On this page:

NSF April 2004 - Charging Scheme

Water Framework Directive National Stakeholder Forum

27/28 April 2004

Proposed charging scheme

Martin Marsden, Water Policy Unit Manager, SEPA

1. General introduction:

SEPA is facing a major change to the scope of its functions. It will be moving from being a pollution control authority covering point sources discharges to have responsibilities for covering abstractions, impoundments, engineering and diffusion pollution control. In addition, SEPA will be responsible for the delivery of River Basin Management planning. These additional duties will affect all aspects of SEPA from Regulation and Environmental Monitoring to Public Affairs. From SEPA's perspective it is important that it is funded so that it can service these new responsibilities quickly and efficiently. However, such a step change in funding requirements raises major concerns from those organisations who face increased charges. This is a matter of especial concern for those organisation who have not contributed, via SEPA's charging scheme, to the provision of an environmental protection service for Scotland.

2. Development of charging scheme

SEPA is determined to develop the new charging scheme in a transparent manner. As announced at the last Executive Stakeholders Forum, SEPA convened its first Regulatory Stakeholder Forum on 29 March 2004. This meeting was focused on the implications of the charging scheme.

At this meeting SEPA described its current estimates of the costs of introducing the new regimes. SEPA currently spends £25m on the Water Environment of which £11m is raised by charges under the Groundwater Regulations and the Control of Pollution Act charging schemes. SEPA currently considers that an additional £15m will be required to be raised by charging by 2007/8 to deliver the WEWS Requirements. Estimates up to 2009/10 are currently being calculated.

The meeting expressed concern over the size of the resource demand and asked SEPA to identify the benefits which SEPA this expenditure would deliver. They also requested that SEPA re-examine what level of efficiencies could be delivered.

2.4 SEPA has prepared draft specifications for an external audit of the basis of its cost estimates. The draft specifications have been issued to the SEPA Stakeholder Group for comment. A copy of the specifications will be available for the Executive Stakeholder Forum.

2.5 The next meeting of the SEPA Stakeholder Group will discuss the rules for allocating costs between controlled activities. This clearly represents a difficult area with the interests of stakeholders potentially differing. On 29 March there was some preliminary discussion of the issues:

· Operator performance was considered to be an important factor for allocating costs

· Charges allocated on the basis of scale of an activity do not necessarily reflect the level of environmental risk

· Charges should be linked to the resource demands which a controlled

Page updated: Monday, September 27, 2004