« Previous | Contents | Next »
Listen
4. Extension of MAs to Level 2 ( SCQF level 5)
4.1 The re-engineering pilot activity has enabled us to gather a wealth of evidence to support the notion that MAs should be extended to all S/NVQ levels, other than level 1 (as level 2 is considered the minimum required for work). In particular SSCs have been calling for MAs to be extended to level 2 and that the Skillseekers programme is phased out.
4.2 There is much evidence to suggest that the Skillseekers brand has become tarnished and many individuals and employers associate this brand with negative connotations. In contrast, research conducted by MRUK found that the MA brand is highly regarded by employers and young people. We believe it would make sense to extend MAs to level 2 in recognition of the fact that for many jobs, this is the correct level for an MA.
Would this devalue the MA?
4.3 One of the key arguments used by opponents to extending the MA programme to level 2 is that it would devalue and undermine the existing, established brand. Evidence from MRUK research on MA and Skillseekers brand perceptions commissioned by Scottish Enterprise in 2003 lends some weight to this argument. It states that " blurring the distinction between Skillseekers and MAs is likely to undermine the value of MAs, rather than enhance the value of Skillseekers (or any other named scheme which fulfils the same role)".
4.4 However we believe that not all current MAs are viewed as having equal value and it is very difficult to compare MAs across different sectors or industries. This is particularly relevant when we consider that the time it takes to complete an MA can vary from framework to framework. For example, a customer service MA can take less than 18 months while a construction MA can take around 4 years. We believe that sectors and industries are adept at recognising the skills needed and placing appropriate value on them. With the establishment of SSCs there is a good starting point for the sector to be able to evidence the skills needed in order to be competent within a job. Although progression may be possible, we believe it is unlikely that comparisons would be drawn between MA frameworks.
Proposal
The MA programme will be extended to enable the use of S/NVQs at levels 2, 3, 4 or 5. The Enterprise Networks will phase out the existing Skillseekers programme to reflect this change.
Specific Questions
4. Should MAs be extended to level 2? YES/NO
5. Please explain the reason for your answer, if necessary.
6. What impact do you think the extension of MAs to level 2 would have on the MA programme or other associated programmes?
« Previous | Contents | Next »