VWTC/12/04
VULNERABLE WITNESSES ACT IMPLEMENTATION STEERING GROUP
TRAINING AND COMMUNICATIONS SUB-GROUP
TAKING EVIDENCE ON COMMISSION/USE OF A SUPPORTER
1. Members are invited to note the draft minutes (attached
Annex B) of the Project Steering Group meeting held on 26
November at which there was a lively discussion on various
aspects of taking evidence on commission and on the use of a
supporter. Comments on the draft from those who attended are
invited not later than 5 January 2005
2. Professor Bull undertook to provide a first draft of the
guidance on taking evidence on commission prior to Christmas.
This will be circulated for comment when received.
3. A first draft of the guidance on the use of a supporter
has already been circulated for comment by not later than 5
January 2005. A copy is attached (Annex A) for information.
4. The next meeting of the Project Steering Group will be
held on Friday 14th January 2005 at 2.30pm in St Andrew's
House. Members are invited to attend and should e-mail Clare
Collin in the Unit to confirm your availability.
SEJD
Victims and Witnesses Unit
December 2004
ANNEX A
1. Guidelines on the Use of a Supporter
2. Draft 1
Professor Graham Davies
School of Psychology
Leicester University
Aims of the Guidance
1. The guidance covers the use of persons to give social
support to vulnerable witnesses giving their evidence in court.
The discretion of the courts to allow supporters for such
witnesses was provided under the Vulnerable Witnesses
(Scotland) Act of 2004, which in turn was based on the
recommendations of the policy document Vital Voices; Helping
Witnesses give Evidence published by the Scottish Executive in
2003.
2. The provision of a supporter for a witness is one of a
number of Special Measures available to the court under the
Vulnerable Witnesses (Scotland) Act to assist vulnerable
witnesses to give their best evidence. The Act provides for the
provision of supporters for vulnerable witnesses for criminal
trials, both summary and indictable at the Sheriff Court and
for solemn proceedings in the High Court. Supporters may also
be provided for witnesses at Children's Panel Hearings.
3. With the exception of children below the age of 12 years
appearing in cases involving sexual assault or physical
violence, the provision of all Special Measures, including the
use of a supporter, is at the discretion of the presiding
officer of the court or hearing. The test for the provision of
such Measures is whether they would be in the best interests of
the witness.
4. The guidance outlines the likely benefits to a vulnerable
witness's evidence of the presence of a supporter in the
courtroom and where necessary, prior to and after a court
appearance. It defines which groups of witnesses are vulnerable
according to the terms of the Act. It describes the role that
supporters can (and cannot) play in facilitating proceedings.
It describes the types of persons who may act as a supporter
and the necessary personal qualities and knowledge they should
possess to play the role successfully. The guidance also
describes the forms that support may take before, during and
after the trial. It emphasises that social support can also be
granted for appearances before a Commissioner and for
attendance at an identification parade
The Benefit to the Vulnerable Witness of the
Presence of a Supporter
5. The role of the court witness supporter is, by his or her
presence, to provide social and emotional support to the
witness and thereby reduce the anxiety and stress on the
witness when giving evidence. Research has demonstrated that
very high levels of stress and anxiety impair both the
operation of memory and thinking skills. The provision of any
aid, such as a supporter, which may reduce such anxiety, will
increase the possibility of the witness being able to give his
or her best evidence.
6. In addition, providing evidence and attending court are
frequently stressful personal experiences for witnesses. They
will have to rehearse and relive usually stressful and
sometimes traumatic experiences and have their recollections of
events challenged during cross-examination. The presence of a
familiar person prior to, during and after the proceedings can
serve to reduce the risk of further emotional damage to
vulnerable witnesses being caused by the process of
investigation and trial.
What Constitutes a Vulnerable Witness?
7. Under the Vulnerable Witnesses (Scotland) Act 2004,
various groups are defined as vulnerable. The principle groups
named in the Act are:
- witnesses under the age of 16 years
- adult witnesses with mental health problems
- adult witnesses with social or learning
disabilities
In addition, protection is available under the Act for
witnesses who are in fear or distress through threats of
intimidation.
8. The services of a supporter are one of a number of
Special Measures that the court may grant to a vulnerable
witness to assist them to give their best evidence.
9. The use of a supporter can be extended to the pre-trial
or evidence-gathering phase of a trial. Legal provision can be
made for Supporters to be present when the witness's evidence
is taken by a Commissioner or during attendance at an
identification parade.
How do Vulnerable Witnesses acquire a
Supporter?
10. Early identification of the need for a supporter is
beneficial for the well being of the vulnerable witness and the
consequent quality of their evidence. The police are generally
the first to identify the needs and wishes of such witnesses.
