< Previous | Contents | Next >
The Licensing (Scotland) Bill: A Consultation on Liquor Licensing
Chapter 2
The National Policy Framework
The Nicholson Report
The Nicholson Report sets out the basis for a policy framework. The proposals
cover the following:
- Licensing Boards should be under a duty to issue policy statements giving
a broad indication of the policy likely to be adopted in the operation of
the licensing system in their area.
- Boards would be required to consult the local forum on policy in general
and to have regard to its view.
- In addition, Scottish Ministers should be empowered to issue and revise
statutory guidance to Boards on the discharge of their functions.
- A new National Licensing Forum should be established to keep licensing
law and practice under review and help to formulate guidance for Boards.
Consultation Summary
There was almost universal agreement to set up a new National Licensing Forum
and to allow Ministers to issue statutory guidance. Of 29 responses on Board
policy statements, a majority were in agreement.
Our Approach
Local flexibility to deal with local circumstances is a vital component of
the Nicholson proposals and we agree with this approach. However, we are also
aware of some concerns from the licensed trade who would like to see an element
of national consistency. We consider that there is a place for both local and
national policy within the new system. We believe that the wide local discretion
given to Licensing Boards under these proposals must be balanced with a clear,
effective and mandatory national framework within which Boards will be required
to operate. We intend to build on the Nicholson approach to this framework,
whilst giving greater weight and prominence to some measures to ensure appropriate
national consistency, certain agreed national standards and to support the licensing
principles.
We think that National and Local Forums are an important part of this approach
and support those proposals. The National Forum should develop links with the
Scottish Advisory Committee on Alcohol Misuse (SACAM) and at least one member
of SACAM should sit on the National Forum.
We also believe that we will require a set of standard national premises
licence conditions covering key issues. Those conditions would be worked
up by the Expert Reference Group and, since they are an important part of the
new system, would be set out in the Bill. Some of those conditions may remove
the need for further local conditions. We would intend to draw up comprehensive
statutory guidance for Boards covering a range of detailed issues, including
the use of the national standard conditions.
In addition, at the local policy level, we would intend to set out certain
mandatory requirements for Board Policy statements. We envisage a single
consolidated policy statement to be reviewed every 2 years with power for Boards
to revise in the interim (or to issue supplementary policy guidance) but only
for new or unanticipated issues. The minimum content of the statement would
also be mandatory.
The local and national frameworks would work together as follows:

Board Policy Statement
The Board would draw on the three elements above - national policy framework,
content as set out in regulations and local knowledge.
|
Your Views
We would welcome your views on the following:
- Should we seek to ensure a measure of national consistency by balancing
Board discretion with an emphasis on a set of standard national licence
conditions supported by detailed statutory guidance?
- Do you agree with the issues identified so far for those standard
national conditions (off-sales, adult entertainment and late opening
premises are covered in Chapter 4):
- no-proof no-sale
- irresponsible promotions
- access by children
- What other issues would be suitable for standard national conditions?
- Do you think that on some of these issues the formulation of national
conditions should remove the need for additional local conditions? If
so, on what issues would this apply?
- In the interests of best use of Board resources and offering certainty
on policy for the licensed trade and local communities, should Board
Policy Statements remain current for 2 years? If not, what period would
you propose?
|
< Previous | Contents | Next > |