« Previous | Contents | Next »
Listen
4 Meeting the aims and objectives of Bus Policy
Current Bus Policy
4.1 It is important for the transport authority to consider their current policies as laid down in their local transport strategy and their regional transport partnership's regional transport strategy in determining the appropriate way forward. The primary reason for establishing a sQP should be to contribute to a sustainable transport network that is accessible to all; attractive so as to encourage modal shift from less sustainable modes, and to reduce or limit traffic congestion, noise or air pollution.
4.2 Once the authority/authorities are clear what they are trying to achieve then they need to determine the appropriate tool to deliver the policy. Current partnership working on a voluntary basis between transport authorities and operators has achieved significant results to date. The improvements delivered have greatly benefited public transport users throughout Scotland. To date the voluntary arrangements have worked well, and many of these can be as effective as sQPs. Transport authorities, however, where they determine there is a need, can consider the move towards a sQP to achieve improved public transport provision in their area and to meet their relevant general policies.
Examples of voluntary Quality partnerships |
|---|
Ferrytoll Park & Ride 
Ferrytoll Park & Ride is a bus park & ride scheme located on the north side of the Forth Road Bridge in Fife. It is a joint initiative developed between Fife Council and Stagecoach. The aim is to tackle congestion problems from the 60,000 vehicles crossing the Forth Road Bridge daily. The site opened in November 2000 at a cost of £4.2m. Construction was funded by the Scottish Executive, Fife Council, The European Union and Scottish Enterprise Fife. The site opened with 500 space capacity but since 2005 following the construction of a multi-storey car park this has doubled to over 1000 spaces. Glasgow Streamline 
'Streamline' is a higher quality, more reliable, efficient and accessible bus service and is the outcome from a 'quality partnership' agreement between Glasgow City Council and First Glasgow. West Dunbartonshire Council is also a partner in the initial route corridor Baillieston to Faifley. A large proportion of the funding for the £30 million project has come from the Scottish Government through various Public Transport Fund awards. Contributions have also been made by Glasgow City Council, First and, for the first Streamline route, West Dunbartonshire Council. Improvements in traffic management allow all streamline buses - equipped to communicate with state-of-the-art information and traffic signalling systems - to provide the public with a higher quality and faster journey on 120 kilometres of treated routes. Quality bus shelters with real-time passenger information displays, and CCTV cameras have been provided at bus stops and on-board buses to improve passenger safety. Streamline is a complete package which has only been possible by a close working partnership between the public and private sector to provide a high quality public transport system for the people of Glasgow. Service 500 Glasgow Flyer 
The Glasgow Flyer is a partnership between Arriva and BAA Glasgow that provides a direct bus route between Glasgow Airport and the city centre 24 hours a day, seven days a week with journeys up to every 10 minutes during the day. Buses are wheelchair accessible, fitted with interior and exterior CCTV, with dedicated drivers trained to SVQ Level 2 in Customer Care. Additional features include full leather interior, WiFi access and onboard passenger commentary of stopping places. Dundee Quality Partnership 
Successful partnership working between Dundee City Council and operators Stagecoach Strathtay and National Express Dundee has delivered significant enhancements to Dundee's transport system in recent years. Bringing Confidence into Public Transport, delivered between 2002 and 2005, saw £2.41 million invested in the redevelopment of major city centre interchanges and Ninewells Hospital interchange facilities, alongside a new public transport information system utilising technology to deliver RTPI displays, SMS, Internet and WAP journey planning and touch screen information kiosks. The SmartBus project delivered £6.77 million worth of improvements between 2003 and 2006, enabling the provision of city-wide RTPI, bespoke bus shelters and fully accessible bus stops, and in-vehicle CCTV. The signing of the Dundee Public Transport Partnership Concordat in 2004 set out the commitments of the partners to provide ongoing investment in improvements to the transport system. The North East of Scotland Quality Partnership for Public Transport 
The Quality Partnership for Public Transport is a voluntary agreement between Aberdeen City Council, Aberdeenshire Council, Nestrans, Stagecoach Bluebird and First Aberdeen, which has been in force since 1998. This successful partnership has seen the introduction of high quality low floor buses, enhanced bus priority measures, better passenger waiting areas, park and ride schemes and a range of ticketing and information initiatives such as real time at-stop passenger information system. The partnership was reviewed in 2005 to include a Passenger Charter and over twenty standards and targets that cover all aspects of bus travel. The extended agreement also includes a commitment to undertake regular customer satisfaction surveys and to produce an Annual Progress Report. |
4.3 At an early stage of the process a review of the effectiveness of existing partnership agreements should take place to establish if there is a need to move towards a sQP. If the only method of achieving this is by a move towards a sQP then the authority must be clear on the rationale behind doing so.
