SEA Objectives | SEA Sub-Objectives | Indicators | Do Nothing | Short-term Options (see Figure 7.1) | Narrative |
|---|
Beatrice | Inch Cape | Bell Rock | Neart na Gaoithe | Forth Array | Solway Firth | Wigtown Bay | Kintyre | Islay | Argyll Array |
|---|
Climatic Factors |
|---|
To incorporate measures to mitigate and adapt to climate change | To efficiently generate clean energy, working towards Scotland's energy targets | Provision of a renewable source of energy Positive contributions to reducing Scotland's 'carbon footprint'. Extent to which climate change predictions raise the risk to infrastructure over the long term |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Life Cycle Assessments for offshore wind turbines (Elsam 2004 as cited in DECC 2009) have indicated that the life cycle impacts of wind power are lower than those of fossil power plants and, although there is energy input required in the manufacture, construction, installation and decommissioning phases, this is earned back in a relatively short period i.e. months not years. Consequently, all of the short-term options will ultimately play a major beneficial role in reducing Scotland's carbon footprint. Argyll Array would provide the greatest area (361km 2) for wind generation out of the short-term options. |
Water |
|---|
To protect surface and aquifer water quality within STW | To maintain chemical, biological and physical water quality of surface and ground waters | Potential changes to surface and groundwater quality with respect to chemistry, biology or physical characteristics - e.g. EU Directives (shellfish growing waters, WFD etc) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | All options have the potential to affect water quality in parts of the STW and in shellfish growing waters through changes in the water column from sediment dispersion and increased turbidity. However, the impacts are considered uncertain. Further hydrodynamic modelling is required (see Table 9.1 in the Environmental Report) to fully understand the nature of the impacts. |
Geology, sediments and coastal processes |
|---|
To protect the geology, seabed sediments and sedimentary processes within STW | To protect the large scale quality of the seabed and sediments and avoid large scale changes to seabed morphology and sediment transport | Likelihood of large scale changes in geochemistry, bathymetry, sediment grain size distribution and sediment transport budgets |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Without further investigation and modelling of changes in the sediment regime, sea level rise (associated with climate change), coastal processes and morphology, the likelihood of large scale changes remains uncertain. Geomorphological features that could be affected by changes in coastal processes include shingle beaches (e.g. from offshore wind farms at Wigtown Bay and Solway Firth) and sand dunes (e.g. from offshore wind farms at Argyll Array, Islay, Kintyre, Wigtown Bay and Solway Firth) etc |
To avoid significant damage to designated geological sites | Significant physical damage or exclusion to designated geological conservation site |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | There are 64 geological SSSIs around the coastline of Scotland. All options have the potential to affect these geological SSSIs due to changes in sedimentation and coastal processes. Modelling of changes to coastal processes would be required to ascertain whether significant impacts are likely. |
Biodiversity, Flora and Fauna |
|---|
To protect and if appropriate enhance biodiversity, fauna and flora | Avoid significant impact to international and nationally designated conservation sites including draft, proposed, candidate and designated Natura 2000 sites | Presence of conservation site within the 'footprint' of the options - e.g. - SPA, Ramsar, SAC, SSSI (including proposed, draft and candidate sites) and likelihood of potential adverse impacts on conservation site. Note the footprint is determined by the range of the potential impact (e.g. extent of noise envelope, sediment plume size). |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | All options were identified in the Screening Habitat Regulations Appraisal ( HRA) (Halcrow 2009) as having the potential for indirect significant effects on some Natura 2000 sites and their qualifying interest features; however the level of significance of the impact is uncertain at this stage - a HRA will be carried out to determine whether an adverse effect on the integrity of one or more Natura 2000 sites is likely as a result of the Plan. The findings of the HRA may lead to further refinement of the short-term options. No options are likely to result in the direct loss or damage of internationally designated habitat. However, designated habitats within the international conservation sites have the potential to be indirectly affected by changes in sediment circulation, erosion and accretion (see requirement for hydrodynamic/sediment modelling study in Table 9.1 of Environmental Report). All short-term options have the potential to indirectly affect interest features of the European sites e.g. by affecting the migratory route or foraging grounds etc of internationally important breeding seabirds, and/or potentially modifying established migratory routes. |
To avoid significant impact to, or disturbance of European protected species | Presence of EPS (notably bats, otters, dolphins, porpoises, whales and marine turtles) within 'footprint' of the options and likelihood of potential adverse impact on protected species. Note the footprint is determined by the range of the potential impact (e.g. extent of noise envelope, sediment plume size). |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | All options (except 'do nothing') have the potential for direct disturbance/injury to European Protected Species - further consideration of the presence and distribution of species is required at scheme level (see Table 9.1 of the Environmental Report) to determine level of significance. |
Contribute to conservation of the wildlife and wildlife habitats of the United Kingdom | For selected 'valued ecosystem components' no significant loss of diversity, distribution or population. Promotion of conservation where possible and appropriate. |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | All short-term options lie within a spawning ground for BAP fish species or lie within 40km of an Important Bird Area. All short-term options with the exception of Solway Firth, Wigtown Bay and Islay lie offshore from SPAs designated for breeding seabirds. |
Landscape, Seascape and Visual Amenity |
|---|
To protect and conserve landscape and seascape character / visual amenity within STWs. | To protect the diversity and local distinctiveness of high sensitivity landscapes/seascapes | Likely adverse effect on areas of high landscape/seascape character |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | The short-term options in the Solway Firth or in the western areas of Scotland lie within medium or high sensitivity seascape/landscapes, which are fragile and sensitive to offshore windfarm developments. |
To avoid significantly affecting the special qualities of internationally and nationally designated landscape and historic areas | Proximity to World Heritage Sites, National Scenic Areas, Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty and Heritage Coasts |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | The Solway Firth and Wigtown Bay options lie within 8km of a NSA. The sites shown to have minor adverse impacts on landscape designations lie between 13 and 35km from an AONB (a high sensitivity landscape) or a NSA. |
To maintain visual amenity from the coast | Distance of the wind farm from the coastline. |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Due to the distance of Bell Rock, Forth Array, Solway Firth, Wigtown Bay, Kintyre and Argyll Array to the coastline (i.e. within 8km of the nearest occupied land), these options could have a potentially major adverse impact on visual receptors along the coastline. Windfarms within 35km may still be visually significant and would require further assessment at scheme level (taking into consideration turbine design e.g. height and other external influences e.g. climatic factors). |
Population and Human Health |
|---|
To avoid negative effects on human health and population and seek opportunities for enhancement | To avoid significantly affecting recreational users | Disruption to key recreational areas for boating | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Only Inch Cape, Islay and Argyll Array lie outside of RYA cruising routes or sailing areas. No sites are located across only RYA cruising/sailing routes of low recreational use. No heavy use RYA cruising routes cross any of the short-term options. |
Disruption to areas of 'greatest' importance for recreation (as identified in 'A Review of Marine & Coastal Recreation' SNH 2007) | 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| Beatrice and Forth Array lie outside of areas identified by SNH (2007) to be of great importance for recreation. |
Cultural Heritage |
|---|
To protect and, where appropriate, enhance the historic environment and cultural heritage in STW | To avoid damage to known archaeological heritage sites | Likely impact on designated site or features (and setting), military remains and/or designated wreck (not charted wreck) attributable to wind farm development |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Only Bell Rock and Argyll Array are known to have designated archaeological assets or heritage features within their footprint. However, there may be unknown, submerged or non-designated archaeological assets (including 36 non-designated wrecks), features or palaeo-landscapes within the footprint of all short-term options, which will be considered at project level. |
Material Assets |
|---|
To avoid significant conflicts with navigation and shipping | To maintain existing standard of safety of navigation, anchorage and shipping. | Likely interference with a defined navigation routes and/or associated anchorage area potentially resulting in increased collision risk and restrictions on pollution- prevention methods. | 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| All options lie partially or wholly within or close to areas of moderate or high AIS Tracking. |
Option | BEATRICE: Located 13.4km offshore on the Smith Bank in the outer Moray Firth, off the north-east coast of Scotland |
|---|
Environmental Receptors |
|---|
Key receptors potentially at risk from offshore wind development at the site comprise: - Shellfish waters at Dornoch Firth and Cromarty Bay. At the former site, the waters are classified for mussel production and at the latter site, there is commercial interest in harvesting cockles.
- Geological SSSIs (though none lie on the coastline immediately adjacent to Beatrice)
- Moray Firth SAC, Inner Moray Forth SPA/Ramsar, Moray and Naim Coast SPA/Ramsar, Cromarty Firth SPA/Ramsar, Troup, Pennan and Lion's Head SPA, East Caithness Cliffs SPA, Berriedale & Langwell Waters SAC, North Caithness Cliffs SPA, Caithness & Sutherland Peatlands SAC/ SPA/Ramsar, Caithness Lochs SPA/Ramsar, Dornoch Firth & Morrich More SAC, Dornoch Firth and Loch Fleet SPA/Ramsar, River Oykel SAC, Faray and Holm of Faray SAC, Sanday SAC, River Spey SAC, River Moriston SAC, and national conservation sites
- Sites of ecological interest, particularly for nesting seabirds and seals along adjacent coasts of Morayshire and Caithness
- All Annex II species of the EU Habitats Directive in addition to the following species of marine mammal have been observed in the area of the Beatrice field: common seal, bottlenose dolphin (small resident population), grey seal, harbour porpoise, Risso's dolphin, white-beaked dolphin, Atlantic white-sided dolphin, striped dolphin, common dolphin, pilot whale, killer whale, sei whale, humpback whale and minke whale
- Seabed fauna
- Internationally important resident and migrant birds. Divers, seaduck (scoter and eider), gannets, swans and geese are considered to be of greatest sensitivity along the east coast of Scotland ( DECC 2009).
