VWTC/02/05
VULNERABLE WITNESSES ACT IMPLEMENTATION STEERING
GROUP
TRAINING AND COMMUNICATIONS SUB-GROUP
GUIDANCE FOR PRACTITIONERS ON THE NEEDS OF WITNESSES
WITH SPECIAL NEEDS
1. At the meeting of the Project Steering Group for the
guidance on taking evidence on commission and the use of a
supporter on 14 January there was discussion about whether
these pieces of guidance could contain a chapter on the
needs of witnesses with special needs. It was agreed that
this would not be appropriate but that the Victims and
witnesses unit would consider further how this issue might
be addressed.
2. The Victims and Witnesses Unit subsequently contacted
ENABLE who had raised the point at the meeting to explore
the possibility that ENABLE might produce a stand alone
piece of guidance for inclusion in the Vulnerable Witnesses
Act guidance pack. And in addition a short précis of that
guidance which would be included in each individual piece
of guidance to be contained in the pack. The timescale for
producing such guidance would however, be very tight.
3. ENABLE has yet to formally respond to this suggestion
but whether or not ENABLE takes this on Members' views are
invited on the principle of going down this route and, if
agreed, views on how this project might be tied in with the
ENABLE project for an interactive DVD as discussed at item
4 above are also sought.
SEJD
Victims and Witnesses Unit
February 2005
ANNEX
TO: Catherine Montgomery Children's Officer ENABLE 6th Floor 7 Buchanan Street Glasgow G1 3HL | FROM: Justice Department Victims and Witnesses Unit St Andrew's House Regent Road Edinburgh EH1 3DG Telephone: 0131-244 2690 Fax: 0131-244 3548 Bill.moore@scotland.gsi.gov.uk http://www.scotland.gov.uk Your ref: Our ref: 21 January 2005 |
Dear Catherine
I refer to the discussion at the Project Steering Group
on the draft guidance on taking evidence on commission and
the use of a supporter on 14 January about whether the
guidance on taking evidence on commission should contain
material on training for interviewing people with special
needs.
We reached the conclusion at that meeting that it would
not be appropriate to do that but agreed that I would
consider how the needs of people with special needs who
come into contact with the justice system as witnesses
might be addressed through guidance on the Vulnerable
Witnesses act.
In our subsequent telephone conversation I sounded you
out about the possibility that Enable, possibly working
with other agencies might be able to pull together material
which could be "stand alone" in our proposed guidance pack
as well as a short piece for inclusion in each individual
piece of guidance which would make up the pack.
We envisage that the main material would alert
practitioners in the justice system to the need to work in
ways that are more responsive and sensitive to people with
a variety of special needs vIt might provide examples of
best practice as to how to explain to people with special
needs what might be required of them as a witness, what the
special measures would involve, dos and don'ts of
interviewing people with special needs and point to where
training on this in particular area would be available.
The short paragraph in each individual piece of guidance
might be by way of a signpost to the "stand alone" material
in the pack with the aim of alerting the reader that they
must keep the needs of people with special needs in mind in
their dealings with them. This could be incorporated in a
statement concerning the promotion of equality and the
tackling of discrimination.
Any work undertaken would need to complement that
already done by COPFS and SCS on promoting equality, and
take account of what guidance and training is already
provided to practitioners such as judges and sheriffs,
advocates and lawyers.
These are our initial thoughts but we would like to
invite Enable working with others, as appropriate, to
consider if this is a project which Enable might wish to
take on and develop and, if so, to propose a specification
for the work bearing in mind that the guidance pack will
relate to the special measures and will be aimed at a wide
range of practitioners beyond those in the legal
profession, such as the police, social workers, support
organisations and other statutory and voluntary agencies.
Any proposals should, of course, be costed.
We look forward to receiving your views on this and
would be happy to discuss this further with you if that
would be helpful.
Yours sincerely
W J MOORE