On this page:

Efficiency Delivery Plans 2008-11 - March 2008

Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] ...[11]

DescriptionEfficiency Delivery Plans - March 2008, for the 2008-11 Efficiency Programme.
ISBN (Web Only)
Official Print Publication Date
Website Publication DateApril 15, 2008

Cabinet Secretary for Finance and Sustainable Growth

Directorate General - Economy

1. Portfolio/Number/Name:DG Economy /DG Economy / 1 / Third Sector

2. Programme/Activity:

Scottish Investment Fund

3. Efficiency

3.1 Current target; £m

2008-09

2009-10

2010-11

Cash

0.15

0.6

1.3

3.2 Efficiencies delivered; £m

2008-09

2009-10

2010-11

Cash

Time

4. Accountable Officer for delivery

Tracey Slaven

5. Project Manager

Roddy Macdonald

6. EGDD Portfolio Manager

Lorimer Mackenzie
7. Description of efficiency and actions to be taken

7.1 What is the efficiency improvement? How will the efficiencies be made?

The efficiency improvement is associated with the design of the Scottish Investment Fund(SIF) to provide a more efficient process of investment in third sector organisations, including optimising loans and equity investment to build a more financially sustainable sector.

This builds on the lessons from the evaluation of the Futurebuilders Scotland programme and is intended to allow the agreement of blended funding based on a holistic assessment of organisational requirements rather than a multiplicity of appraisals by separate organisations. This should reduce the bureaucracy for the individual organisations, improve the operation of market decisions by addressing information failures and consequentially reduce the levels of central government grant required to support private finance and enable projects to proceed.

The Futurebuilders Scotland evaluation identifies £60 of public investment supporting £40 of private sector investment. In moving to the new investment fund we aim to shift this balance to £55:£45.

7.2 What are the main actions that are needed to secure the delivery of this efficiency improvement?

Continued development of SIF design and implementation of fund in 2008-09.

8. Associated costs

8.1 Are there any development or redundancy costs associated with the delivery of this efficiency?

No

9. Measurement

9.1 What are the inputs that will be measured?

Level of financial investment through SIF and other public sector funds.

9.2 What are the outputs that will be measured?

Level of loan and other private sector funding leveraged by SIF

9.3 What is the baseline for inputs and outputs?

Ratio of investment to leverage achieved through the Futurebuilders Scotland programme. Evidenced in programme evaluation at 40%.

10. Quality cross-check

10.1 What quality indicators are being used to ensure that quality of service is maintained or improved?

On-going monitoring of individual investment outcomes. Evaluation of programme, including experience of applicants, will directly assess the effectiveness relative to Futurebuilders Scotland.

11. Monitoring

11.1 What are the arrangements for monitoring the delivery of efficiencies?

Detailed arrangements dependent on final delivery design.

12. Reporting

12.1 What are the arrangements for reporting the delivery of efficiencies?

Detailed arrangements dependent on final delivery design.

13. Dependencies

13.1 Explain if your efficiencies are dependent on legislation or other structural changes being achieved.

Dependent on approval of the detailed design of the SIF.

14. Use of efficiencies

14.1 How are the efficiencies released from improvement activity being used to improve front-line services?

Increase in number of Third Sector organisations assisted through the Investment Fund.

1. Portfolio/Number/Name:DG Economy / 2 / eCare

2. Programme/Activity:

The programme provides for multi-agency data sharing of personal information. This involves building software adaptors between the eCare framework and proprietary software packages in use by social workers, schools, NHS and other services across Scotland. The programme went live in two early implementation sites in late 2007 and will be available for implementation across Scotland from 2008/09. The speed of implementation will depend on local readiness and the provision of adaptors by the eCare team to proprietary packages.

3. Efficiency

3.1 Current target; £m

2008-09

2009-10

2010-11

Cash

0.7

3.2 Efficiencies delivered; £m

2008-09

2009-10

2010-11

Cash

Time

4. Accountable Officer for delivery

Dr Andrew Goudie

5. Project Manager

Linda Rosborough

6. EGDD Portfolio Manager

Lorimer Mackenzie
7. Description of efficiency and actions to be taken

7.1 What is the efficiency improvement? How will the efficiencies be made?

Using improved technical architecture to simplify process of connecting business applications to the national framework. Previously we have had to pay software houses the full costs of adapting their packages to exchange data with the multi-agency eCare store. With this solution we will need to commission much less work from the vendors.

7.2 What are the main actions that are needed to secure the delivery of this efficiency improvement?

Provide a standard piece of software "middleware solution" to each Data Sharing Partnership that provides core functionality to prevent it having to be commissioned from each software vendor. Prospective savings are based on 7 adaptors being procured in 08/09.

8. Associated costs

8.1 Are there any development or redundancy costs associated with the delivery of this efficiency?

Yes Development costs - business case still being developed in conjunction with detailed planning for 08/09 (target date end April 08). But significant net savings being expected of the order identified following successful proof of concept.

9. Measurement

9.1 What are the inputs that will be measured?

Cost of adapter without "appliance

9.2 What are the outputs that will be measured?

Cost of adapter with "appliance"

9.3 What is the baseline for inputs and outputs?

Actual costs for different approaches.

10. Quality cross-check

10.1 What quality indicators are being used to ensure that quality of service is maintained or improved?

Quality assured by Microsoft, Oracle and LogicaCMG and customers including NHS Glasgow and Clyde, NHS Fife, NHS Lothian, South Ayrshire Council.

11. Monitoring

11.1 What are the arrangements for monitoring the delivery of efficiencies?

Transformational Technologies Division will monitor rollout and report to eCare programme board.

12. Reporting

12.1 What are the arrangements for reporting the delivery of efficiencies?

Reporting timing, cost, sustainability and effectiveness to eCare Programme Board.

13. Dependencies

13.1 Explain if your efficiencies are dependent on legislation or other structural changes being achieved.

Dependent on local partners having clear plans for local software provision and willingness to adopt this approach.

14. Use of efficiencies

14.1 How are the efficiencies released from improvement activity being used to improve front-line services?

The efficiency will be assumed as part of the eHealth money allocated. This allows for more connectors to be built substantially increasing the number of agencies able to share data electronically.

1. Directorate/Number/Name:DG Economy- DG Economy / 3 - Forth & Tay Road Bridges

1. Directorate/Number/Name:DG Economy- DG Economy / 3 - Forth & Tay Road Bridges

Moved to list of efficiency projects with expected savings less than £0.5m see here for information.