- Spawning grounds for fish (e.g. lemon sole; further afield sprat and herring) and shellfish species (e.g. Nephrops, scallops, pink shrimp, European lobster, edible crab, velvet crab and shore crab).
- Low sensitivity seascape of East Caithness and Sutherland; this is a mainland rocky coastline with open sea views.
- Land based visual receptors (site lies between 13 and 24km of the coast); also marine recreational users though this would require further consideration at scheme level
- Two RYA Cruising Routes; one light recreational route (known to be in common use but does not qualify for medium or heavy classification) and one medium recreational use (popular route on which some recreational craft will be seen at most times during summer daylight hours)
|
Potentially Significant Effects Prior to Mitigation |
|---|
SEA Objectives | Potentially Significant Impacts (based on generic impacts in Chapter 4) | Potential Significance 45 | Likelihood | Permanence | Reversibility | Spatial scale | Mitigation required? Y = Yes, N = No | Mitigation | Residual Effects |
|---|
Climatic factors | - potential to provide 920 MW for offshore wind generation
|  | High | P | I | I | N | N/A |  |
Water | - potential for indirect changes in quality of designated shellfish waters at Dornoch Firth and Cromarty Bay through changes in the water column from sediment dispersion and increased turbidity.
- temporary increase in suspended sediment in water column during installation and decommissioning may have indirect adverse impacts on water and flora, fauna and biodiversity.
|  | Low | R | R | Y | Y | - Further work required to reduce uncertainty regarding potential impacts on water quality (see Table 9.1 of ER - recommendation for hydrodynamic and water quality modelling at project level)
- Potential to reduce impacts through the use of appropriate construction and decommissioning methods.
|  |
Geology, sediments and coastal processes | - potential for impacts on geological SSSIs through changes in coastal processes, resulting in increased erosion/accretion.
|  | Low | I | N | Y | Y | - Further work required to reduce uncertainty regarding potential impacts on coastal processes (see Table 9.1 of ER - recommendation for sediment dynamic modelling at project level)
|  |
Biodiversity, flora and fauna | - potential for significant indirect temporary and permanent impacts on international and national nature conservation sites - uncertain impacts
- direct adverse impacts on spawning grounds for fish species in footprint of works
- potential for adverse impacts on sites of ecological interest, protected species and other important species including breeding seabirds
|  | High | I | I | Y | Y | - Avoid key areas for species and habitats of nature conservation and fisheries value where known
- Reduce impacts through appropriate design and construction methods (e.g. timing to avoid key seasons)
- Further work required to determine impacts on international nature conservation sites to be assessed through the HRA process
|  |
Landscape and seascape | - as the site lies between 13km and 24km from the coastline (a high sensitivity visual receptor but low visual impact over that distance), there is the potential for minor visual impacts for land-based receptors through changes in the physical elements of the seascape; however the visibility of the windfarm would be dependent on turbine design (e.g. height) and external influences (e.g. weather) and the visual significance is subjective.
- the seascape of East Caithness and Sutherland is robust to development and only a minor negative impact is anticipated as the seascape character is unlikely to significantly change as a result of offshore wind development.
|  | High | R | R | Y | N | - Reduce impacts on land-based visual receptors through appropriate design and positioning of development within the Beatrice site
- No mitigation possible for impacts on seascape character - design to be optimised to minimise physical footprint
|  |
Population and human health | - potential permanent loss of existing RYA cruising routes and potential displacement of recreational craft into commercial routes with associated disturbance to navigational safety for recreational craft and increased distance of travel for recreational craft. This has the potential to result in adverse impacts on health and well-being of local recreational users.
|  | High | R | R | Y | Y | - Avoid existing RYA cruising routes and areas of known high recreational activity/importance where possible.
- Reduce impacts through appropriate design and positioning of development within the Beatrice site
|  |
Cultural heritage | - No known impacts on cultural heritage
|  | N/A | - | - | N | N | N/A |  |
Material assets | - potential for adverse impacts on navigation through the introduction of wind turbines and associated increased vessel movements during construction and decommissioning
|  | High | R | N | Y | Y | - Avoid existing navigation, shipping and aviation routes where possible (it is assumed that wind farms would not be consented where they would pose unacceptable risks to navigational safety).
|  |
Potential for cumulative/in-combination effects? |
|---|
With proposals for other locations/groups of offshore wind development | Round 3 Offshore Wind Zone 1 - Moray Firth: this Round 3 zone borders the eastern edge of Beatrice. | Potential for in-combination and cumulative impacts on: - - Biodiversity, flora and fauna (see Appendix 3 of the AA Screening Report for in-combination effects on Natura 2000 sites)
- increased number of physical barriers to fish movement/migration
- multiple noise sources audible to marine mammals, particularly during construction may occur at the same time and extend over a long period noise, adversely affecting marine mammals
- birds and fish, increased collision risk with birds.
- potential for beneficial cumulative impacts of sites through increased structures providing new reef habitat and new substrate and potential to act as fish aggregation devices.
- Landscape/seascape - potential for cumulative effects on seascape character of east Fife/Firth of Tay, as development may be concentrated within this medium sensitivity seascape.
Material assets - potential increased conflicts with commercial fishing and potential cumulative impacts of all marine developments on sea-based recreational routes e.g. the displacement of recreational craft into commercial routes. |
Beatrice demonstrator project |
Round 3 Offshore Wind Zone 2 - Firth of Forth |
Potential short-term options of Bell Rock, Neart na Gaoithe |
In-combination with other plans, programmes and strategies? | Oil and gas licence blocks | Potential for in-combination and cumulative impacts on: - - Biodiversity, flora and fauna (see Appendix 3 of the AA Screening Report for in-combination effects on Natura 2000 sites)
- increased number of physical barriers to fish movement/migration
- multiple noise sources audible to marine mammals, particularly during construction may occur at the same time and extend over a long period, adversely affecting marine mammals
- birds and fish, increased collision risk with birds.
- potential for beneficial cumulative impacts of sites through increased structures providing new reef habitat and new substrate and potential to act as fish aggregation devices.
- Material assets - potential increased conflicts with commercial fishing and potential cumulative impacts of all marine developments on sea-based recreational routes e.g. the displacement of recreational craft into commercial routes.
|
Increased vessel activity from all existing sources (no specific plan), including motorised water sports, fishing vessels, research and wildlife-watching vessels, vessels associated with known on and offshore development, shipping and other ports | Potential for in-combination and cumulative impacts on: - - Geology, sediments and coastal processes - potential cumulative disturbance to seabed (e.g. scouring) with other activities including increased vessel activity/anchoring and demersal fishing (e.g. trawling).
Material assets - potential increased conflicts with commercial fishing, and navigation, and potential cumulative impacts of all marine developments on sea-based recreational routes e.g. the displacement of recreational craft into commercial routes. |
Edinburgh Harbour - waterfront regeneration project at Granton | Potential for in-combination and cumulative impacts on: - - Geology, sediments and coastal processes - potential for adverse effects associated with increased sediment and turbidity as a result of works
- biodiversity, flora and fauna (see Appendix 3 of the AA Screening Report for in-combination effects on Natura 2000 sites)
- multiple noise and vibration sources audible to marine mammals, particularly during piling for construction, may occur at the same time and extend over a long period, adversely affecting marine mammals
potential for beneficial cumulative impacts of sites through increased structures providing new reef habitat and new substrate and potential to act as fish aggregation devices. |
Bo'ness Foreshore Re-development |
Dundee Waterfront Regeneration | Potential for in-combination and cumulative impacts on: - - Biodiversity, flora and fauna (see Appendix 3 of the AA Screening Report for in-combination effects on Natura 2000 sites)
- increased number of physical barriers to fish movement/migration
- multiple noise sources audible to marine mammals, particularly during construction may occur at the same time and extend over a long period noise, adversely affecting marine mammals
- birds and fish, increased collision risk with birds.
- potential for beneficial cumulative impacts of sites through increased structures providing new reef habitat and new substrate and potential to act as fish aggregation devices.
|
Proposed new Forth replacement crossing | Potential for in-combination and cumulative impacts on: - - Geology, sediments and coastal processes - potential for adverse effects associated with
- increased suspended and deposited sediment and turbidity in the Firth of Forth as a result of construction works
- morphological change of subtidal beds and shoreline due to new runoff outfalls and relocation of Scottish Water treated sewage outfall relating to the new crossing
- Water - potential impacts on water quality as a result of spillages of harmful materials during construction - this is a project level impact
- Biodiversity, flora and fauna (see Appendix 3 of the AA Screening Report for in-combination effects on Natura 2000 sites)
multiple noise and vibration sources audible to marine mammals, from piling activity during construction and the excavation of Beamer Rock, may occur at the same time and extend over a long period, adversely affecting marine mammals |
| Middle Bank, Firth of Forth - licensed aggregate extraction area | Potential for in-combination and cumulative impacts on: - - biodiversity, flora and fauna (see Appendix 3 of the AA Screening Report for in-combination effects on Natura 2000 sites)
- increased number of physical barriers to fish movement/migration
- multiple noise sources audible to marine mammals, particularly during construction may occur at the same time and extend over a long period, adversely affecting marine mammals
- Material assets - potential increased conflicts with commercial fishing and potential cumulative impacts of all marine developments on sea-based recreational routes e.g. the displacement of recreational craft into commercial routes.