Reasons for establishing a sQP
4.4 As discussed, the primary reasons for establishing a sQP should be to contribute to a sustainable transport network that is accessible to all; attractive so to encourage modal shift from less sustainable modes, and to reduce or limit traffic congestion, noise or air pollution.
4.5 The desire for a sQP should not be derived from any sense of failure of any component of the local bus transport network. Existing legislative powers and duties can deal with 'failure' of service provision through implementation of a Quality Contract ( QC) scheme.
4.6 A QC enables local transport authorities to determine what local bus services should be provided in their area and to what standards, and then undertake contracts with bus operators through the competitive tendering process, giving them exclusive rights to undertake services to the defined specification.
4.7 Within Scotland, an authority must be satisfied that a QC is necessary to implement the policies set out in the local transport strategy or strategies in the area to which the proposed scheme relates and is done so in a way that is " economic, efficient and effective".
4.8 The sQP should be seen as a desire to improve local bus services for the benefit of customers, the operators and the transport authority; by providing a sustainable reliable and quality bus network through documented and quantified measures of intervention with identified responsibility of deliverables. It should be used as a commitment to partnership working to achieve common goals and aspirations whether this be from the bus operators business plan or the transport authorities Single Outcome Agreements.
Objectives of a sQP
4.9 A set of clear objectives must be derived to enable delivery of a sQP. It is important to make these objectives SMART (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Realistic and Time Specific) to demonstrate the impact of a sQP on other policies, strategies and objectives in the monitoring and evaluation stage.
4.10 A sQP cannot circumvent or replace the primary legislation regarding the powers and duties placed on operators and or transport authorities. As previously stated, it is not used as a tool to deal with market failure. Equally it should not be drafted in such a way as to have punitive measures imposed on the operator or transport authority in the event of non delivery of any components of the sQP.
4.11 It is also not a tool to restrict or inhibit competition between operators offering the same level of quality bus service provision.
4.12 Objectives that may be considered as part of a sQP include:
- providing quality transport for those without use of a car;
- improving modal choice;
- improving the overall image of bus services;
- marketing and promoting services;
- maintaining good and consistent information;
- increasing bus patronage;
- promoting confidence in the bus service network;
- reducing delays to bus services;
- better customer relations and more customer focussed standards;
- ensuring comfort and convenience across the whole journey;
- maintaining consistent standards of cleanliness;
- ensuring safety and security throughout the whole journey;
- ensuring interchange is not a major barrier to travel;
- increasing mobility and reducing barriers to bus use;
- contributing to social inclusion policies;
- reduction in air pollution; and
- reduction in noise pollution.
4.13 The relevant objectives in the list above would have to be further developed to produce SMART objectives with related indicators and targets with which to measure progress by.
Key features of a sQP
4.14 A sQP is "made" by the transport authority or authorities after consultation with operators and other relevant organisations which cover a defined geographical area; it is not an agreement between parties. The sQP will be available for any operator in the relevant area to join, by giving an undertaking to the Scottish Traffic Commissioner to provide the required standard of service in exchange for the right to use the facilities (e.g. bus infrastructure) provided under the scheme. (See Appendix C)
4.15 While no operator is obliged to participate in a sQP those that do so must give a written undertaking to the Scottish Traffic Commissioner that they will provide local services to the specified standard when using the facilities included in the sQP.
4.16 Where a voluntary partnership commits each party to a programme of incremental improvement over time there is no mechanism to prevent non-participating operators using the improved facilities in competition with those operators that have entered into the agreement.
4.17 In contrast, a sQP excludes the operators that do not participate from using those facilities. This is backed by enforcement powers to the Scottish Traffic Commissioner against non-participating operators that use the facilities without complying with the requirements of the scheme.
4.18 It should be noted that an operator is not prevented from operating along the same route as long as the service is registered with the Scottish Traffic Commissioner but the operator would be prevented from using the facilities provided unless the relevant undertaking to the Scottish Traffic Commissioner has been given that they will meet the standard of service within the scheme.
4.19 If an operator considers that the transport authority put an unreasonable obligation on them for use of the facilities within the sQP then it can call for the application of the Competition Test. The sQP is also subject to the requirements and prohibitions of the Competition Act 1998 (see Chapter 12 'Competition considerations').
Benefits of a sQP
4.20 There are benefits to both transport authorities and bus operators in having statutory backing behind their partnership. These powers are outlined below.
Transport authority
4.21 A principal benefit of a sQP is that it enables stability in the scheme area, allowing the investment required to deliver bus policy, resulting in increased quality. The range of specific standards can be targeted or aimed at what the transport authority wishes to deliver in terms of customer service, quality of vehicles, modal shift, reliability, and air emissions.
