Sunday, November 29, 2009
You are here: Topics > Scotland's Future: A National Conversation > Go to Blogs > Down to Detail > An Independent Scotland
The feedback form for this blog has been disabled
Friday, November 30, 2007
View full article
RSS Version of the latest comments for this article
[Latest First] | [Earliest First] Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] [22] [23] [24] [25] [26] [27] [28] [29] [30] [31] [32] [33] [34] [35] [36] [37] [38] [39] [40] [41] [42] [43] [44] [45] [46] [47] [48] [49] [50] [51] [52] [53] [54] [55] [56] [57] [58] [59] [60] [61] [62] [63] [64] [65] [66] [67] [68] [69]
224. MONDAY, NOVEMBER 5, 2007 20:48trevor swistchew - edinburgh
SCOTLAND waken up and smell the coffee independence is the future the unionists had their chance and did nowt housing and fair pay not Gordons nuclear bombs
223. MONDAY, NOVEMBER 5, 2007 20:41Malcolm - Glasgow
204. John Findlay - Glasgow "Only 31% of Scots want independence. Majority rules. 69% want to remain as we are." Assuming the statistics you're citing are from the numerous three - option polls giving a choice between independence, "more powers" and the status quo, only a fraction of the 69% who don't appear to favour independence are content with the powers the Scottish Parliament currently has, probably between 10% and 20%, and some of the 69% wish to revert to direct rule from London. The overwhelming majority are in favour of greater powers. That these increased powers are undefined in my mind undermines these figures. "More powers" could mean just about anything, but what the Unionist parties envisage remains to be seen. Would all those who indicate a preference for more powers be satisfied with what's proposed, or would a percentage of them decide, in the event of a three-option referendum, that whatever arrangement is suggested falls short of their ambitions, and vote for independence? There have also been polls carried out which give a straight choice between independence and the status quo. These polls have consistently indicated a majority in favour of independence. They aren't usually publicised as much as the three-option polls.
222. MONDAY, NOVEMBER 5, 2007 11:24Mike - Shetland
Let's just get on with a referrendum, let the people speak and then go with the decision, whatever it turns out to be.
221. MONDAY, NOVEMBER 5, 2007 10:09livilion - livingston
221. MK - Glasgow Sunday, November 4, 2007 12:37 Quite! Britain and Eire within the EU are a good model for how Scotland could work with her nearest neighbours. We haven't the slightest interest in what the Irish get up to domestically, we cross their border without a thought. Ihere are no Al Qaeda attacks on Dublin as the former Home Secretary warned, at last year's Labour in Scotland party conference, would befall Scotland if we should choose to take responsibilty for our own affairs. Families keep in touch and visit as they do everywhere else across the Atlantic Archipelago. The RAF patrol the skies over the Irish Sea and the North Atlantic with the full agreement and co-operation of Dublin. So inspite of having shed blood within living memory to retain the Irish as part of the UK, and some strong residual individual anti-Brit animosity, at every level the Irish get along fine with 'Auntie Britannia' across the water. Perhaps some unionist might enlighten me as to why the Scots should be any different?
220. SUNDAY, NOVEMBER 4, 2007 12:37MK - Glasgow
The principle of independence is now gaining momentum and the focus now needs to change - the justification for unification has now moved to suggest "how" Scotland would operate within a UK that would require to have common aims for defence, NHS etc. SNP must now set out its intentions for that - use models like Scandinavia or the Baltics or clusters of other EU countries. These examples show independent countries with joint borders (as Scotland would with England) but they are still, and would consider no alternative to, being independent countries. The whole of the UK needs to be educated on how such an arrangement in the UK would operate - we need to completely undermine those who would seek to lie and scare by suggesting border guards and cut off relatives - the other EU countries manage fine - that message needs to be more clearly communicated. It needs to be set out in a manner that even the Sun and the Mail can understand - the overgrown teenager in the parental nest. Now he is moving to his own place - it doesn't mean he wont see his parents any more, they can all visit each other - but you would surely not advocate that he lives his entire life in the spare room? On a serious note - the Scandinavians and the Baltics have good examples of how they work together on common issues and we need to set out how the same could work in the UK - so that when Wales and Ireland decide that they are ready, the framework is already in place. We need to make clear that we have thought through the whole process and have a structure in mind.
219. THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 1, 2007 23:48Jennifer Milne - Edinburgh
"Scotland the Brave" by Cliff Hanley Hark when the night is falling Hear! hear the pipes are calling, Loudly and proudly calling, Down thro' the glen. There where the hills are sleeping, Now feel the blood a-leaping, High as the spirits of the old Highland men. Chorus Towering in gallant fame, Scotland my mountain hame, High may your proud standard gloriously wave, Land of my high endeavour, Land of the shining rivers, Land of my heart for ever, Scotland the brave. High in the misty Highlands, Out by the purple islands, Brave are the hearts that beat Beneath Scottish skies. Wild are the winds to meet you, Staunch are the friends that greet you, Kind as the love that shines from fair maidens' eyes. Chorus Far off in sunlit places, Sad are the Scottish faces, Yearning to feel the kiss Of sweet Scottish rain. Where tropic skies are beaming, Love sets the heart a-dreaming, Longing and dreaming for the homeland again. Chorus Please can we have this as the National Anthem
218. THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 1, 2007 15:24David - expatNI
I am sick and tired of reading the English rant that they are subsidising Scotland and the Scots. If they are so angry and upset about this, then why in the past, have they continually opposed an independant Scottish nation? Maybe it is because of the Scottish oil revenue? And if you want to argue that it is not Scotland's oil or it will eventually run out then go ahead... because we will still have our other national liquid to keep us going.... Is it not the case that on Islay alone (and last time I looked Islay was definately Scottish) there is more tax revenue stored in whiskey vats than the gold reserve in the Bank of England! Scotland is a country of massive natural resources. Scotland's education and legal systems have been the envy of other nations for years, Kenny MacAskill's plans to change the laws on litigation will further enhance our standing on the world legal stage. Scotland has the intellect and the resources to stand alone and be a proud independant nation. All it needs is the public confidence. If the unionists want so much to be a part of England then that is their choice. But it is a choice many Scots don't want forced upon them.
217. WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 31, 2007 17:36Moira Harper - Ayrshire
I still can't believe we have an SNP government in Scotland, having spent the last 40 years waiting for it!! Alex Salmond & his team have done brilliantly so far, but let us not forget the nitty gritty of the budget is still to come. That said, Scotland is, & always has been perfectly capable of governing itself. Now we are no longer shackled to Labour at Westminster, things can only improve
216. WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 31, 2007 12:59John Dalrymple - BIGGAR
Which self-respecting nation would not want to be in control of its own affairs? So either we are not a nation; or we have long since lost all self respect.
215. WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 31, 2007 10:44chris nickerson, english independence party - london
Just go for it!
Page updated: Wednesday, August 13, 2008