Minutes of the 3rd Meeting of the Freshwater Fisheries
Forum Steering Group held at Strathearn House, Broxden,
Perth, on Friday 27 August 2004.
In attendance:
Gordon Brown - SEERAD (Chairman)
David Dunkley - SEERAD
Graeme Waugh - SEERAD
Shauna Cranney- SEERAD (Secretariat)
Dr John Armstrong - Fisheries Research Services
George Holdsworth - Association of Scottish Stillwater
Fisheries
David Howell - Scottish Natural Heritage
Colin Innes - Salmon and Trout Association
(Scotland)
Derek Keith - Scottish Campaign for Public Angling
Professor Peter Maitland - Fish Conservation Centre
Willie Miller- Consultative Committee on Protection
Orders
Callum Sinclair - Scottish Environment Protection
Agency
Major General Seymour Monro - Atlantic Salmon Trust
Ronnie Picken - Scottish Anglers National
Association
Brian Davidson - Institute of Fisheries Management
Andrew Wallace - Association of Salmon Fishery
Boards
Ron Woods - Scottish Federation for Coarse Angling
Jane Wright - Association of West Coast Fisheries
Trusts
Introduction
1. Gordon Brown informed the Steering Group
members that he would now be acting as Chairman to allow
David Dunkley to participate more actively in the
discussions.
Apologies
2. Apologies had been received from Robert
Ritchie - Salmon Net Fishing Association of Scotland;
Alastair Stephen, representing the Institute of Fisheries
Management - Brian Davidson deputised for Alastair Stephen;
Sarah Bayley - Association of West Coast Fisheries Trusts
and Dr Colin Bull representing east coast fisheries
trusts.
Minutes of the Previous Meetings (1st and
2nd)
3. The following change to the wording under
point 5 of the minutes of the 2nd Steering Group meeting
was submitted by George Holdsworth; "the ASSF stated that
it represented all types of commercial stillwater
fisheries". This change was accepted by the Steering
Group. The minutes of the 1st and 2nd meetings were
approved.
SNH indicated that they had not received a copy of the
responses for the Green Paper - 'Scotland's freshwater fish
and fisheries: Securing their future'. This was one of the
action points from the first Steering Group meeting.
Action - SEERAD to put approved minutes on the
Scottish Executive Web site
- SEERAD to send SNH a copy of the
Summary of responses for the Green Paper
Matters Arising
Task Matrix/ Status Report (SFFF SG 3-1)
4. The Chairman thanked Andrew Wallace for his
role in putting together the Task Matrix. The Group agreed
that the Task Matrix provided a timeline to work to and
would be useful in showing progress on each topic.
5. The Group agreed that the following issues
should be added to the Task Matrix:
· Conservation of coarse fish stocks;
· Management Structures; and
· Funding.
6. It was suggested that the Task Matrix should
be divided into three headings; Management Structures,
Access, and Miscellaneous items. This would help the
debate to be more structured.
Action - SEERAD to update the Task Matrix,
dividing the issues into three headings.
- Steering Group to send
suggestions for issues arising under the miscellaneous
section by 3 September
- SEERAD to add the emergence of
saltwater (mullet and bass) fish in Scotland
to the Task Matrix
- SEERAD to have suggested timings
ready before all Steering Group meetings
- SEERAD to post the Task Matrix on
the website
Paragraph outlining who members represent
7. The Chairman thanked the members of the
Steering Group who had already submitted the paragraph
outlining who their organisations represent and asked those
who had not done so to do so within this week.
Action - Steering Group members to email paragraph to SEERAD by 3
September
- SEERAD to post members
information on the website
Minutes of other Fora
8. The Chairman reported that the other two
relevant fora where fisheries Bill proposals would be
discussed were: The Highlands Aquaculture Forum and the
Scottish Inshore Fisheries Advisory Group. The notes of
these meetings would be available to the Steering
Group.
Action.- SEERAD to invite Gabby Pieraccini to a
future Steering Group meeting to describe inshore
fisheries proposals
-
Chairman undertook to report back on proposals
developed at the Highlands
Aquaculture Forum
Representation of the British Trout Farmers Restocking
Association (BTFRA) and the Scottish Rural Property and
Business Association (SRPBA).
