On this page:

Scottish Household Survey Analytical Topic Report: Characteristics and Experiences of Unpaid Carers in Scotland

« Previous | Contents | Next »

Listen

CHAPTER FIVE: HEALTH AND SOCIAL INCLUSION

5.1 Although caring can be a positive experience, the Care 21 report highlighted that many carers find that: " caring can be a potentially highly stressful, demanding, socially excluding experience, which often causes financial strain, and prevents people from achieving a fulfilling life out with the caring task". (p8)

5.2 There are no significant differences in the self reported health of carers and non-carers, but once again, there are differences between carers and non-carers of different ages, particularly younger adults (see Table 5.1 13). A smaller proportion of carers than non-carers aged 16 to 24 rated their health as 'good'. Conversely, older carers were less likely than older non-carers to report poor health (15% versus 27%).

Table 5.1: State of respondent's health by age (%)

1999 - 2002

16-24

25-34

35-44

45-59

60-74

75 plus

TOTAL

Carer

Good

62

58

55

52

43

39

51

Fairly good

30

30

33

34

43

46

35

Not good

8

13

13

14

15

15

14

Bases

370

905

1372

2308

1587

379

6921

Non-Carer

Good

70

68

64

53

39

30

55

Fairly good

25

24

26

30

39

43

31

Not good

5

8

10

17

22

27

15

Bases

4262

8417

9197

10818

10994

1691

50031

5.3 Similarly, there were no overall differences in the likelihood of carers and non-carers to have an illness or disability but there were some age differences that are displayed in Table 5.2 and Table 5.3 14. Again, older carers are less likely than older non-carers to have an illness or disability (37% of carers aged over 75 years compared with 55% of non-carers of this age).

Table 5.2: Whether respondent has an illness or disability by age of carer (%)

2003 - 2004

16-24

25-34

35-44

45-59

60-74

75 plus

TOTAL

Yes, disability

3

6

6

8

11

16

8

Yes, illness or health problem

4

6

6

9

16

18

10

Yes, both disability and illness or health problem

1

2

2

3

3

2

No, neither

93

87

86

82

70

63

80

Bases

150

373

681

1161

859

218

3442

Table 5.3: Whether respondent has an illness or disability by age of non-carer (%)

2003 - 2004

16-24

25-34

35-44

45-59

60-74

75 plus

TOTAL

Yes, disability

3

3

5

9

15

23

9

Yes, illness or health problem

4

4

6

9

16

20

10

Yes, both disability and illness or health problem

*

1

2

4

6

11

4

No, neither

93

92

88

78

63

45

77

Bases

2165

3835

4706

5611

5522

3448

25287

5.4 As can be seen from Table 5.4, around a fifth ( 19%) of carers within the household feel that their health is not good compared with 11% of carers outwith the household and 15% of non-carers 15. Other than among carers aged 16-24 years old, a higher proportion of adults caring in the household than those caring outwith the household rated their health as not good ( e.g. 20% versus 12% of the 45-59 year old age group).

Table 5.4: State of respondent's health by age of carers providing care in and out of the household compared with non-carers (%)

1999 - 2002

16-24

25-34

35-44

45-59

60-74

75 plus

TOTAL

Care in house

Good

65

51

47

39

34

33

41

Fairly good

28

34

37

40

43

47

40

Not good

7

15

17

20

23

20

19

Bases

80

218

319

509

586

156

1868

Care out of house

Good

61

60

58

56

50

45

56

Fairly good

31

28

31

32

42

45

33

Not good

8

12

11

12

8

10

11

Bases

290

687

1053

1799

1001

223

5053

Non-carer

Good

70

68

64

53

39

30

55

Fairly good

25

24

26

30

39

43

31

Not good

5

8

10

17

22

27

15

Bases

4262

8417

9197

10818

10994

1691

50031

5.5 It is more common for carers within the household to have either a disability or illness than carers outside the household (28% compared with 17% - see Table 5.5). For every age group, those who care in the household were more likely than those caring outwith the household to have an illness or disability ( e.g. 36% versus 26% for the 60 - 74 age group) indicating that this result cannot be purely explained by age. Those who care outwith the household are less likely to have an illness or disability than non-carers (17% compared with 23%).

Table 5.5: Whether respondent has an illness or disability by age of carers providing care in and out of the household compared with non-carers (%) (%)

2003 - 2004

16-34 16

35-44

45-59

60-74

75 plus

TOTAL

Care in house

Yes, disability

10

12

13

16

16

13

Yes, illness or health problem

5

5

9

17

21

11

Yes, both disability and illness or health problem

2

6

4

6

4

No, neither

84

81

72

64

57

72

Bases

131

158

239

277

85

891

Care outside house

Yes, disability

3

4

6

9

16

6

Yes, illness or health problem

5

6

9

15

16

9

Yes, both disability and illness or health problem

1

2

1

3

1

2

No, neither

90

87

85

74

68

83

Bases

392

523

922

582

132

2551

Non-carer

Yes, disability

3

5

9

15

23

9

Yes, illness or health problem

4

6

9

16

20

10

Yes, both disability and illness or health problem

*

2

4

6

11

4

No, neither

93

88

78

63

45

77

Bases

6000

4706

5611

5522

3448

25287

Sole Carers

5.6 A higher proportion of other carers in the household than sole carers and non-carers had an illness or disability (33% compared with 24% and 18% respectively - see Table 5.6).

Table 5.6: Whether have an illness or disability for sole carers and other carers providing care in the household (%)

2003 - 2004

Sole Carers

Other Carers

Non-carers

Yes, disability

10

17

7

Yes, illness or health problem

11

12

8

Yes, both disability and illness or health problem

3

4

3

No, neither

76

67

82

Bases

491

392

16097

5.7 As can be seen from Table 5.7, both types of carers were more likely to rate their health as not good than non-carers (18% of sole carers and 21% of other carers compared with 12% of non-carers). There were age-related health differences between sole carers and other carers, with a higher proportion of sole carers than other carers aged between 16 and 44 years old rating their health as not good (19% versus 11%). However, this pattern reverses among older adults with a higher proportion of other carers than sole carers aged over 60 rating their health as not good (32% versus 16%).

Table 5.7: Age and state of respondent's health of sole carers and other carers providing care in the household compared with non-carers (%)

1999 - 2002

16-34

35-44

45-59

60-74

75 plus

TOTAL

Sole carers

Good

47

46

39

37

42

41

Fairly good

37

33

41

46

43

42

Not good

16

21

20

17

15

18

Bases

130

146

294

390

95

1055

Other carers in household

Good

62

48

39

28

20

41

Fairly good

29

40

39

38

53

38

Not good

9

13

21

34

28

21

Bases

168

173

211

195

61

808

Non-carer

Good

69

65

56

41

31

58

Fairly good

24

27

30

39

42

30

Not good

6

9

15

20

27

12

Bases

9852

7453

7750

5930

1762

32747

5.8 There was no difference in the self reported health of sole carers who provide varying levels of care. However, it should be noted that these results only refer to sole carers providing care within the household.

Key Points

  • Older carers were less likely than older non-carers to report poor health and to have an illness or disability.
  • Younger carers (aged 16-24 years old) were more likely than younger non-carers to report poor health.
  • Those who care within the household more commonly had either a disability or illness than carers outside the household.
  • Those who care outside the household less commonly had an illness or disability than non-carers.
  • A higher proportion of other carers in the household than sole carers and non-carers had an illness or disability.
  • Both sole carers and other carers in the household were more likely than non-carers to rate their health as not good.

« Previous | Contents | Next »

Page updated: Thursday, October 5, 2006