Geology, sediments and coastal processes - potential cumulative disturbance to seabed (e.g. from scouring) |
Potentially Significant Effects Prior to Mitigation |
|---|
SEA Objectives | Potentially Significant Impacts (based on generic impacts in Chapter 4) | Potential Significance 46 | Likelihood | Permanence | Reversibility | Spatial scale | Mitigation required? Y = Yes, N = No | Mitigation | Residual Effects |
|---|
Climatic Factors | - potential to provide 905 MW for offshore wind generation
|  | High | P | I | I | N | N/A |  |
Water | - potential for indirect changes in quality of adjacent shellfish waters at St Andrews to Fife Ness, Fife Ness to Elie, North Berwick to Dunbar and Arbroath through changes in the water column from sediment dispersion and increased turbidity.
|  | Low | R | R | Y | Y | - Further work required to reduce uncertainty regarding potential impacts on water quality and Shellfish Waters (see Table 9.1 of ER - recommendation for hydrodynamic and water quality modelling at project level)
|  |
Geology, sediments and coastal processes | - potential impact on Tayport-Tentsmuir Coast and Barry Links geological SSSIs through changes in coastal processes, resulting in increased erosion/accretion.
|  | Low | I | N | Y | Y | - Further work required to reduce uncertainty regarding potential impacts on coastal processes (see Table 9.1 of ER - recommendation for sediment dynamic modelling at project level)
|  |
Biodiversity, Flora and Fauna | - potential for significant indirect impact on international and national nature conservation sites and protected species including breeding seabirds
- direct adverse impacts on nursery and spawning grounds for fish species in footprint of works
|  | High | I | I | Y | Y | - Avoid key areas for species and habitats of nature conservation and fisheries value where known
- Reduce impacts through appropriate design and construction methods (e.g. timing to avoid key seasons)
- Further work required to determine impacts on international nature conservation sites to be assessed through HRA
|  |
Landscape and seascape | - potential for minor adverse impact on low-medium sensitivity seascape of north east coast and moderate adverse impact on medium sensitivity seascape of east Fife/Firth of Tay.
- As the site lies between 13km and 24km off the coastline (a high sensitivity visual receptor but low visual impact over that distance), there is the potential for minor adverse visual impacts for land-based receptors through changes in the physical elements of the seascape; however the visibility of the windfarm would be dependent on turbine design (e.g. height) and external influences (e.g. climatic factors) and the visual significance is subjective
|  | High | R | R | Y | N | - Reduce impacts on land-based visual receptors through appropriate design and positioning of development within the Inch Cape site
- No mitigation possible for impacts on seascape character - design to be optimised to minimise physical footprint
|  |
Population and human health | - potential adverse impact on shoreline anglers
- potential permanent loss of existing RYA cruising route of medium recreational importance and potential displacement of recreational craft into commercial routes with associated disturbance to navigational safety for recreational craft and increased distance of travel for recreational craft. This has the potential to result in adverse impacts on health and well-being of local recreational users.
|  | High | R | R | Y | Y | - Avoid existing RYA cruising routes and areas of known high recreational activity/importance where possible.
- Reduce impacts through appropriate design and positioning of development within the Inch Cape site and associated onshore development
|  |
Cultural heritage | - No known impacts on cultural heritage
|  | High | - | - | N | N | N/A |  |
Material assets | - potential for adverse impacts on navigation through the introduction of wind turbines and associated increased vessel movements during construction and decommissioning
|  | High | R | N | Y | Y | - Avoid existing navigation, shipping and aviation routes where possible (it is assumed that wind farms would not be consented where they would pose unacceptable risks to navigational safety).
|  |
Potential for cumulative/in-combination effects? |
|---|
With proposals for other locations/groups of offshore wind development | Round 3 Offshore Wind Zone 2 - Firth of Forth | Potential for in-combination and cumulative impacts on: - - Biodiversity, flora and fauna (see Appendix 3 of the AA Screening Report for in-combination effects on Natura 2000 sites)
- increased number of physical barriers to fish movement/migration
- multiple noise sources audible to marine mammals, particularly during construction may occur at the same time and extend over a long period noise, adversely affecting marine mammals
- birds and fish, increased collision risk with birds.
- potential for beneficial cumulative impacts of sites through increased structures providing new reef habitat and new substrate and potential to act as fish aggregation devices.
- Landscape/seascape - potential for cumulative effects on seascape character of east Fife/Firth of Tay, as development may be concentrated within this medium sensitivity seascape.
Material assets - potential increased conflicts with commercial fishing and potential cumulative impacts of all marine developments on sea-based recreational routes e.g. the displacement of recreational craft into commercial routes. |
Potential short-term options of Bell Rock, Neart na Gaoithe |
In-combination with other plans, programmes and strategies? | Increased vessel activity from all existing sources (no specific plan), including motorised water sports, fishing vessels, research and wildlife-watching vessels, vessels associated with known on and offshore development, shipping and other ports | Potential for in-combination and cumulative impacts on: - - Geology, sediments and coastal processes - potential cumulative disturbance to seabed (e.g. scouring) with other activities including increased vessel activity/anchoring and demersal fishing (e.g. trawling).
Material assets - potential increased conflicts with commercial fishing, and navigation, and potential cumulative impacts of all marine developments on sea-based recreational routes e.g. the displacement of recreational craft into commercial routes. |
Edinburgh Harbour - waterfront regeneration project at Granton and Leith | Potential for in-combination and cumulative impacts on: - - Geology, sediments and coastal processes - potential for adverse effects associated with increased sediment and turbidity as a result of works
- biodiversity, flora and fauna (see Appendix 3 of the AA Screening Report for in-combination effects on Natura 2000 sites)
- multiple noise and vibration sources audible to marine mammals, particularly during piling for construction, may occur at the same time and extend over a long period, adversely affecting marine mammals
potential for beneficial cumulative impacts of sites through increased structures providing new reef habitat and new substrate and potential to act as fish aggregation devices. |
Bo'ness Foreshore Re-development |
Dundee Waterfront Regeneration | Potential for in-combination and cumulative impacts on: - - Biodiversity, flora and fauna (see Appendix 3 of the AA Screening Report for in-combination effects on Natura 2000 sites)
- increased number of physical barriers to fish movement/migration
- multiple noise sources audible to marine mammals, particularly during construction may occur at the same time and extend over a long period noise, adversely affecting marine mammals
- birds and fish, increased collision risk with birds.
- potential for beneficial cumulative impacts of sites through increased structures providing new reef habitat and new substrate and potential to act as fish aggregation devices.
|
Proposed new Forth replacement crossing | Potential for in-combination and cumulative impacts on: - - Geology, sediments and coastal processes - potential for adverse effects associated with
- increased suspended and deposited sediment and turbidity in the Firth of Forth as a result of construction works
- morphological change of subtidal beds and shoreline due to new runoff outfalls and relocation of Scottish Water treated sewage outfall relating to the new crossing
- Water - potential impacts on water quality as a result of spillages of harmful materials during construction - this is a project level impact
- Biodiversity, flora and fauna (see Appendix 3 of the AA Screening Report for in-combination effects on Natura 2000 sites)
multiple noise and vibration sources audible to marine mammals, from piling activity during construction and the excavation of Beamer Rock, may occur at the same time and extend over a long period, adversely affecting marine mammals |
| Middle Bank, Firth of Forth - licensed aggregate extraction area | Potential for in-combination and cumulative impacts on: - - biodiversity, flora and fauna (see Appendix 3 of the AA Screening Report for in-combination effects on Natura 2000 sites)
- increased number of physical barriers to fish movement/migration
- multiple noise sources audible to marine mammals, particularly during construction may occur at the same time and extend over a long period, adversely affecting marine mammals
- Material assets - potential increased conflicts with commercial fishing and potential cumulative impacts of all marine developments on sea-based recreational routes e.g. the displacement of recreational craft into commercial routes.
Geology, sediments and coastal processes - potential cumulative disturbance to seabed (e.g. from scouring) |
Option | BELLROCK: located 9.6km offshore, off the East Coast of Angus on the Fife coastline, Scotland |
|---|
Environmental Receptors |
|---|
Receptors potentially at risk from offshore wind development at the site comprise: - Shellfish growing waters at Arbroath, St Andrews to Fife Ness, Fife Ness to Elie and North Berwick to Dunbar. None of these shellfish waters have been classified for commercial shellfish production.
