On this page:

North Strathclyde Community Justice Authority: Multi Agency Public Protection Arrangements: Annual Report 2008/2009

« Previous | Contents | Next »

Listen

Section 10: Statistical Information required for the reporting period

Table 1: Statistical information*

REGISTERED SEX OFFENDERS ( RSO's)

NUMBER

a) Number of Registered Sex Offenders:

i) At liberty and living in your area on 31 st March 2009:

221

ii) Per 100,000 of the population on 31 st March 2009:

36

b) The number of RSO's having a notification requirement who:

i) Complied with notification requirements:

204

ii) Were reported for breaches of the requirements to notify:

5 level 2's , 12 level1's

c) The number of "wanted" RSOs on 31 st March 2009:

Nil

d) The number of "missing" RSOs on 31 st March 2009:

Nil

Table 2: Statistical information*. This Table shows Civil Orders applied and granted in relation to RSO's.

The Number of

Applied for by Police

Granted by the courts

Sexual Offences Prevention Orders ( SOPO'S)

1

1

Risk of Sexual Harm Orders ( RSHO's)

Nil

Nil

SOPO'S imposed by courts at time of conviction:

N/A

Interim SOPO's

Nil

Nil

Interim RSHOS's

Nil

Nil

Full RSHOS's

Nil

Nil

Foreign Travel Orders ( FTO's)

Nil

Nil

Notification Orders ( NO's)

2

2

Table 3: Statistical Information*

REGISTERED SEX OFFENDERS ( RSO's)

NUMBER OF OFFENDERS

a) Number of RSOs managed by MAPPA Category1:

i) Level 1 - Ordinary Risk Management:

162

ii) Level 2 - Local Inter-agency Risk Management:

94

iii) Level 3 - MAPPP:

7

b) Number of Registered Sex Offenders convicted of a further crime of sexual harm or non sexual violence:

i) MAPPA Level 1:

1

ii) MAPPA Level 2:

5

iii) MAPPP 3:

0

c) Number of RSO's returned to custody for a breach of statutory conditions
(including those returned to custody because of a conviction of further serious sexual or violent offence):

11

d) Number of RSO's returned to custody for a breach of SOPO:

0

e) Number of RSO's returned to custody for a breach of FTO:

0

f) Number of RSO's returned to custody for a breach of RSHO:

0

g) Breached their statutory conditions but were not returned to custody:

6

h) Were subject to formal disclosure:

0

Table 4(a): Restricted Patients Highland Health Board

RESTRICTED PATIENTS ( RP'S):

NUMBER

a) Number of RP'S:

i) Living in your area on 31 st March 09:

2

ii)During the reporting year:

2

b) Number of RP's per order:

i) CORO:

3

ii) HD:

0

iii) TTD:

0

c) Number within hospital/community:

i) State Hospital:

1

ii) Other hospital no suspension of detention ( SUS):

0

iii) Other hospital with unescorted SUS:

1

iv) Community (Conditional Discharge):

1

d) Number managed by category between 1 April 2008 and 31 March 2009:2

Level 1 - ordinary agency risk management:

1

Level 2 - through inter agency risk:

1

Level 3 - MAPPP, (critical few):

0

e) Number of RPs convicted of a further crime of sexual harm or non sexual violence:

i) MAPPA Level 1:

0

ii) MAPPA Level 2:

0

iii) MAPPP 3:

0

f) No of RPs on Suspension of detention:

i) who did not abscond or offend:

1

ii) who absconded:

0

iii) who absconded and then offended:

0

iv) where absconsion resulted in withdrawal of suspension of detention:

0

g) No. of RPs on Conditional Discharge:

i) who did not breach conditions, not recalled or did not offend:

1

ii) who breached conditions (resulting in letter from the Scottish Government): 3

0

iii) recalled by Scottish Ministers due to breaching conditions:

0

iv) recalled by Scottish Ministers for other reasons:

0

Table 4 (b): Statistical Information Greater Glasgow & Clyde Health Board

RESTRICTED PATIENTS ( RP'S):

NUMBER

a) Number of RP'S:

i) Living in your area on 31 st March 09:

15

ii)During the reporting year:

15

b) Number of RP's per order:

i) CORO:

15

ii) HD:

0

iii) TTD:

0

c) Number within hospital/community:

i) State Hospital:

19

ii) Other hospital no suspension of detention ( SUS):

7

iii) Other hospital with unescorted SUS:

1

iv) Community (Conditional Discharge):

7

d) Number managed by category between 1 April 2008 and 31 March 2009:4

Level 1 - ordinary agency risk management:

9

Level 2 - through inter agency risk:

6

Level 3 - MAPPP, (critical few):

0

e) Number of RPs convicted of a further crime of sexual harm or non sexual violence:

i) MAPPA Level 1:

0

ii) MAPPA Level 2:

0

iii) MAPPP 3:

0

f) No of RPs on Suspension of detention:

i) who did not abscond or offend:

0

ii) who absconded:

0

iii) who absconded and then offended:

0

iv) where absconsion resulted in withdrawal of suspension of detention:

1

g) No. of RPs on Conditional Discharge:

i) who did not breach conditions, not recalled or did not offend:

5

ii) who breached conditions (resulting in letter from the Scottish Government): 5

0

iii) recalled by Scottish Ministers due to breaching conditions:

2

iv) recalled by Scottish Ministers for other reasons:

0

Table 4: Delineation of RSO'S by age on 31 st March 2009.

Age

RSO Number

RSO Percentage
%

Under 18

2

0.9%

18-21

4

1.80%

22-31

52

23,52%

32-41

41

18.55%

42-51

54

24.43%

52-61

28

12.66%

62-71

27

12.2!%

72-81

11

4.97%

82-91

2

0.90%

Table 5: Delineation of RSO's by ethnicity on 31 st March 2009.

Ethnic Origin

RSO Number

RSO Percentage
%

Asian or Asian British Any other Asian

3

1.35%

Asian or Asian British Bangladeshi

Asian or Asian British Indian

Asian or Asian British Pakistani

Black or Black British African

Black or Black British Any Other Black Background

Black or Black British Caribbean

1

0.45%

Chinese or Other Ethnic Group Chinese

Chinese or Other Ethnic Group Other

Mixed Other

Mixed White and Asian

Mixed White and Black African

Mixed White and Black Caribbean

Not Known

Subject Declines to define Ethnicity

Subject Does Not Understand

White British

217

98.1%

White Irish

White Other

Table 6: Delineation of RSO victims:

No. of RSO's:

Number

Percentage
%

Convicted of a notifiable offence * against a child under 16 years:

24

10.85%

Convicted of a notifiable offence * against a victim over 16 years:

198

89.59%

* Relates to index offence only

Table 7: Delineation of population of RSO's on 31 st March 2009.

Sex

RSO Number

RSO Percentage
%

Male

220

99.54%

Female

1

0.45%

Table 8: Number of RSO's managed under statutory conditions and/or notification requirements on 31 st March 2009:

Number of RSO's

NUMBER

PERCENTAGE
%

On Statutory supervision:

112

50.6%

Subject to notification requirements only:

109

49.3%

« Previous | Contents | Next »

Page updated: Friday, October 23, 2009