On this page:

Strategic Review of Learning Connections

« Previous | Contents | Next »

Listen

APPENDIX 7 - PROJECT DOCUMENTATION USED IN THE REVIEW

a) Project Initiation Document

Objectives

Deliverables

Key Activities

To undertake a Review of Learning Connections and its strategic fit with the Lifelong Learning Directorate in order to maximise effectiveness in policy advice, policy delivery and practice development.

A report for the Lifelong Learning Director which includes a summary of:

  • The background to the development of LC
  • What LC does, including staff, current structure, budgets etc.
  • The extent to which LC contributes to the SG's national outcomes and policy objectives
  • The added value LC brings
  • The delivery landscape for CLD/ ALN/ ESOL and LC's role within this.
  • The evidence collected during the project.
  • Options for the future structure of LC and the delivery of its work ( CLD/ ALN/ ESOL/ CLD Standards Council etc.)
  • Recommendations on how LC should be taken forward
  • Setting the policy framework and defining the policy objectives of CLD/ ALN
  • Defining the journey and the rationale to the creation of the current LC
  • Reviewing the existing work & resources of LC
  • Structured interviews with staff and key stakeholders
  • Mapping the national support for the delivery of CLD ( LC and others)
  • Identification of areas of duplication and overlap
  • Stakeholder engagement to establish perceived added value of LC (from both internal staff and external stakeholders)
  • Develop and test options for future structure and delivery of the work of LC with the LL Director, LC staff, SG and external stakeholders.

Stakeholders

Risks/Issues

Mitigation

General

  • Director of Lifelong Learning
  • Ministers

Internal

  • LC Staff
  • Analytical Services
  • LL Directorate
  • Justice & Communities
  • DG Education
  • Health Dept

Rural/Greener

  • Stakeholder expectations ( LL Director and Internal staff) expecting an 'easy solution'
  • Scope of the work is wide with many partners in the delivery landscape which could impact on the ability to achieve clarity and consensus about the best way forward.
  • An understanding of the role of LC and expectations of LC from Ministers, LC staff, SG and external stakeholders.
  • Tensions and sensitivities of staff which have been increased by recent events
  • Tight timescales - 3 months and the risk of slippage
  • Limited resources (staff) to support the work
  • Issues of potentially re-settling staff within different options for delivery
  • Budget restrictions within SG and LL Directorate restricting the scope of LC achievement/delivery.
  • Reducing the number/pool of national specialists
  • The ideal/optimum solution may not be achievable in the short term
  • Setting up a wider virtual team (including the unions and key people with experience, knowledge and policy inputs) to approve the project process ( PID, PCN etc), to review progress and to help ensure a degree of rigour in the processes
  • Regular meetings with LL Director
  • Sourcing Jeanette and another person to provide a project resource
  • Use of the quinquennial review approach to provide a structure to the project and use of project documentation to monitor progress of project
  • Communication of plan ( PID etc) with LCSMT and key stakeholders
  • Engage all stakeholders ( LC staff, SG and external stakeholders) & and provide opportunity for liaison & updating as project develops
  • Establish a phased plan with short-term solutions and longer-term actions/options

Delivery partners

  • Locals Authorities
  • CLD partnerships
  • Voluntary Sector
  • Scotland's colleges
  • CLD Managers Scotland

Youthlink

External

  • SDS
  • SQA
  • SCQF
  • HMIE
  • LTS
  • COSLA
  • Scottish Community Development Centre

DN More details of the key stakeholders are being collated.

Interdependencies

Critical Success Factors

Scope

National Performance Framework and Outcome Statements

Joint StatementCOSLA/ SG

SOAs and CPPs activity

Government policies

  • Skills strategy
  • Curriculum for Excellence
  • Early Years Framework
  • Offender Learning Report (in production)
  • ALNIS (and the planned re-fresh)
  • Adult ESOL strategy
  • WALT (Working and Learning Together) Community Empowerment Action Plan
  • Equally Well
  • MCMC/16 + Learning Choices
  • Workforce +/employability
  • Youth Work Strategy (and Youth Framework)
  • Fairer Scotland

Baseline survey of Adult literacy and numeracy in Scotland (findings Nov '09 onwards)

Move to Atlantic Quay - location of accommodation & number of desks etc. (current plans have allocated 28 desks for LC - together as one division)

  • Stakeholder buy-in at the start and throughout the process


  • Clear identification of the issues, overlaps and duplication in terms of delivery and fit with current SG policy.
  • A clear report, reflecting the policy landscape, which enables the LL Director & Ministers to understand the role of LC
  • A clear report with recommendations which enables the LL Director to take decisions about the future structure and role of LC.
  • A clear, deliverable action/implementation plan which stakeholders are bought into.

In scope

  • All aspects of LC and the CLD Standards Council (including staff, drcs, & programme budgets) policy and delivery work and practice development.
  • Aspects of policy delivery across the LL Directorate which relate to CLD/ ALN/ ESOL.
  • Interdependencies with aspects of policy delivery across SG

Out of scope

  • Qualification levels & standards
  • IAG given to learners
  • The broader delivery of MCMC and further adult education policy (college delivery).
  • Direct delivery of CLD, ESOL and ALN to adults and youth
  • The purpose and content of the governments strategic policies which relate to LC work.

b) Project Critical Network and Timeline

Project Critical Network and Timeline

« Previous | Contents | Next »

Page updated: Friday, July 3, 2009