1. Portfolio/Number/Name:DG Economy / 4 / Support for Air Services

2. Programme/Activity:

Efficiency savings have been delivered through the introduction of Air Discount Scheme to support the cost of air travel for residents of our island and remote communities instead of a network of Public Service Obligation which were expected to cost substantially more.

3. Efficiency

3.1 Current target; £m

2008-09

2009-10

2010-11

Cash

5.4

4.9

4.6

3.2 Efficiencies delivered; £m

2008-09

2009-10

2010-11

Cash

Time

4. Accountable Officer for delivery

Dr Andrew Goudie

5. Project Manager

Ken Crawford, APM Division

6. EGDD Portfolio Manager

Lorimer Mackenzie
7. Description of efficiency and actions to be taken

7.1 What is the efficiency improvement? How will the efficiencies be made?

The Air Discount Scheme reduces the cost of air travel by 40% for eligible residents in island and remote communities. By working with the airline industry it is able to secure a general lowering of fares and service improvements. Total cost of the scheme is expected to be some £6.6m per annum.

The 2007-08 baseline had included a budget of £12m to fund the introduction of a network of PSO contracts covering the same areas which is no longer necessary.

7.2 What are the main actions that are needed to secure the delivery of this efficiency improvement?

The efficiency saving has already been delivered. The ADS is already operational.

8. Associated costs

8.1 Are there any development or redundancy costs associated with the delivery of this efficiency?

No, the development costs have been met already.

9. Measurement

9.1 What are the inputs that will be measured?

Costs of discount scheme and reimbursement to airlines.

9.2 What are the outputs that will be measured?

Passenger numbers on supportive routes, average fare levels and service frequency/ capacity enhancements.

9.3 What is the baseline for inputs and outputs?

Performance of routes prior to ADS.

10. Quality cross-check

10.1 What quality indicators are being used to ensure that quality of service is maintained or improved?

Service frequency and capacity is being monitored.

11. Monitoring

11.1 What are the arrangements for monitoring the delivery of efficiencies?

Regular data on scheme usage is collected by ADS administration unit.

12. Reporting

12.1 What are the arrangements for reporting the delivery of efficiencies?

Regular profiling prepared for Director of Transport.

13. Dependencies

13.1 Explain if your efficiencies are dependent on legislation or other structural changes being achieved.

No.

14. Use of efficiencies

14.1 How are the efficiencies released from improvement activity being used to improve front-line services?

This efficiency was assumed as part of the allocation made by the Scottish Government to fund the ADS. This freed up resources for Ministers to allocate to their other priorities including support for lifeline air and ferry services.

1. Portfolio/Number/Name:DG Economy / 5 / Highlands & Islands Airports Ltd

2. Programme/Activity:

The Chief Executive and management of HIAL will be expected to deliver cumulative 2% efficiency savings over the next 3 years as part of the efficient running of the company to be reinvested in the company's operations.

3. Efficiency

3.1 Current target; £m

2008-09

2009-10

2010-11

Cash

0.5

1.0

1.5

3.2 Efficiencies delivered; £m

2008-09

2009-10

2010-11

Cash

Time

4. Accountable Officer for delivery

Dr Andrew Goudie and

Managing Director, HIAL

5. Project Manager

Ken Crawford, APM Division

6. EGDD Portfolio Manager

Lorimer Mackenzie
7. Description of efficiency and actions to be taken

7.1 What is the efficiency improvement? How will the efficiencies be made?

HIAL are expected to deliver a range of efficiency improvements across their operations to reinvest in frontline services.

7.2 What are the main actions that are needed to secure the delivery of this efficiency improvement?

Management action by HIAL Board and Managing Director.

8. Associated costs

8.1 Are there any development or redundancy costs associated with the delivery of this efficiency?

None expected.

9. Measurement

9.1 What are the inputs that will be measured?

Operational costs of company.

9.2 What are the outputs that will be measured?

Service delivery and future investment plans.

9.3 What is the baseline for inputs and outputs?

Comparison with 2007-08 performance.

10. Quality cross-check

10.1 What quality indicators are being used to ensure that quality of service is maintained or improved?

Quality will continue to be measured via the local managers at the Airport/Aerodrome locations through the regular audits undertaken by SRG and implementation of the Safety Management System.

11. Monitoring

11.1 What are the arrangements for monitoring the delivery of efficiencies?

Regular monitoring of company budgets and financial performance as reported to Board.

12. Reporting

12.1 What are the arrangements for reporting the delivery of efficiencies?

Will be reported regularly to HIAL Board and expected to feature in Company's annual report.

13. Dependencies

13.1 Explain if your efficiencies are dependent on legislation or other structural changes being achieved.

No.

14. Use of efficiencies

14.1 How are the efficiencies released from improvement activity being used to improve front-line services?

This efficiency was assumed as part of the allocation made by the Scottish Government to Highlands and Islands Airport Ltd.

1. Portfolio/Number/Name:DG Economy / 6 / British Waterways Scotland

2. Programme/Activity:

British Waterways Scotland (BWS) will be expected to deliver a minimum of 2% accumulative efficiency savings in the operation of that body in Scotland to be reinvested in the maintenance and operation of the canal network.

3. Efficiency

3.1 Current target; £m

2008-09

2009-10

2010-11

Cash

0.25

0.5

0.75

3.2 Efficiencies delivered; £m

2008-09

2009-10

2010-11

Cash

Time

4. Accountable Officer for delivery

Dr Andrew Goudie and

Director, British Waterways Scotland

5. Project Manager

Margaret Horn

6. EGDD Portfolio Manager

Lorimer Mackenzie
7. Description of efficiency and actions to be taken

7.1 What is the efficiency improvement? How will the efficiencies be made?

BWS will be required as part of their grant fundings to demonstrate accumulative efficiencies of 2% per annum in the operation of that body over the Spending Review period. It will be for BWS to determine the precise efficiencies to be delivered across their activities.

7.2 What are the main actions that are needed to secure the delivery of this efficiency improvement?

Action by the Director and managers of BWS in running the organisation more efficiently.

8. Associated costs

8.1 Are there any development or redundancy costs associated with the delivery of this efficiency?

None expected.

9. Measurement

9.1 What are the inputs that will be measured?

Cost of BWS operations.

9.2 What are the outputs that will be measured?

Level of delivery of services against operating plan.

9.3 What is the baseline for inputs and outputs?

Comparison with 2007-08 budget and operating plan.

