On this page:

Implementing the Directive in Scotland

Background to the WEWS Act

The decision was taken to use primary legislation to transpose the requirements of the directive. This would ensure that full Scottish Parliamentary scrutiny was given to the proposed legislation.

Stakeholders views were sought on the full range of issues through two detailed consultation papers, and after taking on board the responses the draft Bill was introduced to the Scottish Parliament in 2002. The proposals also received detailed consideration by the Transport and Environment Committee, and several key amendments were introduced through that process.

After the full Parliamentary process was concluded, the Water Environment and Water Services Act received Royal Assent in March 2003.

Relations with Stakeholders

The Act was strengthened by the open participatory process adopted during its development, and working with stakeholders will continue to be a key element of the implementation process. As part of the process Ministers have set up a National Stakeholder Forum. Further information can be found on the National Stakeholder Forum web page.

In considering the implementation of the Water Framework Directive the Executive is committed to a policy of openness in engaging with all stakeholders.

The department has adopted certain key principles which will be applied during the implementation process.

The key principles are:

  • openness in sharing information wherever possible;
  • clear understanding of status, objectives, conduct and roles in any specific policy development exercises;
  • creating an atmosphere of trust through on going dialogue on issues of common concern.
Designation of River Basin Districts

The final issue that remains for transposition in Scotland is the designation of river basin districts. Further to our earlier consultations we are now proposing to designate a single river basin district for most of Scotland.

Arrangements for the cross-border area with England have yet to be finalised. Our current preference is to designate a single cross-border district covering both the Tweed and Solway catchments. The thinking behind this is principally one of scale - if the majority of Scotland is designated as a single river basin district then it seems practical to apply the same sense of scale to the cross-border area. These proposals were the subject of a short consultation which was published on 3 September, and can be viewed by clicking here.

Further detailed consideration is still to be given to the arrangements which will need to be put in place for the river basin planning process in such a district, and early discussions have already taken place with SEPA and the Environment Agency. The detailed proposals for such arrangements will be issued this year, and consultation with key stake-holders will be carried out. It will be important to manage potential differences in regulation and duties in a practical and sensitive manner and this will be a key objective.

Responsible Authorities

We have transposed the Directive by identifying SEPA as the lead authority in the Act; and of course Scottish Ministers also have clearly defined responsibilities.

But the Act also allows for the designation of other responsible authorities, to ensure that all relevant bodies have regard to the requirements of the Directive in carrying out specific functions, which must also be identified by the designation process. For example, designated authorities must have regard to the social and economic impact of their functions; they must promote sustainable flood management and contribute to the achievement of sustainable development.

We will be giving consideration during the course of this year to which other bodies should be designated as 'responsible authorities' and which of their functions should be designated.

As part of this process the draft discussion paper below was distributed in July to public bodies who have been considered for designation. The paper can be accessed by clicking here.

The Scottish Executive and SEPA are approaching implementation on the basis of five themes.

More information is provided on these themes in later sections.

Page updated: Wednesday, August 3, 2005