On this page:

The Scoring Process

The following is a step-by-step illustration of the scoring process:

Step 1:

The Case Officer will use the table below to score the Option, or group of Options, selected under each regional priority in turn against the Group 1 criteria, using 'High' or 'Low'. In the example, the regional priority has scored high for quality, collaboration, integration and multiple outcomes, low for quantity and innovation.

Examples of 'Low' and 'High' ratings can be found in the assessment criteria guidance.

The Case Officer will focus primarily on the evidence you have provided in your online Regional Priority supporting statement and any additional evidence you provided in Section 3 of your Outcome Plan.

NB. If your Proposal scores a high in Quantity, Quality and National target then your Proposal will be assessed as 'Good Fit' for Group 1.

Group 1: Scale of Contribution to Regional Priority

CriteriaRatingApplicant's EvidenceCase Officer's Comments
QualityHigh
QuantityLow
CollaborationHigh
IntegrationHigh
Multiple OutcomesHigh
InnovationLow
National TargetsLow
No. of 'Highs'
4


RatingQualifying RangeTotal No. of 'Highs'Rating for Group 1
Good Fit5 or more 'Highs'
Partial Fit3 or 4 'Highs'4Partial Fit
Poor Fit0-2 'Highs'
Step 2:

The total number of 'High' ratings then determine whether the Group is rated as 'Good Fit', 'Partial Fit' or 'Poor Fit'.

  • Good Fit - 5 or more 'Highs'
  • Partial Fit - 3 or 4 'Highs'
  • Poor Fit - 0-2 'Highs'

The example above scores four highs which equates to a Partial Fit, for Group 1.

Step 3:

The Case Officer then completes the Group 2 scoring by rating the Regional Priority as 'High' or 'Low' against each of the Group 2 scoring criteria.

Group 2: Value for Money

CriteriaRatingApplicant's EvidenceCase Officer's Comments
AdditionalityHigh
Added ValueHigh
Long-term BenefitHigh
Leverage PotentialLow


No. of 'Highs'

3

RatingQualifying RangeTotal No. of 'Highs'Rating for Group 2
Good Fit3 or more 'Highs'3Good Fit
Partial Fit2 'Highs'
Poor Fit0 or 1 'Highs'


Step 4:

The total number of 'High' ratings then determines the overall Group rating.

In the example highlighted above, the regional priority scores three 'Highs' and so is rated as 'Good Fit' for the Group 2 - value for money criteria.

Step 5:

The Case Officer then completes the ' Group 3 - Management of Risk Rating Table', assigning a 'High' or 'L ow' rating to each criterion.

Group 3: Management of Risk

CriteriaRatingApplicant's EvidenceCase Officer's Comments
Meeting DemandLow
Minimising ImpactHigh
Demonstrating FeasibilityHigh


No of 'Highs'

2

RatingQualifying RangeTotal No. of 'Highs'Rating for Group 3
Good Fit3 'Highs'
Partial Fit2 'Highs'2Partial Fit
Poor Fit0 or 1 'Highs'

Step 6:

The total number of 'High' ratings then determines the overall Group rating.

In the example highlighted, the regional priority scores two 'Highs' and so is rated as 'Partial Fit'' for the Group 3 - Management of Risk Criteria.

Step 7:

The Case Officer then uses the ' Assessment Scoring Table' below by selecting and adding up the scores for each category according to whether they were a 'Good', 'Partial' or 'Poor Fit'.

Assessment Scoring Table
Good FitPartial FitPoor Fit
Contribution to Regional Priority1062
Value for Money420
Management of Risk420


In this case the regional priority was scored as follows:

GroupScore
Contribution to Regional Priority6
Value for Money4
Management of Risk2
Total Score12


Step 8:

The Case Officer will repeat the assessment and rating process for each Regional Priority within your Proposal as per steps 1 - 7.

Step 9:

The Case Officer will then enter the final scores for each regional priority into the online screens and add their comments.

Priority 1Priority 2Priority 3Priority 4Priority 5Priority 6Priority 7
Assessment Score12
Comment


Page updated: Monday, July 6, 2009