- Geological SSSIs of Tayport-Tentsmuir Coast (including offshore sandbanks and mudflats) and Barry Links (beach dune and links landforms)
- Barry Links SAC, Firth of Tay & Eden Estuay SAC/ SPA/Ramsar, River Tay SAC, Cameron Reservoir SPA/Ramsar, Forth Islands SPA, Isle of May SAC, Montrose Basin SPA/Ramsar, Forth of Forth SPA/Ramsar, St Abb's Head to Fast Castle SPA, River South Esk SAC, River Tweed SAC, Foulsheugh SPA, Loch Leven SPA/Ramsar, Slammanan Plateau SPA, Fala Flow SPA/Ramsar, Greenlaw Moor SPA, Din Moss/Hoselaw Loch SPA/Ramsar, Westwater SPA/Ramsar, Gladhouse Reservoir SPA/Ramsar, Loch of Skene SPA/Ramsar, Muir of Dinnet SAC/ SPA/Ramsar, South Tayside Goose Roosts SPA/Ramsar, Berwickshire and North Northumberland Coast SAC, River Teith SAC, additional overseas Natura 2000 sites and national conservation sites
- Important Bird Area at Eden Estuary, Tentsmuir Point and Abertay Sands to the west of the site, supporting large numbers of wintering waders and wildfowl. Divers, seaduck (scoter and eider), gannets, swans and geese are considered to be of greatest sensitivity along the east coast of Scotland ( DECC 2009). Breeding seabirds within nearby SPAs.
- Marine mammals including a small population of bottlenose dolphins resident in the Moray Firth, which range off the east coast
- Nursery ground for sandeel, whiting, nephrops, lemon sole, cod, plaice and saithe
- Spawning grounds for fish species: sandeel, plaice and lemon sole
- Medium sensitivity seascape of Fife /Firth of Tay Seascape Unit, characterised by a deposition coastline with open views, Outer Firths and less developed Inner Firths
- Land based visual receptors as site lies within 13km of coast; also marine recreational users though this would require further consideration at scheme level
- Recreational users: shoreline important for anglers
- RYA Cruising Route of medium recreational use (popular route on which some recreational craft will be seen at most times during summer daylight hours) and RYA Sailing Area (area in extensive use for general day sailing by all types of recreational craft but particularly smaller craft)
- Bell Rock Lighthouse A-Listed Building; the world's second oldest and automatic lighthouse occupying Bell Rock reef
- Sea vessels: the majority of shipping is associated with access to ports in the Firths of Forth and Tay, and consists mainly of cargo vessels and tankers. There are no traffic separation schemes or anchorages in the area
|
Potentially Significant Effects Prior to Mitigation |
|---|
SEA Objectives | Potentially Significant Impacts (based on generic impacts in Chapter 4) | Potential Significance 47 | Likelihood | Permanence | Reversibility | Spatial scale | Mitigation required? Y = Yes, N = No | Mitigation | Residual Effects |
|---|
Climatic factors | - Potential to provide 700 MW for offshore wind generation
|  | High | P | I | I | N | N/A |  |
Water | - potential for indirect changes in quality of adjacent shellfish waters at St Andrews to Fife Ness, Fife Ness to Elie, North Berwick to Dunbar and Arbroath through changes in the water column from sediment dispersion and increased turbidity.
|  | Low | R | R | Y | Y | - Further work required to reduce uncertainty regarding potential impacts on water quality and Shellfish Waters (see Table 9.1 of ER - recommendation for hydrodynamic and water quality modelling at project level)
|  |
Geology, sediments and coastal processes | - potential for significant indirect impacts on geological SSSIs through changes in coastal processes, resulting in increased erosion/accretion.
|  | Low | I | N | Y | Y | - Further work required to reduce uncertainty regarding potential impacts on coastal processes (see Table 9.1 of ER - recommendation for sediment dynamic modelling at project level)
|  |
Biodiversity, Flora and Fauna | - potential for significant indirect impact on international and national nature conservation sites and protected species
- potential adverse impacts on wintering waders and wildfowl, particularly in the adjacent Important Bird Area and on breeding seabirds
- direct adverse impacts on nursery and spawning grounds for fish species in footprint of works
|  | High | I | I | Y | Y | - Avoid key areas for species and habitats of nature conservation and fisheries value where known
- Reduce impacts through appropriate design and construction methods (e.g. timing to avoid key seasons)
- Further work required to determine impacts on international nature conservation sites to be assessed through the HRA process
|  |
Landscape and seascape | - as the site lies within 13km of the coastline (a high sensitivity visual receptor but moderate visual impact over that distance), there is the potential for moderate adverse visual impacts for land-based receptors through changes in the physical elements of the seascape; however the visibility of the windfarm would be dependent on turbine design (e.g. height) and external influences (e.g. climatic factors) and the visual significance is subjective
- potential for moderate adverse impact on landscape/seascape character of Fife/Firth of Tay as the medium sensitivity seascape is vulnerable, with associated impacts on land-based tourism and recreation.
|  | High | R | R | Y | N | - Reduce impacts on land-based visual receptors through appropriate design and positioning of development within the Bell Rock site
- No mitigation possible for impacts on seascape character - design to be optimised to minimise physical footprint
|  |
Population and human health | - potential loss of existing RYA cruising route and RYA sailing area. Potential displacement of recreational craft into commercial routes with associated disturbance to navigational safety for recreational craft and increased distance of travel for recreational craft. This has the potential to result in adverse impacts on health and well-being of local recreational users.
- potential for adverse impact on shoreline anglers
|  | High | R | R | Y | Y | - Avoid existing RYA cruising routes and areas of known high recreational activity/ importance where possible.
- Reduce impacts through appropriate design and positioning of development within the Bell Rock site and associated onshore development
|  |
Cultural heritage | - potential for adverse impacts on the setting of Bell Rock Lighthouse A-Listed Building, if wind farm is not appropriately sited/designed.
|  | High | - | - | N | N | - Seek to avoid development in the vicinity of the listed lighthouse through appropriate design and positioning of turbines within the site
|  |
Material assets | - potential for adverse impacts on navigation through the introduction of wind turbines and associated increased vessel movements during construction and decommissioning
|  | High | R | N | Y | Y | - Avoid existing navigation, shipping and aviation routes where possible (it is assumed that wind farms would not be consented where they would pose unacceptable risks to navigational safety).
|  |
Potential for cumulative/in-combination effects? |
|---|
With proposals for other locations/groups of offshore wind development | Round 3 Offshore Wind Zone 2 - Firth of Forth | Potential for in-combination and cumulative impacts on: - - Biodiversity, flora and fauna (see Appendix 3 of the AA Screening Report for in-combination effects on Natura 2000 sites)
- increased number of physical barriers to fish movement/migration
- multiple noise sources audible to marine mammals, particularly during construction may occur at the same time and extend over a long period, adversely affecting marine mammals
- birds and fish, increased collision risk with birds.
- potential for beneficial cumulative impacts of sites through increased structures providing new reef habitat and new substrate and potential to act as fish aggregation devices.
- Material assets - potential increased conflicts with commercial fishing and potential cumulative impacts of all marine developments on sea-based recreational routes e.g. the displacement of recreational craft into commercial routes.
- Landscape/seascape - potential for cumulative effects on seascape character of East Fife/Firth of Tay, as development may be concentrated within this medium sensitivity seascape.
- Cultural heritage - potential combined pressures on setting of Bell Rock Listed Lighthouse from various offshore wind zones/developments
|
Potential short-term options of Inch Cape and Neart na Gaoithe |
In-combination with other plans, programmes and strategies? | Increased vessel activity from all existing sources (no specific plan), including motorised water sports, fishing vessels, research and wildlife-watching vessels, vessels associated with known on and offshore development, shipping and other ports | Potential for in-combination and cumulative impacts on: - - Geology, sediments and coastal processes - potential cumulative disturbance to seabed (e.g. scouring) with other activities including increased vessel activity/anchoring and demersal fishing (e.g. trawling).
- Material assets - potential increased conflicts with commercial fishing, and navigation and potential cumulative impacts of all marine developments on sea-based recreational routes e.g. the displacement of recreational craft into commercial routes.
|
Edinburgh Waterfront - waterfront regeneration project at Granton | Potential for in-combination and cumulative impacts on: - - Geology, sediments and coastal processes - potential for adverse effects associated with increased sediment and turbidity as a result of works
- Biodiversity, flora and fauna (see Appendix 3 of the AA Screening Report for in-combination effects on Natura 2000 sites)
- multiple noise and vibration sources audible to marine mammals, particularly during piling for construction, may occur at the same time and extend over a long period, adversely affecting marine mammals
- potential for beneficial cumulative impacts of sites through increased structures providing new reef habitat and new substrate and potential to act as fish aggregation devices.
|
Bo'ness Foreshore Re-development |
Dundee Waterfront Regeneration | Potential for in-combination and cumulative impacts on: - - Biodiversity, flora and fauna (see Appendix 3 of the AA Screening Report for in-combination effects on Natura 2000 sites)
- increased number of physical barriers to fish movement/migration
- multiple noise sources audible to marine mammals, particularly during construction may occur at the same time and extend over a long period, adversely affecting marine mammals
- birds and fish, increased collision risk with birds.
