MINUTES OF VULNERABLE WITNESSES ACT IMPLEMENTATION STEERING
GROUP, TRAINING AND COMMUNICATIONS SUB-GROUP
WEDNESDAY 10 NOVEMBER 2004 AT 2PM ROOM CONFERENCE ROOM ST
ANDREWS HOUSE EDINBURGH
1. Welcome and introductionsBill Moore (Chair) SEJD Victims and Witnesses unit
Margaret Allison, SEJD Victims and Witnesses unit
Lindsey Anderson, COPFS
Clare Collin, SEJD Victims and Witnesses unit
Sharon Duffy, VIA
Jean Hamilton, Skills for Justice (substituting Tommy
Cuthbert)
Tom Fyffe, JD Criminal Procedure Division
Margaret Mckay, Justice for Children
Catherine Montgomery, Enable
Frances Roberts, SCRA
Phillip Shearer , SLAB (substituting Tom Murray)
Nigel Whitelaw, SCS
Claudine Persaud (Secretary) SEJD Victims and Witnesses
unit
Apologies:
Tommy Cuthbert Skills for Justice
Mandy Gahan, VSS
Pat Hewitson, VSS
Anne Houston, Justice for Children
Anne Keenan, the Law Society
Inspector Dawn Laing, ACPOS
Tom Murray, SLAB
Frank Russell, VSS
Alan Todd, ACPOS
2. Minutes of last meeting - Agreed
3. Matters arising - None
4.Section | Comments/issues | Action |
| Taking evidence on commission/use of a
supporter - (paper VWTC/10/04) | - Explanitory paper issued giving detail
of the contract awarded for the production
of 2 pieces of guidance on taking evidence
on commission and use of a supporter.
- The Group discussed the fact that
collectively they would effectively be
managers for this contract and were invited
to attend a meeting for discussions with
the contractors (Professor Ray Bull and
Professor Graham Davies) at St Andrews
House on 26 November at 3pm.
- It was explained that the professors
will be consulting with a variety of
stakeholders as part of their research and
that the stakeholders concerned had been
notified of a possible approach.
| - Victims & Witnesses unit to
re-issue Specification for work to members
of the Group for information.
- Group members to notify Victims &
Witnesses unit if they wish to attend
meeting with contractors by 23 November
2004.
|
5. Other training and promotional issues - (paper
VWTC/11/04)Section | Comments/issues | Action |
| Promotional issues | - The victims & witnesses unit
explained that paper VWTC/11/04 arose from
the brainstorming session at the previous
meeting which had as its purpose to
encourage further consideration of this
subject.
- VIA invited the group to view three
videos for children, which they had
obtained from south of the border on the
subjects
o A case for balance o A case for special measures o Giving Evidence - What's it really
like | |
| The group agreed that these would be highly
relevant as they demonstrated special measures
in action and could possibly be adapted for
Scottish purposes with for example additions
around the subject of remote sites. It was
agreed that information in different mediums
would still necessary. - The danger of promotional material
becoming outdated by phase 2 of the
introduction of the Act, was discussed. It
was suggested that additions to existing
SCS Virtual Courtroom go some way towards
avoiding this problem.
- How to gauge the reactions of children
to such material was considered. It was
agreed that the Unit should try to obtain a
copy of the research material setting out
the views of children (referred to in
evidence before the Justice 1 committee) as
reluctant witnesses in domestic abuse cases
in England
.
| - Justice for Children to obtain document
showing views of children gathered in
response to these videos.
- Victims & Witnesses unit to obtain
copy of the research material setting out
the views of children as reluctant
witnesses in domestic abuse cases in
England.
|
Training | - The possibility of a national strategy
for training was discussed as a way to
cover common areas of concern in training.
Agreed that core/need to know what training
would be required by all, and that
specialist training depending on
involvement and responsibilities of the
type of organisation would have to be
provided by the organisation concerned. The
possibility of encouraging relevant
organisations to create training plans
through bilateral discussions with them was
discussed as a possible step towards the
Victims and Witnesses Unit being able to
evaluate the adequacy of training.
- Agreed that Vulnerable Witnesses Act
roadshows may flag up common areas of
concern and highlight training needs. This
had already occurred at the High Court
Reform roadshows where lack of clarity
about start dates for roll out had been
highlighted as a cause for concern by
practitioners. The requirement for clear
timetable was agreed. Victims and Witnesses
Unit still awaiting previously requested
advice from OSSE on this matter.
- A training pack produced by SE for the
Child Protection legislation was cited as
an example of successful guidance and the
group suggested that this could be used as
a template for generic guidance, which
should be produced with a view to being
accessible and adaptable to anyone. It was
suggested that this work may be something
that the contractors (Professor Ray Bull
and Professor Graham Davies) should bear in
mind as should the sub-set group...
| - Victims and Witnesses unit to send link
to roadshow invite to be sent to
sub-group
|
6.
Section | Comments/issues | Action |
Verbal progress report of sub-set
group in drafting guidance on (a)
identifying degree of vulnerability for
child witnesses; (b) use of prior
statements; (c) use of screens and;(d) Live
TV links | - The sub-set met again on 12 October and
informed the sub-group that
o they had contacted the police to obtain
any guidance they may have on identifying
vulnerability in child witnesses with a view to
considering whether it might be incorporated in
material being produced by the sub-set
group o they are looking at an info sharing
protocol o the subject of defence witnesses was being
looked at o they are investigating how best to obtain
views of children and parents - The sub-group then went on to say that
any guidance produced by them would be best
practice guidance covering simple tips
about how best to do things as well as the
more complex aspects. Agreed that any
guidance should be produced with public
access in mind.
- The sub-set group hoped that they would
have a first draft of guidance on
identifying the level of vulnerability in
child witnesses ready for the next meeting
of the sub-group and that they hoped to
complete the whole package of guidance they
had agreed to produce by the beginning of
February.
- A document giving views gathered from
children about CCTV was given to the
sub-set for information by Justice for
Children and a further copy was requested
by Victims and Witnesses unit.
- Agreed Claire Collin, Victims and
Witnesses unit should join sub-set.
| - Justice for Children
to provide Victims and Witnesses unit with
a copy of document giving views gathered
from children about CCTV.
|
7. A.O.B.Section | Comments/issues | Action |
Field officer | - Field officer introduced and role
explained as
o To assess the readiness of organisations
for 1 April 2005, through field visits and
direct contact & a questionnaire o To identify possible sites for remote
locations - by looking at existing
accommodation and its suitability o Roles and responsibilities in relation to
remote sites and draft protocols | |
Re-course for members of the public
re. special measures | - Discussions arose around the need for
the public to be aware about the re-course
available to them if they felt that a
sheriff wasn't following best practice
about special measures. Agreed that current
re-course would be used.
| |
8. Next meeting- Agreed Thursday 16th December 2004 at 2pm
Victims and Witnesses Unit
10 November 2004