« Previous | Contents | Next »
Listen
ANNEX E
PARTIAL EQUALITY IMPACT ASSESSMENT
SCHEMES OF DELEGATION, LOCAL REVIEW PROCEDURES, APPEALS REGULATIONS
1. Equality impact assessment ( EQIA) is about considering how policy (by policy we mean activities, functions, strategies, programmes, and services or processes) may impact, either positively or negatively, on different sectors of the population in different ways.
2. The Scottish Government has a statutory duty to consider and address the impact of policy on particular groups (disabled people, women & men and different ethnic groups). In addition to these statutory responsibilities the Government also has a commitment to promoting equality in the areas of religion and belief, age and sexual orientation. This partial EQIA recognises that we are not currently able to identify in all cases who these people might be and what specific needs they may have.
3. The Scottish Government has developed the following 10 step process to aid the EQIA process.
Step 1 | Define the aims of the policy |
Step 2 | What is already known about the diverse needs and/or experiences of the target audience? |
Step 3 | What else do we need to know to help us understand the diverse needs and/or experiences of the target audience? |
Step 4 | What does the information we have tell us about how this policy might impact positively or negatively on the different groups within the target audience? |
Step 5 | What, if any, changes will be made to the policy? |
Step 6 | Does the policy provide the opportunity to promote equality of opportunity or good relations? |
Step 7 | Based on the work we have done - rate the level of relevance of the policy - HIGH, MEDIUM OR LOW |
Step 8 | Do we need to carry out a further impact assessment? |
Step 9 | Explain how we will monitor and evaluate this policy to measure progress |
Step 10 | Sign off and publish the impact assessment |
4. This partial EQIA covers the first three steps. We are seeking your views on the conclusions made and particularly where you consider that the policy may impact disproportionately on equalities groups.
Step One
Defining the aims of the policy
Title of Policy | Schemes Of Delegation, Local Review Procedures, Appeals Regulations |
Name of Branch, Division | E-planning, Planning Policy and North Division |
Department or Agency | Directorate of the Built Environment |
What is the purpose of the proposed policy (or changes to be made to the policy)? | A new set of regulations to govern the preparation and content of schemes of delegation under the Planning etc. (Scotland) Act 2006 and the modernised procedures for local reviews and planning appeals. |
Who is affected by the policy or who is intended to benefit from the proposed policy and how? | Principally planning authorities and parties who wish to seek a review or an appeal of a planning decision, which they are dissatisfied with. |
How have you, or will you, put the policy into practice, and who is or will be responsible for delivering it? | Mainly planning authorities and the Directorate for Planning and Environmental Appeals. Scottish Ministers will also have responsibilities. |
How does the policy fit into our wider or related policy initiatives? | The draft regulations fit into the strategic aims of the Scottish Government to produce a: - Wealthier and Fairer Scotland, enabling businesses and people to increase their wealth , by increasing the speed and efficiency of the planning appeals process, and ensuring that that the issues raised are fairly considered.
- Greener Scotland, improving Scotland's natural and built environment and the sustainable use and enjoyment of it, the appeals and review processes have a role to play in ensuring that inappropriate development does not take place.
- Overall the proposals will support the Scottish Government's objective of promoting sustainable economic growth by increasing efficiency whilst maintaining the quality of service
|
Do you have a set budget? | No |
Step Two
What is already known about the diverse needs and/or experiences of the target audience?
To understand the different needs and experiences of those affected by the policy, we have gathered the following information about the target audience.
The evidence and information contained in this EQIA primarily comes from consultations undertaken over the past few years by the Scottish Government on modernising the planning system. It is supported by work of the Scottish Parliament's Communities Committee in its consideration of the Planning etc. (Scotland) Bill and specific research projects.
A summary of the range of information can be found in the summary table with specific evidence and information highlighted below.
