On this page:

Achieving the Standard for Headship – Providing Choice and Alternatives: Consultation Response Form

Your Details

Please complete the details on the Respondent Information Form below. This will help ensure we handle your response appropriately.

* Required
Organisation: (if applicable)
Postal Address: * Required
* Required
   
   
   
1. Are you reponding as: (please tick one box) * Required An individual (go to Q2a/b and then Q4)
on behalf of a group or organisation (go to Q3 and then Q4)
   
 
Do you agree to your response being made available to the public (in Scottish Executive library and/or on the Scottish Executive website)? Yes (go to 2b below)
No, not at all (We will treat your response as confidential)

Yes, make my response, name and address all available
Yes, make my response available, but not my name or address
Yes, make my response and name available, but not my address

   
 

The name and address of your organisation will be made available to the public (in the Scottish Executive library and/or on the Scottish Executive website). Are you also content for your response to be made available?

Yes
No We will treat your response as confidential
   
 

Yes
No

 

Your Consultation Response

Specific questions on Proposal

Preparation and Entry

Question 1: Are the entry principles correct?

Question 2: Are there aspects of the proposal which would benefit from more clarity or guidance?

Question 3: Should there be a common application form regardless of approach?

Development Activities

Question 4: Are the development principles correct?

Question 5: Are there aspects of the proposal which would benefit from more clarity or guidance?

Assessment

Question 6: Are there aspects of the proposal which would benefit from more clarity or guidance?

Question 7: Is the assessment process sufficiently challenging and rigorous?

Question 8: Should there be a maximum and minimum timescale for candidates undertaking a flexible approach? If so what should these be?

Support the process

Question 9: Are there aspects of the proposal which would benefit from more clarity or guidance?

Question 10: In which areas do you feel there is sufficient flexibility at present, and where do you feel that additional capacity, innovation or fresh approaches might be needed?

Question 11: Which aspects of development for headship would you regard as core or strongly recommended for candidates undertaking a Professional Development Plan?

Relationship with SQH

Question 12: To what extent would it be feasible to dovetail the delivery and assessment structures established by the existing SQH providers and those envisaged in this paper for the proposed flexible approaches?

General Questions

Question 13: Do you find the proposal is described adequately?

Question 14: Is the proposal likely to be seen as attractive to aspirant headteachers?

Page updated: August 15, 2005