- potential for beneficial cumulative impacts of sites through increased structures providing new reef habitat and new substrate and potential to act as fish aggregation devices.
|
Proposed new Forth replacement crossing | Potential for in-combination and cumulative impacts on: - - Geology, sediments and coastal processes - potential for adverse effects associated with i
- increased suspended and deposited sediment and turbidity in the Firth of Forth as a result of construction works
- morphological change of subtidal beds and shoreline due to new runoff outfalls and relocation of Scottish Water treated sewage outfall relating to the new crossing
- Water - potential impacts on water quality as a result of spillages of harmful materials during construction - this is a project level impact
- Biodiversity, flora and fauna (see Appendix 3 of the AA Screening Report for in-combination effects on Natura 2000 sites)
- multiple noise and vibration sources audible to marine mammals, from piling activity during construction and the excavation of Beamer Rock, may occur at the same time and extend over a long period, adversely affecting marine mammals
|
Middle Bank, Firth of Forth - licensed aggregate extraction area | Potential for in-combination and cumulative impacts on: - - Biodiversity, flora and fauna (see Appendix 3 of the AA Screening Report for in-combination effects on Natura 2000 sites)
- increased number of physical barriers to fish movement/migration
- multiple noise sources audible to marine mammals, particularly during construction may occur at the same time and extend over a long period, adversely affecting marine mammals
- Material assets - potential increased conflicts with commercial fishing and potential cumulative impacts of all marine developments on sea-based recreational routes e.g. the displacement of recreational craft into commercial routes.
- Geology, sediments and coastal processes - potential cumulative disturbance to seabed (e.g. from scouring)
|
Option | NEARTNAGAOITHE: Located 15.2km offshore, on the Fife coastline, Scotland |
|---|
Environmental Receptors |
|---|
Receptors potentially at risk from offshore wind development at the site comprise: - Shellfish growing waters at Arbroath, St Andrews to Fife Ness, Fife Ness to Elie and North Berwick to Dunbar. None of these shellfish waters have been classified for commercial shellfish production.
- Barry Links SAC, Firth of Tay & Eden Estuary SAC/ SPA/Ramsar, River Tay SAC, Cameron Reservoir SPA/Ramsar, Forth Islands SPA, Isle of May SAC, Montrose Basin SPA/Ramsar, Firth of Forth SPA/Ramsar, St Abb's Head to Fast Castle SPA, River South Esk SAC, River Tweed SAC, Foulsheugh SPA, Loch Leven SPA/Ramsar, Slammanan Plateau SPA, Fala Flow SPA/Ramsar, Greenlaw Moor SPA, Din Moss/Hoselaw Loch SPA/Ramsar, Westwater SPA/Ramsar, Gladhouse Reservoir SPA/Ramsar, Loch of Skene SPA/Ramsar, Muir of Dinnet SAC/ SPA/Ramsar, South Tayside Goose Roosts SPA/Ramsar, Berwickshire and North Northumberland Coast SAC, River Teith SAC, additional overseas Natura 2000 sites and national conservation sites
- Resident and migrant birds (including breeding seabirds). Divers, seaduck (scoter and eider), gannets, swans and geese are considered to be of greatest sensitivity along the east coast of Scotland ( DECC 2009).
- Marine mammals including a small population of bottlenose dolphins resident in the Moray Firth, which range off the east coast, and protected species
- Nursery ground for sandeel, whiting, nephrops, lemon sole, cod and saithe and spawning grounds for fish species: sandeel, plaice and lemon sole
- Medium sensitivity seascapes of East Fife /Firth of Tay (deposition coastline with open views, Outer Firths and less developed Inner Firths) and Firth of Forth (Outer Firths and developed Inner Firths) Seascape Units
- Land based visual receptors (site lies between 13km and 24km of coast) ; also marine recreational users though this would require further consideration at scheme level
- Recreational users: area of great importance for informal recreation and popular for walking, hiking over 8km, shoreline angling, bird watching and wildlife watching
- RYA Cruising Route of medium recreational use (popular route on which some recreational craft will be seen at most times during summer daylight hours);
- Sea vessels: the majority of shipping is associated with access to ports in the Firth of Forth and Tay, and consists mainly of cargo vessels and tankers. There are no traffic separation schemes or anchorages in the area
|
Potentially Significant Effects Prior to Mitigation |
|---|
SEA Objectives | Potentially Significant Impacts (based on generic impacts in Chapter 4) | Potential Significance 48 | Likelihood | Permanence | Reversibility | Spatial scale | Mitigation required? Y = Yes, N = No | Mitigation | Residual Effects |
|---|
Climatic factors | - potential to provide 360 MW for offshore wind generation
|  | High | P | I | I | N | N/A |  |
Water | - potential for indirect changes in quality of adjacent shellfish waters at St Andrews to Fife Ness, Fife Ness to Elie, North Berwick to Dunbar and Arbroath through changes in the water column from sediment dispersion and increased turbidity.
|  | Low | R | R | Y | Y | - Further work required to reduce uncertainty regarding potential impacts on water quality and Shellfish Waters (see Table 9.1 of ER - recommendation for hydrodynamic and water quality modelling at project level)
|  |
Geology, sediments and coastal processes | - potential for significant indirect impacts on geological or geomorphological features through changes in coastal processes
|  | Low | I | N | Y | Y | - Further work required to reduce uncertainty regarding potential impacts on coastal processes (see Table 9.1 of ER - recommendation for sediment dynamic modelling at project level)
|  |
Biodiversity, flora and fauna | - potential for significant indirect impact on up to 38 UK Natura 2000 sites, additional overseas sites, national nature conservation sites, and protected species including breeding seabirds
- direct adverse impacts on nursery and spawning grounds for fish species in footprint of works
|  | High | I | I | Y | Y | - Avoid key areas for species and habitats of nature conservation and fisheries value where known
- Reduce impacts through appropriate design and construction methods (e.g. timing to avoid key seasons)
- Further work required to determine impacts on international nature conservation sites to be assessed through the HRA process
|  |
Landscape and seascape | - potential for moderate adverse impact on medium sensitivity seascapes of East Fife/Firth of Tay and Firth of Forth, with associated impacts on land-based tourism and recreation.
- as the site lies between 13km and 24km off the coastline (a high sensitivity visual receptor but low visual impact over that distance), there is the potential for minor adverse visual impacts for land-based receptors through changes in the physical elements of the seascape; however the visibility of the windfarm would be dependent on turbine design (e.g. height) and external influences (e.g. climatic factors) and the visual significance is subjective
|  | High | R | R | Y | N | - Reduce impacts on land-based visual receptors through appropriate design and positioning of development within the site
- No mitigation possible for impacts on seascape character - design to be optimised to minimise physical footprint
|  |
Population and human health | - potential adverse impact on shoreline recreational users
- potential loss of existing RYA cruising route and potential displacement of recreational craft into commercial routes with associated disturbance to navigational safety for recreational craft and increased distance of travel for recreational craft. This has the potential to result in adverse impacts on health and well-being of local recreational users.
|  | High | R | R | Y | Y | - Avoid existing RYA cruising routes and areas of known high recreational activity/ importance where possible.
- Reduce impacts through appropriate design and positioning of development within the site and associated onshore development
|  |
Cultural heritage | - No known impacts on cultural heritage
|  | High | - | - | N | N | N/A |  |
Material assets | - potential for adverse impacts on navigation through the introduction of wind turbines and associated increased vessel movements during construction and decommissioning
|  | High | R | N | Y | Y | - Avoid existing navigation, shipping and aviation routes where possible (it is assumed that wind farms would not be consented where they would pose unacceptable risks to navigational safety).
|  |
Potential for cumulative/in-combination effects |
|---|
With proposals for other locations/groups of offshore wind development | Round 3 Offshore Wind Zone 2 - Firth of Forth | Potential for in-combination and cumulative impacts on: - - Biodiversity, flora and fauna (see Appendix 3 of the AA Screening Report for in-combination effects on Natura 2000 sites)
- increased number of physical barriers to fish movement/migration
- multiple noise sources audible to marine mammals, particularly during construction may occur at the same time and extend over a long period noise, adversely affecting marine mammals
- birds and fish, increased collision risk with birds.
- potential for beneficial cumulative impacts of sites through increased structures providing new reef habitat and new substrate and potential to act as fish aggregation devices.
- Landscape/seascape - potential for cumulative effects on seascape character of East Fife/Firth of Tay and Firth of Forth, as development may be concentrated within these medium sensitivity seascapes.
- Material assets - potential increased conflicts with commercial fishing and potential cumulative impacts of all marine developments on sea-based recreational routes e.g. the displacement of recreational craft into commercial routes.
|
Potential short-term options of Bell Rock and Inch Cape |
In-combination with other plans, programmes and strategies? | Increased vessel activity from all existing sources (no specific plan), including motorised water sports, fishing vessels, research and wildlife-watching vessels, vessels associated with known on and offshore development, shipping and other ports | Potential for in-combination and cumulative impacts on: - - Geology, sediments and coastal processes - potential cumulative disturbance to seabed (e.g. scouring) with other activities including increased vessel activity/anchoring and demersal fishing (e.g. trawling).
- Material assets - potential increased conflicts with commercial fishing, and navigation and potential cumulative impacts of all marine developments on sea-based recreational routes e.g. the displacement of recreational craft into commercial routes.
|
Edinburgh Waterfront - waterfront regeneration project at Granton and Leith | Potential for in-combination and cumulative impacts on: - - Geology, sediments and coastal processes - potential for adverse effects associated with increased sediment and turbidity as a result of works
- Biodiversity, flora and fauna (see Appendix 3 of the AA Screening Report for in-combination effects on Natura 2000 sites)
- multiple noise and vibration sources audible to marine mammals, particularly during piling for construction, may occur at the same time and extend over a long period, adversely affecting marine mammals
- potential for beneficial cumulative impacts of sites through increased structures providing new reef habitat and new substrate and potential to act as fish aggregation devices.
|
Bo'ness Foreshore Re-development |
Dundee Waterfront Regeneration | Potential for in-combination and cumulative impacts on: - - Biodiversity, flora and fauna (see Appendix 3 of the AA Screening Report for in-combination effects on Natura 2000 sites)
- increased number of physical barriers to fish movement/migration
- multiple noise sources audible to marine mammals, particularly during construction may occur at the same time and extend over a long period noise, adversely affecting marine mammals
- birds and fish, increased collision risk with birds.
