Indicator | Case study area |
|---|
Aberdeen | Dumfries and Galloway | Dundee | East Renfrewshire | Edinburgh | Inverclyde | Orkney | Perth and Kinross | South Lanarkshire |
|---|
Vandalism | Greater increase in the wardened areas than local authority. Police say increased detection rates but residents' perceptions of prevalence also increased. NO CONCLUSION | | Slight increase compared to slight decline across local authority. Perceived prevalence increased. RISE NEGATIVE. | | Greater increase in the wardened areas than the local authority. RISE NEGATIVE | | Increase then decline but overall increase. No LA comparative data. NO CONCLUSION. | Greater increase in the wardened areas than the local authority but perception data suggests vandalism declined. RISE POSITIVE. | Increase then fall. Overall increase. No local authority data. NO CONCLUSION. |
|---|
Breach of Peace | Greater increase in the wardened areas than the local authority. . RISE NEGATIVE | Large increase while small reduction across the local authority. RISE NEGATIVE. | | | | | | | Increased then declined. Overall increase. No local authority comparator data. NO CONCLUSION |
|---|
Fire-raising incidents | Declined but no local authority comparator data. NO CONCLUSION | | | Declined but data incomplete. NO CONCLUSION. | No change while increased across local authority POSITIVE INTERVENTION. | | | | |
|---|
Indicator | Case study area |
|---|
Aberdeen | Dumfries and Galloway | Dundee | East Renfrewshire | Edinburgh | Inverclyde | Orkney | Perth and Kinross | South Lanarkshire |
Complaints of antisocial behaviour | | | | | | | Increased but no comparative data. NO CONCLUSION. | Declined then increased but decline overall. No local authority data but perception data suggest antisocial behaviour is reducing. RISE POSITIVE. | |
|---|
Housebreakings | | Large increase while small reduction across the local authority. RISE NEGATIVE. | | | Steady decrease while increase in the local authority. POSITIVE INTERVNTION. | | | | |
|---|
Malicious false alarm calls | | Increased but figures are small and no local authority comparator data. NO CONCLUSION. | Declined then increased but overall decline. No local authority comparator data. NO CONCLUSION | | | | | | |
|---|
Cost of antisocial behaviour to council | | | | | | | Declined but no comparative data. NO CONCLUSION. | | |
|---|
Environmental Street Cleanliness. | | | | | | | | Increased then declined. Score lower in the local authority. POSITIVE INTERVENTION | |
|---|
Indicator | Case study area |
|---|
Aberdeen | Dumfries and Galloway | Dundee | East Renfrewshire | Edinburgh | Inverclyde | Orkney | Perth and Kinross | South Lanarkshire |
Detection rates for vandalism | | | | | | Declined. No local authority comparator data. Perception data shows an increase. NO CONCLUSION. | | | |
|---|
Detection rates for disorderly conduct | | | | | | Slight increase but no local authority comparator data. NO CONCLUSION. | | | |
|---|
Issuing of restorative warnings | | | | | | Increased but no local authority comparator data. NO CONCLUSION. | | | |
|---|
Drunk and incapable | Smaller increase than in the local authority and decline in 2 nd year. RISE POSITIVE | | | | | | | | |
|---|
Street drinking | | | | | | | | | Large increase but no local authority comparator data. NO CONCLUSION. |
|---|
Racially aggravated incidents | Declined. No local authority comparator data. NO CONCLUSION | | | | | | | | |
|---|
Number of persistent offenders | | | | | | Fallen but no local authority comparator data. NO CONCLUSION | | | |
|---|
Indicator | Case study area |
|---|
Aberdeen | Dumfries and Galloway | Dundee | East Renfrewshire | Edinburgh | Inverclyde | Orkney | Perth and Kinross | South Lanarkshire |
Urinating in public | Increase greater than in the local authority but based on small figures. Could also be due to increased detection. NO CONCLUSION. | | | | | | | | |
|---|
Neighbourhood disputes | | Decline but no local authority comparator data. NO CONCLUSION. | | | | | | | |
|---|
Assaults | | Large increase while small reduction across the local authority. RISE NEGATIVE. | | | | | | | |
|---|
Shoplifting | | Large increase while small reduction across the local authority. RISE NEGATIVE. | | | | | | | |
|---|
Malicious incidents attended | | | Declined then increased but overall decline. No local authority comparator data. NO CONCLUSION | | | | | | |
|---|
Indicator | Case study area |
|---|
Aberdeen | Dumfries and Galloway | Dundee | East Renfrewshire | Edinburgh | Inverclyde | Orkney | Perth and Kinross | South Lanarkshire |
Incidents reported for malicious intent | | | Declined then increased but overall decline. No local authority comparator data. NO CONCLUSION | | | | | | |
|---|
Youth Disturbance calls | | | Declined in parallel with decline across the local authority. NEUTRAL | | | | | | |
|---|
Noise-related calls | | | Slight increase. Local authority data incomplete and confounded by introduction of noise wardens across LA. NO CONCLUSION. | | | | | | |
|---|
Indicator | Case study area |
|---|
Aberdeen | Dumfries and Galloway | Dundee | East Renfrewshire | Edinburgh | Inverclyde | Orkney | Perth and Kinross | South Lanarkshire |
Break-ins to motor vehicles | | | Slight increase while decline across then local authority. RISE NEGATIVE. | | | | | | |
|---|
Thefts of motor vehicles | | | Slight increase while decline across the local authority RISE NEGATIVE. | | | | | | |
|---|
Vandalism to void properties | | | | Steady decline. No local authority comparator data. NO CONCLUSION. | | | | | |
|---|
Removal requests for graffiti | | | | Steady decline. No local authority comparator data. NO CONCLUSION. | | | | | |
|---|
Indicator | Case study area |
|---|
Aberdeen | Dumfries and Galloway | Dundee | East Renfrewshire | Edinburgh | Inverclyde | Orkney | Perth and Kinross | South Lanarkshire |
Reports of graffiti | | | | | | | | | Increased then decreased but increased overall. no local authority comparator data NO CONCLUSION |
|---|
Fly-tipping | | | | | | | | | Increase then fall. Overall increase. No local authority comparator data . NO CONCLUSION |
|---|
Overall pattern across case study area. | Very limited evidence of impact. However, residents' perception surveys show that neighbourhood quality has increased and the wardens are felt to have had an impact. | No evidence of impact but has to question whether wardens could have impacted on some of the variables. This is reinforced by positive perceptions from the survey of residents. | No evidence of impact from the crime statistics although there is from the perception surveys. Have to question whether wardens could have impacted on some of the variables. | Absence of comparative data means no firm conclusions can be drawn. However, perception surveys show positive changes. | Some evidence of impact. Perceptions of incidence of vandalism have improved. | Lack of local authority comparator data means firm conclusions cannot be drawn. However, residents' rating of the neighbourhood has increased. | Mixed picture but lack of comparative data means no conclusions can be drawn. Perception surveys show that antisocial behaviour is felt to have got worse. | Reasonable evidence of impact which is backed up by the perception surveys. | Most indicators conform to Rise and Fall pattern but lack of local authority comparator data means that it is not possible to say if the Confidence or Misplaced Confidence theories apply. Activities of wardens tend to suggest the former. This is backed up by improvements in residents' perceptions of neighbourhood quality. |
|---|