9. It was suggested at the last Steering Group
meeting that a representative from the British Trout
Farmers Restocking Association (BTFRA) should be invited to
future Steering Group meetings. SEERAD reported that they
had looked for information on the BTFRA on the internet,
and had found no BTFRA website but did find references to
BTFRA in respect of one fish farm on other websites. It
was agreed that the British Trout Association should be the
body invited to attend.
10. It was suggested that it would be useful to
invite representatives of the land owners who would be
affected by issues such as access to future meetings. A
suggestion was made to contact the National Farmers Union
(Scotland)(NFU(S)) and the Scottish RPBA.
11. SCAPA objected to the SRPBA being invited to
future meetings. However, the rest of the Steering Group
felt that it was important that these Groups were
invited.
Action - SEERAD to contact NFU(S) and SRPBA and
invite them to future Steering Group
meetings
- SEERAD to invite a representative
from the BTA to future meetings
Representation for East Coast Fishery Trusts
12. The Chairman reported that due to other work
commitments, Colin Bull would no longer be representing the
East Coast Fishery Trusts interests. The Group agreed to
invite Bob Laughton (Spey District Salmon Fishery Board) to
replace Colin Bull as the representative for this
Group.
Action -
SEERAD to circulate agendas ASAP for future
Steering Group meetings to permit
members to decide on requirement for their
attendance.
Communicating the Group's messages
13. The possibility of obtaining Scottish
Executive media training was discussed at the last Steering
Group meeting. The Group was informed that this training
is only available for Scottish Executive staff.
14. It was also reported that the Scottish
Executive Press Office could only be used by the Group when
the Press Releases had a SEERAD lead. In general, all
press releases giving the views of the Group would require
full approval from the Steering Group before they were
issued.
Link to discussion forum on members' organisations web
pages
15. It was agreed that the Steering Group should
stimulate discussion on the electronic discussion forum.
It was suggested that members should put links to the
discussion forum on their respective organisation's
websites. A number of those present indicated that this had
already been done.
16. There was some discussion about how the
comments posted on the discussion forum should be used by
the group. The Chairman suggested that the Secretariat
should summarise responses from the discussion forum, and
then circulate to the Steering Group before meetings.
Action - SEERAD to issue the full web address
for the Discussion forum to the Steering
Group
- SEERAD to summarise discussion
forum responses and circulate to Steering
Group members prior to meetings
Bill issues
Legislative options for angling methods (SFFF SG
3-2)
17. A paper on the legislative options for angling
was presented by Ron Woods. The paper described the
situation in England and Wales, and how angling methods
were regulated by Environment Agency byelaws. Ron Woods
also presented a matrix showing how Environment Agency
regulations set different limits on the number of rods that
can be used for coarse and game fishing in different
waterways.
Rod Numbers
18. Following substantial discussion, some
Steering Group members thought that the regulation of the
use of multiple rods should be left to local management
level. There were concerns raised regarding the
enforceability aspect of introducing multiple rods and the
difficulty in distinguishing between the different types of
angling.
19. The Group also discussed the possibility of
having one set of regulations for game angling and one set
for coarse angling. A paper (SFFF 3-6) was produced and
circulated for discussion at the meeting.
Action - Steering Group members to provide
responses to SFFF 3 -6 by 3 September
The use of Live Fish as Bait
20. To try to focus the debate on this issue, 3
options for discussion were proposed:
· An outright ban;
· Restricting the use of live fish as bait to
waters from which the bait has been caught; or
· Relying on movement controls and a code of
practice on the use of live fish as bait.
