards have the discretion
to take action which is appropriate for local circumstances. However, we believe,
as set out in Chapter 2, that it is also important
that this discretion is operated within the context of a clear and effective
national framework.
We are aware that the licensed trade has been critical of the lack of consistency
within the existing system. We feel that the National Framework, the basis of
which was proposed by the Nicholson Committee, will bring with it an appropriate
level of consistency. Boards will only be entitled to operate their discretion
within the boundaries of that framework. Standard National Licence Conditions
will be an important feature of that system, limiting Board discretion on issues
best controlled at national level.
In addition, we have listened to concerns that the single premises licence
(and removal of permitted hours) will lead to a greater level of irresponsible
promotions caused by greatly increased competition. Although it is not our role
to legislate to prevent competition, we are concerned that standards in the
trade should be maintained at a reasonably high level and should not be undermined
by an increase in competition under the new system. We do not believe that we
need to move away from the single premises licence approach to achieve this.
We consider that a degree of differentiation and thus the maintenance of
certain minimum standards could be achieved by extending the role of standard
national licence conditions.
We will ask the Expert Group to consider the best approach but have the
following in mind:
- standard national conditions appropriate for off-sales;
- standard national conditions appropriate for the provision of adult entertainment
(including lap dancing); and
- options for late opening premises - the development of either standard
national conditions or statutory guidance.
On licence variations, transfers and the provisional grant of licences,
we accept the need for a workable system with straightforward administrative
procedures. The Expert Group will be asked to develop a suitable process. We
do not expect all variations to require consultation or publication. We will
consider further the appropriate relationship between the provisional and confirmed
premises licence to ensure that business development is not stifled.
We support the Nicholson Committee's wish to see new applications, including
off-sales, accompanied by the relevant, planning, building control and food
hygiene certificates and, where advised by the relevant authorities, support
the Board's ability to attach additional conditions for the promotion of the
licensing principles. We will consider further the issues raised by consultation
respondents on fire certificates.
The consultation has highlighted that there may be an argument for some
form of closer co-operation between the licensing and planning regimes. We intend
to consider this further and would be grateful for views on how well the present
system operates.
Personal Licence
For personal licences, we support a move away from the moral judgement of who
is a 'fit and proper person'. However, it will be important to retain an effective
system that enables Boards to ascertain, whether or not someone is a suitable
person to hold a licence. We support the Nicholson Committee's approach which
emphasises qualifications and relevant criminal convictions. Qualifications
will be national and we will consider their compatibility with England and Wales.
We will propose a list of 'relevant' criminal convictions for the Bill.
We believe the initial grant of a personal licence should be undertaken by
the Board for the area in which the applicant is working or, if not employed,
the Board for the area where the applicant resides. The same would apply to
renewals - we do not believe it should be necessary for someone to apply for
renewal to the same Board that granted their licence. Any review of a personal
licence where a relevant offence has been committed should be carried out by
the Board where the holder is presently working and a process will be developed
to transmit such information to the relevant Board.
We will consider in discussion with the Department for Culture, Media and
Sport, the possibility of a central database including how such a system could
operate and who would run it.
Some consultees have queried whether the designated personal licence holder
is required to be on the premises during all opening hours. We can confirm that
this will not be the case.
Occasional Licences and Occasional Permissions
We support the Nicholson Committee's approach to Occasional Licences and Occasional
Permissions. However, we would welcome views on the desirability of some form
of regulation for Occasional Permissions, perhaps through training.
Grounds for Refusal of a Premises Licence
We support the Nicholson Committee's approach to grounds for refusal for
the grant (or provisional grant) of a premises licence. However, any Board
exercising its discretion in this area will be required to act within the overall
national framework. Further consideration will be required of the grounds in
relation to transfers and variations.
On overprovision, we have already announced for off-sales that we would require
local Licensing Boards to make a proactive assessment of local provision in
consultation with the local community, police and licensed trade before the
new regime takes effect. We intend to extend our approach to over provision
to all licensed premises where the provision of alcohol is the main business.
We will seek early advice from the proposed National Licensing Forum on what
constitutes over provision and how it should be tackled. The Board's conclusions
should be reflected in their policy statements and arrangements would be made
for regular review.
We intend to extend the 'relevant criminal convictions' qualification to
applicants for premises as well as personal licences. We will ensure this
is applicable to companies and partnerships as well as individuals.
We support the Committee's proposals of allowing reapplications within 1
year or sooner if circumstances have changed.
|
Your Views
We would welcome your views on the following:
Standard national licence conditions
- Should we seek to maintain high standards in the industry by developing
standard national licence conditions for off-sales and the provision
of adult entertainment and either national conditions or guidance for
late opening premises?
- At what point should premises be considered to be 'late opening'?
- We would welcome your views on the types of conditions that might
be imposed.
Premises licences
- We would welcome your views on whether there should be closer co-operation
between the planning and licensing regimes at local level.
Occasional permissions
- Do you agree that we should seek to impose some controls on occasional
permissions for voluntary organisations?
- What would be the best way to do that?
Overprovision
- Do you agree that Licensing Boards should be required to actively
assess overprovision within their area with the results reflected in
their policy statement?
|
< Previous | Contents | Next > |