- potential for beneficial cumulative impacts of sites through increased structures providing new reef habitat and new substrate and potential to act as fish aggregation devices.
|
Proposed new Forth replacement crossing | Potential for in-combination and cumulative impacts on: - - Geology, sediments and coastal processes - potential for adverse effects associated with
- increased suspended and deposited sediment and turbidity in the Firth of Forth as a result of construction works
- morphological change of subtidal beds and shoreline due to new runoff outfalls and relocation of Scottish Water treated sewage outfall relating to the new crossing
- Water - potential impacts on water quality as a result of spillages of harmful materials during construction - this is a project level impact
- Biodiversity, flora and fauna (see Appendix 3 of the AA Screening Report for in-combination effects on Natura 2000 sites)
- multiple noise and vibration sources audible to marine mammals, from piling activity during construction and the excavation of Beamer Rock, may occur at the same time and extend over a long period , adversely affecting marine mammals
|
Middle Bank, Firth of Forth - licensed aggregate extraction area | Potential for in-combination and cumulative impacts on: - - Biodiversity, flora and fauna (see Appendix 3 of the AA Screening Report for in-combination effects on Natura 2000 sites)
- increased number of physical barriers to fish movement/migration
- multiple noise sources audible to marine mammals, particularly during construction may occur at the same time and extend over a long period, adversely affecting marine mammals
- Material assets - potential increased conflicts with commercial fishing and potential cumulative impacts of all marine developments on sea-based recreational routes e.g. the displacement of recreational craft into commercial routes.
- Geology, sediments and coastal processes - potential cumulative disturbance to seabed (e.g. from scouring)
|
Potentially Significant Effects Prior to Mitigation |
SEA Objectives | Potentially Significant Impacts (based on generic impacts in Chapter 4) | Potential Significance 49 | Likelihood | Permanence | Reversibility | Spatial scale | Mitigation required? Y = Yes, N = No | Mitigation | Residual Effects |
|---|
Climatic factors | - potential to provide 415 MW for offshore wind generation
|  | High | P | I | I | N | N/A |  |
Water | - potential for indirect changes in quality of shellfish waters at St Andrews to Fife Ness, Fife Ness to Elie, Arbroath and North Berwick to Dunbar through changes in the water column from sediment dispersion and increased turbidity.
|  | Low | R | R | Y | Y | - Further work required to reduce uncertainty regarding potential impacts on water quality and Shellfish Waters (see Table 9.1 of ER - recommendation for hydrodynamic and water quality modelling at project level)
|  |
Geology, sediments and coastal processes | - potential for significant indirect impacts on geological or geomorphological features through changes in coastal processes
|  | Low | I | N | Y | Y | - Further work required to reduce uncertainty regarding potential impacts on coastal processes (see Table 9.1 of ER - recommendation for sediment dynamic modelling)
|  |
Biodiversity, flora and fauna | - potential for significant indirect impact on up to 38 Natura 2000 sites, additional overseas sites and national conservation sites, and protected species including breeding seabirds - uncertain impact
- direct adverse impacts on nursery and spawning grounds for fish species in footprint of works
|  | High | I | I | Y | Y | - Avoid key areas for species and habitats of nature conservation and fisheries value where known
- Reduce impacts through appropriate design and construction methods (e.g. timing to avoid key seasons)
Further work required to determine impacts on international nature conservation sites to be assessed through the HRA process |  |
Landscape and seascape | - potential for minor adverse impact on low-medium sensitivity seascape of Berwick-upon-Tweed
- as the site lies between 13km and 35km off the coastline (a high sensitivity visual receptor but low visual impact over that distance), there is the potential for minor adverse visual impacts for land-based receptors through changes in the physical elements of the seascape; however the visibility of the windfarm would be dependent on turbine design (e.g. height) and external influences (e.g. climatic factors) and the visual significance is subjective
there is the potential for a minor adverse impact on the Northumberland Coast AONB (considered to be of high sensitivity, lying approximately 18km from the site) |  | High | R | R | Y | N | - Reduce impacts on land-based visual receptors through appropriate design and positioning of development within the site
- No mitigation possible for impacts on seascape character - design to be optimised to minimise physical footprint
- Seek to avoid development within vicinity of AONB through positioning of development within the site
|  |
Population and human health | - potential loss of existing RYA cruising route and potential displacement of recreational craft into commercial routes with associated disturbance to navigational safety for recreational craft and increased distance of travel for recreational craft. This has the potential to result in adverse impacts on health and well-being of local recreational users.
|  | High | R | R | Y | Y | - Avoid existing RYA cruising routes and areas of known high recreational activity/ importance where possible.
- Reduce impacts through appropriate design and positioning of development within the site and associated onshore development
|  |
Cultural heritage | - No known impacts on cultural heritage
|  | High | - | - | N | N | N/A |  |
Material assets | - potential for adverse impacts on navigation through the introduction of wind turbines and associated increased vessel movements during construction and decommissioning
|  | High | R | N | Y | Y | - Avoid existing navigation, shipping and aviation routes where possible (it is assumed that wind farms would not be consented where they would pose risks to navigational safety).
|  |
Potential for cumulative/in-combination effects? |
|---|
With proposals for other locations/groups of offshore wind development | Round 3 Offshore Wind Zone 2 - Firth of Forth | Potential for in-combination and cumulative impacts on: - - Biodiversity, flora and fauna (see Appendix 3 of the AA Screening Report for in-combination effects on Natura 2000 sites)
- increased number of physical barriers to fish movement/migration
- multiple noise sources audible to marine mammals, particularly during construction may occur at the same time and extend over a long period, adversely affecting marine mammals
- birds and fish, increased collision risk with birds.
- potential for beneficial cumulative impacts of sites through increased structures providing new reef habitat and new substrate and potential to act as fish aggregation devices.
- Material assets - potential increased conflicts with commercial fishing and potential cumulative impacts of all marine developments on sea-based recreational routes e.g. the displacement of recreational craft into commercial routes.
|
Potential short-term options of Bell Rock, Neart na Gaoithe |
In-combination with other plans, programmes and strategies? | Increased vessel activity from all existing sources (no specific plan), including motorised water sports, fishing vessels, research and wildlife-watching vessels, vessels associated with known on and offshore development, shipping and other ports | Potential for in-combination and cumulative impacts on: - - Geology, sediments and coastal processes - potential cumulative disturbance to seabed (e.g. scouring) with other activities including increased vessel activity/anchoring and demersal fishing (e.g. trawling).
- Material assets - potential increased conflicts with commercial fishing, and navigation and potential cumulative impacts of all marine developments on sea-based recreational routes e.g. the displacement of recreational craft into commercial routes.
|
Edinburgh Waterfront - waterfront regeneration project at Granton and Leith | Potential for in-combination and cumulative impacts on: - - Geology, sediments and coastal processes - potential for adverse effects associated with increased sediment and turbidity as a result of works
- Biodiversity, flora and fauna (see Appendix 3 of the AA Screening Report for in-combination effects on Natura 2000 sites)
- multiple noise and vibration sources audible to marine mammals, particularly during piling for construction, may occur at the same time and extend over a long period, adversely affecting marine mammals
- potential for beneficial cumulative impacts of sites through increased structures providing new reef habitat and new substrate and potential to act as fish aggregation devices.
|
Bo'ness Foreshore Re-development |
Dundee Waterfront Regeneration | Potential for in-combination and cumulative impacts on: - - Biodiversity, flora and fauna (see Appendix 3 of the AA Screening Report for in-combination effects on Natura 2000 sites)
- increased number of physical barriers to fish movement/migration
- multiple noise sources audible to marine mammals, particularly during construction may occur at the same time and extend over a long period, adversely affecting marine mammals
- birds and fish, increased collision risk with birds.
- potential for beneficial cumulative impacts of sites through increased structures providing new reef habitat and new substrate and potential to act as fish aggregation devices.
|
Proposed new Forth replacement crossing | Potential for in-combination and cumulative impacts on: - - Geology, sediments and coastal processes - potential for adverse effects associated with
- increased suspended and deposited sediment and turbidity in the Firth of Forth as a result of construction works
- morphological change of subtidal beds and shoreline due to new runoff outfalls and relocation of Scottish Water treated sewage outfall relating to the new crossing
- Water - potential impacts on water quality as a result of spillages of harmful materials during construction - this is a project level impact
- Biodiversity, flora and fauna (see Appendix 3 of the AA Screening Report for in-combination effects on Natura 2000 sites)
multiple noise and vibration sources audible to marine mammals, from piling activity during construction and the excavation of Beamer Rock, may occur at the same time and extend over a long period, adversely affecting marine mammals |
Middle Bank, Firth of Forth - licensed aggregate extraction area | Potential for in-combination and cumulative impacts on: - - Biodiversity, flora and fauna (see Appendix 3 of the AA Screening Report for in-combination effects on Natura 2000 sites)
- increased number of physical barriers to fish movement/migration
- multiple noise sources audible to marine mammals, particularly during construction may occur at the same time and extend over a long period, adversely affecting marine mammals
- Material assets - potential increased conflicts with commercial fishing and potential cumulative impacts of all marine developments on sea-based recreational routes e.g. the displacement of recreational craft into commercial routes.