21. The Chairman asked the Steering Group for
their views on this issue. The table below shows each
organisation's view on this:
Organisation | View |
ASFB | Outright ban |
Fish Conservation centre | Outright ban |
Consultative Committee on Protection
Orders | Outright ban |
Scottish Anglers National
Association | Outright ban |
Atlantic Salmon Trust | Outright ban |
Institute of Fisheries Management | Outright ban |
Association of Scottish Stillwater
Fisheries | No view |
Scottish Federation for Coarse
Anglers | Similar position to England and
Wales |
Association of West Coast Fisheries
Trusts | Outright ban (but has not spoken to
Trusts yet) |
Scottish Campaign for Public Angling | Outright ban |
Scottish Natural Heritage | Restrict to bait from the same
catchment |
Scottish Environment Protection
Agency | Need to check the view from SEPA |
Salmon and Trout Association | Outright ban |
22. It was agreed that the Steering Group should
be aware of the possible welfare implications of this
issue. There were also concerns about the ability to
enforce a scheme where the use of live bait is restricted
to the use of the fish from catchments from which they had
been caught.
Action - AWCFT to consult members on the use of
live fish as bait
-
SEERAD to meet with the Animal Health and Welfare
Division to examine wider animal welfare
implications
Information on Section 30 of the Salmon and Freshwater
Fisheries Act 1975 (SFFF SG 3-3)
23. It was reported that there were limited powers
in Scotland to control the movements of fish between
catchments.
24. The Steering Group had been provided with a
paper on Section 30 of the 1975 Act, outlining the
situation in England and Wales on fish movements between
catchments. The document highlighted some of the failings
of Section 30 including:
· Enforceability;
· Addressing supply side factors; and
· Addressing the people who put the fish in the
water.
25. The Steering Group agreed that, in the first
instance, a definition of what species were native and non
native to Scotland had to be considered. It was agreed
that the basic principles of the Section 30 model were
sound, and that the problems arose in the enforcement
issue.
26. There was a general consensus from the
Steering Group that Scotland should introduce measures to
regulate the movement of fish between catchments, and
section 30 of the 1975 Act, along with the recommendations
of the EA in the light of experience of its use, would
provide a suitable basis for developing such measures.
Action - Peter Maitland to circulate details of
fish native to Scotland
Access (SFFF SG 3-4)
27. Derek Keith gave a short talk on the issue of
access in Scotland. The main points raised included:
· Placing of the notice that an Order has been
made only in the Edinburgh Gazette was not sufficient to
allow full public awareness that an Order had come into
force;
· The length of the consultation period ( at
least 28 days) was not long enough as generally the minimum
was used;
· If more than one objection was received then a
public inquiry should be held;
· No historical data existed to measure increased
fishing against;
· Land, therefore fishing rights changes
hands;
· Liaison Committees are not effective;
· Wardens are nominated by the owners of the
fisheries; and
· Orders have been renewed 'without limit of
time'.
28. It was suggested that the Steering Group
should also look at areas where Protection Orders had
proven to work well. It was agreed that the failings of
the present Protection Order system needed to be identified
and listed.
29. There was general agreement from the Steering
Group that there were problems with the 1976 Act. The
Group was reminded that the Minister has stated that the
1976 Act will be repealed and replaced with something
better. The Group agreed that there are many instances
where different anglers, with reasonable aspirations to
target different species, might wish to access the same
waters at the same times, and that managers will have to be
able to deal with these potentially conflicting fishing
needs. It was suggested that when repealing the 1976 Act,
the Steering Group should come up with sensible resource
sharing ideas.
Action - Organise a visit to a Protection Order
area such as the Tweed
- 4 or 5 people to develop some
scenarios for discussion on management issues
before the next Steering Group meeting. SEERAD to
suggest personnel
- 4 or 5 people to develop some
scenarios for access for the next
Steering Group meeting. SEERAD
to suggest personnel
- Ron Woods to email papers on Management Structures from the
Angling for Change Group before the next
meeting
AOB
Date of the next Freshwater Fisheries Forum
30. The Chairman suggested that the Freshwater
Fisheries Forum should be used for providing feedback on
the progress made by the Steering Group on the various Bill
issues. Members of the Steering Group would be asked to
gave presentations on the various Bill topics. It was
suggested that the date of the next Freshwater Fisheries
Forum should be postponed to late January 2005 when the
Steering Group would have more to report to back to
Stakeholders.
Action - SEERAD to check the availability
of Stirling University for January.
Date and Place of Next Meeting
31. 10:00, 7 October 2004, Strathearn House,
Perth