Once it is established that a vulnerable person is likely to be
called as a witness, the police will need to explain to them
the role and purpose of a supporter and establish if they wish
an application to be made to the court or hearing for such a
Special Measure. Legal representatives may also, at a later
stage in the legal proceedings, identify a witness as
vulnerable and make application to the court for Special
Measures, including the use of a supporter.
11. With the exception of children under the age of 12 years
appearing in cases involving sexual assault or violence, all
Special Measures, including the provision of a supporter for a
witness, are at the discretion of the presiding officer of the
court or hearing, who will wish to have clear grounds in order
to make an informed decision. Expert evidence concerning a
particular witness's needs or vulnerabilities can be admitted
from a psychologist, medical practitioner or other qualified
person. If there is concern over witness intimidation, then
evidence for this concern needs to be presented to the court or
hearing. The onus is therefore upon those making the
application to collect all the necessary information to place
before the court or hearing.
12. Normally, the witness's legal representative will make
an application to the presiding officer of the court at least
14 days before the first hearing of the case for which the
witness has been cited. For the High Court, this will normally
be the preliminary diet, for the Sheriff Court, the first diet
and for Summary Proceedings, the intermediate diet. The 2004
Act requires the presiding officer of the court or hearing to
make a decision on the provision of Special Measures within 7
days of the lodging of the notice. An early application is also
required where an application is made for a supporter to
accompany the witness during the evidence-gathering phase of an
investigation.
13. In exceptional cases, where the vulnerability of a
witness is only detected on the day at which the witness's
evidence is taken, the 2004 Act provides for a late application
to be made and considered by the court or hearing. Inevitably,
such late applications may lead to delay and less than optimal
arrangements, so a timely application is always preferable.
14. Applications for the use of a supporter may be made on
behalf of either the prosecution or defence witnesses.
15. All applications for the use of Special Measures,
including the provision of a supporter require the consent of
the witness, or if they are deemed unable to provide informed
consent, the parent or other carer. There is no legal
requirement for vulnerable witnesses to use Special Measures
and such witnesses may opt out of such Measures if they so
wish.
Who can be a Supporter?
16. It is essential that the witness agrees to the
nomination of the person who is to be the supporter and that
the witness understands what the supporter can and cannot do to
assist them. Care should be taken to ensure that there has been
no undue pressure exerted on a vulnerable witness to accept a
particular person as a supporter. The need for consent applies
equally to children who may require a supporter. Where a
witness is unable through age or other vulnerability to give
informed consent to the choice of a supporter, then
responsibility devolves to the parent or other carer.
17. Examples of persons who may play the role of supporter
include a relative, personal friend or a social worker.
Ideally, such a person should have no direct knowledge of the
facts of the case, though in some instances, some familiarity
is unavoidable. The use of another witness in the same case as
a nominated supporter can be considered and where this occurs,
the supporter should always have their evidence taken prior to
that of the vulnerable witness.
18. Supporters may be required during evidence gathering, as
well as the actual trial or hearing. Subject to the agreement
of the court or hearing, a supporter may accompany the
vulnerable witness during the taking of statements or
attendance at identification parades. Wherever possible, a
different supporter should be used for the evidence gathering
phase, compared to the trial or hearing, to minimise the risk
of contamination or influence on the vulnerable witness's
evidence.
What skills and knowledge are required of a
Supporter?
19. First, supporters should have some personal knowledge
and rapport with the witness. Second, they should be able to
offer vulnerable witnesses reassurance and social support,
while still being aware of their duty not to discuss the case
or their evidence with witnesses. Third, they should have
sufficient knowledge and understanding of evidence gathering
and courtroom procedures as to be able to offer explanation and
reassurance to the witness. If this knowledge is not already
present, it should be possible for the supporter to acquire it,
provided he or she is appointed in good time.
What role can supporters play?
20. Supporters accompany the vulnerable witness solely to
provide social and emotional support. In their initial contact
with the witness, they will need to explain to the witness that
they are independent of both prosecution and defence and that
they cannot discuss either the case or the evidence. Supporters
provide emotional and social support, but must refrain from
giving their own views on the case or on the witness's
evidence.
21. Supporters should make clear to witnesses that their
work is not and cannot be confidential. If the witness begins
to talk about the case or their own evidence, the supporter
should make a note of this in the witness's own words and be
prepared to disclose this to the police or counsel.
The Role of the Supporter in the Court
Process
22. Subject to the agreement of the court, support can be
provided for a vulnerable witness prior to, during and
following the trial or hearing.
Support prior to the trial or hearing
23. subject to the agreement of the presiding officer of the
court or hearing, supporters may accompany vulnerable witnesses
in evidence-gathering procedures, such as attending an
identification parade or having their evidence taken by a
Commissioner. Supporters should have sufficient knowledge to
answer any straightforward queries about the procedures
involved, but should not discuss the witnesses' evidence.