10. Quality cross-check

10.1 What quality indicators are being used to ensure that quality of service is maintained or improved?

BWS collects regular data on canal users' experience which will inform this element.

11. Monitoring

11.1 What are the arrangements for monitoring the delivery of efficiencies?

Regular monitoring reports from BWS are expected.

12. Reporting

12.1 What are the arrangements for reporting the delivery of efficiencies?

Expected to be included in Annual Reports of BWS.

13. Dependencies

13.1 Explain if your efficiencies are dependent on legislation or other structural changes being achieved.

No

14. Use of efficiencies

14.1 How are the efficiencies released from improvement activity being used to improve front-line services?

This efficiency was assumed as part of the allocation made by the Scottish Government to British Waterways Scotland.

1. Portfolio/Number/Name:DG Economy / 7 / Support for Ferry Services

2. Programme/Activity:

The contract arrangements for delivery of ferry services to the Northern Isles and Clyde & Hebrides limit the allowable cost increases on key elements of the budget requiring the company to deliver efficiency in their operations to reduce costs.

3. Efficiency

3.1 Current target; £m

2008-09

2009-10

2010-11

Cash

1.0

1.0

1.0

3.2 Efficiencies delivered; £m

2008-09

2009-10

2010-11

Cash

Time

4. Accountable Officer for delivery

Dr Andrew Goudie and

Managing Director, David MacBrayne Ltd

5. Project Manager

Alan McPherson

6. EGDD Portfolio Manager

Lorimer Mackenzie
7. Description of efficiency and actions to be taken

7.1 What is the efficiency improvement? How will the efficiencies be made?

The ferry services concerned are delivered by 2 subsidiaries of David MacBrayne Ltd following tender processes. Both contracts run for a period of 6 years. They contain provision for recalculating the contract cost base, resources and therefore subsidy assumptions required. Some key elements of these costs are fixed to increase by no more than CPI. It is anticipated that some costs will rise in line with RPI or higher and the company will be under pressure to find efficiency savings to fund these cost increases.

7.2 What are the main actions that are needed to secure the delivery of this efficiency improvement?

Action by David MacBrayne management.

8. Associated costs

8.1 Are there any development or redundancy costs associated with the delivery of this efficiency?

None expected, but salary costs are a major element in the CHFS contract.

9. Measurement

9.1 What are the inputs that will be measured?

Cost of operating the contract.

9.2 What are the outputs that will be measured?

Service delivery in accordance with contract performance requirements.

9.3 What is the baseline for inputs and outputs?

Financial models that underpin contract agreements.

10. Quality cross-check

10.1 What quality indicators are being used to ensure that quality of service is maintained or improved?

Regular performance monitoring information and negotiation with company, together with financial penalties for performance failures.

11. Monitoring

11.1 What are the arrangements for monitoring the delivery of efficiencies?

Detailed report on company performance verified by sample checking.

12. Reporting

12.1 What are the arrangements for reporting the delivery of efficiencies?

We shall monitor through our analysis of financial performance.

13. Dependencies

13.1 Explain if your efficiencies are dependent on legislation or other structural changes being achieved.

No.

14. Use of efficiencies

14.1 How are the efficiencies released from improvement activity being used to improve front-line services?

This efficiency was assumed as part of the allocation made by the Scottish Government to David MacBrayne Ltd.

1. Portfolio/Number/Name:DG Economy / 8 / Stirling - Alloa - Kincardine Railway (SAK) Project

2. Programme/Activity:

Stirling - Alloa - Kincardine Railway project.

The project, which will re-open approximately 21km of existing, disused and abandoned railway lines between Stirling Station and Longannet Power Station in Kincardine. A new railway station is being built in Alloa town centre allowing direct hourly passenger services between Alloa, Stirling and Glasgow Queen Street stations while passengers can change at Stirling for further services to Edinburgh. The line will also carry coal from the West of Scotland to Longannet Power Station and potentially provide freight services to other customers along the line.

Construction work is expected to be finished in spring 2008 with the first trains running following a period of commissioning and driver training. It is anticipated that passenger services will be running by summer 2008.

3. Efficiency

3.1 Current target; £m

2008-09

2009-10

2010-11

Cash

2

0

0

3.2 Efficiencies delivered; £m

2008-09

2009-10

2010-11

Cash

Time

4. Accountable Officer for delivery

Dr Andrew Goudie and Chief Executive, Transport Scotland (Dr Malcolm Reed)

5. Project Manager

Scott Prentice

6. EGDD Portfolio Manager

Lorimer Mackenzie
7. Description of efficiency and actions to be taken

7.1 What is the efficiency improvement? How will the efficiencies be made?

This project was originally promoted and to be delivered by third party sponsors and scheduled to complete in summer 2007 with an estimated final cost of £65m. Because of slippage, Transport Scotland, in June 2007, felt it necessary to take a "hands on" approach and directly manage delivery of the final phase of the project taking over day-to-day management of the scheme in August 2007. A simplified governance structure was implemented and objectives and roles and responsibilities agreed with the new Project Board. A due diligence audit was commissioned and this reported an increased estimated final cost. The streamlined management structure has provided efficiency in two main areas:

Direct savings of £0.3m in management fees between August 2007 and July 2008.

  • Improved communications and clear definition of roles and responsibilities has resulted in a reduction in the estimated final cost of £3.7m. These efficiencies were realised in the 2007-08 financial year.
  • Tangible opportunities for further savings of up to £2m have been identified on land & compensation and construction contract costs, and are being aggressively pursued by the project team.
  • The final cost of the project is therefore realistically expected to be reduced by approximately 5% compared with the liabilities faced when Transport Scotland took over management of the project. Efficiencies resulting from any further reduction in the estimated final cost from the current level will be realised in the 2008-09 financial year.

7.2 What are the main actions that are needed to secure the delivery of this efficiency improvement?

Transport Scotland approval for the authority required to adopt a "hands on" management approach for this project.

Establishment of the new governance structure was agreed between Transport Scotland, Clackmannanshire Council and Network Rail at the first meeting of the new Project Board in July 2007.

Transport Scotland redeployed existing staff resource during July and August to form the Project Delivery Team. Project Delivery is being managed by a team of three, only one of whom is dedicated full time to the project.

8. Associated costs

8.1 Are there any development or redundancy costs associated with the delivery of this efficiency?

Existing staff resources were deployed to deliver the project. Redundancy costs were incurred by tie ltd, the previous delivery managers and this has been accounted for in the estimated saving of £0.3m for tie ltd fees.