4.22 For the transport authority, benefits are realised by all operators conforming to the same conditions if they wish to use the facilities provided; thereby raising the overall level of quality in a consistent manner. This is in contrast to a voluntary scheme which may be diluted, or fail to deliver, because an existing operator, or newly registered local bus service operator, provides a lower standard of service than provided by incumbent operators.
4.23 Within a voluntary scheme, there is no means of preventing additional operators providing lower quality services on the route or in the area. A sQP would effectively prevent such a situation occurring as non-conforming operators would be excluded from using the 'improved' transport authority controlled facilities.
Bus operator
4.24 From an operator's perspective, a sQP is beneficial because it can guarantee that effective bus priority and other quality measures required to enable bus services to operate punctually and reliably are actually delivered; and that there is a statutory basis for their provision, maintenance and enforcement.
4.25 There is also a level of protection given to the operator through a sQP that the investment they have made, for example in new vehicles, is not diminished by non-conforming operators running services using poorer quality vehicles.
Proposed Glasgow sQP |
|---|
Glasgow City Council is proposing to introduce a statutory Quality Partnership scheme to deliver an effective and sustainable transport system for the city. The Council's Local Transport Strategy (2007-2009) supports the establishment of Quality Partnership Schemes. Commitments have also been made by Strathclyde Partnership for Transport within their Regional Transport Strategy. The making of the sQP is a key component as it provides a statutory basis for establishing a baseline for the quality of bus services within the city. |
4.26 There are, therefore, benefits to both transport authorities and bus operators in entering into a quality partnership that has the backing of statutory powers behind it. Table 4.1, however, summarises which is the most appropriate method of quality partnership to deliver the objectives, in some cases a voluntary scheme will be just as effective in delivering the objectives.
Table 4.1 Use of voluntary or statutory quality partnership to deliver objectives
Objectives | voluntary QP | statutory QP | Comment | Responsibility of deliver |
|---|
Operator | Transport Authority |
|---|
Providing quality transport for those without use of a car | vv | vvv | Combination of a number of factors can lead to improvements in transport that can benefit all including those that do not have use of a car. | • | • |
Improving modal choice | vv | vvv | Combination of all improvements should lead to modal shift. | • | • |
Stable network | v | vvv | Can be achieved by Quality Contracts. | • | |
Improving the overall image of bus services | v | vvv | Services not meeting the specified standards will not be able to use the facilities in a statutory scheme. | • | • |
Marketing and promoting services | vv | vv | Can be built into voluntary and statutory partnerships. | • | |
Maintaining good and consistent information | vv | vv | Information may be already specified under a Bus Information strategy and therefore not included in sQP. | • | • |
Increasing bus patronage | vv | vvv | sQPs can set realistic targets to increase growth. | • | |
Promoting confidence in the bus service network; | v | vvv | Statutory schemes will deliver a stable network for 3-5 years, with bus priority, improved quality of vehicles, improved information leading to passenger being more confident to travel bus. | • | • |
Reducing delays to bus services | v | vvv | Bus priority measures to be included as part of scheme. | • | |
Better customer relations and more customer focussed standards | v | v | Can equally be achieved by the EU Drivers CPC (Certificate of Professional Competence). | • | |
Ensuring comfort and convenience across the whole journey | v | v | Although reduced congestion will contribute to this it can be achieved by investment in vehicles and improved timetabling. | • | • |
Maintaining consistent standards of cleanliness | v | vv | Can be built into voluntary and statutory partnerships i.e. CCTV on all buses and clean shelters. | • | • |
Ensuring safety and security throughout the whole journey; | v | vv | Can be built into voluntary and statutory partnerships i.e. CCTV on all buses. | • | |
Ensuring interchange is not a major barrier to travel | v | vv | Service level in statutory scheme may be higher by providing more direct services to reduce interchange. | | • |
Increasing mobility and reducing barriers to bus use | v | vv | Infrastructure provision in statutory scheme may be higher allowing reduced barriers to bus use therefore increasing mobility. Providing low floor buses on services. | • | • |
Contributing to social inclusion policies | vv | vv | Both voluntary and statutory schemes can contribute to social inclusion policies. | • | • |
Reduction in air pollution | v | vvv | Engines with reduced emissions can be specified in sQP e.g. Euro III standard. | • | |
Reduction in noise pollution | v | vvv | Environmentally friendly vehicles with quieter engines can be specified as a standard within a sQP. Noise and vibration can be reduced by resurfacing key sections of route where problems exist. | • | |
Key | vvv | Most appropriate method of delivering objectives |
vv | An appropriate method of delivering objectives |
v | A less appropriate method of delivering objectives |
« Previous | Contents | Next »