« Previous | Contents | Next »
Listen
Table 6
Applications reassessed as homeless/potentially homeless within 12 months of previous case being closed by local authority: 2004-05
| Assessments 2004-05 | Previous case closed within 12 months | % of repeat assessments |
|---|
Scotland | 40,348 | 3,415 | 8 |
|---|
Aberdeen City | 747 | 14 | 2 |
|---|
Aberdeenshire | 798 | 54 | 7 |
|---|
Angus | 865 | 12 | 1 |
|---|
Argyll & Bute | 517 | 29 | 6 |
|---|
Clackmannanshire | 587 | 30 | 5 |
|---|
Dumfries & Galloway | 1,085 | 55 | 5 |
|---|
Dundee City | 402 | 12 | 3 |
|---|
East Ayrshire | 881 | 108 | 12 |
|---|
East Dunbartonshire | 344 | 12 | 3 |
|---|
East Lothian | 432 | 24 | 6 |
|---|
East Renfrewshire | 264 | 15 | 6 |
|---|
Edinburgh, City of | 4,794 | 572 | 12 |
|---|
Eilean Siar | 167 | 10 | 6 |
|---|
Falkirk | 1,044 | 8 | 1 |
|---|
Fife | 2,808 | 246 | 9 |
|---|
Glasgow City | 9,721 | 1,283 | 13 |
|---|
Highland | 1,681 | 203 | 12 |
|---|
Inverclyde | 420 | - | - |
|---|
Midlothian | 483 | 25 | 5 |
|---|
Moray | 561 | 25 | 4 |
|---|
North Ayrshire | 1,076 | 58 | 5 |
|---|
North Lanarkshire | 2,890 | 165 | 6 |
|---|
Orkney | 90 | 4 | 4 |
|---|
Perth & Kinross | 875 | 32 | 4 |
|---|
Renfrewshire | 774 | 48 | 6 |
|---|
Scottish Borders,The | 479 | 8 | 2 |
|---|
Shetland | 72 | 2 | 3 |
|---|
South Ayrshire | 576 | 61 | 11 |
|---|
South Lanarkshire | 1,511 | 97 | 6 |
|---|
Stirling | 579 | 42 | 7 |
|---|
West Dunbartonshire | 1,130 | 41 | 4 |
|---|
West Lothian | 1,695 | 120 | 7 |
|---|
Notes: Definitions for this table are those used by the Accounts Commission for the statutory performance indicator 6(c) on homelessness. In this case, the percentage represents the number of applications assessed as homeless or potentially homeless within 12 months of a previous application (also resulting in a homeless/potentially homeless assessment) being closed, relative to the number of applications assessed as homeless/potentially homeless during 2004-05.
Due to technical problems experienced by some local authorities in identifying associated applications by the same household, some local authority level figures are likely to substantially underestimate the scale of repeat assessments..
« Previous | Contents | Next »