| Description | The aim of this evaluation was to describe and evaluate post-incident management services for preventing psychological and physical harm in police and prison staff potentially exposed to BBVs in the work context. |
|---|
| ISBN | 9780755974948 (Web Only) |
|---|
| Official Print Publication Date | April 2009 |
|---|
| Website Publication Date | April 06, 2009 |
|---|
Next »
Listen
Avril Taylor 1, Kirsty Roy 2, Beth Cullen 2, Jane Gow 1, Karen Dunleavy 1
1University of the West of Scotland, 2Health Protection Scotland
ISBN 978 0 7559 7494 8 (Web only publication)
ISSN 0950 2254
This document is also available in pdf format (1.7mb)
C ontents
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION
Background
The study
Structure of the report
CHAPTER TWO POST-INCIDENT MANGEMENT: POLICIES AND PROCEDURES IN THE POLICE AND PRISON SERVICES
Post-incident management
Policies and procedures in Scottish police forces
Policies and procedures in the Scottish Prison Service
Summary
CHAPTER THREE METHODS
Study design
Steering group
Ethical approval
Permission and support
Publicity
Data collection and timescale
Data entry and analysis
Methodological limitations
CHAPTER FOUR FINDINGS FROM THE EVALUATION
I: Numbers of occupational exposure incidents reported over the study period
II: Findings from the Incident Report Forms
III: Findings from the Incident Review
IV: Findings from Staff Evaluation Questionnaires
CHAPTER FIVE DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS
Discussion
Conclusions and recommendations
REFERENCES
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS
LIST OF TABLES AND CHARTS
ANNEXES
The University of Paisley changed its name during the study to the University of the West of Scotland. The university logo was amended on study materials where possible.
Annex 1: Incident Report Form
Annex 2: Incident Report Form Supplementary sheet
Annex 3: Incident Review Form
Annex 4: Staff Evaluation Questionnaire
Annex 5: The data collection process
Annex 6: Intra-observer, inter-observer and inter-panel variation
The views expressed in this report are those of the researcher and
do not necessarily represent those of the Department or Scottish Ministers.
Next »