9. Measurement

9.1 What are the inputs that will be measured?

Completion of the construction works to the correct quality to ensure efficient handover of the new infrastructure to Network Rail post commissioning. Contractors programme and actual / forecast costs will be monitored.

9.2 What are the outputs that will be measured?

The project final cost, handover date to Network Rail and the date where operational services commence.

9.3 What is the baseline for inputs and outputs?

Baseline programme and cost was approved by the Project Board in October 2007.

10. Quality cross-check

10.1 What quality indicators are being used to ensure that quality of service is maintained or improved?

There were clear quality failings in the inherited delivery model for this project. The project quality success factor is for the completed railway to be successfully handed over to Network Rail to take control of operations and maintenance within two weeks of commissioning.

This milestone must be met in order to allow training for train drivers and signallers to be undertaken and operational services to commence in summer 2008.

11. Monitoring

11.1 What are the arrangements for monitoring the delivery of efficiencies?

The project is being controlled against a baseline target cost and programme, i.e. reporting each period compares the "gap" between the current forecasts and the baseline target.

12. Reporting

12.1 What are the arrangements for reporting the delivery of efficiencies?

Progress against the baseline cost and programme. These will be reported to Rail Finance in Transport Scotland. The goal is reduced project costs for the same outputs.

13. Dependencies

13.1 Explain if your efficiencies are dependent on legislation or other structural changes being achieved.

The structural changes for Transport Scotland to move to a "hands on" project management role were approved in June 2007. The structure of the project team was formalised on 7 December 2007. No other changes are required.

14. Use of efficiencies

14.1 How are the efficiencies released from improvement activity being used to improve front-line services?

Transport Scotland has retained these savings to meet other spending pressures and priorities within Transport Scotland.

1. Portfolio/Number/Name:DG Economy / 9 /Railway Construction Programme

2. Programme/Activity:

The railway construction programme is being run by Transport Scotland . Since the formation of the Rail Delivery Directorate in 2006 a considerable body of experience has been established in negotiating with Network Rail (NR) in the latter's role of construction project delivery.

Currently there is one very-near complete negotiation of specification and price in relation to the Airdrie to Bathgate line (A2B). The savings will be delivered over the period from 2007-08 until completion of the project, expected in 2010-11.

The team will now move onto look at other rail construction schemes (Borders Rail, Glasgow Airport Rail Link, & Edinburgh to Glasgow Improvements and therefore we expect these efficiencies to grow & continue for a number of years to come (at least until 2014).

3. Efficiency

3.1 Current target; £m

2008-09

2009-10

2010-11

Cash

15

15

15

3.2 Efficiencies delivered; £m

2008-09

2009-10

2010-11

Cash

Time

4. Accountable Officer for delivery

Dr Andrew Goudie and Chief Executive, Transport Scotland (Dr Malcolm Reed)

5. Project Manager

Jerry Morrissey

6. EGDD Portfolio Manager

Lorimer Mackenzie
7. Description of efficiency and actions to be taken

7.1 What is the efficiency improvement? How will the efficiencies be made?

The negotiated savings are achieved by Agency staff led by Bill Reeve (Director of Rail Delivery) looking at the latest technologies and best practice to identify efficiency gains and challenge cost assumptions. In a monopoly environment, it is vital we challenge all costs & efficiency assumptions. We have successfully achieved this on Airdrie to Bathgate and expect to do the same on future rail projects.

Price is £70m less than the price offered by NR after several rounds of negotiation.

7.2 What are the main actions that are needed to secure the delivery of this efficiency improvement?

For the Agency to obtain the final offer in writing from NR of the fixed price at the reduced level. This results from many days spent investigating and reviewing the cost estimates made by NR.

8. Associated costs

8.1 Are there any development or redundancy costs associated with the delivery of this efficiency?

No.

9. Measurement

9.1 What are the inputs that will be measured?

Work conducted by NR to plan, build and deliver the new railway with associated works such as stations and depots.

9.2 What are the outputs that will be measured?

The completed project will be delivered by NR with the Rail Regulator (ORR) reviewing the quality of the work.

9.3 What is the baseline for inputs and outputs?

2006 prices for the agreed spec and offered price from NR.

10. Quality cross-check

10.1 What quality indicators are being used to ensure that quality of service is maintained or improved?

Agency staff experience but especially the ORR review of the adequacy and acceptability of the construction programme.

11. Monitoring

11.1 What are the arrangements for monitoring the delivery of efficiencies?

With price being fixed the efficiencies will show during the construction years.

12. Reporting

12.1 What are the arrangements for reporting the delivery of efficiencies?

Reduced project costs for the same outputs. Costs transferred for the project will be less.

13. Dependencies

13.1 Explain if your efficiencies are dependent on legislation or other structural changes being achieved.

None required.

14. Use of efficiencies

14.1 How are the efficiencies released from improvement activity being used to improve front-line services?

This efficiency was assumed as part of the allocation by Ministers to Transport Scotland. Transport Scotland has retained these savings to meet other spending pressures and priorities within Transport Scotland.

1. Portfolio/Number/Name:DG Economy / 10 / Network Rail Rebate

2. Programme/Activity:

We have reviewed the Railway costs and persuaded Rail Regulator (ORR) to extract for us a support Grant rebate of £7.2m for the year 08-09.

3. Efficiency

3.1 Current target; £m

2008-09

2009-10

2010-11

Cash

7.2

0

0

3.2 Efficiencies delivered; £m

2008-09

2009-10

2010-11

Cash

Time

4. Accountable Officer for delivery

Dr Andrew Goudie and Chief Executive, Transport Scotland (Dr Malcolm Reed)

5. Project Manager

David Binnie

6. EGDD Portfolio Manager

Lorimer Mackenzie
7. Description of efficiency and actions to be taken

7.1 What is the efficiency improvement? How will the efficiencies be made?

We are able to obtain the ORR recommended level of effort for a cost to Scottish Ministers for year 08-09 which is less than the original Grant award from 2004 Determination.

7.2 What are the main actions that are needed to secure the delivery of this efficiency improvement?

Actions completed last year to secure the payment of this rebate by Network Rail.

8. Associated costs

8.1 Are there any development or redundancy costs associated with the delivery of this efficiency?

No.

9. Measurement

9.1 What are the inputs that will be measured?

Financial Grant support paid to NR by Scottish Ministers.

9.2 What are the outputs that will be measured?

ORR continue to monitor the work and outputs of NR in Scotland.

