| Description | Report of evaluation of the Scottish Recovery Indicator (SRI) pilot in five health board areas of Scotland. SRI is a practice development tool for assessing whether mental health services are meeting service-users' needs for equality, social inclusion and recovery. |
|---|
| ISBN | 9780755972104 (Web Only) |
|---|
| Official Print Publication Date | October 2008 |
|---|
| Website Publication Date | October 24, 2008 |
|---|
Next »
Listen
Joanne McLean, Scottish Development Centre for Mental Health
Indiya Whitehead, Scottish Development Centre for Mental Health
ISBN 978 0 7559 7210 4 (Web only publication)
This document is also available in pdf format (536k)
CONTENTS
Executive Summary
Introduction
Methods
Results
Recommendations for the roll-out of SRI
Chapter One: Introduction
Background
Scottish Recovery Indicator
Need for evaluation
SRI pilot sites
Objectives
Approach
Chapter Two: Methodology
Introduction
Stage one: Preparation
Stage 2: Local case studies
Stage 3: Analysis
Chapter Three: Results
Introduction
Response
Limitations
Findings: preparation
Administration
Reflections on administration of the SRI
SRI content
Feedback
Impact of the SRI and action planning
Re-administration
Chapter Four: Conclusions and recommendations
Key issues raised by the evaluation
Recommendations for the development and roll-out of SRI
References
Appendix One: Summary version of SRI Tool under evaluation
Appendix Two: Action Plan Example
Appendix Three: Additional information for other development resources
List of Tables and Figures
Figures:
Figure 1.1 SRI Development Process
Tables:
Table 3.1 Response
Table 3.2 Settings of SRI pilots by pilot area
Table 3.3 Participants perspectives on SRI training
Table 3.4 Dominant issues in completing Parts 1 and 2
Table 3.5 Dominant issues for administrators in completing Part 4
Table 3.6 Dominant issues for administrators in completing Part 5
Table 3.7 Dominant issues for participants in completing Part 5
Table 3.8 Evaluation participant comments issues with Parts 1 and 2 questions
Table 3.9 Evaluation participants' issues with Part 4 questions
Table 3.10 Evaluation participants' issues with Part 5 questions
The views expressed in this report are those of the researcher and
do not necessarily represent those of the Department or Scottish Ministers.
Next »