- Geology, sediments and coastal processes - potential cumulative disturbance to seabed (e.g. from scouring)
|
Potentially Significant Effects Prior to Mitigation |
|---|
SEA Objectives | Potentially Significant Impacts (based on generic impacts in Chapter 4) | Potential Significance 50 | Likelihood | Permanence | Reversibility | Spatial scale | Mitigation required? Y = Yes, N = No | Mitigation | Residual Effects |
|---|
Climatic factors | - potential to provide 300 MW for offshore wind generation
|  | High | P | I | I | N | N/A |  |
Water | - potential for indirect changes in quality of shellfish waters at Mull of Galloway through changes in the water column from sediment dispersion and increased turbidity.
|  | Low | R | R | Y | Y | - Further work required to reduce uncertainty regarding potential impacts on water quality and Shellfish Waters (see Table 9.1 of ER - recommendation for hydrodynamic and water quality modelling at project level)
|  |
Geology, sediments and coastal processes | - potential impact on geological SSSIs e.g. Torrs to Mason' Walk through changes in coastal processes, resulting in increased erosion/accretion.
|  | Low | I | N | Y | Y | - Further work required to reduce uncertainty regarding potential impacts on coastal processes (see Table 9.1 of ER - recommendation for sediment dynamic modelling)
|  |
Biodiversity, flora and fauna | - potential for significant indirect impact on up to 14 Natura 2000 sites (Solway Firth SAC and the Upper Solway Flats and Marshes SPA/Ramsar are the closest Natura 2000 sites to this option), national conservation sites and protected species - uncertain impact
- potential adverse impacts on wintering waders and wildfowl, particularly in the Important Bird Area on the Upper Solway Flats and Marshes
- direct adverse impact on nursery grounds for fish species in footprint of option
|  | High | I | I | Y | Y | - Avoid key areas for species and habitats of nature conservation and fisheries value where known
- Reduce impacts through appropriate design and construction methods (e.g. timing to avoid key seasons)
Further work required to determine impacts on international nature conservation sites to be assessed through the HRA process |  |
Landscape and seascape | - potential major adverse impact on Outer Solway seascape/landscape character, which is fragile and potentially unable to accommodate wind farm development without significant character change. Associated impacts on land-based tourism and recreation may also be experienced as a result of a change in seascape character.
- there is the potential for a potentially major adverse impact on the East Stewartry Coast NSA, lying approximately 8km from the site and minor adverse impact on the Solway Coast AONB (considered to be of high sensitivity, lying 14km from the site)
- as the site lies between 0km and 8km off the coastline (a high sensitivity visual receptor and high visual impact over that distance), there is the potential for major adverse visual impacts for land-based receptors through changes in the physical elements of the seascape; however the visibility of the windfarm would be dependent on turbine design (e.g. height) and external influences (e.g. climatic factors) and the visual significance is subjective
|  | High | R | R | Y | N | - Reduce impacts on land-based visual receptors through appropriate design and positioning of development within the site
- No mitigation possible for impacts on seascape character - design to be optimised to minimise physical footprint
- Seek to avoid development within vicinity of NSA and AONB through positioning of development within the site
|  |
Population and human health | - potential impact on recreational users at sea (particularly anglers) and on the shoreline, and associated impacts on the local economy.
- potential loss of existing RYA cruising route and RYA sailing area. Potential displacement of recreational craft into commercial routes with associated disturbance to navigational safety for recreational craft and increased distance of travel for recreational craft. This has the potential to result in adverse impacts on health and well-being of local recreational users.
|  | High | R | R | Y | Y | - Avoid existing RYA cruising routes and areas of known high recreational activity/ importance where possible.
- Reduce impacts through appropriate design and positioning of development within the site and associated onshore development
|  |
Cultural heritage | - No known impacts on cultural heritage
|  | High | - | - | N | N | N/A |  |
Material assets | - potential for direct adverse impacts on IMO routing and navigation aids and cumulative impacts associated with the Robin Rigg Windfarm
|  | High | R | N | Y | Y | - Avoid existing navigation, shipping and aviation routes where possible (it is assumed that wind farms would not be consented where they would pose unacceptable risks to navigational safety).
|  |
Potentially Significant Effects Prior to Mitigation |
|---|
SEA Objectives | Potentially Significant Impacts (based on generic impacts in Chapter 4) | Potential Significance 51 | Likelihood | Permanence | Reversibility | Spatial scale | Mitigation required? Y = Yes N = No | Mitigation | Residual Effects |
|---|
Climatic factors | - potential to provide 280 MW for offshore wind generation
|  | High | P | I | I | N | N/A |  |
Water | - potential for indirect changes in quality of shellfish waters at Mull of Galloway through changes in the water column from sediment dispersion and increased turbidity.
|  | Low | R | R | Y | Y | - Further work required to reduce uncertainty regarding potential impacts on water quality and Shellfish Waters (see Table 9.1 of ER - recommendation for hydrodynamic and water quality modelling at project level)
|  |
Geology, sediments and coastal processes | - potential for significant indirect impact on Borgue Coast geological SSSI through changes in coastal processes, resulting in increased erosion/accretion.
|  | Low | I | N | Y | Y | - Further work required to reduce uncertainty regarding potential impacts on coastal processes (see Table 9.1 of ER - recommendation for sediment dynamic modelling at project level)
|  |
Biodiversity, flora and fauna | - potential for significant indirect impact on Natura 2000 sites (the closest site is Burrow Head SAC), national nature conservation sites and protected species- uncertain impact
- direct adverse impact on nursery grounds for fish species in the footprint of the scheme
- adverse impact on Regulated Cockle Fishery Area, which the site lies within.
|  | High | I | I | Y | Y | - Avoid key areas for species and habitats of nature conservation and fisheries value where known
- Reduce impacts through appropriate design and construction methods (e.g. timing to avoid key seasons)
- Further work required to determine impacts on international nature conservation sites to be assessed through the HRA process
|  |
Landscape and seascape | - potential major adverse impact on Outer Solway seascape/landscape character, which is fragile and potentially unable to accommodate wind farm development without significant character change, particularly at such close proximity from the coast. Potential for associated impacts on land-based tourism and recreation.
- potential for major adverse impact on Fleet Valley NSA, which lies within 8km of the site.
- as the site lies between 0km and 8km off the coastline (a high sensitivity visual receptor and high visual impact over that distance), there is the potential for major adverse visual impacts for land-based receptors through changes in the physical elements of the seascape; however the visibility of the windfarm would be dependent on turbine design (e.g. height) and external influences (e.g. climatic factors) and the visual significance is subjective
|  | High | R | R | Y | N | - Reduce impacts on land-based visual receptors through appropriate design and positioning of development within the site
- No mitigation possible for impacts on seascape character - design to be optimised to minimise physical footprint
- Seek to avoid development within vicinity of NSA through positioning of development within the site
|  |
Population and human health | - potential impacts on recreational users, particularly anglers at sea and on the shoreline with associated impacts on the local economy.
- potential loss of existing RYA cruising route and RYA sailing area. Potential displacement of recreational craft into commercial routes with associated disturbance to navigational safety for recreational craft and increased distance of travel for recreational craft. This has the potential to result in adverse impacts on health and well-being of local recreational users.
|  | High | R | R | Y | Y | - Avoid existing RYA cruising routes and areas of known high recreational activity/ importance where possible.
- Reduce impacts through appropriate design and positioning of development within the site and associated onshore development
|  |
Cultural heritage | - No known impacts on cultural heritage
|  | High | - | - | N | N | N/A |  |
Material assets | - potential for adverse impacts on navigation through the introduction of wind turbines and associated increased vessel movements during construction and decommissioning
|  | High | R | N | Y | Y | - Avoid existing navigation, shipping and aviation routes where possible (it is assumed that wind farms would not be consented where they would pose unacceptable risks to navigational safety).
|  |
Potentially Significant Effects Prior to Mitigation |
|---|
SEA Objectives | Potentially Significant Impacts (based on generic impacts in Chapter 4) | Potential Significance 52 | Likelihood | Permanence | Reversibility | Spatial scale | Mitigation required? Y = Yes, N = No | Mitigation | Residual Effects |
|---|
Climatic factors | - potential to provide 378 MW for offshore wind generation
|  | High | P | I | I | N | N/A |  |
Water | - potential for indirect changes in quality of shellfish waters through changes in the water column from sediment dispersion and increased turbidity.
|  | Low | R | R | Y | Y | - Further work required to reduce uncertainty regarding potential impacts on water quality and Shellfish Waters (see Table 9.1 of ER - recommendation for hydrodynamic and water quality modelling at project level)
|  |
Geology, sediments and coastal processes | - potential for significant indirect impacts on geological or geomorphological features through changes in coastal processes
|  | Low | I | N | Y | Y | - Further work required to reduce uncertainty regarding potential impacts on coastal processes (see Table 9.1 of ER - recommendation for sediment dynamic modelling)
|  |
Biodiversity, flora and fauna | - potential for significant indirect impact on up to 8 Natura 2000 sites, national conservation sites and protected species including breeding seabirds- uncertain impacts
- potential adverse impacts on wintering waders and wildfowl, particularly associated with the adjacent Important Bird Area
- direct adverse impacts on nursery and spawning grounds for fish species in footprint of works
|  | High | I | I | Y | Y | - Avoid key areas for species and habitats of nature conservation and fisheries value where known
- Reduce impacts through appropriate design and construction methods (e.g. timing to avoid key seasons)
Further work required to determine impacts on international nature conservation sites to be assessed through the HRA process |  |
Landscape and seascape | - potential major adverse impact on West Kintyre seascape/landscape character, which is fragile and potentially unable to accommodate wind farm development without significant character change, particularly at such close proximity to the coastline. Potential for associated impacts on land-based tourism and recreation.