9.3 What is the baseline for inputs and outputs?

Work during 06-07 to agree the rebate amount.

10. Quality cross-check

10.1 What quality indicators are being used to ensure that quality of service is maintained or improved?

ORR monitor and report on the quality of the work undertaken by NR.

11. Monitoring

11.1 What are the arrangements for monitoring the delivery of efficiencies?

Regular ORR reports each quarter. We will ensure that rebate is paid to Scottish Ministers or netted off against other grant payments to NR.

12. Reporting

12.1 What are the arrangements for reporting the delivery of efficiencies?

Regular ORR quarterly reports. Rebate will be reflected in lower grant support costs from Scottish Ministers to NR.

13. Dependencies

13.1 Explain if your efficiencies are dependent on legislation or other structural changes being achieved.

Not dependent.

14. Use of efficiencies

14.1 How are the efficiencies released from improvement activity being used to improve front-line services?

This efficiency was assumed as part of the allocation by Ministers to Transport Scotland. Transport Scotland has retained these savings to meet other spending pressures and priorities within Transport Scotland.

1. Portfolio/Number/Name:DG Economy / 11 / Network Rail support

2. Programme/Activity:

Network Rail Periodic Review by Office of Rail Regulator (ORR) in relation to the Control Period 4 from 2009 to 2014 (CP4) requires input from Scottish Ministers. In July 2007 the Scottish HLOS (High Level Output Specification) and SoFA (Statement of Public Funds Available) were published setting out the requirements for the 5 years of CP4.

This will set the level of support to Network Rail (NR) from Scottish Ministers as determined by the ORR.

3. Efficiency

3.1 Current target; £m

2008-09

2009-10

2010-11

Cash

0

25

25

3.2 Efficiencies delivered; £m

2008-09

2009-10

2010-11

Cash

Time

4. Accountable Officer for delivery

Dr Andrew Goudie and Chief Executive, Transport Scotland (Dr Malcolm Reed)

5. Project Manager

Jonathan Pugh/ Martin McKinlay

6. EGDD Portfolio Manager

Lorimer Mackenzie
7. Description of efficiency and actions to be taken

7.1 What is the efficiency improvement? How will the efficiencies be made?

Efficiency saving comes from work by Agency staff to identify potential efficiencies in the NR Maintenance & Renewal programme costed by NR in their Cost Model. Agreement on the efficiencies to be made will be determined by the ORR & the level of financial support needed by NR; this potentially being less than the NR requested amounts of financial support from their Business Plan of October 2007.

7.2 What are the main actions that are needed to secure the delivery of this efficiency improvement?

For Agency to ensure that ORR Determination reflects the efficiencies found in the review of the Cost Model.

To maintain regular reviews of progress with ORR in accepting the Agency findings and to deliver the lower costs suggested by Agency Staff.

8. Associated costs

8.1 Are there any development or redundancy costs associated with the delivery of this efficiency?

None

The costs associated are minimal and have not been netted off.

9. Measurement

9.1 What are the inputs that will be measured?

Network Rail's work to maintain the Rail Network.

The financial Grant support to Network Rail from Scottish Ministers and reduces from £366m in 08/09 to £331m pa in 09/10 & 10/11; the cost in 09/10 would have been around £375m without intervention. The particular element of efficiency produced by work to date is £25M pa lower for costs in CP4.

9.2 What are the outputs that will be measured?

The ORR will monitor and review the renewal, operational & maintenance work (OMR) undertaken by NR. Both for quality and quantity of completed work.

9.3 What is the baseline for inputs and outputs?

The work carried out on OMR by NR in period (CP3) from 2004-2009.

10. Quality cross-check

10.1 What quality indicators are being used to ensure that quality of service is maintained or improved?

ORR monitor and report on the quality of work undertaken by NR.

11. Monitoring

11.1 What are the arrangements for monitoring the delivery of efficiencies?

ORR monitor and report on delivery of efficiencies and ensure that any inefficiency is penalised.

12. Reporting

12.1 What are the arrangements for reporting the delivery of efficiencies?

Regular ORR reports each quarter. Financial savings are secured by the ORR's Determination for CP4 as against the figures requested of ORR by NR in 2007.

13. Dependencies

13.1 Explain if your efficiencies are dependent on legislation or other structural changes being achieved.

No, they are not.

14. Use of efficiencies

14.1 How are the efficiencies released from improvement activity being used to improve front-line services?

This efficiency was assumed as part of the allocation by Ministers to Transport Scotland. Transport Scotland has retained these savings to meet other spending pressures and priorities within Transport Scotland.

1. Portfolio/Number/Name:DG Economy / 12 / Management and Maintenance of the Trunk Road Network

2. Programme/Activity:

Maintenance of the Scottish Trunk Road network was initially subject to competitive tender in 1996. Contracts were re-tendered in 2001 based on four operating areas or 'Units' and were known as the Second Generation of Contracts or '2G Contracts'. A further 3rd Generation contract competition in 2 phases was undertaken in 2005/06 and 2006/07 with the specific aims of:

  • Clarifying Transport Scotland's requirements to ensure accurate pricing
  • Introduction of efficiency gains from improved technologies and management processes
  • Providing a clear and extensive tendering process

Two Units were tendered and new operators commenced work on 1 April 2006 for 5 years with the remaining two commencing work on 1 April 2007, also for 5 years. The cumulative cash releasing savings of the '3G Contracts', in comparison with what the same work would have cost under the previous '2G Contracts', are likely to be around £19m for the 2007/08 year.

Phasing the competition for the 3rd Generation trunk road contracts has also helped to secure better value for money as has the use of e-procurement practices and an enhanced contract strategy. The contract form has been enhanced by the combined use of lump sums and a library of prices hence streamlining efficient contract management.

3. Efficiency

3.1 Current target; £m

2008-09

2009-10

2010-11

Cash

15

19

15

3.2 Efficiencies delivered; £m

2008-09

2009-10

2010-11

Cash

Time

4. Accountable Officer for delivery

Dr Andrew Goudie and Chief Executive, Transport Scotland (Dr Malcolm Reed)

5. Project Manager

Donald Morrison

6. EGDD Portfolio Manager

Lorimer Mackenzie
7. Description of efficiency and actions to be taken

7.1 What is the efficiency improvement? How will the efficiencies be made?

The efficiency improvement will be made through more competitive prices for trunk roads management and maintenance allowing for more work to be undertaken for the same or less resource. Improved prices were secured through a more competitive procurement process and through providing better information on the trunk road network from improved asset management plans. Current analysis shows the potential for 15 to 17 percent more work to be carried out.