24. Where an identification parade is to take place,
supporters should introduce themselves to the Conducting
Officer for the parade and may accompany witnesses into the
room in which the parade is to take place. When the parade is
viewed, they should stand behind and to the side of witnesses,
but on no account communicate or prompt witnesses when they
view the parade and make their decision.
25. Where evidence is to be taken by a Commissioner,
supporters should introduce themselves to the Commissioner and
may accompany the witness into the room where the evidence is
to be taken. They should position themselves in such a way as
to be out of the line of sight of the witness, but in
sufficient proximity as to allow them to offer them comfort and
assurance during the taking of evidence. Supporters cannot
prompt or otherwise influence the witness when their evidence
is being collected.
26. Where some delay elapses between the witness being cited
and the court or hearing taking place, the uncertainty and
delay can be very stressful for the witness. Supporters can
perform a useful liaison role by keeping in touch with the
witness and passing on to the police or legal authorities any
requests for changes in provision of Special Measures or
incidents of undue pressure or intimidation.
27. As the trial date draws closer, the needs of the witness
for information and reassurance from the supporter are likely
to increase. Where witnesses are not familiar with legal
procedures, a visit to the court or hearing building is likely
to be beneficial. It will enable witnesses to familiarise
themselves with the location of the defendant and the witness
and the positions of the various court or hearing officials. It
should also enable the witness to understand the layout of the
building, including the toilets and other facilities such as
the witness waiting room and cafeteria (where present).
Support during the trial or hearing
26. Vulnerable witnesses are likely to be at their most
anxious on the day of the trial or hearing. It is appropriate
for supporters to accompany the witness to and from the venue.
On no account should supporters discuss witnesses' evidence
with them during such journeys or at court prior to the
tendering of evidence. However, it may be useful to raise the
possibility of further delay in the hearing of the case, so
that witnesses are better prepared for any postponement and
rescheduling, should this occur.
27. Supporters will need to work closely with the officers
of the court and in particular the ushers and representatives
of the Witness Service, whose duties complement those of
supporters. Supporters should sit with the witness until their
evidence is called, either in the witness waiting room or in
the room where the court or hearing takes place, depending upon
established procedures. They may also accompany the witness in
any meetings at the trial or hearing involving the presiding
officer or legal representatives and the witness. Where the
witness is a child or young person, then supporters should
ensure that a sufficient supply of age-appropriate playthings
is available (they can be brought to court by the witness if
necessary). When the vulnerable witness is called to give their
evidence, supporters, if necessary with the permission of the
presiding officer of the court, should sit in such a position
as to be visible to the witness, but not in line of sight of
either the presiding officer or the legal representatives.
28. Where the witness is giving their evidence via a
video-link, the supporter may, with the agreement of the
presiding officer of the court, accompany the witness into the
link room during the tendering of their evidence. Supporters
should explain the nature of the link to the witness: that the
court will be able to see him or her give their evidence but
that the witness will only see the person who is questioning
them, and provided the equipment is appropriately arranged, the
witness will not see the defendant while giving their evidence.
It is quite in order for the supporter to talk informally to
the witness while the witness is waiting to be examined, but
again there should be no discussion of the case or their
evidence. When the witness is giving their evidence, the
supporter should normally be seated behind the witness, so as
to eliminate the possibility of non-verbal communication
between supporter and witness. The supporter should stay silent
during the examination and cross-examination of the witness. If
the witness begins to exhibit signs of undue stress, then the
supporter should alert the presiding officer, so a decision may
be made as to whether a short break should be called.
Support after the trial or hearing
29. A Witness will need continuing support after their
evidence has been taken and when the proceedings have been
concluded. Their recollections will have been challenged in
cross-examination and allegations may have been made that the
witness has misremembered events or deliberately misled the
court. The outcome of the trial or the sentence passed on the
defendant may be very much at variance with what the witness
hoped or expected. The supporter can play a valuable role in
listening to the witness's views and concerns. If necessary the
supporter can pass on these concerns to counsel who may be able
to explain to the witness otherwise puzzling aspects of the
legal proceedings, the verdict or the sentence. Where a witness
leaves court prior to the completion of proceedings, the
supporter should make every effort to establish the outcome,
communicate this to the witness and answer any questions or
queries.
