« Previous | Contents | Next »
Listen
LIST OF QUESTIONS
Q1: Do you think that planning guidance on HMOs should be provided as an annex to SPP3, which replaces the existing Circular 4/2004?
Q2: Do you agree that this revised structure, including the annexes, improves upon the existing SPP3? In what ways do you think the revised structure provides more effective guidance?
Q3: Do you agree it is desirable to achieve a more robust and consistent approach to the assessment of housing need and demand? Does the approach set out in chapter two provide an appropriate mechanism for this?
Q4: How should the transition between the existing housing delivery system and that proposed be handled? How best can the cycles of new development plans due from the end of 2008 and the LHS due in summer 2009 be synchronised?
Q5: Do you agree that local authorities should set policies to control the proportion of HMO accommodation in a given unit, where this is necessary? How should maximum proportions be decided?
Q6: How do you think the planning system and the HMO licensing system can work together more effectively?
Q7: Does "the period under consideration" require a definition?
Q8: Is this a useful way to highlight the range of complementary policy and guidance that should be referred to throughout the process set out in SPP3? If not, what approach would be preferable?
Q9: Are there particular costs or benefits not addressed in the partial RIA? What are they?
Q10: Will particular groups not identified by the partial RIA be affected by SPP3?
Q11: How might SPP3 impact positively or negatively on equalities groups?
Q12: Will any groups not identified already in the partial EqIA be affected by SPP3?
Comments on any other part of the consultative draft are welcomed.
« Previous | Contents | Next »