« Previous | Contents | Next »
Listen
9 specific questions on proposal
9.1 Preparation and Entry
Q1. Are the entry principles correct?
Q2. Are there aspects of the proposal which would benefit from more clarity or guidance?
Q3. Should there be a common application form regardless of approach?
9.2 Development Activities
Q4. Are the development principles correct?
Q5. Are there aspects of the proposal which would benefit from more clarity or guidance?
9.3 Assessment
Q6. Are there aspects of the proposal which would benefit from more clarity or guidance?
Q7. Is the assessment process sufficiently challenging and rigorous?
Q8. Should there be a maximum and minimum timescale for candidates undertaking a flexible approach? If so what should these be?
9.4 Supporting the Process
Q9. Are there aspects of the proposal which would benefit from more clarity or guidance?
Q10. In which areas do you feel there is sufficient flexibility at present, and where do you feel that additional capacity, innovation or fresh approaches might be needed?
Q11. Which aspects of development for headship would you regard as core or strongly recommended for candidates undertaking a Professional Development Plan?
9.5 Relationship with SQH
Q12. To what extent would it be feasible to dovetail the delivery and assessment structures established by the existing SQH providers and those envisaged in this paper for the proposed flexible approaches?
9.6 General Questions
Q13. Do you find the proposal is described adequately?
Q14. Is the proposal likely to be seen as attractive to aspirant headteachers?
« Previous | Contents | Next »