Do we have information on |
Age | Yes | X | No | |
Disability | Yes | X | No | |
Gender | Yes | X | No | |
Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual & Transgender | Yes | | No | X |
Race | Yes | X | No | |
Religion and Belief | Yes | X | No | |
Age | Evidence: Research contained in Planning and Community Involvement indicated that generally the people likely to volunteer their views on a planning application come from a narrow age profile dominated by the middle aged and the elderly. Consultation: In its pre-legislative consultation on the Planning Bill, the Scottish Parliament's Communities Committee heard from a representative of the Scottish Youth Parliament that there is a need to consider how the planning process can be made more open and transparent so that it is easier to understand and that young people should be consulted in a proactive and non-tokenistic manner. Summary of Evidence of Getting Involved In Planning http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2002/10/15638/12159 Planning and Community Involvement in Scotland. http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2004/07/19666/40347 |
Disability | Local authorities amongst others have a specific duty to prepare and publish a Disability Equality Scheme setting out how they will meet these duties under the Disability Discrimination Act 2005. |
Gender | Evidence: Defra funded focus groups (organised by the Women's Network) aimed primarily at looking at environmental decision-making for women. Women in decision-making sets out views of women on barriers to participation. In addition, research contained in Planning and Community Involvement showed that women were slightly more likely than men to become involved in the planning process, but significantly more likely to oppose a planning application. Consultation: Results from the Scottish Household Survey set out in Getting Involved in Planning: Summary of Evidence showed that broadly men and women were equally interested in the planning of their area and considered it was important that people should be involved in the planning of their area. |
Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual & Transgender | No information available |
Race | Research contained in Planning and Community Involvement indicated that Planning and Community Involvement in Scotland indicated that White Caucasians dominated the responses. Of the 142 responses to the questionnaire, only three (two percent) were from an ethnic minority. This is broadly in line with the ethnic mix across Scotland. However, in two of the three areas there was no involvement from people who were non white. Evidence from across Britain indicates that planners have little understanding of the relationship between planning and race equality. Research published in 2004 by the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister ( ODPM), which covered England, found that, 'issues about diversity and planning are not that well understood or a priority in planning practice and procedure.' The research also discovered that while a majority of planning officers had received some training on diversity issues, the training rarely made the link between planning and diversity. Although there is no equivalent research into planning in Scotland, the CRE's knowledge of individual planning situations would indicate that the situation in Scotland is no different. http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2004/07/19666/40347 - Research highlighting the age, gender and race demographic of those involved in the planning system. |
Religion and Belief | We have very limited information on the response to the proposals from faith groups. The Brethren Gospel Trusts responded to the proposals in the White Paper agreeing that in general delegated decision making appears to work satisfactorily. They raised objections to the proposals to alter the current appeal arrangements. |
Step Three
What else do we need to know to help us understand the diverse needs and/or experiences of the target audience?
Age |
We have limited information on the potential impact of this policy on this group. We will seek to disaggregate the views from individuals on the proposals by asking respondents to indicate the broad age category they are in. We will also look at the arrangements during the public consultation to engage with organisations representative of such groups. |
Disability |
We have some information on the views of organisations representative of disabled people on the broad principles of the overarching primary legislation. We are therefore looking for views on the more detailed proposals set out in the secondary legislation. Additionally we will seek to disaggregate the views from individuals on the proposals by asking respondents to indicate whether they consider themselves to be disabled. |
Gender |
We have some limited information on the potential barriers to engagement for a part of this group. We will seek to disaggregate the views from individuals on the proposals by asking respondents to indicate their gender. We will also look at the arrangements during the public consultation to engage with organisations representative of such groups. |
Lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender |
We have no information on the potential impact of this policy on this group. We will look at the arrangements during the public consultation in an attempt to engage with organisations representative of the LGBT community. |
Race |
We have limited information on views regarding the broad principles of the overarching primary legislation. We have no information on the proposals contained in the secondary legislation. We will seek to disaggregate the views from individuals on the proposals by asking respondents to indicate their ethnicity. We will also look at the arrangements during the public consultation in an attempt to engage with organisations representative of such groups. |
Religion and Belief |
We have no information on the potential impact of this policy on this group. We will look at the arrangements during the public consultation in an attempt to engage with organisations representative of religious and belief groups. |
References to Published Information
A Gender Audit of Statistics (Scottish Executive 2007)
http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2007/03/27104158/1
Draft PAN: Community Engagement - consultation responses (Scottish Executive 2006)
http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2006/12/08125517/0
Getting Involved in Planning - Summary of Evidence (Scottish Executive 2002)
http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2002/10/15638/12159
Planning and Community Involvement (Scottish Executive 2004)
http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2004/07/19666/40347
Scottish Parliament Communities Committee: Reports of Pre-legislative events: Planning etc (Scotland) Bill (Scottish Parliament 2006)
http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/committees/communities/reports-06/cor06-05-Vol02-01.htm#6
Women in decision-making (Women's Environmental Network 2007)
http://www.wen.org.uk/general_pages/resources.htm
« Previous | Contents | Next »