- potential for minor adverse impact on three NSAs, Antrim Coast and Glens AONB and the Causeway Coast AONB (high sensitivity landscapes lying between 20 and 30km from the site)
- as part of the site lies within 8km off the coastline (a high sensitivity visual receptor and high visual impact over that distance), there is the potential for major adverse visual impacts for land-based receptors through changes in the physical elements of the seascape; however the visibility of the windfarm would be dependent on turbine design (e.g. height) and external influences (e.g. climatic factors) and the visual significance is subjective
|  | High | R | R | Y | N | - Reduce impacts on land-based visual receptors through appropriate design and positioning of development within the site
- No mitigation possible for impacts on seascape character - design to be optimised to minimise physical footprint
- Seek to avoid development within vicinity of NSA s through positioning of development within the site
|  |
Population and human health | - potential impacts on recreational users, particularly anglers at sea and those on the shoreline with associated impacts on the local economy.
- potential loss of existing RYA cruising route and potential displacement of recreational craft into commercial routes with associated disturbance to navigational safety for recreational craft and increased distance of travel for recreational craft. This has the potential to result in adverse impacts on health and well-being of local recreational users.
|  | High | R | R | Y | Y | - Avoid existing RYA cruising routes and areas of known high recreational activity/ importance where possible.
- Reduce impacts through appropriate design and positioning of development within the site and associated onshore development
|  |
Cultural heritage | - No known impacts on cultural heritage
|  | High | - | - | N | N | N/A |  |
Material assets | - potential for adverse impacts on navigation through the introduction of wind turbines and associated increased vessel movements during construction and decommissioning
|  | High | R | N | Y | Y | - Avoid existing navigation, shipping and aviation routes where possible (it is assumed that wind farms would not be consented where they would pose risks to navigational safety).
|  |
Potentially Significant Effects Prior to Mitigation |
|---|
SEA Objectives | Potentially Significant Impacts (based on generic impacts in Chapter 4) | Potential Significance 53 | Likelihood | Permanence | Reversibility | Spatial scale | Mitigation required? Y = Yes, N = No | Mitigation | Residual Effects |
|---|
Climatic factors | - potential to provide 680 MW for offshore wind generation.
|  | High | P | I | I | N | N/A |  |
Water | - potential for indirect changes in quality of shellfish waters at Loch Gruinart and Askinish Bay through changes in the water column from sediment dispersion and increased turbidity.
|  | Low | R | R | Y | Y | - Further work required to reduce uncertainty regarding potential impacts on water quality and Shellfish Waters (see Table 9.1 of ER - recommendation for hydrodynamic and water quality modelling at project level)
|  |
Geology, sediments and coastal processes | - potential impact on geological SSSIs e.g. Rinns of Islay through changes in coastal processes, resulting in increased erosion/accretion.
|  | Low | I | N | Y | Y | - Further work required to reduce uncertainty regarding potential impacts on coastal processes (see Table 9.1 of ER - recommendation for sediment dynamic modelling at project level)
|  |
Biodiversity, flora and fauna | - potential for significant indirect impact on up to 16 Natura 2000 sites, national nature conservation sites and protected species
- direct adverse impacts on nursery and spawning grounds for fish species in footprint of works
|  | High | I | I | Y | Y | - Avoid key areas for species and habitats of nature conservation and fisheries value where known
- Reduce impacts through appropriate design and construction methods (e.g. timing to avoid key seasons)
- Further work required to determine impacts on international nature conservation sites to be assessed through the HRA process
|  |
Landscape and seascape | - potential major adverse impact on West Islay seascape/landscape character, which is fragile and potentially unable to accommodate wind farm development without significant character change. Potential for associated impacts on land-based tourism and recreation.
- potential for minor negative impact on two National Scenic Areas
- as the site lies between 13 and 24km off the coastline (a high sensitivity visual receptor but low visual impact over that distance), there is the potential for low visual impacts for land-based receptors through changes in the physical elements of the seascape; however the visibility of the windfarm would be dependent on turbine design (e.g. height) and external influences (e.g. climatic factors) and the visual significance is subjective
|  | High | R | R | Y | N | - Reduce impacts on land-based visual receptors through appropriate design and positioning of development within the site
- No mitigation possible for impacts on seascape character - design to be optimised to minimise physical footprint
- Seek to avoid development within vicinity of NSA s through positioning of development within the site
|  |
Population and human health | - potential impacts on recreational users, particularly anglers at sea and those on the shoreline with associated impacts on the local economy.
|  | High | R | R | Y | Y | - Avoid existing areas of known high recreational activity/ importance where possible.
- Reduce impacts through appropriate design and positioning of development within the site and associated onshore development
|  |
Cultural heritage | - No known impacts on cultural heritage
|  | High | - | - | N | N | N/A |  |
Material assets | - potential for adverse impacts on navigation through the introduction of wind turbines and associated increased vessel movements during construction and decommissioning
|  | High | R | N | Y | Y | - Avoid existing navigation, shipping and aviation routes where possible (it is assumed that wind farms would not be consented where they would pose unacceptable risks to navigational safety).
|  |
Potentially Significant Effects Prior to Mitigation |
|---|
SEA Objectives | Potentially Significant Impacts (see generic impacts in Chapter 4) | Potential Significance 54 | Likelihood | Permanence | Reversibility | Spatial scale | Mitigation required? Y = Yes, N = No | Mitigation | Residual Effects |
|---|
Climatic factors | - potential to provide 1500 MW for offshore wind generation
| 
| High | P | I | I | N | N/A | 
|
Water | - potential for indirect changes in quality of shellfish waters at Loch Scridain, Loch a'Chumhainn, Isle of Ulva and Ardtoe and Loch Ceann Traigh through changes in the water column from sediment dispersion and increased turbidity.
|  | Low | R | R | Y | Y | - Further work required to reduce uncertainty regarding potential impacts on water quality and Shellfish Waters (see Table 9.1 of ER - recommendation for hydrodynamic and water quality modelling at project level)
|  |
Geology, sediments and coastal processes | - potential for significant indirect impacts on geological or geomorphological features through changes in coastal processes
|  | Low | I | N | Y | Y | - Further work required to reduce uncertainty regarding potential impacts on coastal processes (see Table 9.1 of ER - recommendation for sediment dynamic modelling at project level)
|  |
Biodiversity, flora and fauna | - potential for significant indirect impact on up to 13 Natura 2000 sites, national conservation sites and protected species including breeding seabirds.
- direct adverse impacts on nursery and spawning grounds for fish species in footprint of works
- direct adverse impact on reef habitat in footprint of the works
|  | High | I | I | Y | Y | - Avoid key areas for species and habitats of nature conservation and fisheries value where known
- Reduce impacts through appropriate design and construction methods (e.g. timing to avoid key seasons)
- Further work required to determine impacts on international nature conservation sites to be assessed through the HRA process
|  |
Landscape and seascape | - potential major adverse impact on West Mull/East Tiree and West Coll/Tiree seascape/landscape character, which is fragile and potentially unable to accommodate wind farm development without substantial character change, particularly considering the close proximity to the coastline. Potential for associated impacts on land-based tourism and recreation.
- potential for minor adverse impact on two National Scenic Areas
- as part of the site lies within 8km off the coastline (a high sensitivity visual receptor and high visual impact over that distance), there is the potential for major adverse visual impacts for land-based receptors through changes in the physical elements of the seascape; however the visibility of the windfarm would be dependent on external influences (e.g. climatic factors) and the visual significance is subjective
|  | High | R | R | Y | N | - Reduce impacts on land-based visual receptors through appropriate design and positioning of development within the site
- No mitigation possible for impacts on seascape character - design to be optimised to minimise physical footprint
- Seek to avoid development within vicinity of NSA s through positioning of development within the site
|  |
Population and human health | - potential impacts on recreational users, particularly anglers at sea and those on the shoreline with associated impacts on the local economy.
|  | High | R | R | Y | Y | - Avoid existing areas of known high recreational activity/ importance where possible.
- Reduce impacts through appropriate design and positioning of development within the site and associated onshore development
|  |
Cultural heritage | - potential for adverse impact on setting of Skerryvore Lighthouse A-Listed Building if wind farm inappropriately sited/designed.
|  | Medium to low | - | - | N | N | - Seek to avoid development in the vicinity of the listed lighthouse through appropriate design and positioning of development within the option boundary
|  |
Material assets | - potential for direct adverse impacts on IMO routing and navigation aids
|  | High | R | N | Y | Y | - Avoid existing navigation, shipping and aviation routes where possible (it is assumed that wind farms would not be consented where they would pose unacceptable risks to navigational safety).
|  |