7.2 What are the main actions that are needed to secure the delivery of this efficiency improvement?

Procurement practices:

The procurement process has been completed and included:-

  • Increased engagement with suppliers.
  • Use of an effective and well managed consultative procurement process.
  • Use of a well planned and risk based tender programme.

In order to secure the delivery of this efficiency improvement, the four contracts for managing and maintaining the trunk roads networks were awarded in two phases in December 2005 and December 2006.

Asset management planning:

The following ongoing actions are required to ensure delivery of the savings:-

  • Develop structural maintenance condition indicators which will allow us to track road condition across a range of treatments.
  • Develop performance measurement for road structures and bridges
  • Formally implement a comprehensive AMP.
  • Continue to review the performance and enhance our IT systems to enable us to better identify need, priorities and assess life cycle costs.
  • Carry out further surveys of our inventory to establish more accurate life cycle and condition data.

Carry out customer surveys to identify the standard of service that is expected by our stakeholders, balancing quality (level of service) with price (willingness to pay).

8. Associated costs

8.1 Are there any development or redundancy costs associated with the delivery of this efficiency?

There are development costs associated with improving asset management planning for the trunk roads network. These development costs have not been netted off the efficiency savings since they are one-off development costs whereas the efficiency savings recur annually throughout the lifetime of the contract and beyond. Furthermore, efficiency was not the sole driver of investing in improved asset management planning arrangements. Improving customer service was a significant factor when deciding to invest in improved asset management planning arrangements.

There are also costs associated with the development of the e-procurement process. These have not been netted off as efficiency was not the sole driver.

9. Measurement

9.1 What are the inputs that will be measured?

The input that will be measured is expenditure on trunk roads maintenance.

9.2 What are the outputs that will be measured?

The outputs that will be measured is the volume of roads maintenance carried out and multiplied by the rates for the new and previous maintenance and management contracts.

9.3 What is the baseline for inputs and outputs?

The baseline for measuring inputs and outputs is the previous trunk roads contracts, which will be compared with the new trunk road contracts.

10. Quality cross-check

10.1 What quality indicators are being used to ensure that quality of service is maintained or improved?

The quality of trunk roads management and maintenance will be monitored to ensure that the quality of roads management and maintenance is maintained or improved.

11. Monitoring

11.1 What are the arrangements for monitoring the delivery of efficiencies?

The National Network Manager TR-NMD is responsible for monitoring the quantity and quality of outputs from the new trunk road management and maintenance contracts. This will be done by comparing the cost of carrying out a typical sample of work on an annual basis and comparing the cost between the new and previous contracts. The work sample will be devised by the independent Performance Audit Group who audit, monitor and report on the performance of the contractors on a regular basis.

12. Reporting

12.1 What are the arrangements for reporting the delivery of efficiencies?

Information on the quantity and quality of outputs is reported to the National Network Manager by the Performance Audit Group who monitor and report on the performance of the contractors hence ensuring that the efficiency improvements are being secured.

13. Dependencies

13.1 Explain if your efficiencies are dependent on legislation or other structural changes being achieved.

No legislative or structural changes required to deliver these efficiency savings.

14. Use of efficiencies

14.1 How are the efficiencies released from improvement activity being used to improve front-line services?

This efficiency was assumed as part of the allocation by Ministers to Transport Scotland. Transport Scotland has retained these savings to meet other spending pressures and priorities within Transport Scotland.

1. Portfolio/Number/Name:DG Economy / 13 / Sustainable Reconstruction Technique

2. Programme/Activity:

Efficiency savings will be delivered through the use of a sustainable reconstruction technique called 'crack and seat', where the existing road construction is considered appropriate for its use. The technique involves the removal of the top road surface layers and the cracking and rolling (breaking up) of the remaining in situ road construction layers (usually lean mix concrete). A further benefit of this technique is that less waste material is sent to landfill sites.

3. Efficiency

3.1 Current target; £m

2008-09

2009-10

2010-11

Cash

0.7

0.7

0.7

3.2 Efficiencies delivered; £m

2008-09

2009-10

2010-11

Cash

Time

4. Accountable Officer for delivery

Dr Andrew Goudie and Chief Executive, Transport Scotland (Dr Malcolm Reed)

5. Project Manager

Donald Morrison

6. EGDD Portfolio Manager

Lorimer Mackenzie
7. Description of efficiency and actions to be taken

7.1 What is the efficiency improvement? How will the efficiencies be made?

The efficiency to be made is to deliver the same road maintenance at a lower price

The efficiency improvement will mean that where the existing road construction is suitable for the crack and seat technique around twice the length of trunk road can be reconstructed for the same level of investment.

7.2 What are the main actions that are needed to secure the delivery of this efficiency improvement?

The main action needed to secure delivery of this efficiency improvement is to identify the sections of trunk road that may be suitable for the 'crack and seat' technique in the forward road maintenance remedial programme and ensure that this technique is considered for appropriate maintenance schemes

8. Associated costs

8.1 Are there any development or redundancy costs associated with the delivery of this efficiency?

There are no development or redundancy costs associated with the delivery of this efficiency.

9. Measurement

9.1 What are the inputs that will be measured?

The input measured will be the construction costs compared against other more conventional forms of construction.

9.2 What are the outputs that will be measured?

The output that will be measured is the amount of road maintenance carried out compared to the use of more conventional techniques.

9.3 What is the baseline for inputs and outputs?

The baseline for inputs and outputs is comparison with other contracts using conventional remedial techniques.

10. Quality cross-check

10.1 What quality indicators are being used to ensure that quality of service is maintained or improved?

Quality will be monitored against current industry standards and against the performance of other sections of the network repaired with other more conventional techniques.

11. Monitoring

11.1 What are the arrangements for monitoring the delivery of efficiencies?

Trunk Roads Network Management Directorate is responsible for monitoring the quantity and quality of outputs from our Operating Company contracts. This work will be undertaken by the Performance Audit Group who audit, monitor and report on the performance of maintenance contracts.

12. Reporting

12.1 What are the arrangements for reporting the delivery of efficiencies?

Information on the quantity and quality of outputs is reported to the Trunk Roads Network Management Directorate by the independent Performance Audit Group who monitor and report on the performance of maintenance contracts.

13. Dependencies

13.1 Explain if your efficiencies are dependent on legislation or other structural changes being achieved.

No legislative or structural changes required to deliver these efficiency savings.