ANNEX B
MINUTES OF VULNERABLE WITNESSES ACT IMPLEMENTATION
STEERING GROUP, TRAINING AND COMMUNICATIONS
SUB-GROUP
PROJECT STEERING GROUP - TAKING EVIDENCE ON
COMMISSION; USE OF A SUPPORTER HELD ON FRIDAY 26 NOVEMBER
2004
3. Welcome and introductions
Bill Moore (Chair) SEJD
Paul Smart, SEJD
Clare Collin, SEJD
Professor Ray Bull
Frank Russell, VSS
Robbie Burnett, The Law Society
Maggie Mellon, Justice for Children
Frances Roberts, SCRA
Nigel Whitelaw, SCS
Claudine Persaud (Secretary) SEJD
Apologies:
Sharon Duffy, VIA
Anne Keenan, The Law Society
Inspector Dawn Laing, ACPOS
Lindsey Anderson, Crown Office
4. Outline of Leicester University's approach to the project
- VWTC/PSG/01/04
Paper | Comments/issues | Action |
| Taking evidence on commission/use of a
supporter - (paper VWTC/PSG/01/04) | - A copy of the Specification for the
work to produce 2 pieces of guidance on
taking evidence on commission and use of a
supporter was issued to Members for
information.
- It was explained that the Professors
are consulting with a variety of
stakeholders as part of their
research.
| |
5.Comments from initial approach to stakeholders - (paper
VWTC/PSG/02/04 & VWTC/PSG/02/04A)
Paper | Comments/issues | Action |
VWTC/PSG/02/04 | - COPFS, SCS and the Law Society of
Scotlands comments given to Professor
Bull.
| - Members to forward any comments to the
Professors, copied to the VW Unit.
|
VWTC/PSG/02/04A | Victims and Witnesses units
comments in response to a point made by COPFS about
further disclosures by witnesses after evidence on
commission had been taken, also passed to Professor
Bull. | |
6.Papers Tabled by Professor Bull - Taking Evidence on
Commission and Role of the Supporter: Draft Guidance
Paper | Comments/issues | Action |
Taking Evidence on Commission:
Draft Guidance (tabled by Professor Bull)
(copy attached) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Role of Supporter Draft Guidance
(Note from Professor Davies) (copy
attached) Next Steps | The following points were discussed:- - Frequency of use of taking evidence on
commission as a special measure - it was
concluded that it is unlikely to happen
often particularly in respect of child
witnesses.
- To what extent would interviewers be
trained in taking evidence in this way -
agreed that this was a question that the
contractors should put to the Law Society,
the Faculty of Advocates and the Judicial
Studies Committee.
- The issue of who would act as the
Commissioner and the concerns around the
possible difficulties that could arise
should the Judge appoint another party to
act as the Commissioner - it was explained
that it is for the Court to decide who to
appoint as the Commissioner.
- The question of whether the media would
be allowed to be present when evidence was
being taken on commission was considered -
it was concluded that if there were no
reporting restrictions at the trial the
media would be present at the trial but not
at the commissioning of evidence.
- Who would have the right to see the
video recording of the proceedings - it was
explained that the video would be the
property of the court and that parties
would have to apply to the clerk to the
court to view it. The judge and the jury
would also be able to view the video. The
Victims and Witnesses Unit would ascertain
the position.
- The question of whether a visually
recorded prior statement could be
cross-examined through a commission was
considered and it was agreed that it
could.
- It was agreed that there would need to
be a live audio link between the accused
and his representatives.
- The question of what the court and
accused should be able to see was
considered - it was agreed that there would
need to be a camera to provide head and
shoulder shots of the witness and another
covering the whole room and all others
present. The meeting was unsure as to
whether that would meet ECHR
requirements.
- Timing of taking evidence on commission
- the Victims and Witnesses Unit suggested
that this should be as soon as possible in
the proceedings if not before the beginning
of the actual trial.
- Would the supporter have a passive or
more active role - it was agreed the
supporter should have a passive role.
- Guidance should also cover the location
of the supporter, i.e. where do they sit in
relation to the witness?
- Professor Bull advised that first draft
of both pieces of guidance will be made
available to Project Steering Group Members
week commencing 20th December 2004.
| . . . . . - Researchers to take up with the Law
Society, Faculty of Advocates and the
Judicial Studies Committee
. . . . . . . - Victims and Witnesses Unit to check
position with OSSE
. . . . . . . . . . - Victims and Witnesses Unit to check the
position with the Lord President's Private
Office re. accessibility of video and the
destruction of evidence.
. - Victims and Witnesses Unit to consider
ECHR question with OSSE and Equipment and
Accommodation sub-group
. . . . . . . - The Victims and Witnesses Unit to take
up with OSSE
. . . - Frank Russell agreed to send to
Professor Bull a copy of VSS guidance on
how to treat children.
- Members consider draft and provide as
much feedback as possible on drafts to help
improve guidance
|
7. AOB - Professor Bull and Maggie Mellon of
Justice for Children to meet.
8. Date of the next meeting - Agreed to hold
the next meeting week commencing 10th January 2005.
Victims and Witnesses Unit
29 November 2004