On this page:

Final results of the 2007 June Agricultural Census

Page: [1] ...[6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12]

DescriptionTables and graphs showing the final results of the 2007 June Agricultural and Horticultural census
ISBN (Web Only)
Official Print Publication Date
Website Publication DateOctober 24, 2007

FINAL RESULTS OF THE JUNE 2007 AGRICULTURAL CENSUS

TOGETHER WITH FINAL JUNE RESULTS FOR THE YEARS 1997 TO 2006 FOR COMPARISON

Table 8. Number of employees, 1997 to 2007 (5)

Percentage
change between
199719981999200020012002200320042005200620072006 & 2007
Regular full-time staff
Males : Hired10,80010,3209,9509,6009,1808,8108,4008,2407,8207,7507,400-4.5%
Family5,2002,9402,9803,0702,9602,5802,5802,4702,2802,2002,110-4.1%
Partnersna2,6602,4302,2502,2802,3202,2002,1402,1202,1302,1601.4%
Total16,00015,92015,36014,92014,41013,72013,18012,85012,23012,09011,670-3.5%
Females : Hired73081074077081082074081082084098016.7%
Family4503703403903603403303503503303403.0%
Partnersna2002001901902502602502102402400.0%
Total1,1801,3701,2801,3501,3701,4101,3301,4001,3701,4101,56010.6%
Regular part-time staff
Males : Hired1,9202,1302,0202,1302,1902,1502,2402,1902,1902,2402,4107.6%
Family2,1101,8201,8401,8501,8801,8701,8601,8401,9601,8901,8900.0%
Partnersna460490470460550570560610580560-3.4%
Total4,0304,4104,3604,4404,5404,5704,6704,6004,7504,7104,8503.0%
Females : Hired1,1501,1401,1201,1701,2001,1201,1201,1109901,0201,13010.8%
Family1,1201,0209901,020990960980920950930880-5.4%
Partnersna250280240270280270290250240230-4.2%
Total2,2602,4002,3802,4302,4502,3602,3702,3302,1902,1902,2502.7%
Total regular staff23,47024,11023,38023,14022,67022,05021,55021,18020,54020,39020,330-0.3%
Casual and seasonal staff
Males2,9102,9402,8002,9102,8403,0503,1803,1603,3303,2403,83018.2%
Females6607106407507509001,0401,0701,3001,2901,78038.0%
Total3,5703,6403,4303,6703,5903,9504,2204,2304,6304,5305,61023.8%


(5) In 1998, new questions were asked on the management of agricultural holdings, including whether legal and financial responsibility for the holding was undertaken by the occupier and other partners in a legal partnership. For such holdings, the labour questions distinguished the partners in the partnership working on the holding from hired and family workers. It appears that this change in questions may have led to the recording of workers who were not previously included in the returns. Figures from 1998 onwards are not therefore strictly comparable with those of previous years.

Page: [1] ...[6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12]

Page updated: Tuesday, October 23, 2007