14. Use of efficiencies

14.1 How are the efficiencies released from improvement activity being used to improve front-line services?

This efficiency was assumed as part of the allocation by Ministers to Transport Scotland. Transport Scotland has retained these savings to meet other spending pressures and priorities within Transport Scotland.

1. Portfolio/Number/Name:DG Economy / 14 / Enterprise, Energy & Tourism

2. Programme/Activity:

Action to stimulate economic growth through 3 major NDPBs (Scottish Enterprise, Highlands & Islands Enterprise and Visit Scotland), the use of European Structure Funds and a range of Scottish Government grant schemes.

3. Efficiency

3.1 Current target; £m

2008-09

2009-10

2010-11

Cash

14.17

-

-

3.2 Efficiencies delivered; £m

2008-09

2009-10

20010-11

Cash

Time

4. Accountable Officer for delivery

Dr Andrew Goudie

5. Project Manager

David Wilson

6. EGDD Portfolio Manager

Lorimer Mackenzie
7. Description of efficiency and actions to be taken

7.1 What is the efficiency improvement? How will the efficiencies be made?

These fall into 5 categories covering each NDPB, ESF and in-house grant schemes.

Scottish Enterprise

- Restructuring plan announced by Ministers in September 2007 will realise circa £8m in staffing/accommodation costs in 2008/09; increasing to circa £10m per annum with effect from 2009/10.

Highlands and Islands Enterprise

- Highlands and Islands Enterprise (HIE) has undertaken an organisational restructure to ensure the organisation better reflected its new focus to improve service delivery. A selective voluntary severance (SVS) action was undertaken by 31/3/08. The annual paybill savings results from this will be over £2.1 million.

  • Reduction in spend on staff business travel elements
  • Reduction in spend on office accommodation
  • Reduce/eliminate invoices from ad hoc facilities procurement
  • Reduction in spend on sundry office supplies

How will the efficiencies be made?

  • Increased use of e-procurement with embedded visa/GPC
  • Increased selective use of on-line purchase of air travel visa/GPC
  • Contract for supply of hire car with improved rates
  • Revision of staff travel policy and tighter staff e-claims process
  • Reduction in staff office space occupied and termination of leases

Sharing HIE's office space with others (recovery of rent/rates)

These will realise £0.230 p.a.

Visit Scotland

Savings are in the range of £1.2m to £1.76m for each year in addition to efficiency savings of £1m a year from earlier efficiency exercises. This is made up of:

  • Restructuring of the organisation on functional basis with a focus on both tourism businesses and visitors as customers and a reduction in Directorates will release between £0.5m and £1m each year;
  • Property savings from sharing offices with other agencies and reorganising Tourist Information Centres etc will provide savings of £0.25m a year; and
  • Savings from improvements in procurement both internally and through central procurement initiatives of £0.47m a year.

These savings were built in to the results of SR2007, i.e. VisitScotland had its grant in aid over the SR period reduced by £1m a year in 09-10 and 10-11, and the further efficiencies it plans to make will be needed to cover that reduction. That was made clear when VisitScotland were informally notified of the outcome of the Spending Review.

As a proportion of the VisitScotland overall operating budget (i.e. ignoring capital, funding provided for direct Ryder Cup projects costs) these savings amount to between 2.2% to 3.4% (in year savings fro 2008-09) and 3.1% to 4.4% in future years.

ESF:

The principal efficiency savings is the reduction in the number of external delivery bodies administering Structural Funds programmes. For 2000-06, 5 organisations - called Programme Management Executives (PMEs) - were required. Given the fewer number of programmes and smaller total allocation of funding for 2007-13, only 2 organisations will be used - 'Intermediate Administration Bodies' (IABs). IABs are directly contracted to the Scottish Government for the period up to the end of 2009 (new contracts will be considered for the period after). The contracts were subject to a full tendering exercise and have been made to ESEP Ltd (for the Lowlands & Uplands Scotland SF programmes) and Highlands & Islands (Scotland) Structural Funds Partnership Ltd (for the H&I SF programmes).

The savings are to the public sector as a whole, rather than the Scottish Government itself. For 2000-06, the PMEs were paid for by a combination of contributions from Scottish stakeholders (not including the Executive) and technical assistance from the EU programmes. The cost to the Scottish public sector was approximately £16.2 million over the whole period. This method of funding intermediary bodies has been disallowed by the Commission, hence the decision by the Executive to take funding of the bodies in-house directly (EU technical assistance can still pay for a portion of the costs, so the net cost to the Scottish public sector - i.e. the Scottish Government - is estimated to be £4.5 million over the 7 years). Consequently, there is a savings to the overall public sector, but an additional cost to the Scottish Government.

Savings are £1.64m p.a.

Other Grants

  • Reducing limits and extending coverage of Regional Selective Assistance will deliver more economic growth in terms of GDP and lower cost for jobs than before.
  • Possible Energy Saving Trust efficiencies in Year 2 and 3 through delivering more schemes for same money.
  • Passing responsibility for 2 small innovation schemes to SEn and 2 to the Scottish Funding Council should achieve admin savings and delivery gains in years 2 and 3.

All of these savings are still to be quantified.

7.2 What are the main actions that are needed to secure the delivery of this efficiency improvement?

As above.

8. Associated costs

8.1 Are there any development or redundancy costs associated with the delivery of this efficiency?

Scottish Enterprise:

There are redundancy costs associated with the organisation restructuring in 07/08.

Highlands and Islands Enterprise:

Redundancy cost of approximately £4m funded from 2007-08 budget allocation. Re-training a number of remaining staff, costs met from within ongoing staff training budget.

VisitScotland:

An additional £5m was allocated in 2007-08 towards the costs of the restructuring VisitScotland into fewer customer-focused directorates to improve the service provided and defray some costs of property realignments (e.g. early cessation of leases etc).

These costs have not been netted off from the efficiency savings.

9. Measurement

9.1 What are the inputs that will be measured?

Salary, headcount and operational/maintenance costs.

9.2 What are the outputs that will be measured?

Economic growth arising out of the various interventions carried out by Agencies and this Directorate.

9.3 What is the baseline for inputs and outputs?

2007/08

10. Quality cross-check

10.1 What quality indicators are being used to ensure that quality of service is maintained or improved?

Key performance indicators and measures relevant to delivery of output/targets as agreed with Scottish Government.

11. Monitoring

11.1 What are the arrangements for monitoring the delivery of efficiencies?

Agencies/NDPBs monitor costs on a monthly basis as part of sound financial management process.

