« Previous | Contents | Next »
Listen
Table 1.20: Young people receiving aftercare services - by age and economic activity on 31st March 2006
Economic activity as at 31 March 2006 | Age of young people on 31 March 2006 | Total | Percentage of all young people entitled to aftercare | Percentage of young people with known economic activity |
|---|
15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21+ |
|---|
In education, training or employment |
|---|
In higher education | 0 | 11 | 29 | 29 | 20 | 10 | 15 | 114 | 4 | 7 |
|---|
In education other than HE | 21 | 35 | 41 | 33 | 12 | * | * | 152 | 5 | 9 |
|---|
In training or employment | 0 | 51 | 102 | 109 | 70 | * | * | 377 | 13 | 22 |
|---|
Not in education, training or employment |
|---|
- due to short term illness | 0 | * | * | * | * | * | * | 14 | 0 | 1 |
|---|
- due to L/T illness or disability | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | 66 | 2 | 4 |
|---|
- due to looking after family | 0 | 6 | 35 | 38 | 21 | 16 | 8 | 124 | 4 | 7 |
|---|
- due to other circumstances | * | 166 | 294 | 203 | 119 | 74 | * | 892 | 32 | 51 |
|---|
Don't know economic activity | * | 119 | 182 | 171 | 85 | 73 | * | 653 | 23 | |
|---|
No longer in touch | * | 34 | 94 | 133 | 74 | 47 | * | 436 | 15 | |
|---|
Total | 30 | 427 | 788 | 740 | 419 | 275 | 149 | 2,828 | 100 | 100 |
|---|
Percentage in employment, education or training |
|---|
As % of those with known economic activity | 84 | 35 | 34 | 39 | 39 | 32 | 39 | 37 | |
|---|
As % of those eligible for aftercare support | 70 | 23 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 18 | 20 | 23 |
|---|
East Renfrewshire, Scottish Borders, Midlothian and Aberdeenshire did not provide information in time for inclusion. 2004-05 figures for these authorities have been incorporated into this table, but do not include young people aged 19-21. Data supplied by Aberdeen City and Edinburgh may be incomplete. Data supplied by North Ayrshire and Eilean Siar include young people who left care in 2005-06 only. All figures in this table should therefore be understood as estimates that are likely to be lower than the true figure, and caution should be used when using the figures. The number of young people no longer in touch differs to that reported in table 1.19 due to misreporting by four local authorities.
« Previous | Contents | Next »