12. Reporting

12.1 What are the arrangements for reporting the delivery of efficiencies?

Agency/NDPB Directors of Finance and Performance will receive quarterly reports, liaison with sponsor Division in EET and Strategic Council oversight.

13. Dependencies

13.1 Explain if your efficiencies are dependent on legislation or other structural changes being achieved.

No.

14. Use of efficiencies

14.1 How are the efficiencies released from improvement activity being used to improve front-line services?

Relevant organisation will use relevant savings to deliver increased front line services and grants to customers.

1. Portfolio/Number/Name:DG Economy / 15 / e-Procurement Scotland

2. Programme/Activity:

e-Procurement Scotland

3. Efficiency

3.1 Current target; £m

2008-09

2009-10

2010-11

Cash

0.3

0.6

0.9

3.2 Efficiencies delivered; £m

2008-09

2009-10

2010-11

Cash

Time

4. Accountable Officer for delivery

Dr Andrew Goudie

5. Project Manager

Ian Burdon

6. EGDD Portfolio Manager

Lorimer Mackenzie
7. Description of efficiency and actions to be taken

7.1 What is the efficiency improvement? How will the efficiencies be made?

Revised commercial arrangements for e-Procurement Scotland implementation and related services, delivering the programme at lower cost (while at the same time accelerating roll-out) through use of existing in-house staff rather than more expensive external contractors.

7.2 What are the main actions that are needed to secure the delivery of this efficiency improvement?

Commercial arrangements for the e-procurement programme require to be renegotiated.

8. Associated costs

8.1 Are there any development or redundancy costs associated with the delivery of this efficiency?

No.

9. Measurement

9.1 What are the inputs that will be measured?

Costs of on-going ePS implementation programme and related services (excluding new activity, e.g. on national licensing and e-invoicing).

9.2 What are the outputs that will be measured?

Throughput (number and value of transactions) and number of service users.

9.3 What is the baseline for inputs and outputs?

2007-08 ePS expenditure, throughput and number of service providers.

10. Quality cross-check

10.1 What quality indicators are being used to ensure that quality of service is maintained or improved?

Customer satisfaction survey and service utilisation figures (reflecting performance of ePS roll-out).

11. Monitoring

11.1 What are the arrangements for monitoring the delivery of efficiencies?

The structure of reporting will be monitored by use of the new Business Management Tool.

12. Reporting

12.1 What are the arrangements for reporting the delivery of efficiencies?

Quarterly reports to the Director General.

13. Dependencies

13.1 Explain if your efficiencies are dependent on legislation or other structural changes being achieved.

Dependent on successful renegotiation of ePS commercial structure, retention of experienced key staff and continued demand for ePS roll-out (which is itself dependent on SG support and endorsement).

14. Use of efficiencies

14.1 How are the efficiencies released from improvement activity being used to improve front-line services?

Efficiency savings being used for other services within Scottish Procurement Directorate.

1. Directorate/Number/Name:DG Economy- DG Economy / 16 - Scottish Public Pensions Agency

1. Directorate/Number/Name:DG Economy- DG Economy / 16 - Scottish Public Pensions Agency

Moved to list of efficiency projects with expected savings less than £0.5m see here for information.

1. Directorate/Number/Name:DG Economy- DG Economy / 17 - General Register Office for Scotland

1. Directorate/Number/Name:DG Economy- DG Economy / 17 - General Register Office for Scotland

Moved to list of efficiency projects with expected savings less than £0.5m see here for information.

1. Directorate/Number/Name:DG Economy- DG Economy / 18 - Planning and Building Standards

1. Directorate/Number/Name:DG Economy- DG Economy / 18 - Planning and Building Standards

Moved to list of efficiency projects with expected savings less than £0.5m see here for information.

1. Portfolio/Number/Name: DG Economy / 19 / Local Government

2. Programme/Activity:

The Scottish Government's Concordat with Local Government sets out a new relationship between the Scottish Government and local government. Local government has an excellent record to date in its delivery of efficiency savings and recognises the need to continue to do so. For the period 2008-09 to 2010-11, the level of efficiency savings for local government will be 2% per annum as it is for the wider public sector. Under the concordat, local authorities will be allowed to retain all of these to redeploy against ongoing pressures and address local priorities.

3. Efficiency

3.1 Current target; £m

2008-09

2009-10

2010-11

Cash

174.7

349.4

524.1

3.2 Efficiencies delivered; £m

2008-09

2009-10

2010-11

Cash

Time

4. Accountable Officer for delivery

Dr Andrew Goudie

5. Project Manager

Vicki Bibby

6. EGDD Portfolio Manager

Lorimer Mackenzie
7. Description of efficiency and actions to be taken

7.1 What is the efficiency improvement? How will the efficiencies be made?

It will be for each local authority to decide which efficiencies will best meet its needs and how to deliver them

7.2 What are the main actions that are needed to secure the delivery of this efficiency improvement?

These will depend on the needs and circumstances of each individual authority.

8. Associated costs

8.1 Are there any development or redundancy costs associated with the delivery of this efficiency?

This will depend on the specific circumstances in the local authority at the time.

9. Measurement

9.1 What are the inputs that will be measured?

Under the concordat, local authorities are working towards single outcome agreements and the measurements will depend on the content of these agreements.

9.2 What are the outputs that will be measured?

These will depend on the individual single outcome agreements.

9.3 What is the baseline for inputs and outputs?

The baseline will be the 2007-08 financial and activity outturn figures.

10. Quality cross-check

10.1 What quality indicators are being used to ensure that quality of service is maintained or improved?

These will depend on the individual single outcome agreements.

11. Monitoring

11.1 What are the arrangements for monitoring the delivery of efficiencies?

These will be specific to individual authorities but reporting will be co-ordinated by COSLA.

12. Reporting

12.1 What are the arrangements for reporting the delivery of efficiencies?

For 2005-08, COSLA developed a structure for monitoring and reporting efficiency savings made by local authorities which will form the basis for reporting for 2008-11.

13. Dependencies

13.1 Explain if your efficiencies are dependent on legislation or other structural changes being achieved.

These will depend on the circumstances of a specific efficiency gain.

14. Use of efficiencies

14.1 How are the efficiencies released from improvement activity being used to improve front-line services?

Local authorities have the flexibility to redeploy the resources freed through efficiency gains to the delivery of front-line services.



Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] ...[11]

Page updated: Wednesday, May 28, 2008